An Interview with Uncounted Director David Earnhardt - Page 13

The whole process of doing this documentary has just affirmed my belief that ordinary people are helping things change in this country. And it gives me hope.


Uncounted has been showing at film festivals and hosted at local screenings across the country. It's now being released for sale nationally through its distributor, and will also be featured on the Starz network during the months of August and September, including featured placement during the Democratic National Convention. You can find out more information on the film by visiting the film's official website.

Page 1Page 2Page 3Page 4Page 5Page 6Page 7Page 8Page 9Page 10Page 11Page 12 — Page 13

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for david-r-perry

Article Author: David R Perry

Lost somewhere in the rolling hills of Tennessee, David R Perry can occasionally be found doing dark, unspeakable things to words. Printed words, spoken words, electronically mangled words... really any kind but twittered words.

Visit David R Perry's author pageDavid R Perry's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • Uncounted: The New Math of American Elections Uncounted: The New Math of American Elections

    UNCOUNTED is an explosive documentary that shows how the election fraud that changed the outcome of the 2004 election led to even greater fraud in 2006 - and now looms as an unbridled threat to the ...

  • Hacking Democracy Hacking Democracy

Article comments

  • 1 - Dave Nalle

    Aug 17, 2008 at 10:15 pm

    Your interview would be a lot more interesting if you hadn't stuck to nothing but softball questions and fawning on your subject.

    I'd have liked to see you ask him if he had any evidence at all that any voting machines had ever been hacked during an election (there is none) and perhaps hit him with some questions about the hundreds of thousands of bogus registrations from ACORN and other leftist groups, or perhaps the cash for votes practices of Democrats in a number of southern states.

    But I guess that wouldn't suit your agenda, just as the media avoids reporting on election fraud in general because they know that any unbiased and halfway thorough investigation will reveal so much more fraud from the left than the right that it would be embarassing.

    Think about it. All this furor about voting machines, yet it is the city and county and state electoral bureaucracies which are dominated by Democrats which have been the main supporters of the use of these machines.

    Partisans like the people who made this film have identified a legitimate problem, but they need to come to grips at some point with the reality that if there is fraud going on, it's much more likely to be their political allies who are doing it.

    Dave

  • 2 - David R. Perry

    Aug 17, 2008 at 10:45 pm

    Dave,

    I'm assuming that you haven't actually watched said movie. I would recommend it (it's available via Netflix, by the way; in case anyone here subscribes), as I found it very interesting, and many of the criticisms you mention are dealt with in more detail there. I was not attempting to rehash every point or claim of the film.

    Granted, the film has an admittedly obvious leftist bent to it, but I think it's ridiculous to criticize the main thrust of the film, which deals with the need for more accountability and checks and balances in the voting process. That is something that only benefits a real democracy. Your quibble seems to be with "why" they're looking into it in the first place, which is less important.

    If you'd like to ask your own questions, the production company seems fairly open to media inquiries. Perhaps you can help fill in the blanks of the discussion.

    By the way, your critique would be more interesting if you didn't exhibit an obviously equal, but opposite, agenda. (Agendas come from both sides, you know.)

    - DRP

  • 3 - Dave Nalle

    Aug 17, 2008 at 11:23 pm

    Well, I'd normally take a middle course, but when dealing with a partisan position I'm naturally inclined to take the opposite one.

    I've done a lot of reading on the voting security issue == things like actual academic studies -- but there's so much propaganda out there that I'm reluctant to watch a film. The format is much easier to use for propaganda and distortion in the grand Michael Moore tradition.

    These things are getting on cable, though. So when it does I'll be all over it.

    Dave

  • 4 - John

    Jun 29, 2009 at 6:05 am

    The bias is so overwhelmingly against Republicans that the film is self- discrediting.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 11, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs