What it is, at least, is a bit fresh and a different perspective from which to view the music of the Beatles. After hearing the Beatles at some point, day-in and day-out, for the past 40 years for most people in the Western world, why aren't we all welcoming any change up to the sounds? Great as they are, it's nice to hear something a little different once in a while.
Most of all, Love is simply fun to hear. Let go all the preconceived notions, drop all the pretense associated with the Beatles after 40 years of deification, forget their status, and Love flows like a bunch of great music, nearly non-stop from beginning to end. It's hard to imagine any 80 minute stream of music having no stumbles, but Love manages to work - that's the magic of the Beatles at their best, I suppose, but there's more at play here than simply the magic of those great tunes they wrote so long ago. What really sells this set is what some have such a hard time with: the constant segues between songs, as if the whole album were nearly one long song. But buried in that mix are neat little nuggets for the Beatles die-hards - parts of songs that had been previously buried or parts that had never seen the light of day before, brought out by the Martins especially for this set. Love should be a treasure trove for the fans looking for new details to dig into.
What one can hope to get out of this, as a general Beatles fan, however, is this: the hope that these remixes are a glimpse of the future, a first strike perhaps, of the much-hinted at Beatles remastering campaign coming in 2007. If Love is any indication of what the old Beatles tapes can sound like after much tender restoration, the remasters will satisfy all but those audiophiles for whom anything other than the original, virgin vinyl is the peak of perfection. And I'll go one further: I'm hoping that Love's remixing is a hint that the Martins and the remaining Beatles went back to the original master tapes and remixed the albums, not to try and erase their origins but simply to make them sound as clean and crisp as possible.
Article comments
1 - Nik
Good review, and I like your take on the disc. I think my main problem with the disc, now that I've had more time to chew on it, is that I bought into the hype of it being a "mashup" or somesuch and was disappointed to consider it pretty tame as "mixing" up things went. That said, the more I listen to it the more blown away I am by the sound... and already putting another mortgage on the house in anticipation of buying the remastered albums whenever they appear. They get us every time!
2 - Tom Johnson
I think I went into this with the belief that there was no way they'd go with something as radical as a real mashup, Nik. I just couldn't believe they'd do something that could alienate the massive older fanbase they have who would absolutely not appreciate a move like that.
Something I wish I'd thought more about is what impact projects like this (and Let It Be Naked) are having on the legacy of the Beatles. Are they watering down the power of their catalog, or are they keeping their name out there, somewhat refreshened for younger ears that may not be already into them? A topic for another time, I suppose . . .
3 - Robert Rouse
I've listened to this album six times now - twice in 5.1 surround sound, and what I take away from it each time is something new - no pun intended. Even the songs that sound as if they're "untouched" have a richer stereo mix than ever before. The word that keeps coming to my mind is "soundscape". A lot of die hard Beatles fans aren't even giving "Love" a chance - and they have no idea what they're missing. I am probably more of a die-hard fan than most fans - my son's name is Harrison, my daughter is McCartney - and as long as Sir George Martin is at the mixing console, I have utter faith that he will protect the legacy he helped form.
I too am hoping Martin gets together with Giles, Paul and Ringo and does a "cleaning" of all the old discs, I have no problem purchasing all of them again for the fourth time. But he had better hurry. Martin is 80 years young - he needs to get this done.
A side note, as I listened to "Get Back", "Let It Be", etc. I was reminded of how much better the "Let It Be" album might have been with Martin in charge of production instead of Phil Spector.
4 - Jeremy
Except bringing out the re-mastered material, I did not find anything exciting on the album.
Gilles Martin- son gets a toy- access to the material no one else had before, uses technology to polish it, has couple of good ideas, but not enough talent to make it really something.
George Martin- getting old, trying to put his son's foot in the Beatles world. So the little one does not have to search for another 10-min-famous Hayley Westenra.
Paul, Ringo and Yoko- fighting for the Beatles legacy the wrong way through not very inspiring recycling of the old and stepping on the fingers of everyone who has talent, wants to play with their music and actually show its greatness from different perspectives, not only the Apple-approved one.
And while Beatles are proud to be in a circus, Gramophone magazine compares Bono to Beethoven :):):). Maybe Beatles should hire Ruffi for their "legacy" project.
5 - Connie Phillips
Congrats! This article has been forwarded to the Advance.net websites.
6 - Connie Phillips
Congratulations! This article was an Editor's Pick this week.
7 - Brad Schader
Thank you for the review. I kept hearing about this "new" Beatles album, but had no idea what people were talking about. I heard "mash-up", but am old when it comes to music and had no idea what that was. This sounds interesting.