The Enduring 20-Year Legacy of Nirvana's Nevermind

Part of: The Rockologist

Unless you've been off living in a cave somewhere these past few weeks, you've no doubt been unable to escape all the hype surrounding the 20th anniversary of Nirvana's landmark 1991 album Nevermind.

That the album itself was an unexpectedly earth-shattering event has never even been in question. Nevermind was without a doubt, one of those rare moments in music where a single release changed literally everything. That the album knocked the piss out of everyone (especially King of Pop Michael Jackson) by inexplicably rising to the top of the charts on the strength of little more than street buzz that caught everyone by surprise, in and of itself makes it one of those rare and wonderful happy accidents where the fans became the tail wagging the industry dog.

Prior to 1991, the last time this occurred was when the Beastie Boys revealed to the world that black kids weren't the only ones listening to rap with 1987's Licensed To Ill. As big as that record proved to be, though, the scale of Nevermind's success was something on an entirely different level.

Of course, it can be argued that not all of Nevermind's initial impact was necessarily positive. Who doesn't remember that brief, early nineties period when you couldn't turn on a radio without hearing a slew of imitators (Silverchair, anyone?).

All of the renewed "voice of a generation" accolades these past few weeks have also proven to be just a little bit much. Kurt Cobain's legacy is marked as much by his suicide as it is by his music. Which probably makes the comparisons to John Lennon most often heard when discussing his impact more than a tad annoying to some Beatles fans. Understandably so, too.

Lennon's murder was arguably a political act — albeit carried out by a deranged fan. Cobain on the other hand chose to take his own life, to become forever immortalized in what could rightfully be called the ultimate case of the angst-ridden, reluctant rock star. Where Lennon died for his art, Cobain may have died because of it.

Either way, Nirvana (and by association, the rest of the Seattle-based grunge movement) represent the last time rock music really mattered in both a musical and a cultural sense. The successes of modern day hitmakers like Coldplay and Kings Of Leon notwithstanding, rock and roll is mostly on life support these days. It just hasn't produced anything comparable to the way that Nirvana and a fan-based, street level movement like grunge impacted mainstream culture on a similarly massive level since. In that respect, Nirvana really were a lot like the Beatles.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2Page 3

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for glen-boyd

Article Author: Glen Boyd

You'll find Blogcritics music editor Glen Boyd sharing his Thoughtmares on his personal blogs The World Wide Glen, and The Rockologist. Glen is also the author of Neil Young FAQ, scheduled for a spring 2012 release by Backbeat Books/Hal Leonard …

Visit Glen Boyd's author pageGlen Boyd's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - Jordan Richardson

    Sep 29, 2011 at 11:31 pm

    Nice job, Glen. I appreciated reading your view from the inside of the movement. Well done.

  • 2 - Glen Boyd

    Sep 29, 2011 at 11:40 pm

    Thanx Jordan...and it finally got wrote a day after our BC music scribe summit last night on facebook.

    -Glen

  • 3 - The Dirty Lowdown

    Sep 30, 2011 at 12:38 pm

    Nice review and retrospective. I remember feeling the same way when it came out, at least at first. To me it was just another hard rock band, and I had pretty much given up on hard rock. Dungeons and Dragons and Warrior Kings, and fantasy to screaming guitars. then it hit me, they were singing and playing about "serious" things and no other hard rock bands were doing that then. then I gave "never Mind' another listen and it grew on me. I think the fact that they wrote and sang serious topics in a hard rock way was more important than any individual song, and I also think that's where the beatle comparisons came in. The Beatles had migrated to doing the same thing when rock n roll was ruled by hotrods, surfers, and puppy love the Beatles came out singing about The Taxman, etc...

  • 4 - Greg Barbrick

    Oct 01, 2011 at 1:11 pm

    Nice work Glen. It was an amazing night, and I distincly remember wondering "Who are these rabid Nirvana fans?" It took me a minute to fully "get" the band also, but we had a wealth of great bands around here to choose from back then didn't we?

    What really convinces me today is how I still go back and listen to Nevermind fairly regularly. It remains an essential album, and the cultural impact of it was unbelievable. Great article my friend.

  • 5 - Glen Boyd

    Oct 01, 2011 at 1:41 pm

    Thanx Greg and Dirty. I knew they rocked and all that ... itr just took me a minute, well, okay a decade or so, to fully get the impact thing. Thanx guys!

    -Glen

  • 6 - El Bicho

    Oct 01, 2011 at 2:40 pm

    Nice remembrance but...

    Why should old Beatles fans be annoyed that Generation X found their voice in music somewhere else? Boo hoo, Boomers. It's not always about you.

    And it was more than street buzz that caused the album to rise up the charts. It was the non-stop playing on radio and MTV of "Smells Like Teen Spirit", and even then, it took four months to unseat Michael Jackson.

    btw, if people think Coldplay is rock and roll, that might explain why the genre is on life support.

  • 7 - Glen Boyd

    Oct 01, 2011 at 3:05 pm

    As fan of both groups (the Beatles and Nirvana), I certainly don't begrudge one over the other, nor the fanbases of each. That said, if some fans choose to insert Lennon's name into any discussion about Cobain (which many do), then Beatles fans have every right to respond. The generation gap you take such pains to emphasize isn't really the most relevant factor in that argument. Not by a long shot...

    -Glen

  • 8 - Greg Barbrick

    Oct 02, 2011 at 9:51 am

    Glen - I agree with Bicho on the "Boo hoo Boomers" statement. Their sense of entitlement to the cultural stage is nauseating. In my mind it is what the "Conan vs Leno" brouhaha really boiled down to. But I digress.

    And never forget what Tom Leykis said about Coldplay. What was the word he used? Oh yeah, "p***ies".

  • 9 - Glen Boyd

    Oct 02, 2011 at 10:03 am

    That Leykis episode about Coldplay is a classic. That one and the one about going to a U2 concert and interviewing the only black guy there...never laughed so hard in my life.

  • 10 - Glen Boyd

    Oct 02, 2011 at 10:05 am

    I wonder what ever happened to Leykis...

  • 11 - Greg Barbrick

    Oct 02, 2011 at 12:45 pm

    Reduced to showing up at Gene Simmons' wedding last I heard

  • 12 - El Bicho

    Oct 02, 2011 at 1:24 pm

    How does the generation gap not factor into it? I am guessing most of your folks and their friends didn't get your music, did they?

    Don't get me started on that Conan vs Leno mess. That was so ridiculous on all fronts, from NBC execs to hypocritical members of Team Coco.

    Would love to hear that Leykis bit. He's got a weekend syndicated show about drinking and is supposed to be coming back in April when his CBS contract ends. He also seems to be invloved in some type of internet radio/podcasts on his blowmeuptom website

  • 13 - Glen Boyd

    Oct 02, 2011 at 2:53 pm

    Perhaps I'm to blame for bringing it up in the first place, but for me its a tired argument. That said, I'll bite (at least part way).

    Both artists meant everything to their respective, and yes largely generational fan bases, and one shouldn't be taken away from the other. But when Cobain's fans keep bringing up Lennon (and it is usually them that do so), they miss a few really relevant points in my view. Lennon's activism (along with other similarly engaged artists of his time) had repercussions that went far beyond music -- including altering the political landscape of the time, and arguably contributing to the end of a very unpopular war.

    The battles he fought were real ones -- including deportation and being placed on an "enemies list" by both the U.S. president and the director of the FBI. Cobain, on the other hand, seemed to want nothing to do with the position he was given, and eventually chose to check out altogether as a result.

    That's not necessarily a slam on him as an artist (although you will never see me condoning suicide). But it does represent the difference between the two men in my view. Like it or not, Cobain's suicide is as big a part of his legacy as his music, and all of the carping in the world about a "generation gap" doesn't change that.

    Cobain's cultural impact is undeniable though, and if you don't think I addressed that in the article, you simply didn't read it carefully enough.

    As for Coldplay, I cited them simply as one example of a band currently playing "rock" (as opposed to the disposable Bieber, Britney, Black Eyed Peas crap that sells the most records these days). I didn't really state an opinion one way or the other because the article wasn't really about them.

    But for the record, I do admit they are a bit of a guilty pleasure...which I guess makes me a P***y in the Tom Leykis universe. So be it.

    -Glen

  • 14 - Glen Boyd

    Oct 02, 2011 at 4:02 pm

    I wouldn't know squat about Conan and Leno. I'm a Kimmel guy.

    -Glen

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Feb 22, 2012

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for January

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs