Paul Rodgers to front Queen on tour

CMU is reporting that Queen and Paul Rodgers are going to tour together.

Brian May has confirmed rumours that Queen are planning a reunion tour with
former Free / Bad Company front-man Paul Rodgers taking as lead singer.

Writing on his official website May told fans: "It really all came about because of the Fender 50th Anniversary gig that I did with Paul Rodgers. We were both so amazed at the chemistry that was going on in All Right Now, that suddenly it seems blindingly obvious that there was something happening here. Barring accidents, Queen and Paul Rodgers will be on the road, pretty much for sure, around April 2005"...

I am betting that tickets for these gigs will sell-out damn fast, so get yours right away.

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for marty-dodge

Article Author: Marty Dodge

Latest CD
And Glory new techno thriller

Visit Marty Dodge's author pageMarty Dodge's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

— go to most recent comments
  • 1 - Eric Olsen

    Dec 13, 2004 at 9:26 am

    very interesting news, thanks Marty! What an odd pairing: Paul and Freddy sound about exactly nothing alike

  • 2 - Mark Saleski

    Dec 13, 2004 at 9:55 am

    geezuz! this is almost as weird as finding out about the pairing of elvis costello and diana krall.

  • 3 - Eric Olsen

    Dec 13, 2004 at 10:16 am

    Paul and Freddy won't be living together, however

  • 4 - JR

    Dec 13, 2004 at 10:24 am

    Since the power trio behind Freddie Mercury tended toward sounding like Cream on those early Queen albums, I can see how this could work. They certainly shouldn't call it Queen, but a Paul Rodgers version of "Dragon Attack" or "Tie Your Mother Down" or even "Get Down Make Love" wouldn't be a big stretch.

  • 5 - diane

    Dec 13, 2004 at 10:25 am

    I dunno about this one, I mean, it doesn't sound like it would work real well. Is Rodgers going to be SINGING?
    He has a great voice and all but not anything like Freddy.

  • 6 - Andrew Ian Dodge

    Dec 13, 2004 at 10:29 am

    Its been obvious for a while that Queen want to tour. They have been feeling out several other singers like Robbie Williams.

    I have to say the awesome Paul Rodgers will be a heck alot easier on the ears that hearing someone like Robbie butcher the songs. The fact that you will get Free/Bad Co and PR's solo stuff as well is a bonus.

  • 7 - Mark Saleski

    Dec 13, 2004 at 11:56 am

    too bad there's so much bad karma with george michael....because he's the one.

    seriously.

  • 8 - Bill Lamb

    Dec 13, 2004 at 2:33 pm

    All of the comments seem to add up to what I believe - there isn't another Freddy.

    Paul Rodgers has the vocal chops but nothing approaching the showmanship that so many of Queen's classics demand.

    I think the George Michael suggestion is an intriguing one, but George Michael really is a ballad and R&B/Dance singer...I really can't see him tackling the more overt Rock material.

    Personally...I wish the remaining Queen members would move on with a different project with a different name. Freddy was an integral part of Queen...he was THE queen...and can't be replaced.

  • 9 - Lono

    Dec 14, 2004 at 2:19 am

    I can't say I am even remotely excited about this. Sadly, it seems Paul Rodgers has fallen to become simply a characiture of his swinging 70s self. He doesn't treat the Bad Company catalogue with reverence these days. His live versions sound like tacky vegas lounge singer covers. This saddens me because I love Bad Company.

    As for the queen aspect of this, I would advise the band to let sleeping dogs lie.

  • 10 - Shark

    Dec 14, 2004 at 8:53 am

    Queen?

    Jeez, aren't they dead?

    Shouldn't they be touring with Lynard Skynard?

    Man, when greed meets nostalgia, anything is possible.

    Have some integrity:

    Boycott this dead horse.

  • 11 - Eric Olsen

    Dec 14, 2004 at 9:03 am

    my main concern with this from a fidelity standpoint is that I can't imagine Rodgers throwing himself fully into the "mincier" elements of the Queen ouevre, as would be required

  • 12 - Mark Saleski

    Dec 14, 2004 at 9:44 am

    but George Michael really is a ballad and R&B/Dance singer...I really can't see him tackling the more overt Rock material.

    the only reason i suggested this is that i remember seeing him on that Freddy Mercury tribute many years back....and was very surprised to see how well he handled the material. tunes like "Somebody To Love" are all over the place and he was right there with 'em.

  • 13 - Eric Olsen

    Dec 14, 2004 at 9:50 am

    and he rocked pretty well on "Faith"

    I think George would be a much better fit than Rodgers but he is all serious and adult these days - I don't think he wants to be seen as "flamboyant" either

  • 14 - Andrew Ian Dodge

    Dec 14, 2004 at 10:11 am

    Heh, one might expect Queen to concentrate more on the more rocker/metal side of their repetoire. I rather doubt they will do some uber-camp like "i'm going slight mad' or 'Crazy Think Called Love'. He certainly has the pipes for 'We will Rock You' et al.

  • 15 - SFC Ski

    Dec 14, 2004 at 11:23 am

    Damn, sHark, is there anything that doesn't piss you off these days?

  • 16 - Mark Saleski

    Dec 14, 2004 at 11:36 am

    Damn, sHark, is there anything that doesn't piss you off these days?

    anna kournikova.

    maybe.

  • 17 - djradiohead

    Dec 15, 2004 at 6:04 pm

    This idea is about as good as Ian Astbury filling in for Jim Morrison on a 'Doors' reunion tour.

  • 18 - djradiohead

    Dec 15, 2004 at 6:06 pm

    This idea is about as good as Ian Astbury filling in for Jim Morrison on a 'Doors' reunion tour.

  • 19 - Shark

    Dec 15, 2004 at 10:46 pm

    re: PFC SKI: "Damn, sHark, is there anything that doesn't piss you off these days?"

    Babe, I never get pissed off. I just point out the underlying Canons of Life when viewed through the distorted lens of my inner Peter Finch:

    "...when greed meets nostalgia, anything is possible."

    You can quote me, mano.

    And yer welcome.

  • 20 - Shark

    Dec 15, 2004 at 10:47 pm

    Saleski, re: anna kournikova --

    Hey, at this point in life, if it's carbon-based and got legs...

  • 21 - Temple Stark

    Dec 16, 2004 at 1:38 am

    Figures a shark would be a leg man

  • 22 - Temple Stark

    Dec 16, 2004 at 1:46 am

    anything (well .. ) that gets Queen songs back out there is a good thing. Rodgers can hit the high notes - and he's English (right?) so he'll like dressing up in women's clothing or camping it up a bit.

  • 23 - Kari

    Dec 16, 2004 at 5:14 pm

    i can't think of anybody in this whole world besides paul rodgers who has the vocal talents to even consider filling freddy's shoes george michaels may be a queen but he is no queen you go paul

  • 24 - Marc Katz

    Dec 19, 2004 at 6:13 pm

    An Open Letter To Brian May & Roger Taylor

    “The Show Must” Not “Go On”!
    (as presently lined up)

    Dear Brian & Roger,

    I have been a FAN of your music for the last 27 years!! I was very fortunate to see QUEEN live in the late 70’s & early 80’s as well as “The Brian May Band” in 1993.

    I love your music. It has helped me get through my personal journey in life as well as uplift my spirits to play music myself & to carry on. You are the Greatest!!

    When I first heard of the plans for a tour with Paul Rodgers, I was ecstatic! As my hunger to see you live again is ravaging (I amongst others " In the STATES).

    After seeing & listening to the QUEEN " On Fire 1982 tour, it brought back found memories because I saw the show at Madison Square Garden during the late Summer of 1982.

    Excellent show, as always. However, it struck me extremely deeply that Freddie (especially during this performance) was undoubtedly as irreplaceable as John Lennon was to the Beatles. Including many other deceased mega-legends.

    One question that has always puzzled me is that both of you (Roger & Brian) are accomplished lead singers in your own right. This is no secret to anyone.

    In closing, I would greatly appreciate it if you would reconsider a new QUEEN line up of:

    Roger Taylor (lead vocals, percussion), Brian May (lead vocals, the Red Special), John Deacon (our “illustrious” bass player) and Spike Edney on Piano & Keys.
    {Please John}. (Even Tim Staffell would be an ideal addition)?

    Please know that I admire Paul Rodgers very much; as I do other lead singers, but if I may say, without Freddie, it may be a tad emotional.

    AND FOR ALL YOU QUEEN FANS & OTHERS

    1) The Rock band QUEEN was founded by Brian May & Roger Taylor from the ashes of “SMILE”. Listen to the record!!
    2) Approximately 63% of all QUEEN material was written by Brian, Roger & John.
    3) Roger & Brian are LEAD VOCALISTS.
    4) QUEEN is a Rock Band, not one person!
    In closing please accept my letter as just an opinion from an emotional & one of a Billion or so
    QUEEN admires.

    Thank you for reading.
    Be Well,

    Marc Katz
    Richmond, Maine U.S.A.
    marc@wiscasset.net

  • 25 - jcara

    Dec 19, 2004 at 9:10 pm

    I heard Paul Rogers do the intro to BR once before, and it gave the song a great feeling, much like Paul Mcartney when he did HELP at half tempo on the solo tour in 88

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Feb 13, 2012

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for January

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs