Music Review: The Rolling Stones - Flowers

Part of: The Discographer

Record companies like cash cows. When their cash cows take longer to produce an album than in the past, the record companies begin looking around for a way to make money. And so the Flowers album was born.

As Mick Jagger and Keith Richards began writing most of the material for their albums, the time between the releases lengthened. In addition Keith, Brian, and Mick were having problems with the law due to various drug offenses and assorted girlfriends who began occupying more of their time.

Flowers was cobbled together by their American record label, London. It consisted of singles that had not appeared on an American album, tracks that were exclusive to English releases, plus a few unreleased songs that had been hanging around. All of these mismatched songs added up to an uneven album that was helped by a few very good parts.

The hit single “Have You Seen Your Mother Baby Standing In The Shadows” is an essential Stones rocker. “Mother’s Little Helper” finally made its debut on an American Stones album after reaching the top ten as the A side of the “Lady Jane” release. This less than positive ode to housewives was a good companion to the “Mothers” single.

“Ruby Tuesday,” “Let’s Spend The Night Together,” and “Lady Jane” were recycled quickly and while they are all excellent songs, they had been released in the past year both as album cuts and singles.

“Back Street Girl” from the English Between The Buttons” features a nice acoustic guitar sound set against an accordion of all things. The unreleased “Sittin’ On A Fence” from 1965 features a creative Richards-Jones acoustic guitar duet. The unreleased “My Girl” is terrible. I can only imagine what the Temptations thought when they heard this Rollings Stones interpretation of their song.  

While The Rolling Stones had little input into the making of Flowers, years later Charlie Watts stated Mick Jagger left the leaves off of the flower stem supporting Brian Jones face on the album jacket on purpose. Brian was becoming less dependable in the studio and particularly on the road and Jagger and Richards continued to become closer.

Flowers was a hit and rose to number three on the American charts. The record company ended up very happy. While at the time it may have been interesting in places, today it is unessential. Flowers is only for Rolling Stones fans who want everything.

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for david-bowling

Article Author: David Bowling

I have been collecting vinyl records for over forty years and my collection is approaching 50.000 records. My wife Susan and children, Stacey and Amy, have learned to humor my passion. I am now settled in beautiful Whispering Pines, North Carolina …

Visit David Bowling's author pageDavid Bowling's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - Rob

    Jun 03, 2008 at 2:38 am

    Yes; well put.

  • 2 - Tony Oresteen

    Feb 10, 2009 at 1:22 pm

    Dissagree. It IS esential if you want to put Aftermath & Between The Buttons in the original track order of the UK releases (and not buy the UK versions). The only song missing from Aftermath is 'What To Do' which can be found on Fazed Cookies.

    Having grown up overseas in the 60's I had the UK versions of the Stones and Beatles albums and I prefer the UK track order. I was in the USA when Flowers came out and wore out the album.

  • 3 - Pamela J. Smith

    Jan 12, 2010 at 5:55 am

    Disagree - Flowers is one of my favorite Rolling Stone Albums - I got it as soon as it came out and I too wore the grooves off the album -

  • 4 - Trudy

    Oct 23, 2010 at 7:14 pm

    Flowers rocks. End of story.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.