Sunday Morning Playlist: Garage Rock of the 1960s

Part of: Sunday Morning Playlist
Author: uaoPublished: Nov 20, 2005 at 2:11 pm 16 comments

Garage Rock is the real rock, the rock without pretense (but often with aspirations). It goes beyond a musical genre to qualify as a cultural phenomenon, one that not only gave countless bands their one-shots on flimsy little labels in every corner of the U.S., but also one just as fervent in Canada, England, Scandinavia, Europe, Japan, and just about anywhere a few kids could get together with guitars and amps.

As musical genre, it refers primarily to what was essentially the "indie" music of the sixties; local combos recording on primitive equipment for small, local labels. Some of these bands wound up with a national hit; others had giant local hits, when radio airplay was still regional. Most never struck gold at all, seemingly bottomless vaults are crammed with just the stuff that never even got released.

13th Floor Elevators

In essence, it was rock's great populist movement, fed largely from 60's suburbia, where a lot of very typical and not-so-typical teens picked up guitars and started picking out hits of the day, especially those by The Kinks, The Rolling Stones, The Beatles, Bob Dylan, and the Yardbirds. In suburbia you have garages; where else would a kid go to make noise? From the early days of the British Invasion through the end of the psychedelic age, it was a rare block that didn't have some band or another on it, however informally.

This glut of bands resulted in a glut of little labels, often run by local deejays or impresarios, who would buy recordings often made in the most rudimentary of studios, or pay for a little studio time themselves.

The Standells   Barry & The Remains

Which resulted in a glut of 45's, far too many for the market to absorb, with most destined for cut-out bins and meltdown.

By the 1970's, many of these little labels had gone bankrupt, either pinning their hopes on local talent that never panned out, or finding distribution, promotion, quality control, and other aspects of the industry too difficult or expensive to maintain. Some lucky ones were bought out by larger companies, but their mid-60's one hit wonder 45's were lost to the mists of history in the fast-changing rock/pop world of the day.

Radio also had undergone transformation with the advent of FM. Music stations began migrating to the wider-frequency FM for its superior sound (in the earliest days, FM radio was a nowhereland of freewheelin' freakazoids, the golden age, claim those who were there). As AM lost its monopoly, and with it much of its audience, it also spelled the doom for regional radio. Consolidation in the radio industry left stations in very different markets with the same precise playlists; regional charts were no longer compiled.


Chocolate Watchband   The Kingsmen

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2Page 3Page 4Page 5Page 6Page 7Page 8Page 9Page 10Page 11

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for uao

Article Author: uao

uao isn't my real name.

Visit uao's author pageuao's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

  • 1 - The Proprietor

    Nov 20, 2005 at 5:52 pm

    The Standells reunited for a live show in 1999 (with Dodd, Valentino and Tamblyn; Gary Lane didn't participate) released as "Ban This! Live From Cavestomp".

    The definitive Remains recording was the Capitol audition, which was released as "A Session With The Remains" by Sundazed a few years back. It's an especially fierce recording (their original "Why Do I Cry" is much more powerful than on the Epic LP).

  • 2 - Victor Plenty

    Nov 20, 2005 at 6:54 pm

    Excellent work as always, uao. Interesting mix of stuff almost everybody knows about ("Louie Louie" for example) right alongside songs many of us may never have heard of.

    One minor quibble on your title: I'd recommend taking out the apostrophe. It makes the construction look like a possessive, rather than a plural; garage rock belonging to 1960, rather than garage rock from the entire decade of the Sixties.

    Also interesting that "96 Tears" came from such obscure origins. The local "classic rock" station plays it all the time. For some reason I'd always assumed it was from a more well-known band with lots of other hits.

  • 3 - uao

    Nov 20, 2005 at 7:21 pm

    Thank you Proprietor, for your ever-useful nuggets of knowledge; I always appreciate them.

    Victor Plenty: as an English language instructor, I'm sensitive to apostrophes. However, I've been taught that in addition to denoting a passive, they can also be used when puralizing a specific number: 1960's vs. 1960s. Maybe I'm wrong; I'm too lazy to fish out my Elements of Style right now. But I'll sleep on it, and if the title bugs me in the moring, I'll change it.

    Thanks ;-)

  • 4 - uao

    Nov 20, 2005 at 7:22 pm

    I meant "possessive" not "passive" I am a famously lousy typist.

  • 5 - Victor Plenty

    Nov 20, 2005 at 7:38 pm

    It can be equally correct to pluralize a number with an apostrophe, or with just a plain S. You are of course quite right about that, as a general rule. In this specific case, it's the context that makes the construction seem possessive and not plural.

    If the title had been "Garage Rock of the 1960's" it would be clear you intended the plural, with or without the apostrophe.

    Of course the larger cultural context makes it unlikely any native English speaker would interpret "1960's Garage Rock" as a reference to only the year 1960, but for the benefit of any readers who might not share that cultural context, it would be more clear to leave the apostrophe out.

    As I said before, it's a minor quibble, but I at least wanted to make it a clearly stated quibble. :)

  • 6 - uao

    Nov 20, 2005 at 7:48 pm

    For me it's like talking shop, I like it. Your point is a good one, given the wording of the title. You've convinced me; I've reworded it.

  • 7 - godoggo

    Nov 20, 2005 at 8:02 pm

    Where are the chick's?

  • 8 - godoggo

    Nov 20, 2005 at 8:32 pm

    Correction: Wheres.

  • 9 - Michael J. West

    Nov 20, 2005 at 8:47 pm

    Awesome list, UAO! Thanks for linking to the Essential Pebbles collection, too--in any era, that awesome CD is as indie (and as freakin' great) as it gets.

  • 10 - godoggo

    Nov 20, 2005 at 11:18 pm

    Just out of curiosity, I googled both names for the decade in the NY Times, figuring they'd have it standardized. Apparently I figured wrong.
    Results:
    about 24,200 from nytimes.com for "1960's"
    about 23,400 from nytimes.com for "1960s"

    A lot (not all) of the latter are from book etc. titles, so I guess the apostrophe wins. But I don't like it, myself.

  • 11 - GoHah

    Nov 21, 2005 at 12:01 am

    Great article. Maybe this group is more borderline Garage (since they evolved into different directions), but I think the biggest amphetimine-jolt of that time comes from Love's "7 and 7 Is"--that'll give you chills.

    Oh, I think the decades are supposed to be written apostrophe-free (but spoken with the apostrophe left in).

  • 12 - wum

    Nov 23, 2005 at 4:36 pm

    Good article, look forward to part 2.

  • 13 - Grammar Cop

    May 22, 2008 at 9:07 pm

    Apostrophes never make something plural. 1960s is correct.

  • 14 - JC Mosquito

    May 23, 2008 at 1:11 am

    1960s is indeed correct, but doesn't look as psychedelic as 1960's.

  • 15 - Dr Dreadful

    May 23, 2008 at 2:15 am

    1960s is correct.

    1960's is incorrect.

    You will not use it.

    You will be assimilated.

  • 16 - Christopher Rose

    May 23, 2008 at 5:55 am

    This 3 year old article has been corrected, thanks Grammar Cop.

    Resistance is futile.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 12, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs