U2—Please, please, please don’t ever cover U2. Their songs are perfect the way they are. But if you must, please don’t try to sound like them. You can’t do it right and no one will enjoy listening to it. Trick it up. Make it your own. And don’t try to sound like The Edge. Sorry, this is as objective as I can be about U2. You should have heard what I wanted to write.
Eminem—I don’t get this guy and his act has already been done by people who can sing and play their own instruments—at the same time!
Jessica Simpson—There is no reason for any of this young lady’s music to be heard anywhere or by anyone.
Kid Rock—This guy doesn’t know it but he would make a great 80s Christian artist. He makes his living sounding like a knock-off of artists from the past.
System of a Down—What do you like better, their worship or their praise?
Monty Python have got nothing on Pat Boone. You want absurd, this is the pinnacle. No comedy writer in his/her dreams could have dreamt up anything even half as stupid. The mere idea of Pat Boone, Mr. ...
I don't get it. Are these bands that Christian musicians shouldn't cover, or that no one should cover? By your descriptions you don't seem to like the bands in question, but I don't see the connection with christian music.
Evanescence IS NOT a Christian band. And item 8 should be "Jessica Simpson", not "Jennifer", but the admonishment still applies.
5 -
Vern Halen
Jun 08, 2005 at 1:26 pm
They're covering secular material because, I hate to say it, most Christian music is poorly written. Nothing against Christians or music, but the approach to the subject matter is very narrow, and so there aren't many great songs developed. But listen to U2's cover of Woody Guthrie's Jesus Christ - the song & the performance are brilliant, and just make you wanna stand up and Hallaleujah!!!
i've said this before around here somewhere, but folk singer Greg Brown characterizes modern christian music as "Praise the Lord, Let's Go To The Mall!".
Occasionally, Christian artists do fantastic covers that are well worth listening to. Specific examples include Phil Keaggy's brilliant cover of Badfinger's "Baby Blue", his in-concert staples "Here Comes The Sun" and "Blackbird", and Keaggy's collaborations with Neal Morse on the bonus disc of "One", including another terrific Badfinger cover ("Day After Day"), George Harrison ("What Is Life"), The Who ("Sparks") and yes, U2 ("Where The Streets Have No Name"). Morse also did an entire Beatles cover set after his religious awakening ("Yellow Matter Custard").
Wow, someone has just been called an idiot by a person whose idea of a good online moniker is the nursery-school nickname of a man more famous for the people with whom he has been romantically linked than any actual musical accomplishments, but not even punctuated correctly!
Someone got told!
13 -
Adam
Sep 21, 2005 at 2:07 pm
I just want to know, why the specific attack at christian cover songs. It's almost a rule of the music industry that cover songs are going to suck, they don't have to be christian to do so. take Limp Bizkits cover of Behind Blue Eyes, quite possibly the worst cover ever. For one thing it totally missed the message behind the song, and it cut out the part of the song where it picks up (on the lyric "if i swallow anything evil...") and instead turned a fantastic song from one of the greatest bands in rock history into 3 minutes of wrist-slitting crap. Or Out of Your Mouth's cover of Music in which the lead singer expertly manages to make every single lyric in the song sound exactly the same as the next (not that the original song was that good anyway). A Pefect Circle's Imagine, any one of the million covers of Wonderwall, Samiam's cover of Here Comes your Man. Cover's will suck no matter, you don't have to be a christian to make a song sucks, but apparently if you can start a blog topic of that matter you're an expert on was makes music acceptable. Perhaps if Christian music is so repulsively vomit enducing to you, you should make an executive decision when the song comes on the radio: turn it off. The bands aren't forcing you to listen to their music.
What about secular artists covering Christian music -- like the Byrds on Sweetheart of the Rodeo singing the old Louvin Brothers chestnut "The Christian Life"? which was before Roger McGuinn became an evangelical Christian, by the way.
I didn't know Christian recording artists wrere into secular covers, although it doesn't surprise me -- as has been stated, most Christian rock tends not to be very good rock, unfortunately. It's pretty much always been that way -- even Keaggy's stuff tends toward the corny and sentimental.
Ever heard of Larry Norman? Now there was a guy who could straddle both worlds. He had this record about 25 years or so ago called Only Visiting This Planet that was unashamedly devout and which rocked pretty gracefully as well.
I'm sure there have been others, but if I want Christian music I'll listen to pure twangy gospel -- which is not trying to be anything other than what it is.
yeah, ummm Joe. This article really is a joke. Youre ideals of a good cover song are a joke. hahaha. I got it, buddy. Good one.
17 -
michael n. ferry
May 25, 2006 at 2:57 am
whether it's a joke or not, doing a cover has it pros and cons,
if ever "christian bands" will cover a song composed or done by "non christians" the reason would fall to any or some of the following reasons:
1. they like the song so they will do their own rendition;
2. they like the song but they loathe the way it was performed so they're gonna fix it in a way they think it's better;
3. they're using the song as if a bait, a magnet or something to attract people and later on introduce their own "spiritual thing";
4. they treated music (regardless of their label) as a gift entrusted by the Creator to the stewards who will use it wisely in a right place, and in a right time with a right motive or objectives;
5. they're going to sing the song because they have already "redeemed it" or "brought it back";
6. they are going to sing a song to emphasize a certain part of the lyrics, or to sahre the story behind of it with some kind of lesson to be learned or to honor the composer, writer, lyricist
18 -
Jeremy
Jan 16, 2008 at 12:01 pm
I'm not a fan of Christian covers of secular songs. Not one bit. The original song was written with a particular meaning in mind, and regardless of the cover band's interpretation, the original meaning of the song will always remain intact. So, to all the bands and artists I enjoy listening to: sorry, I'm deleting the songs you've covered out of my iTunes. Be original, or at the very least, perform music that truly and originally glorifies God.
19 -
Crystal
Jun 11, 2008 at 1:22 pm
Please. There are many good independent Christian artists. Many of which are alternative and like industrial, punk, metal, gothic, etc. For instance, take the band Flyleaf. Amazing band, beautiful, creative lyrics which sound wayyy better than Evanescence. Or the band, Plumb. Her music is amazing and she has actually WRITTEN songs for secular artists such as Mandy Moore, Michelle Branch, and others. Evanescence actually quoted Plumb as one of their inspirations. So, not all Christian music sucks.
20 -
Jon S.
Aug 12, 2008 at 1:36 pm
There are the rare good Christian bands who have a unique sound that they develop out of passion for music, but the majority try to sound like big-name mainstream bands...and fail. I grew up listening to Christian bands only because that's what my parents desired. Now that I'm on my own, I've began expanding my library to mainstream and indie music, and I realized that while I was listening to only Christian bands, I stopped listening to the lyrics. The lyrics were usually cheesy cliches that no one can really connect to. Now I'm trying to train myself to listen to the words again as I'm finding a lot of wisdom and truth in the mainstream and indie bands. There are still a lot of non-Christian bands that also try to mimic big-name bands, and those are the ones that are equally reproachable as the Christian bands. My biggest challenge to everyone is to start listening to the lyrics and really figuring out what they're saying: is it something meaningful or something to rake in some cash?
Article comments
1 - Tan Hoang
Britney Spears should be on this list too.
2 - James
There is no reason to listen to Xn music, ever! How can people listen to that crap without vomiting after 10 minutes of it? if not sooner?
3 - Mat Brewster
I don't get it. Are these bands that Christian musicians shouldn't cover, or that no one should cover? By your descriptions you don't seem to like the bands in question, but I don't see the connection with christian music.
4 - DhammaSeeker
Evanescence IS NOT a Christian band. And item 8 should be "Jessica Simpson", not "Jennifer", but the admonishment still applies.
5 - Vern Halen
They're covering secular material because, I hate to say it, most Christian music is poorly written. Nothing against Christians or music, but the approach to the subject matter is very narrow, and so there aren't many great songs developed. But listen to U2's cover of Woody Guthrie's Jesus Christ - the song & the performance are brilliant, and just make you wanna stand up and Hallaleujah!!!
If only all Christian music sounded so spiritual.
6 - Mark Saleski
i've said this before around here somewhere, but folk singer Greg Brown characterizes modern christian music as "Praise the Lord, Let's Go To The Mall!".
...which seems just about right.
7 - The Proprietor
Occasionally, Christian artists do fantastic covers that are well worth listening to. Specific examples include Phil Keaggy's brilliant cover of Badfinger's "Baby Blue", his in-concert staples "Here Comes The Sun" and "Blackbird", and Keaggy's collaborations with Neal Morse on the bonus disc of "One", including another terrific Badfinger cover ("Day After Day"), George Harrison ("What Is Life"), The Who ("Sparks") and yes, U2 ("Where The Streets Have No Name"). Morse also did an entire Beatles cover set after his religious awakening ("Yellow Matter Custard").
8 - Phillip Winn
Phil Keaggy is the except to nearly every rule.
9 - Henry Porter
My idea of great (not to mention uncompromising) Christian music.
10 - Vern Halen
Yeah, I guess Phil Keaggy is living proof that being a good musician doesn't mean you've got to sell your soul to the debbil.
11 - Pdiddy
you're an idiot.
12 - Phillip Winn
Wow, someone has just been called an idiot by a person whose idea of a good online moniker is the nursery-school nickname of a man more famous for the people with whom he has been romantically linked than any actual musical accomplishments, but not even punctuated correctly!
Someone got told!
13 - Adam
I just want to know, why the specific attack at christian cover songs. It's almost a rule of the music industry that cover songs are going to suck, they don't have to be christian to do so. take Limp Bizkits cover of Behind Blue Eyes, quite possibly the worst cover ever. For one thing it totally missed the message behind the song, and it cut out the part of the song where it picks up (on the lyric "if i swallow anything evil...") and instead turned a fantastic song from one of the greatest bands in rock history into 3 minutes of wrist-slitting crap. Or Out of Your Mouth's cover of Music in which the lead singer expertly manages to make every single lyric in the song sound exactly the same as the next (not that the original song was that good anyway). A Pefect Circle's Imagine, any one of the million covers of Wonderwall, Samiam's cover of Here Comes your Man. Cover's will suck no matter, you don't have to be a christian to make a song sucks, but apparently if you can start a blog topic of that matter you're an expert on was makes music acceptable. Perhaps if Christian music is so repulsively vomit enducing to you, you should make an executive decision when the song comes on the radio: turn it off. The bands aren't forcing you to listen to their music.
14 - Joe Battista
Adam,
If you're really interested, the article was meant as a joke. Most people got it.
By the way, there's a pretty good cover of America's "Lonely People" on the latest Jars of Clay album.
15 - Rodney Welch
What about secular artists covering Christian music -- like the Byrds on Sweetheart of the Rodeo singing the old Louvin Brothers chestnut "The Christian Life"? which was before Roger McGuinn became an evangelical Christian, by the way.
I didn't know Christian recording artists wrere into secular covers, although it doesn't surprise me -- as has been stated, most Christian rock tends not to be very good rock, unfortunately. It's pretty much always been that way -- even Keaggy's stuff tends toward the corny and sentimental.
Ever heard of Larry Norman? Now there was a guy who could straddle both worlds. He had this record about 25 years or so ago called Only Visiting This Planet that was unashamedly devout and which rocked pretty gracefully as well.
I'm sure there have been others, but if I want Christian music I'll listen to pure twangy gospel -- which is not trying to be anything other than what it is.
16 - Jim Sawyer
yeah, ummm Joe. This article really is a joke. Youre ideals of a good cover song are a joke. hahaha. I got it, buddy. Good one.
17 - michael n. ferry
whether it's a joke or not, doing a cover has it pros and cons,
if ever "christian bands" will cover a song composed or done by "non christians" the reason would fall to any or some of the following reasons:
1. they like the song so they will do their own rendition;
2. they like the song but they loathe the way it was performed so they're gonna fix it in a way they think it's better;
3. they're using the song as if a bait, a magnet or something to attract people and later on introduce their own "spiritual thing";
4. they treated music (regardless of their label) as a gift entrusted by the Creator to the stewards who will use it wisely in a right place, and in a right time with a right motive or objectives;
5. they're going to sing the song because they have already "redeemed it" or "brought it back";
6. they are going to sing a song to emphasize a certain part of the lyrics, or to sahre the story behind of it with some kind of lesson to be learned or to honor the composer, writer, lyricist
18 - Jeremy
I'm not a fan of Christian covers of secular songs. Not one bit. The original song was written with a particular meaning in mind, and regardless of the cover band's interpretation, the original meaning of the song will always remain intact. So, to all the bands and artists I enjoy listening to: sorry, I'm deleting the songs you've covered out of my iTunes. Be original, or at the very least, perform music that truly and originally glorifies God.
19 - Crystal
Please. There are many good independent Christian artists. Many of which are alternative and like industrial, punk, metal, gothic, etc. For instance, take the band Flyleaf. Amazing band, beautiful, creative lyrics which sound wayyy better than Evanescence. Or the band, Plumb. Her music is amazing and she has actually WRITTEN songs for secular artists such as Mandy Moore, Michelle Branch, and others. Evanescence actually quoted Plumb as one of their inspirations. So, not all Christian music sucks.
20 - Jon S.
There are the rare good Christian bands who have a unique sound that they develop out of passion for music, but the majority try to sound like big-name mainstream bands...and fail. I grew up listening to Christian bands only because that's what my parents desired. Now that I'm on my own, I've began expanding my library to mainstream and indie music, and I realized that while I was listening to only Christian bands, I stopped listening to the lyrics. The lyrics were usually cheesy cliches that no one can really connect to. Now I'm trying to train myself to listen to the words again as I'm finding a lot of wisdom and truth in the mainstream and indie bands. There are still a lot of non-Christian bands that also try to mimic big-name bands, and those are the ones that are equally reproachable as the Christian bands. My biggest challenge to everyone is to start listening to the lyrics and really figuring out what they're saying: is it something meaningful or something to rake in some cash?