Alito: Right Wing Ideologue? - Page 3

I do not join [the majority] opinion which was never necessary and is now obsolete. That opinion fails to discuss the one authority that dictates the result of this appeal, namely, the Supreme Court’s decision in Stenberg v Carhart [citation removed]. Our responsibility as a lower court is to follow and apply controlling Supreme Court precedent. (p.p. 74-75)

It’s not surprising that a lot of liberals are talking about Judge Alito without mentioning Farmer or indeed the many cases in which he vindicated minority religion rights and expanded the grounds upon which someone can be granted asylum, especially on the basis of issues relating to gender and sexuality (see Ann Althouse’s Op Ed in the New York Times for more on this). By looking at these decisions we are forced to realise that Alito is not the far-Right ideologue some fear. Yes he’s conservative and yes he’s traditional but he’s traditional in more than just his values: he’s traditional in his concept of what a judge’s role is: the interpretation and application of law without allowing that role to be over-clouded by personal beliefs or excessively influenced by interest groups and lobbyists.

I may not agree with Samuel Alito’s beliefs on many things but I am impressed by his capacity not only intellectually but also judicially. Will he signify a swing to the Right? Possibly – he’s certainly more right than Sandra Day-O’Connor but I’m not at all sure John Roberts matches Rehnquist’s rightism so I’m not sure the balance has swung that much. Is he a strict constructionist? Yes, although his interpretation is literal and not historical: this is something to be glad of. Would he be a fair and balanced arbiter on the Supreme Court bench? I believe so.

Cross-posted at Mental Meanderings.
Ed:LisaM

Page 1Page 2 — Page 3

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

  • 1 - RJ

    Nov 02, 2005 at 7:35 pm

    Fine post. Not only well-written, but well-cited, as...uh...well... ;-)

  • 2 - Alethinos

    Nov 03, 2005 at 8:33 am

    >>From the perspective of qualifications there’s simply no opposing Samuel Alito.<<

    No, there isn't. You've written an excellent piece. However...

    What's at stake here is not simply another conservative being seated on the SC. We are seeing a "Balkanization" of America along socio-political lines. Currently the Religious Right sees an unparalleled opportunity to foist their limited, highly rigid philosophy on the rest of the country.

    Meirs nomination may well have been a smokescreen - the plan all along to nominate Alito after the hue and cry over Meirs reached a feverpitch...

    So there is more at stake than Alito's excellent qualifications.

    Still, a damn good post! Thank you!

    Alethinos

  • 3 - Danielle

    Nov 03, 2005 at 10:58 am

    Good post. I think the concern that you overlook is that the SCJ's aren't limited by precedent as an appealate court judge is. SCJ's set the precedent or overturn it as they see fit - whether that be idealogically or the law.

  • 4 - Alethinos

    Nov 03, 2005 at 11:51 am

    Good point Danielle.

    Alethinos

  • 5 - Fiona de Londras

    Nov 03, 2005 at 8:49 pm

    I understand the argument that although Alito has been an excellent appellate judge in terms of sticking to precedent but that, on the Supreme Court bench, he wouldn’t have to stick to precedent. Now I’m not an expert in US law but generally speaking superior courts will only overturn settled precedent in cases where there has been a huge social shift in perception or circumstances. Given how recently Roe was reaffirmed by the Supreme Court I don’t foresee any attempts to overturn that particular precedent in the near future.

  • 6 - Alethinos

    Nov 03, 2005 at 10:36 pm

    Fiona... The fear/concern is that a case will be "designed" for the Supreme Court, find its way to it via the normal appellate process and THEN the newly conservative majority will have at it. Of course you never know what a person will do once they're let loose on the Court...

    My whole take on this comes more from philosophy of law than as someone with your (very impressive) credentials. I have an MA in History of US Constitutional Law and teach part time at local colleges here abouts...

    So I am coming at this from this philosophical/historical angle.

    Thanks again for your great input! Keep it up please!

    Alethinos

  • 7 - Temple Stark

    Nov 06, 2005 at 9:28 pm

    Fiona,

    This post was chosen by the section editor as a BC pick of the week. Go HERE (link) to find out why. Put a graphic button on your page.

    And thank you
    - Temple

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 30, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs