It’s funny how some of the right wingers get all loopy when they hear somebody speak the truth. They can’t handle hearing it (i.e., Cindy Sheehan, Ambassador Joe Wilson, Scott Ritter, Sen. Max Cleland, Richard Clarke, and Hans Blix). Nothing bothers these people more than the truth. It drives them up the friggin’ wall. They will smear anybody who speaks the truth. There is a reason for this, and it comes from the very foundation of the Neoconservative belief system.
The Neoconservatism movement is built upon the notion that it’s better to get people to believe in “noble lies” than have them unsettled by the truth. The father of Neoconservatism, Leo Strauss, argued that:
Contemporary liberalism was the logical outcome of the philosophical principles of modernity, as practiced in the “advanced” nations of the Western world in the 20th century. He believed that contemporary liberalism contained within it an intrinsic tendency towards relativism, which in turn led to the nihilism that he saw as permeating contemporary American society.– Wikipedia on Leo Strauss
Thus, for Strauss, overcoming relativism was of primary importance.
Strauss noted that thinkers of the first rank, going back to Plato, had raised the problem of whether good and effective politicians could be completely truthful and still achieve the necessary ends of their society. By implication, Strauss asks his readers to consider whether “noble lies” (Plato) have any role at all to play in uniting and guiding the cities of man. Are certain, unprovable “myths” taught by wise leaders needed to give most people meaning and purpose and to ensure a stable society? Or can society flourish on a foundation of those “deadly truths” (Nietzsche) limited to what we can know absolutely?
You see, neoconservatism is a political school of thought that suffers from an elevated ego. The proponents of the theory believe they know “what’s good for the rest of us”. These people believe that the American people are better off ignorant and blind, than with actual freewill. In their view, freewill can lead to nihilism. And to them, nihilism will lead to the end of civilization.
To put it another way, in the view of the Neocons, people are no different than a pack of wolves. In a wolf pack (no relation to neoconservative Paul Wolfowitz), the dogs need to know their place in the pecking order or the pack will become unstable and inefficient. Through dominance, submission, and aggression, each dog will find it’s place, and the pack will be happy. The Neocons believe that people need a hierarchy of order– people need to be given commands that are easy to understand, and they need to have a routine. Freewill is bad for the pack. Uncertainty is bad for the pack. Questioning the alpha-male puts the balance of the pack in danger. If the leader of the pack wants you to roll over, do it. Don’t ask questions, just do it. Good dog!
You see, if the wolf pack can’t understand quantum mechanics, evolution, the general theory of relativity or esoteric spiritual or philosophical texts– teach them something they can understand, regardless of whether it’s right or not. Make it simple, make it rigid, and do not waiver from it ever. Stay the course, or the rest of the wolves may get restless. The pack needs, above all else, uniformity and security. They need to know what is good and what is bad. There is no grey area for a wolf. A wolf hunts, it doesn’t question it’s existence, it’s habitat, or the alpha-male.
You see, neoconservatism does not give Man much credit (or compassion). It is anti-humanist. It is sheer wolf. It believes ignorance is better than knowledge. It values power more than love. It fears science, knowledge and enlightenment. It fears foreign packs. But most of all, it fears its true nature as a human being. And thus, it fears truth.
Mythologically speaking, Neoconservatism plays only to Man’s masculine attributes (power, violence, discipline, order, etc.) without care for it’s feminine attributes (love, compassion, chaos, etc. – think of the Goddess Aphrodite, goddess of Love and Chaos) As such, neoconservatism is completely out of balance. It fails to recognize half of our given human nature. It is out of touch with the moon– the mother. It exhalts the sun– the father. It disregards compassion, and knows not how to forgive. It thrives on competition and cannot handle cooperation. Neoconservatism is a philosophy of self-destruction.
So next time you see some neoconservative doing everything under the sun to avoid the truth– have pity on him. He has not yet realized that he is a human being. His world view does not permit him to seek the truth. On the contrary, a neocon has not evolved from his animal past. He has no other choice than to just “howl at the moon.”
Powered by Sidelines
PLEASE NOTE: THE BULLDOG MANIFESTO DOES NOT WISH TO INSULT ANY FELLOW CANINES WITH THE PRECEDING POST. THE BULLDOG MANIFESTO BELIEVES WOLVES ARE BEAUTIFUL ANIMALS, AND HAVE SOME VERY GOOD THINGS TO TEACH US. WOLVES ARE NICE. HUMAN BEINGS BEHAVING LIKE WOLVES ARE NOT NICE.