Home / Petroski: To Engineer Is Human—Failure As a Design Consideration

Petroski: To Engineer Is Human—Failure As a Design Consideration

Please Share...Print this pageTweet about this on TwitterShare on Facebook0Share on Google+0Pin on Pinterest0Share on Tumblr0Share on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

Engineers today… are not superhuman. They make mistakes in their assumptions, in their calculations, in their conclusions. That they make mistakes is forgiveable, that they catch them is imperative.

Henry Petroski has written a number of very enjoyable essays on the art and practice of engineering design. In To Engineer Is Human, he turns his gaze on a different and more serious aspect of engineering. In building structures and mechanisms, it is not enough to ensure success&#8212the engineer must also “forsee failure” and design to avoid it.

Petroski looks at structures and designs that have failed, and also those that avoided failure. Along the way, he examines what we mean by terms like “strong enough,” and why it doesn’t make sense to overdesign in the attempt to eliminate the possibility of failure. He tells us how the collapse of the Hyatt Regency walkways in Kansas City was related to the failure of “Galloping Gertie” (the Tacoma Narrows bridge) in Washington state four decades earlier.

In much the same way as Petroski celebrated the design of everyday things like The Pencil, he discusses the way new materials changed the way engineers could deal with the problems of design, and how these changes gave rise to new methods for avoiding catastrophic failure. The chapter on the design of London’s Crystal Palace describes the methodical way in which the new structural design was tested, and how even individual members were tested before being included in the building.

A chapter on brittle fracture looks at buses, nuclear power plants, stainless-steel utensils and the Liberty Bell to explore how crystalline materials may be stressed beyond their capacity to bear. And in a chapter titled “Forensic Engineering and Engineering Fiction,” Petroski refers to Nevil Shute, whose novel No Highway tells the story of a forensic engineer who sabotages an airplane he fears may be subject to fatigue failure, to prevent its flying before he can uncover evidence to substantiate his fears. Petroski feels this story reflects the real brittle-failure issues faced by the DeHavilland Comet, although he quotes Shute’s own disclaimer.

This book is a work of fiction. None of the characters are drawn from real persons. The Reindeer aircraft in my story is not based on any particular commercial aircraft…
&#8212Nevil Shute, author’s note to No Highway

My favorite chapter, “From Slide Rule to Computer,” looks at the reliability of numbers and our willingness to extend more credibility to them when they are computed by machine rather than “the human brain.” (Although my enjoyment is perhaps as much for my fellow-feeling with Petroski that learning how to assign “sig figs” in order to calculate with a slide rule ought to be still a required part of engineering education.)

We all rely on the conscientious nature and diligent design of engineers as we go about our daily business. We literally put our lives in the hands of these men and women dozens of times a day. Petroski’s work goes a long way to reassure us that, despite the notorious failures, the vast majority of structures and designs function safely, as they should. As they are designed to do.

Powered by

About DrPat

  • Petroski’s book on bridge engineers is an excellent set of sketches on the topic, but that and “To Engineer Is Human” don’t dig into the fascinating story of the Tacoma Bridge quite enough. Perhaps the definitive layman’s text on the subject is “In the Wake of Tacoma: Suspension Bridges and the Quest for Aerodynamic Stability”, which addresses many of the engineering issues and concerns Petroski points to in his texts.

    Excellent review!

  • I had the fun of visiting the Tacoma Narrows bridge two summers ago, and was allowed to come up under the bridge to observe the earthquake retro-fit that was ongoing. This is a failure that has long intrigued me (and my spouse, who used the time to walk across the bridge).

    After our visit to the bridge, we had a long chat with a woman whose father was the last person off the TNB before the span parted.

  • Thanks, Dr. Pat, for raising this topic!

    I was fortunate enough to hear Petroski as a visiting speaker at Carnegie Mellon University when he was writing To Engineer is Human around 1992. At that time, I was having early success as a writer of books for young readers, but I was still primarily an academic scientist.

    I had written books on Materials Science and Artificial Intelligence for teenagers (no one with real intelligence would write the book), and my colleagues at the Engineering Design Research Center were lobbying me to try a book on engineering. I wasn’t able to come up with an angle that would sell books until I heard Petroski.

    Then I had it: his book was for adults and focused mainly on civil engineering. I’d broaden the content and, of course, write for a younger crowd. The result was Catastrophe! Great Engineering Failure — and Success published by the Scientific American Books for Young Readers imprint of W. H. Freeman in 1995.

    A little more than a year after it was published, I was bold enough to start a new life as a writer. I still don’t know if that was a successful move, but I’ve had my share of failures, so I must be getting someplace 🙂