Q. "How much of a 99-cent iTunes download do I get to keep?" - Recording artist

A. "10 cents."

This sobering Q & A comes from the National Association of Record Industry Professionals (NARIP) iTunes Artist-Producer Royalty Calculation sheet.

More: "For major label artists, Apple collects 34 cents and the label keeps 55 cents."

Wow.

Some things never change.

That acronym - "na-RIP" - is perfect.

[via redferret.net]

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

  • 1 - Eric Olsen

    Sep 22, 2004 at 11:54 am

    good one Joe, thanks, and some tings don't ever change

  • 2 - SFC SKI

    Sep 22, 2004 at 12:08 pm

    Using the conventional arrangement, how much does the artist make?

    Impossible to measure, but if more people will pay for the one good tune an artist produces, rather than forego buying an album of filler and one good tune, is it a gain for the artist?

  • 3 - brad sucks

    Sep 22, 2004 at 1:40 pm

    Pretty understandable considering how much the label invests in promoting and marketing and distributing the artist's music.

    For independents like me though, we get 65 cents off of every iTunes song purchase and $6.50, which is not bad at all.

  • 4 - brad sucks

    Sep 22, 2004 at 1:41 pm

    and I MEANT to say $6.50 off each album purchase.

  • 5 - Al Barger

    Sep 22, 2004 at 7:33 pm

    Heck, 10 percent ain't that bad, if the band is actually getting paid. That's about 10 percent more than most acts ever get.

    Of course, if you're your own label, and getting the label share too, as Brad apparently does, then you're kicking ass.

  • 6 - Tate

    Oct 04, 2008 at 4:49 pm

    Where do the other 10 cents go? 34 + 55 = 89.

  • 7 - Tate

    Oct 04, 2008 at 4:51 pm

    nevermind, i'm dumb

  • 8 - John

    Aug 30, 2009 at 5:03 pm

    So 10 cents go to an artist, who quickly makes more than I do in a year, while 55 cents goes towards the cost of janitors and technicians at the label who actually need the money. Sounds fair to me.

  • 9 - Janitor man

    Dec 05, 2009 at 10:58 pm

    More like 10 cents to the artist, 1 cent to the janitor and technicians and 54 cents to the higher ups.

  • 10 - TB

    Jul 28, 2010 at 8:02 pm

    10 cents go to the artist, when they are with 5 in a band, they need to sell 2.000.000 songs PER YEAR to get the average bruto income of an American citizen. Besides the Lady Gagas and Beyoncés of this world, not many artists can pull this off...

    Not to mention the many websites that offer other peoples music for sale for 20 cent/song illegally, not giving ANY money to the artist.

    So if you want the artist to make another CD of the music you adore so much, next time buy it at the local record store or at a gig.

  • 11 - Joe Alford

    Nov 07, 2010 at 2:50 am

    The ol Hunter S Thompson quote applies here: "The music business is a cruel and shallow money trench, a long plastic hallway where thieves and pimps run free, and good men die like dogs. There's also a negative side."

    We need to go with non profit distribution sites who are willing to not take a percentage. I've found one, not sure they're non-profit or how they make money but supposedly they're 100% free.

  • 12 - Jacob

    Jan 23, 2011 at 10:03 pm

    I'm fine with a label taking 50%, because there are people who get paid and the label should work to promote the artist. I hate how itunes takes 50%, for doing almost nothing!

  • 13 - Alison

    Feb 23, 2011 at 7:21 pm

    So, does that artist actually make any more from record sales if they don't have their own label? Considering the fact that after the record company gets their money, the writer must be paid {more than the artist} and then the producer. There's jack sh*t left.

  • 14 - MMandM

    Mar 16, 2011 at 5:15 pm

    @ Alison - if you're indy, be your own label with the release and you collect the whole 65%. Having said that, I think it apalling that Apple collects this amt for hostng a file. They're actually worse than the industry before it.

  • 15 - duh

    Apr 20, 2011 at 9:46 pm

    Ok... quit bashing apple iTunes, let's be honest, it is better to get 10 cents per song than to not get 10 cents. Ex: I like one or two songs from certain bands. I can find it for free on youtube, and will do so at 15.00$ per album for one song. I, however will pay $0.99 for the one song I want and leave the rest of the album. If there was no itunes the artist would get $0 rather than $0.10. I'm sure I'm not the only person who thinks like this.

  • 16 - Daniel

    Jun 13, 2011 at 2:41 pm

    In my band we get about 25% iTunes gets 30% and label gets about 45%

  • 17 - Al

    Jul 09, 2011 at 9:59 am

    Independant is the way to go plus touring makes alot of money

  • 18 - Emma

    Aug 11, 2011 at 8:39 am

    Local record store? Where'd they all go? Even walmart looks to be marking down cds (to get rid of them)...

  • 19 - SE

    Nov 23, 2011 at 5:20 am

    Brad Sucks left a comment above and I just wanted to say that Brad Sucks is Awesome. Borderline, Making Me Nervous... Classic!

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Feb 10, 2012

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for January

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs