Review: Velvet Revolver Contraband

Historically, guitar heroes who leave their most famous band don't top their previous efforts with a new band. But Velvet Revolver is categorized as a "supergroup" - a label that also spells doom. Throughout rock history, egos, death, boredom or "creative differences" have ended supergroups. Scott Weiland and the ex-GNR boys share the same personal sagas with addiction, booze and rock and roll chaos. This lineup mixes the wild eyed 80's and some 90's angst perfectly. Stone Temple Pilots were always seen as Pearl Jam/Alice in Chains ripoffs but Weiland had the charisma and cheap drug experiences required for a frontman. STP never really aspired to new heights. This album plays to Weiland's strengths and to Slash's chemistry with his ex-GNR mates.

"Slither" was the first single and immediately scores as Weiland proves the rehab was worth the wait. "Fall to Pieces" is destined to be a crowd pleaser or encore in future VR concerts. It's not necessarily a ballad but the soaring guitar solos by Slash are cigarette lighter ready for the GNR crowd. "Spectacle" is bare knuckle brawling by Weiland and Slash against their opponents. Matt Sorum and Duff handle the rhythm section tighter than their GNR days and Dave Kushner brings some post 90's rhythm guitars to balance Slash.

What this disc proves that you can have your 70's/80's/90's and new millenium production all rolled into one. Now pick up a six pack and put this on your iPod and blow your earphones away. Hopefully, Velvet Revolver puts out a double album before this decade is over.

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for tube-pinoy

Article Author: Tube Pinoy

Randy "Tube" P is a free lance writer (and member) of the Filipino-American National Historical Society of Hampton Roads (FANHS-HR) and one of the authors of the book, "In Our Uncle's Words: We Fought for Freedom". …

Visit Tube Pinoy's author pageTube Pinoy's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found

Article comments

— go to most recent comments
  • 1 - Chris Beaumont

    Jul 09, 2005 at 11:07 am

    THis really is an excellent album. I look forward to whatever they may give us in the future.

  • 2 - Marty Thau

    Jul 09, 2005 at 6:23 pm

    Some contend this is "old school" redux but I don't buy into that. That's just the voice of cynics who probably never liked this style of music to begin with. Weiland was always a great front man (drug problems aside) and Slash is simply the greatest guitarist for what he does.
    These guys are the stars of that form.
    Followers of this style of music now have someone to latch onto.

  • 3 - Revtim

    Jul 09, 2005 at 9:31 pm

    It's funny you say "put this on your iPod", isn't this one of those discs with the copy protection that prevents copying to a portable device? (Easily avoided by pressing SHIFT while putting the disc in or turning off autorun, though.)

    I don't have an iPod, so I cannot say for sure either way.

  • 4 - Temple Stark

    Jul 09, 2005 at 9:56 pm

    I love Slash and this kind o music. but i putt his in and it's all derivative retro bleh (and circa junior high school love bmb / snake lyrics. Lenny Kravitz retro is better.

    SnakePit and even Izzy's Ju Ju Hounds; none of it was very good. All drowned in influences without offering anything new.

    Slash should break out and do a solo guitar record. With a couple of guests. The Cult's Sorum is pretty drum clinical and servicable with occasional flashes of brilliance.

    Weiland? Trying too hard. always tried to hard. Took drugs because he knows he's not very talented. Never had much talent. Plush was STP's best song. They were never very good - and most of the time god-awful. And I was dying for them to be good so they would do my name proud (or something like that anyway)

    Opinions? I got 'em.

  • 5 - Tube Pinoy

    Jul 09, 2005 at 10:47 pm

    Revtim, I just found that out yesterday. I actually have only played on my pc yesterday but wrote the review months before. Temple Stark thanks for the opinion. Slash, Weiland and VR will incite some love 'em or hate 'em. I didn't like STP and barely liked GnR. I just really like this record.

  • 6 - Temple Stark

    Jul 09, 2005 at 10:49 pm

    That's cool. Music is very subjective, but spelling isn't. Gawd I screwed it up there, eh?

  • 7 - Revtim

    Jul 10, 2005 at 12:41 am

    Tube Pinoy, did you press SHIFT while inserting the disc or turn off autorun? If not, it installed software on your PC without your consent.

    Did the same thing with me, I wasn't paying close enough attention. I had to find the driver called 'SbcpHid' and remove it. Google for 'SbcpHid' for more explicit instructions, if you need to.

  • 8 - Marty Thau

    Jul 10, 2005 at 3:12 pm

    You sure do, Temple -- have opinions, that is -- and you sure are a tough audience. Further, how on earth would YOU know WHY Weiland took drugs? I think you just like to be contraire -- perhaps to be noticed? Why don't you give it a rest already and tell us about something you like with a passion instead of ripping apart musicians to feed your ego.

  • 9 - Temple Stark

    Jul 10, 2005 at 3:23 pm

    Marty, see my other posts here on musicians I like. I'm a contributor at the site and have a huge range of taste in music.

    Just opinions. Everyone's got 'em.

    - Temple

  • 10 - Tube Pinoy

    Jul 10, 2005 at 5:33 pm

    Thanks for the tip, Revtim

  • 11 - Marty Thau

    Jul 10, 2005 at 7:34 pm

    You still haven't answered my question Temple -- how would YOU know WHY Weiland took drugs? Are you a personal friend? Or, did you just write that to stir some waves? Having spent a lifetime in the music biz I know what it feels like to read some writer's fantasies about my personal life that are totally misinformed, or purposely manufactured to be sensational. It hurts. Weiland obviously has had problems that led to drugs but he does deserve credit for picking himself up and going at it again. Actually I'm rooting for him to succeed because of it. One should not be ridiculed for exhibiting human frailty.

  • 12 - Temple Stark

    Jul 10, 2005 at 7:40 pm

    I could be totally wrong. Absolutely. I don't tend to have much sympathy for people who take, well, illegal drugs especially. Prodigal son stories don't work for me. I much more applaud those strong enough not to succumb in the first place.

    I'm sure it was medicinal.

    I want him to succeed, too and do applaud that he has pushed himself to recovery (though really, after rock bottom he didn't have much choice, did he? Other than death and no sane perosn wants him to die prematurely).

    I just wish he had dropped the singing for a successful career in welding.

    Can I no longer have opinions about national politicians either? I'm sure they have feelings, too. Somewhere.

  • 13 - H.W. Saxton

    Jul 10, 2005 at 7:58 pm

    Marty, This is unrelated to this thread but:When is someone going to do a complete anthology of Suicide? They have so much good material languishing in semi-obscurity. Undeservedly I might add. I've got all the LP releases,the 12' of "Dream Baby Dream", all of Alan's solo stuff and some of Marty's. There are a lot of obscure tracks by them such as : "Speed Queen,Rock N Roll Rebel,Rock N Roll Is Killing My Life and so many others that deserve a wider release. They are to me such an underrated and influential band. Without them there would not have been the 80's electro-pop boom, the No Wave scene, a lot of the electro funk out of NYC (Baambata,ESG,Liquid Liquid) and much more. At least not to the extent there was. Just curious as I could not think of a band that are more deserving of a wider release and recognition.They are still so far ahead of their time musically. PS: Strange as it may seem one of the first songs I taught myself on the guitar was "Ghost Rider". Lots of fuzz and a little tremolo and delay...

  • 14 - Marty Thau

    Jul 10, 2005 at 9:08 pm

    Temple, you can have opinions about anyone you like. Why don't you try, though, to be a bit more honest and accurate. Now you're coming across as just another hungry for recognition sarcastic gossip hack.
    Unfortunately people like you do succeed -- but no-one really likes them.

  • 15 - Temple Stark

    Jul 10, 2005 at 9:22 pm

    I thought I was just answering your question instead of ignoring you. I'm at the site, not waiting with baited breath for you to reply, but for editing duties.

    If you've got a Jones for SW and STP is your favorite band - great.

    "People like me?" "Gossip hack?" (I freely admit to the sarcastic) Now where did that come from? Who's attacking now?

    Have more fun and answer HW's query. Sheesh.

  • 16 - Omni Temporal

    Jul 10, 2005 at 9:38 pm

    That's "bated" breath, not "baited" breath. Thank you.

  • 17 - H.W. Saxton

    Jul 10, 2005 at 9:41 pm

    Fishermen wait with "baited" breath. Aha ha ha. Sorry.

  • 18 - Temple Stark

    Jul 10, 2005 at 9:47 pm

    what the fuck ever. LOL Man you guys .. you're cracking me up - literally. And correct.

  • 19 - Marty Thau

    Jul 11, 2005 at 12:26 am

    Temple, you never did answer my question and you know it. You skirted around it and threw in your usual cutesy savage sarcastic crap. That's all. You're part of the new breed of "paparazzi" writers -- who will say and do anything to be noticed.

    MT

  • 20 - Victor Plenty

    Jul 11, 2005 at 12:36 am

    Actually Temple did answer your question, Marty.

  • 21 - Marty Thau

    Jul 11, 2005 at 4:24 am

    Not to my satisfaction, Victor.

  • 22 - Victor Plenty

    Jul 11, 2005 at 5:01 am

    If you can't find satisfaction when someone admits "I could be totally wrong" about an opinion, you are setting yourself up for disappointment.

  • 23 - Marty Thau

    Jul 11, 2005 at 7:14 am

    "I COULD BE WRONG?" What kind of admission is that, Victor? How about I WAS WRONG TO WRITE THAT!
    THAT should have been the answer - not some half-assed admission of guilt.

  • 24 - Victor Plenty

    Jul 11, 2005 at 12:07 pm

    An admission of "guilt" may be what you wanted in the privacy of your own mind, Marty, but that was never the question you asked Temple. What you actually asked was how he knew the reasons for Weiland's drug use.

    He answered your question by admitting he had no such personal knowledge. In doing so he made it sufficiently clear for any reasonable reader to understand that his comments were speculative personal opinions, not insider revelations.

    If you were expecting him to perform the written equivalent of craving your lordly pardon and humbly licking the bottom of your shoe, you'd better get used to disappointment.

  • 25 - Marty Thau

    Jul 11, 2005 at 2:47 pm

    Victor, Temple wrote Weiland took drugs because he knew he had little talent. I asked Temple how he knew this. He answered by saying he "could" be wrong -- not that he "was" wrong in writing it because he couldn't really back up his statement.
    It was opinion stated as fact. "Could have been wrong" implies the possibility that he also could have been right. "I WAS wrong" was the honest thing to write. Temple skirted the question and you're making this more of an issue than it deserves. Now go back into your little cubicle and mind your own business.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 22, 2013

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs