An Interview With Joseph Shahda, Citizen Translator and American Hero - Page 3

Author: PatfishPublished: Mar 30, 2006 at 6:07 am 8 comments

In response to my question about his thoughts on whether the United States can win the Iraq war, Shahda stated emphatically that the United States is already winning the war.

“We are winning the Iraq war, let’s start with this fact,” Shahda stated with a passion. “and we are going towards a result of victory”.

Joseph then explained that there are perhaps thirty to forty thousand terrorists against 140,000 U.S. troops. There are 230,000 Iraqi troops working with the U.S. plus 30,000-40,000 coalition troops. Shahda says the numbers are against the terrorists right from the start.

“I was in Lebanon during the bombing of the Marine barracks,” Joseph explained. He described the dancing in the street by the Palestinian terrorists responsible for the attack, how they shouted with joy that they had beat the Americans. Only a loss of American resolve can cause us to lose the war, Shahda explained. This from a man who witnessed what happens when America doesn’t fight back.

We discussed the ominous situation in Iran and Joseph felt that while America could flatten Iran easily, he didn’t think this would be necessary. “The Iranian people are wonderful and hate the regime governing them,” he said. Joseph expressed joy over the recent “Cedar Revolution” in his own country and stated firmly that such a thing would never have happened were it not for America being involved in the mess that is the Middle East. He believed that American presence and resolve could well cause an uprising in the Iranian citizenry given the right time and circumstance.

Joseph Shahda’s optimism and love for America was palpable. In just talking to him I felt my resolve toughen and my own love of my country of birth deepen. Everyday he sits down and begins more translations. I’d argue that Shahda’s meticulous efforts are far better than we could expect from the government bureaucrats.

These are historic times. This is an historic action by our government, this recruitment of citizens to aid in the proper documentation of history.

For what Shahda is revealing via his translations is how it really happened. Some might argue that the documents cannot be verified. Of course they can’t. They were captured during the turnover of a violent regime. Documents captured during W.W. II could not be verified, indeed, any documents obtained in this manner are what they are: details of a government that is no more. Common sense should dictate that Saddam’s dying regime had better things to do than create forgeries of thousands and documents, letters and memos. To argue that the American administration might have foisted false documents on the American public is to also run roughshod over common sense. Both Saddam and the United States simply had more important issues than bothering with this sort of silliness.

Continued on the next page Page 1Page 2 — Page 3 — Page 4

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for patfish

Article Author: Patfish

Pat Fish is a pop culture and political pundit. When she’s not working on her own blog she contributes regularly right here on Blogcritics.
Pat lives in Delaware with her husband. They are owned by four cats, two dogs and one adorable granddaughter. …

Visit Patfish's author pagePatfish's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

  • 1 - Dave Nalle

    Mar 30, 2006 at 8:57 am

    Amazing stuff, Pat. Thanks for posting the links. I hope you'll keep us updated. Wish I could comment on Free Republic, but I've been permanently banned for being too liberal.

    Of the documents translated thus far, many are just confirmation of things we already knew, but #3 and #4 of your links above are very significant because of their late dates, especially #4 which seems to refer to the mobile WMD labs which everyone has been denying the existence of.

    Dave

  • 2 - Pat Fish

    Mar 30, 2006 at 9:48 am

    Go on, Dave. YOU were too liberal for FreeRepublic? Wow.

    And you got "zotted"?

    Heh.

  • 3 - Dave Nalle

    Mar 30, 2006 at 5:00 pm

    Perhaps it was that I was too Libertarian. They tend to be pretty hard line religious right types.

    I find their way of banning people particularly annoying. They ban your IP in such a way that you can't even respond to the message they send you telling you that you've been banned or use the email link on the site. And then they don't respond to emails sent by any other means, not even to tell you WHY you got banned.

    Dave

  • 4 - sujatha

    Mar 30, 2006 at 5:25 pm

    Pat, this is "history-making" all right. An eye-opener this one. Thanks.

  • 5 - Ruvy in Jerusalem

    Mar 31, 2006 at 10:15 am

    Pat, I haven't read the links yet, but given all the arguments over Iraq, I hope people take the trouble to go to this article to get to the links and READ them.

    Mazel Tov! You did a great job.

    Shabbat Shalom,
    Reuven

  • 6 - fntstc4

    Apr 02, 2006 at 3:19 pm

    I am unclear as to Iraq's development of anthrax under Saddam. Did he or didn't he develop and use anthrax? Does anybody out there know this answer?

  • 7 - Dave Nalle

    Apr 02, 2006 at 3:23 pm

    He definitely HAD live anthrax and within the last 5 years. That's been definitively established by these documents. And if he had the anthrax that means he had to also have the labs and facilities to keep the culture alive, and that suggests that he had the capability to weaponize it. The accepted view seems to be that he did not produce weaponized anthrax in substantial volume, however.

    Dave

  • 8 - Stephen

    Apr 04, 2006 at 1:06 pm

    Iraq only ever produced liquid bulk anthrax with a 2/3-year shelf life. Its last remaining stocks were unilaterally destroyed in 1991.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 26, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs