Beating Golf Clubs Into Swords

In a recent interview with Politico, President Bush admitted that he had given up golf in deference to the families who have lost a loved one in Iraq.

"I don't want some mom whose son may have recently died to see the commander in chief playing golf," he said. "I feel I owe it to the families to be in solidarity as best as I can with them. And I think playing golf during a war just sends the wrong signal."

Bush's remarks, which have received widespread condemnation, are more apt than he realizes. The game of golf itself is a metaphor for constructive human activity and recapitulates the human experience of our historical transformation from hunter-gatherers to cultivators. Golf as a metaphor stands in opposition to the realities of war, which is the ultimate destructive human activity.

For those who are not addicted to the playing or to the viewing of grown men chasing a tiny ball across an enormous lawn, the appeal of golf may be hard to understand. However, if we look at golf in terms of its media ecology, its attraction can be better understood.

The playing of golf is a linear, one-at-a-time activity that was well suited to the biases of the print era in which it was created. It is not an accident that golf was first conceived in Scotland and became popular just as the printing press was converting the Anglo-Saxon manuscript culture into a print culture. With its one thing at a time play and its linear progression, golf reflects the one at a time linear experience of reading. Golf stands out against all other sports in that the goal is to minimize scoring, not maximize it. In a similar fashion, reading text minimizes the context of language, removing the normal cues of intonation, inflection and volume.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for robert-k-blechman

Article Author: Robert K. Blechman

Executive Severance
The Mysterious Bookshop Event
58 Warren Street
New York City
Wednesday, March 28th, 6:30-8:00

"Who says you can't marry modern technology and old school mystery? …

Visit Robert K. Blechman's author pageRobert K. Blechman's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found
  • No image found

Article comments

— go to most recent comments
  • 1 - Irene Wagner

    May 18, 2008 at 12:44 am

    Reading : Golf :: Not reading : Not golfing.

    It was bound to happen.

  • 2 - wdufkin

    May 18, 2008 at 7:04 am

    It was a noble genture on the part of Bush. I don't much about golf but I know as the parent of two servicemen I appreciate the solidarity.

  • 3 - bliffle

    May 18, 2008 at 11:59 am

    dufkin,

    Are you kidding?

  • 4 - Joanne Huspek

    May 18, 2008 at 12:58 pm

    Hmm... you're obviously looking at golf from the male perspective. Believe me, as a female hacker, I have a completely different take on the game of golf, but then again, most women do.

  • 5 - Dr Dreadful

    May 18, 2008 at 1:14 pm

    If the C-in-C thinks frivolity during wartime is inappropriate, perhaps his daughter shouldn't have had that big expensive wedding either.

  • 6 - Lee Richards

    May 18, 2008 at 1:41 pm

    The sacrifice of those serving, being wounded or killed in Iraq, and their families, is total, but in Bush's mind, giving up golf equals "solidarity" and sacrifice right along with them.

    How about his riding off on his frequent and prolonged vacations, clearing brush, biking, or joking about WMD with the press--more "solidarity" with those on their 3rd or 4th tour?

    What about sending just enough troops originally to lose with, and now threatenting to veto new vets benefits so they will stay in the service rather than run off to college--more Bush solidarity with them and their families they can count on?

    And his compassion for the sacrifice of the fallen could easily be seen--if only their caskets weren't hidden away from the public when their bodies are returned home.

    The Bush Doctrine, of charging it all to future generations--including the children of the troops--what a wise and compassionate gesture(and enormous shared debt)of sacrifice and solidarity. Yep, we're all in this together, just like a foursome at the country club.

    Of course, he could have shown his respect and solidarity with hundreds of thousands of this nation's young soldiers by not sending them into his optional and mismanaged war in the first place. But, sometimes, a man's just gotta do what God(and the Saudis)tell him to do.

    He is one for the ages. First he was our Great Decider, and now he's proudly donned the mantle of The Prime Ex-Putt-Putter in American history.

  • 7 - Clavos

    May 18, 2008 at 1:51 pm

    Of course, he could have shown his respect and solidarity with hundreds of thousands of this nation's young soldiers by not sending them into his optional and mismanaged war in the first place

    Better yet, he could show his solidarity with the nation's youth by disbanding the armed forces altogether, thus keeping them completely out of harm's way.

  • 8 - Dr Dreadful

    May 18, 2008 at 1:59 pm

    Lee, you hit the nail right on the head. I've got no problem with Bush playing golf during a war or doing whatever the hell he wants to relax. After all, Churchill wasn't about to give up his cigars just because Hitler was bombing the shit out of English cities.

    But if he thinks giving up golf is going to act as some kind of universal salve for his conscience (or his image), he's sorely mistaken.

  • 9 - Lee Richards

    May 18, 2008 at 4:02 pm

    Clavos, I often enjoy and respect your comments.

    This, however, is either imperceptive, disingenuous or both, in relation to my point of "optional and mismanaged."

  • 10 - Clavos

    May 18, 2008 at 4:35 pm

    I don't disagree with either of your points, Lee. This war is "optional and mismanaged," just like the one in which I was forced to participate.

  • 11 - Lumpy

    May 18, 2008 at 4:54 pm

    the particular war in iraq might be 'optional' now, but large scale conflict with imperialist islam is inevitable.whether the ostriches of the left admit it or not.

  • 12 - Lee Richards

    May 18, 2008 at 5:07 pm

    Those messages comin' in loud and clear today, Lumpy?

    Your "inevitable" might be a wiser person's "possible", but maybe preventible. Predestination just doesn't work too well in internatioanal relations(as GWB has shown.)

  • 13 - Lee Richards

    May 18, 2008 at 5:24 pm

    Clavos,
    I sincerely appreciate what you did when you were called upon. I know it cost you too much.

    My service was stateside and in peace time--not in your league. My friends and family members did serve in Vietnam and the most gung-ho, super-patriotic, lifelong Republican among them--an army career colonel who served two tours there--would, I believe, want to spit on Bush for his asinine self-justification and condescending callowness.

  • 14 - Zedd

    May 18, 2008 at 5:35 pm

    I thought you were making a commentary on the manufactured nature of the game, paralleling it with the class thing, Bush and the war. Then how the war became real.

  • 15 - Zedd

    May 18, 2008 at 5:39 pm

    Lumpy,

    I think others would say that large scale war with the imperialist West is inevitable.

    Feeling emotional about those that you fear or disagree with to the point that you through out the potential for diplomacy, is dangerous. You simply CANT do that.

  • 16 - Lumpy

    May 18, 2008 at 6:10 pm

    what imperial west? you're stuck in the 19th century, zedd. it's islam, not th west which is currently trying to impose ideology by force. just being big or influential doesn't nake u imperialistic.

  • 17 - Lumpy

    May 18, 2008 at 6:22 pm

    lee. the writing on the wall is 10ft high. you can bury your heas in the sand and pretend it's not there but that doesn't actually alter reality.

  • 18 - Lee Richards

    May 18, 2008 at 7:15 pm

    Lumpy,
    What wall of inevitability do you see? Where? Who built it? Who wrote on it? When did you read it? What specifically does it say? How do you know it can't be erased or torn down, or worn away?

    You prophecy an "inevitable" Armageddon you can't possibly guarantee. It might, of course, happen someday, but your unfounded certainty is no more than the equivalent of the crazy guy on the street always carrying the sign predicting "the end is near."

    Using a cracked crystal ball to prepare for the future is just as bad as your dismissive "head in the sand" put-down.

  • 19 - Dave Nalle

    May 18, 2008 at 10:08 pm

    Lee, putting aside Lumpy's bizarre spelling and biblical allusions, you ought to read up on the real situation with Islam sometime. Try to look past the Iraq war to the larger picture.

    Start by reading Bernard Lewis' Islam and the West (free plug for my doctoral advisor's doctoral advisor). It's old, but he lays out the fundamental problems brilliantly and covers the historical context well. Then read While Europe Slept by Bruce Bawer. Then read The Coming Balkan Caliphate by Christopher Deliso. If that last book doesn't wake you up, nothing will.

    Dave

  • 20 - Clavos

    May 18, 2008 at 10:12 pm

    Also, Lawrence Wright's Pulitzer-winning The Looming Tower.

  • 21 - bliffle

    May 18, 2008 at 10:19 pm

    The warriors used to say that it was inevitable that the US and USSR would have a horrendous ground war in Europe.

  • 22 - Clavos

    May 18, 2008 at 11:24 pm

    The warriors used to say that it was inevitable that the US and USSR would have a horrendous ground war in Europe."

    And, in part because they did, bliffle, both sides armed themselves to the teeth, stationing large numbers of troops all over Europe and creating the famous balance of MAD, so there wasn't one.

    If the pundits hadn't hammered the point, one side might have gotten the drop on the other, and the outcome could have been as they predicted.

  • 23 - Dave Nalle

    May 19, 2008 at 3:50 am

    And it's worth noting that the coming conflict with Islam doesn't take the form of a grand confrontation of superpowers. It's a confrontation between ideologies held by multiple nations without a unified leadership and it isn't all about who has the biggest weapons. It's not about some Islamic empire standing toe to toe with the US at this point, it's about a gradual cultural movement and demographic forces which can't be faced down with missiles and guns.

    Dave

  • 24 - Irene Wagner

    May 19, 2008 at 12:09 pm

    Dave Nalle Wondering about the tie-in between your #23 here and something you said on another thread that has too many comments already, I cut, pasted, and moved it:

    Cultural imperialism - and the economic imperialism it goes hand in hand with - has at its heart the seduction of the subject population and ultimately their voluntary accession to the cultural conquest. That's an enormous difference.
    I'm against physical conquest. I'm all for cultural and economic corruption and subjugation.


    The best cultural corruption is mutual cultural corruption: ideas are traded like commodities. One expects to learn something from the culture he is trying to imbue with the wisdom from his own.

    So, which elements of non-Islamic culture would you select to infect the Muslim world, and what would be your goal in choosing these, rather than other elements of non-Islamic culture which you might have chosen to effect this "facing down."

  • 25 - Douglas Mays

    May 19, 2008 at 3:30 pm

    Look, it is just some really sleazy attempt at showing if he actualy cares about the soldiers he is sending to Iraq to be slaughtered.

    It is really an insult to make such a golf/war statement as solidarity to the troops. God, Bush is really a scummy idiot.

    Golf clubs as weapons? Go back to the 70s and ask Jack Nicholson about his use of golf clubs as the original form of road rage at an intersection in Hollywood.

    FU Bush,
    DM

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 29, 2012

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs