Today on Blogcritics
Home » Culture and Society » Science and Technology » Politics and MySpace: “the leading social networking blogosphere”?

Politics and MySpace: “the leading social networking blogosphere”?

Please Share...Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Share on LinkedIn0Pin on Pinterest0Share on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

I love Howard Fineman. He's one of the best political writers in the business. He's great on Hardball, and his coverage and analysis of elections and the pure sport of politics is second-to-none.

But still, it's hilarious when non-tech-savvy journalists wade into those electronic weeds.

The Internet is now a part of politics as it never has before. As Fineman rightly notes, it was Howard Dean's (and Joe Trippi's) success in raising money and building a grassroots community online in 2003 that ushered political campaigns into a new era. Politics and politicians have always followed the money, and therefore 2008 presidential hopefuls are online and actively seeking advantage, dollars, and voters. Both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama broke away from the long tradition of officially announcing a presidential campaign in a hometown dripping from its very pores in Americana, for example, and instead announced via online video.

Politicians are now seeking ways to integrate technology into their relationship with constituents as well. Obama has made at least one appearance on popular left-leaning political blog Daily Kos during the run-up to the pivotal 2006 midterm elections, and '08 presidential aspirant John Edwards delivers regular posts on Twitter, the newest rage of the tech-bloggy set. (Edwards' staff has thanked his "followers" on Twitter for all of their words of support over the recent announcement that Elizabeth Edward's breast cancer has returned.)

Journalists are trying to keep up. It's chuckle-worthy every time that Hardball's Chris Matthews (another favorite of mine) announces that features and video clips can be found online. He has a look of smirking wonder that seems to say, "There's this thing called the Internet and people actually do stuff there, can you believe it?"

This week, in the midst of an interesting-as-usual piece called "Out of Control," which looks at how technology and the media now leave political candidates with less control over the message of campaigns than ever before, Fineman let this beauty slip: "Last time I checked, MySpace, by far the leading social networking blogosphere, had more than 60 million registered members."

The leading social networking blogosphere. If only he had just scaled it back half a notch and left it at "leading social networking website." Or platform, tool, place, locale, or e-shack of misbegotten ill designed schlock. But blogosphere has a pretty clear, if broad, connotation: representing that vast array of millions of blogs, most of which are separate online entities from one another.

MySpace certainly has millions of profiles, all of which have a blog feature. So I suppose it would be okay to call MySpace a blogosphere unto itself, though I would wager that's going a bit too far. And it would be definitely be inaccurate to compare that "blogosphere" with the blogosphere.

So MySpace is not a social networking blogosphere. It's a huge and monstrous social networking site. The blogosphere is its own universe (thus the 'sphere!) and many who occupy it are more than happy to not be associated with MySpace.

Howard, we love you, but you gaffed a little on this one!

Powered by

About ebrage

  • http://backwardfive.com Eric Friesen

    You could almost write a post a day about someone getting the lingo wrong. I chuckle, too, when it happens.

    But then I go ahead and fret about whether I’m getting the lingo wrong myself when I write something or comment on someone else’s post.

    Things are moving so fast that you have to really pay attention to keep up.

  • http://dumpsterbust.blogspot.com Eric Berlin

    You’re absolutely right Eric. I tried to keep this piece light and somewhat tongue-in-cheek. It does fascinate me for some reason though when media people get into talking about online media.

  • http://backwardfive.com Eric Friesen

    Yes, indeed – your description of Chris Matthews and his look of “smirking wonder” is pretty much bang on. A lot of the old media people do that kind of thing.

    You get the impression that they either genuinely believe their program/network is cutting edge with their super-keen “email feedback feature”, or they are just reading the cue cards and don’t really buy into this whole “Internets” thing.

  • http://dumpsterbust.blogspot.com Eric Berlin

    I think it’s a little of both!

  • Media

    In April 1993 then-Attorney General Janet Reno fired all 93 federal prosecutors …. And she gave them 10 days to hit the road.
    But when “reporting” on the dismissals of eight prosecutors on Bush’s watch, neither ABC nor CBS mentioned it. Even in interviews with Attorney General Gonzales, ABC, CBS, CNN, FNC and NBC all failed to mention Reno’s “March Massacre” of 1993.

  • http://dumpsterbust.blogspot.com Eric Berlin

    Well, we’re talking about how sometimes MSM journalists misunderstand and misinterpret what’s going on in online media, and not intentional (or purported intentional) media bias. Though certainly worthy of discussion, that’s an entirely separate realm!