Today on Blogcritics
Home » Culture and Society » Nuclear War Is Becoming Increasingly Likely in the Middle East

Nuclear War Is Becoming Increasingly Likely in the Middle East

Please Share...Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Share on LinkedIn0Pin on Pinterest0Share on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

I don’t like to be an alarmist, but pieces are starting to fall together in a particularly uncomfortable way, and we here in the West are the last to see it.

We’re all familiar with the “Arab Spring” that has worked its way across the Middle East and North Africa, and of its latest iteration in Syria which threatens to erupt into civil war. Now we might say, “So what? Another civil war in the Middle East that doesn’t affect us.” Oh, but if the puppets who are pulling the strings lose control, the result will indeed affect all of us. We would be wise to pay attention, because we may be approaching a showdown between the Shi’a and the Sunni Muslims of the world.

Most Americans have at one point or another heard the terms “Sunni” and “Shi’a” in news stories about the Middle East, but few of us really understand the meaning. Even those of us who are more familiar with Islam have a tendency to equate the Sunni/Shi’a schism with the Catholic/Protestant schism of mainstream Christianity. Even President George W. Bush, just two months before America invaded Iraq was unaware that there are two major sects of Islam and so could not have imagined the gift he was handing Shi’a Iran by toppling Saddam Hussein, whose government was comprised mostly of minority Sunnis. No, the Islamic schism is much deeper and more prone to violence than anything mainstream Christianity has faced since the days of the Spanish Main. In fact, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the one time second in command of al-Qaeda (which is a hard-line Sunni group) was exploring ways to draw America into a war with Shi’a Iran.

Now it looks as if the conflict between the Shi’a supported government and the Sunni backed people in Syria is beginning to take the form of a direct confrontation between Shi’a and Sunni Islam as a whole. Islamic scholar Vali Nasr is a former State Department adviser who formerly taught at the U.S. Naval Postgraduate School, and who now teaches at Tufts University’s Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy. He points out in the article, “This portends very bad things for the region. If this gets worse and becomes a full-scale civil war…this will spill over. Other countries are vulnerable…and could end up having a bigger, broader conflict in the Gulf between Saudi Arabia and Iran.”

To make matters worse, the struggle for authority between Iran’s President Ahmadinejad and Supreme Ayatollah Khamenei has ended badly, for the Ayatollah’s party now controls enough seats to eliminate the office of the president entirely and enable the Ayatollah to rule the nation by fiat. As bad as the western media made Holocaust denier Ahmadinejad look, he was actually the more moderate of the two. But now there is no one left to act as a moderating influence on the Ayatollah, and if his inflammatory remarks are any indication, it does not bode well for maintaining peace in the region.

The final piece of this particular conundrum is Iran’s nuclear power program, of which the previous reference shows Ayatollah Khamenei to be an ardent supporter. As I have stated on Blogcritics for years, despite any claim otherwise, Iran is striving as hard as they can to develop a nuclear weapon; not to defend against America or Israel (for we are the excuses, not the reason), but to counterbalance the nukes possessed by Sunni Pakistan.

We’ve all watched this death spiral before, in the Cold War. But cooler heads prevailed and the human race survived, perhaps because the cooler heads understood that the very survival of the human race depended on maintaining the peace. Such is not the case with the Sunni and the Shi’a. Not only do they have no such fear that the whole world would pay the ultimate price for their folly, but both sects are absolutely sure that God will bring them victory.

We can only hope that here, too, cooler heads will prevail. Otherwise, the only safe place in the Middle East will be Mecca, for neither side would dare to destroy their holy city. If worse comes to worst, I would expect that the Sunnis would prevail, for not only do the Sunnis comprise the significant majority of the population and wealth of the world’s Islamic nations, but the West, and particularly America, may well be drawn in on Saudi Arabia’s side; too much of our economic national interest is tied up therein.

If this conflict does come to pass, however, one can only hope that the world (including America’s religious right) takes it as a hard-learned lesson of the wisdom of the separation of Church and State.

Powered by

About Glenn Contrarian

White. Male. Raised in the deepest of the Deep South. Retired Navy. Strong Christian. Proud Liberal. Thus, Contrarian!
  • http://viclana.blogspot.com/ Victor Lana

    Of course, Glenn, it seems that Israel has told Obama all bets are off. If they strike Iran (as they once did Iraq), I fear the outcome will be a good deal worse for the whole region and the world. ‘Tis a muddle, to be sure.

  • Glenn Contrarian

    Here’s some pertinent comments by Trita Parsi, the president of the National Iranian American Council.

  • John Lake

    Contrarian has written an article clearly defining his position on several of the most important conflicts in today’s world. It would be a wonder if those running for office today could do half as well.

    The only exception to that I make is the use of the term “puppets” to describe lawmakers and politicians who make the final decisions that might lead to war in Syria, or to a full-scale bombardment of Iran.

    Many in the political contests, and in the media seem unaware of Iran’s overtures to peace, and I am influenced by those who say that Ahmadinejad’s poor showing in the parliamentary elections won’t in fact change much. But we heed what Glenn has written. Santorum now sees his platform as being “the strongest” of the candidates; he is unaware of any internal politics in Iran, and requires that they surrender NOW!, or pay the price.

    It is said that Syria is a far more complex situation that the earlier “Spring” revolutions. We spent years in weak Iraq; the moment we left, they began to reinstall the old order. Now the people of Syria are pleading for help. There are many complex issues, and we need a wise leader with a cool head, Obama, to get us through this. The American Ambassador to Syria is unfit; he spends his day watching You Tube videos.

    As to the “Puppets,” the Republican corporate tools are sabre rattling as one. Puppets they are of our corporate dominated society which in some ways still resembles America. But these agents still must come to grips with the leaders of the world, The United Nations, and NATO; all matters they don’t mention. They are as I suggest only interested in appearing “strong.”

  • Glenn Contrarian

    For anyone who is interested, memri.org is a great site for finding out what’s really going on in the Middle East.

  • pablo

    How typical of the so called liberal contrarian to cite MEMRI as to what is going on in the Middle East. One of the board members of MEMRI is none other than Elliot Abrams one of the biggest neo con fascists in existence. Like I said, typical of Glenn.

  • Glenn Contrarian

    pablo –

    I also have the al-Jazeera app on my iPhone – I find their reporting at least as trustworthy as some others in the MSM.

    But I see what you mean – since when should we depend on direct translations of news stories and speeches from within the Middle Eastern countries for our news? We should just listen to what ABC and Fox tell us, right?

    As far as your criticism of memri.org, they do tend to concentrate more on what they think are threats…but it’s still more real news from the region than we get from other news sources except for al-Jazeera (and they have stuff that al-Jazeera doesn’t have).

  • Jordan Richardson

    Glenn, you may find this piece interesting with respect to MEMRI. I go there quite often, although with more than a few grains of salt in my back pocket.

  • Glenn Contrarian

    Jordan –

    That’s an eye-opening reference. I knew they leaned more than a little bit pro-Israel and anti-Arab, but I didn’t know it was that bad. Thanks for the reference – I do appreciate it.

    Pablo – take notice – Jordan just provided for you a shining example of how to get someone to listen to you – speak forthrightly and provide good evidence to back up what you say. Don’t just toss out snide comments, for the one you’re trying to talk to will just shut you out. IIRC, you’re Pinoy – and you should know this already since Filipinos tend to use courteous or oblique approaches much more than Americans do.

  • Igor

    I’ve been reading MEMRI occasionally for almost 20 years and I don’t think it’s ever been a secret that it’s operated by Israeli Intelligence. But even so, it’s an excellent source as long as you take that into consideration and refer to other sources as well.