The Friday Morning Listen

Part of: Friday Morning Listen

For Alto - Anthony Braxton

This morning, one of the emails caught in my spam trap had the following Dadaist poetry subject line:

    doubtful barnyard helga hundredth fulsome origin folly servile exculpatory celsius optoelectronic applause criteria devisee artful melissa sickle feldman

Now, isn't that a mouthfull? I especially like the "doubful barnyard helga" part. Could be a band name, or maybe a new gymnastics move, or something.

Anyway, the disconnected nature of this stuff inspired me to listen to some music with a certain amount of randomness...and this Braxton solo disc fits the bill. If you've never listened to Anthony Braxton before, well, I wouldn't recommend starting here. It's difficult listening. He's an interesting guy though. Most of his compositions are named by number ("Composition 187"), combinations of numbers ("1. Composition N. 169 + (186 + 206 + 214)"), or pictogram describing the relationships between song structures:

If you want to find out more about Anthony Braxton, try to find a used copy of Graham Lock's Forces In Motion, in which you will discover that Braxton may have too many brain cells in that head of his.

(First posted on Mark Is Cranky)

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for mark-saleski

Article Author: Mark Saleski

Mark Saleski is a writer and music obsessive based out of the Monadnock region of New Hampshire. He has contributed to Jazz.com and also writes reviews for Blogcritics.org. He produces the weekly feature The Friday Morning Listen. …

Visit Mark Saleski's author pageMark Saleski's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

  • 1 - Eric Olsen

    Apr 19, 2004 at 1:20 pm

    Thanks Mark, difficult indeed but almost always interesting.

    What is the point of those dada word spams? What are they trying to achieve?

  • 2 - Mark Saleski

    Apr 19, 2004 at 2:19 pm

    i think the idea is to add words to the subject line that may seem 'appropriate'. i mean, clearly nobody would write a spam email with the word 'misappropriated' in the title, right?

    wrong!

    it's entertaining though.

  • 3 - Eric Olsen

    Apr 19, 2004 at 2:23 pm

    But what do THEY get out of it? What is the motivation? Or are these just incredibly bored shitsticks?

  • 4 - Mark Saleski

    Apr 19, 2004 at 2:44 pm

    oh, that.

    i dunno. i suspect that all of the email is contructed with software. maybe it actually makes their 'hit rate' go up.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Feb 10, 2012

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for January

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs