A Picture's Worth a Thousand Slurs

Author: SharkPublished: Feb 12, 2004 at 12:02 pm 6 comments

A PICTURE'S WORTH A THOUSAND SLURS:
Hanoi Kerry vs Dictator Don

Since John Kerry has finally emerged as the Democratic nominee for President, operators of the Right Wing Propaganda Machine have dipped into their bag of tricks and set loose the hounds (ie. stealth, ad hoc, "non-profit" groups such as the newly formed "Viet Nam Veterans Against Kerry", and the usual suspects of media whores with journalism degrees).

A picture of Jane Fonda at a 1970 anti-war rally began circulating on the net, and quicker than you could say "botox injections", CNN, MSNBC, and FOX were flashing it every 15 minutes as if it were Janet Jackson's silicone-stuffed boob.


What's so important about this photo? SHE'S WITH JOHN KERRY!!!

Okay, she's not exactly "with" Kerry, (the irony is lost on the Right Wing Web Site where we got this photo: they had to put a large red arrow in the picture so the viewer could actually FIND Kerry)--- but apparently ---sharing a few square acres with "Hanoi Jane" 34 years ago is STILL A PRETTY FRIGGIN' BAD THING.

Rush Limbaugh, who could never pass up a good piece of hyperbole for his frothing fans, has a statement on his web site about this photo:

"THIS IS THE PICTURE THEY HOPED WE'D NEVER SEE."

Well, I've got "news" for these manipulative bastards. We've got another picture "They Hoped You Wouldn't See": DONALD RUMSFELD AND SADDAM HUSSEIN.


And no need for red arrows or complicated directions: THEY'RE TOUCHING.

Kerry might have been in the same photo as Jane Fonda, BUT AT LEAST HE DIDN'T HAVE TO WASH THE BLOOD OFF HIS HANDS after the picture was taken.


Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

  • 1 - Shark

    Feb 12, 2004 at 4:12 pm

    Had to add this:

    Thirty-four year old photo taken TWO YEARS before Jane went to Hanoi.

    Liberal media, feh.





  • 2 - Mac Diva

    Feb 12, 2004 at 4:28 pm

    Two years before? The Right Wing blogs have been omitting that tidbit for some reason.

  • 3 - Shark

    Feb 12, 2004 at 8:10 pm

    Nothing is too low, immoral, or unethical for some of these pigs.

    PS: A good rule of thumb these days:

    Reality is the opposite of whatever the voice of authority is telling you.

  • 4 - Eric Olsen

    Feb 12, 2004 at 8:18 pm

    Excellent post and I agree the logic is specious at best, BUT why identify this kind of thing with the right (or left or center) - this is hardly a tactic specific to, what? Republicans, whoever is in power, THIS administration, etc. It's everywhere and the center - which is about 60% of the nation - sees right through it.

  • 5 - Shark

    Feb 12, 2004 at 10:54 pm

    Eric, thanks.

    Just goes to show:

    All news is mar...

    nevermind.

    BTW: got pinged from a pretty good site in my ol' home state. Made a bunch of fellow Texans laugh.

    Huzzah!

    Now if I can only get 'em to buy something...





  • 6 - Donna

    Nov 02, 2006 at 9:29 pm

    Definitely on the wrong site.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Feb 09, 2010

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for January

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs

Upcoming Stories from Blogcritics
  •