Top Ten Rock Bands and Songs EVER - Page 16

Article comments

Subscribe to comment RSS

• 1 - Matt Fanslow

  Mar 29, 2004 at 8:59 am

  How is Metallica not on the list, much less an honorable mention? They alone are responsible for making metal/speed metal mainstream. They are just as important as Nirvana.

• 2 - Barry Stoller

  Mar 29, 2004 at 9:10 am

  NOPE - due to corporate radio's overkill, almost all of these bands now qualify for nothing but most boring; the others, similarly falling victim to standard rock critic worship, qualify for the same. What we need is a postmodernist re-evaluation, a cultural archeological dig to finally break fresh strata. Allow then a real contender to kick off the new vision: BLOODROCK as number 1. Let's go (fresh)... from there.

• 3 - Craig Lyndall

  Mar 29, 2004 at 9:11 am

  There is no way Metallica is as influential as Nirvana. If you look at the span of their careers and the fact that Nirvana had 3 real albums, 1 b-sides album, and an unplugged album from the 1989 - 1994. They have achieved far more in that painfully short period of time than Metallica has to this point.

• 4 - Craig Lyndall

  Mar 29, 2004 at 9:14 am

  "7. Marvin Gaye - "I Heard It Through The Grapevine" (1968)
  Motown's greatest singer's greatest singing performance."
  
  I would argue with this completely and totally. There are so many other songs by Marvin Gaye that I like so much more. Specifically, "What's Going On."

• 5 - Eric Olsen

  Mar 29, 2004 at 9:15 am

  Metallica could very easily be on the honorable mention list, but I think Black Sabbath is a more important metal band.

• 6 - WarrenP

  Mar 29, 2004 at 9:15 am

  Rock and Roll? Aretha Franklin? Outkast?
  Are you for real?
  Marvin Gaye? Dude - get a life you 'sell-out' kiss ass! People LIKE categorys for a reason. Bob Marley? Sly and the Family Stone? Rock? I mean - I listen to these entertainers, too - but, ROCK is ROCK! I wish the media would stop trying to 'gender cross' musics all over the f*&^'en map!
  It's insulting.

• 7 - Craig Lyndall

  Mar 29, 2004 at 9:17 am

  Damn it and another thing. I hate the Rolling Stones. Really, I can't stand them at all. I do understand their contributions to rock and roll, but to say that one of their songs is number 1 is preposterous. Maybe top twenty, but how is this song ahead of Stairway and that song isn't even on the list. Stairway and Zeppelin put the effing Stones to shame.

• 8 - A Girl

  Mar 29, 2004 at 9:18 am

  Dude, you just took yourself out for a nice Italian Dinner... You dated yourself. Radiohead much?! The Bends, OK Computer, Kid A etc. (heck even the sketchy Pablo Honey). That retro era doesn't have a lock on thoughful innovation and raw emotion, you know.

• 9 - Ace

  Mar 29, 2004 at 9:28 am

  How come Queen wasn't even mentioned?
  Thanks to them, stadiums all over the world have not one, but two himns repeatedly being played on every match... "We will rock you" is the thing you hear when everybody is slapping their seats rhytmically... And what song other than "We are the champions" come right in handy when your favorite team wins??

• 10 - Ace

  Mar 29, 2004 at 9:31 am

  (sorry for this second post)
  PD: Of course, Queen is not great only because it's affinity to sports...

• 11 - Eric Olsen

  Mar 29, 2004 at 9:42 am

  Craig, you really need to check into the STones a little more. How much have you listened to them? You have too good taste to dismiss them so completely - give them another shot.
  
  RE those complaining about the "rock" category: there will never be agreement on what should or should not fit. I interpreted "rock" fairly broadly. Perhaps the songs should have been called the "Rock Era." I have no problem thinking of Sly and Bob as rock bands.

• 12 - mwanji

  Mar 29, 2004 at 9:42 am

  Eric,
  
  Why even write such an article? You know you'll only get abuse for it. I hope they paid you well, at least.
  
  "I wish the media would stop trying to 'gender cross' musics"
  
  What is gender-crossed music?

• 13 - h price

  Mar 29, 2004 at 9:42 am

  What!!! No Jimi Hendrix Expereience, Come on, PLEASE! Hendrix did more in 4 measly years than Ueffing2, Marley, Velvet Underground could possibly do in 40. The only thing Hendrix didn't do with an ax was invent it. This is crazy.

• 14 - Eric Olsen

  Mar 29, 2004 at 9:46 am

  Mwanji, I have no problem with the controversy - you sort of answered your own question as to why they would ask me to write it (smile). While there has been all kinds of disagreement, I have already had a ton of very complimentary notes even from those who disagree. All I'm really concerned about is whether or not I did a good job of supporting those I did pick.

• 15 - Mark Saleski

  Mar 29, 2004 at 9:53 am

  mighty fine drivel, mr. olsen.
  
  ;-)
  

• 16 - Southern Belle

  Mar 29, 2004 at 9:57 am

  Nope, nobody is perfect...Still, I can't get over the fact that one of the most innovative, artistic and talented bands ever, the Queen, was never mentioned. Shame on you for this oversight.
  
  Otherwise it was an interesting article.

• 17 - Eric Olsen

  Mar 29, 2004 at 10:02 am

  Thanks Southern Belle, As much as I like some Queen, I don't think they overall rate the very top echelon. Thanks for your kind words otherwise!
  
  Thanks Mark, you are coolest!

• 18 - Mark Saleski

  Mar 29, 2004 at 10:05 am

  hey, ya coulda thrown 'ole Al a bone and at least had them add Elvis Costello to the msnbc "who's missing" pole.

• 19 - Eric Olsen

  Mar 29, 2004 at 10:07 am

  I put him in the "solo+backup" category.

• 20 - Mark Saleski

  Mar 29, 2004 at 10:17 am

  You dated yourself. Radiohead much?! The Bends, OK Computer, Kid A etc.
  
  Radiohead's "OK Computer" = Low Rent King Crimson.

• 21 - Bill

  Mar 29, 2004 at 10:25 am

  Hey Eric,
  
  Ever hear of a little band called Aerosmith? Rock & Roll Hall of Fame? 30+ years of making music? 60 million + records sold? Pioneers of the rock/rap genre? Any of this ringing a bell?

• 22 - Eric Olsen

  Mar 29, 2004 at 10:34 am

  Bill, If Aerosmith had made more albums like Get Your Wings, Toys In the Attic and Rocks they would have received more consideration. As it is, I see them a second tier. But it's just opinion, okay?

• 23 - Craig Lyndall

  Mar 29, 2004 at 10:36 am

  Aerosmith is probably the greatest American rock band, but unfortunately for them, they cam after Zeppelin and the Stones. They should win an award for longevity, but there would be no Aerosmith without a Zeppelin, Stones, etc.

• 24 - MH

  Mar 29, 2004 at 10:36 am

  Where do you come up with Velvet and the Dead? I saw these bands live and they sucked..They sold no records and influenced very few others. Ask either of them to open for The Who and you have all the makings of a nice little riot. Your need to be hip and diverse clouds any real conviction and I find your list nothing but a political comprimise of misguided PC dribble. If Sly and Bob Marley are ROCK then so is Maria Carey and the Spice Girls.

• 25 - Don Geddis

  Mar 29, 2004 at 10:38 am

  What drugs were you on in the seventies!!!!! Most of your list isn't even what any moron would call rock & roll!!!!!!!! Bob Marley is reggae, aretha franklin is soul and nirvana was grunge.............Get A Clue!!!!