A Case for Term Limits: What Politicians Won't Say (Anything) - Page 2

The questions no one ever asks are why are they trying to get reelected, and why are they trying to regain control of Congress? It seems from the moment they arrive, their main goal is to perform some function or say some thing that will ensure that their voters back home will remain endeared to them at the end of their term. Was Henry Kissinger correct when he said, "90% of politicians give the other 10% a bad name?" Does Charlie Rangel love serving the people of New York, or does he enjoy being a congressman? What if we eliminated the possibility that it could be the latter?

If representatives and senators were limited in the number of times they could serve in office, the lure of the vote would not be as strong. Maybe they would perform their representative function. Maybe there would be compromise instead of stubborn and irrational opposition. Maybe then their language and their actions would have some heft.

As P.J. O'Rourke once said, "the Democrats are the party that says government will make you smarter, taller, richer, and remove the crabgrass on your lawn. The Republicans are the party that says government doesn't work and then they get elected and prove it."

What if it didn't matter what they said, and they got to the business of doing?

Well, hopefully, Dan Quayle had it right when he said "the future will be better tomorrow".

Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for corey-may

Article Author: Corey May

Corey May is a professional writer, if you count drafting legal documents as "writing," and if you think getting paid to do something makes you a "professional." On political issues, he leans in whatever direction makes the most sense. …

Visit Corey May's author page

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

  • 1 - El Bicho

    Aug 19, 2010 at 11:28 pm

    A Case Against Term Limits: California

  • 2 - christian

    Aug 20, 2010 at 12:37 am


    Muslims that intend to build their prayer center near Ground Zero in Lower Manhattan

    If this were to happen, or if those are too afraid (politicians) to speak out towards this issue, yes issue, which is ridiculous. How in the world would we, Americans, and I don't care what party we are speaking from, allow such thing. A prayer center for Muslims. Why do they believe they have the rights, or even consider doing such thing. They need a place to pray, and they decide to build it near ground zero. Not yet understanding. religion? how many sin a day, and Muslims are not allowed to do a lot of things that they do. But they want us to understand their religion, and respect it when 99 percent are violating their own religion and don't practice it as they are suppose to. Ground zero for Muslims? and we wonder why we call it ground zero.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 19, 2013

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs