The Phil Spector Deal: From Music, To Madness, To — Murder?

The other night I was watching ABC News Nightline -- as is my normal late night viewing habit right before Jimmy Kimmel, Uncle Frank, and Guillermo give me a few good yuks and lull me off to dreamland — when they ran a piece which caught my attention. It was about the Phil Spector murder trial.

Now, I have to tell you that normally such sensational and scandalous celebrity stories don't do a lot for me. To me the usual category this stuff falls under — what with Anna Nicole, Paris, Britney and the like — is one of distraction. In other words, I've always believed that the media focus on these types of stories serves no real purpose other than to numb the public into a state of ignorant bliss. What better than celebrity dirt to divert our attention away from more important issues such as how we're presently being raped at the gas pump, or how the Democratic congress just this week caved on the issue of continuing funding for the Iraq war?

But I'll save the rants on those particular topics for another time and place. The Phil Spector deal caught my eye because, as a music fan, I'm still somewhat dumbstruck by the whole thing. You see, Phil Spector was, and is, one of my musical idols.

As a fan, I know all too well of Phil Spector's reputation both inside and outside of the recording studio. He is one of those maybe not so rare birds in the music business to whom both the terms genius and lunatic could be equally applied. And this was long before he was ever accused of shooting the House of Blues waitress he brought home to his Hollywood castle for a night of drinking and who knows what else, presumably because she simply decided it was time to leave.

Spector has been described as the ultimate control freak inside the recording studio. He's been known to drive his musicians to the brink of madness in take after take after take, just to get the sound of something like a tambourine right. For example, during the recording of the Spector produced Beatles album Let It Be, the already splintering band apparently was so divided over the final result that Paul McCartney eventually felt compelled — decades later — to release the Un-Spectorized Let It Be...Naked version of the album.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2Page 3

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for glen-boyd

Article Author: Glen Boyd

You'll find Blogcritics music editor Glen Boyd sharing his Thoughtmares on his personal blog The Rockologist. Glen is also the author of Neil Young FAQ, published in May 2012 by Backbeat Books/Hal Leonard Publishing.

Visit Glen Boyd's author pageGlen Boyd's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - JC Mosquito

    May 25, 2007 at 10:44 am

    In the first edition of The Rolling Stone Illustrated History of Rock and roll, Phill had repeatedly told the interviewer that "To know him is to love him" was inscribed on his father's grave.

    Near the end of the interview, however, he let go a Freudian slip and said, "That's the inscription on MY grave." Like a dead man walking.

    I dunno - Spector hasn't been relevant for a long time, I don't think, other than the couple of 30 - 40 years old albums mentioned before. Like a ghost, he's been haunting the living world of rock 'n' roll history, with little heard from him except rattling chains, perhaps, or maybe cymbals... and tympanis... and glockenspiels.... and string sections.... and baritone saxes....

  • 2 - J. P.

    May 25, 2007 at 1:54 pm

    The great producers all self-destruct, with the salient exception of George Martin.

    Phil Spector. Joe Meek. Brian Wilson. Who's next?

  • 3 - JC Mosquito

    May 26, 2007 at 12:46 am

    Actually, I can't see Rick Rubin or Brendan O'Brien leaving anytime soon.

  • 4 - Glen Boyd

    May 26, 2007 at 2:20 am

    I used to work for Rick, Skeet. And he is a very brilliant guy, but part of what I think makes him an unlikely candidate to do a "Spector" or a "Wilson" anytime soon is the fact that he is also remarkably centered.

    I once went to Rick about a band I knew here In Seattle (which had a few friends), and his response was "is the greatest thing you have ever heard?"

    When I honestly could not answer in the affirmative, he told me to come back to him once I could say that it was.

    Like I said, a very centered guy. And one, I have very great respect for.

    When I worked for Rick, I was a young kid (at least interms of maturity) who was basically in over my head and I wish to God I could take back the way I blew my big break knowing what I know now. Because for the most part I'm devoid of my youthful bad habits back then.

    But like I said, despite his eccentricities, he is a very centered guy. And I think his genius lies in the way he just lets the artists he works with just do their thing. He trusts them, which is why he picks them so carefully.

    -Glen

  • 5 - Frank O

    May 27, 2007 at 6:22 pm

    I am sick of everyone carrying on about how great Phil Spector is. He stuck a bunch of band-aids on the lousey Let It Be sessions, where he was not welcome by everyone as producer anyhow. The Ramones did not get anything good out of the album they did with Spector. Certainly not any good sales or hits. It sounds thin, and it was the end for them pretty much. He had nothing to do with Youve Lost That Lovin Feeling, but I'll bet that The Rightious Brothers and Sonny Bono had more to do with the wall of sound than Spector did. I'm just sick of it. I'm sick of Rockin around the Christmas tree. Stop making him the God of pop. We would have figured it out without 'ol Phil. Why don't you heap some praise on JOE MEEK? The person Spector tried so hard to emmulate? He is the real innovator who broke down the walls. Sick Sick Sick.


    REDRUM

  • 6 - Glen Boyd

    May 27, 2007 at 6:40 pm

    Frank,

    I guess I could say that I would take your posted twice comments under consideration, but that would be giving them too much credit. To say that Phil Spector had nothing to do with "Lovin Feelin" is of course ridiculous. His imprint is all over that record. As for the Ramones? Well, they never really had any hits or really sold any records anyway and they were only really appreciated years later. But "Do You Remember Rock and Roll Radio" comes as close to a hit as anything I can think of by the Ramones. The Let It Be sessions were by all accounts a disaster and the Beatles were for all intents and purposes finished as a band by that point anyway.

    But to understand Spector's greatness, all you have to do is point your ears toward "River Deep, Mountain High" or "Walking In The Rain." He is pretty much the only record producer I can think of whose sound is identified in many cases above the actual artists he produced.

    While I appreciate your comments, for me they hold little water.

    -Glen

  • 7 - JC Mosquito

    May 27, 2007 at 8:08 pm

    Think of how often the term "Wall of Sound" is used to describe a particular style of music production. Off the top of my head, I can't think of any other production style associated with a particular producer other than Phil Spector and the Wall of Sound.

    Also, consider when he was making those records - he was right in the gap between the loss of Elvis, Chuck, Jerry Lee, etc. to various (although in some cases temporary) career killers, and The Beatles, Stones, Byrds, Dylan, etc. first wave of the superstars of the Sixties. Yeah, he didn't do anything for me in regards to the Beatles and the Ramones, but he made his mark early enough to matter. Think of how often Springsteen in his early days went for that operatic, emotional, over the top production. Sometimes the seeds gotta scatter.

  • 8 - Glen Boyd

    May 27, 2007 at 9:47 pm

    JC,

    I realize that I'm in the minority on this -- at least amongst Ramones fans -- but I actually think End Of The Century was one of their best records. I'd definitely rate it up there with Rocket To Russia and The Ramones Leave Home. There are spme great songs on that record, starting off with Rock & Roll Radio and going right through everything there from Chinese Rock to Rock & Roll High School. When the two "Walls Of Sound" at play here clash--Spector's and The Ramones own "Wall"--the results aren't always pretty and even I'll admit the sound is occassionally a bit on the tinny side. But song for song, the record holds up pretty well for me.

    Again though, I realize I'm in a monority holding this view and almost half expect a deluge of comments from Ramones fans now voicing their adamant disagreement with me.

    I do agree though that Spector's work on Let It Be is pretty uneventful. The idea of putting two talents of that magnitude in the same room and expecting things to go smoothly was probably a misguided one at best.

    Especially since the Beatles were already imploding. They didn't need any of Spector's help.

    -Glen

  • 9 - JC Mosquito

    May 27, 2007 at 11:17 pm

    I see where you're coming from, Glen, re: both the Beatles & Ramones. I think at the time the fans who had only recently latched on to the punk/new wave thing via Ramones, Blondie, or whoever, were in for a shock - they got the punk facade stripped back to expose the songs for what they really were - pop of the first degree. In fact, if I remember correctly, it was the biggest selling Ramones album for years after it was released - maybe still is.

    As for the Beatles... Let It Be - Naked is a wonderful way to wrap up their set - and I know I'm in the minority on that count. If nothing else, it proves that at the end, despite their personal relationships falling apart, the Beatles could still play - instead of the ramshackle sounding band of the original album, LIBN shows some pretty tight performances - rock solid drumming, steady bass & guitars and keyboard touches in the right places by a band that to this day stands a little taller than whoever is the second best rock 'n' roll band of all time.

    There you go, Glen - maybe you won't be the only target tonight.

    Sk.

  • 10 - James Cushing

    May 30, 2007 at 9:50 pm

    Let us not forget Phil Spector's last two artistically and commercially successful productions: "All Things Must Pass" and "The Concert for Bangladesh," both for George Harrison, 1970 & 1971. Let us meditate on the irony that this highly spiritual studio album, and the charity concert album that followed it, are linked to a man now facing a murder charge.

  • 11 - JC Mosquito

    May 31, 2007 at 12:06 am

    Mr. Cushing, tonight you are the winner of the Soul of Wit award. No cash, just bragging rights for what's left of the evening.

  • 12 - Kevin Cramsey

    Jun 01, 2007 at 12:24 pm

    Glen,

    I agree with many other bloggers -- Specter has been irrelevant for a long time. Even his best records were basically just teeny-bopper rock. And the wall of sound, well, I find it irritating. Melding all the instruments together to the point of making them unrecognizable does not make for fun listening. It's a noise, not music. There's no clarity. No personality. In the end, Specter should be forgotten -- erased from music history the way O.J. has been from football because he is a fiend who has spent decades pointing guns at innocent people. He's a wretched excuse for a human being. I pray he is convicted and rots in his cell, where they won't let him wear his ridiculous hair.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 19, 2013

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs