Music Review: Love - Forever Changes (Deluxe Collector's Edition)

If ever an album has warranted the deluxe remastering treatment so prevalent among classic rock albums these days, it is Love's Forever Changes.

So you might be scratching your head and thinking to yourself right about now, "Who? What?" and in that regard you would not be alone.

Although the 1968 release is now regarded by many music critics as one of the best albums ever made — it is often mentioned with the same tone of reverence held for such landmarks as Sgt. Pepper and Pet Sounds, and recently came in at a very respectable #40 on one of those Rolling Stone Best Albums Of All Time lists — the record barely registered a yawn when it first came out.

Love's third and final album didn't even make the Billboard Top 20 back then, peaking at a dismal #154. Even on today's classic rock stations, chances are you won't hear it sandwiched between the Stones/Beatles/Zeppelin rotation — well, outside of maybe the occasional play that the lead track "Alone Again Or" might get, anyway.

Often dismissed at the time as Elektra's "other band," few are aware that it was Love who first introduced the Doors (who often opened shows for them back then) to execs at the label.

love2Even so, Forever Changes stands as a landmark recording.

The songs on the record, mostly written by the group's late genius, guitarist Arthur Lee, capture the psychedelic folk-rock vibe of the period without sounding at all dated today (well, okay, maybe just a little). They also feature some of the most complex song structures and chord changes this side of the more often praised Brian Wilson or Lennon and McCartney. It's also no accident that no less an artist than Jimi Hendrix has cited Lee as a primary influence.

So the best news here is that the remastering job on disc one is a doozy. Lee's guitar in particular rings like a bell on this crystal clear revisit of the original recording. On tracks like "Alone Again Or" the orchestral arrangements are also cleaned up quite a bit from the original, which occasionally suffered from being a bit muddy sounding. Ditto for the strings on "Andmoreagain," which sound sweeter than ever.

But much like Sgt. Pepper or Pet Sounds, the songs on Forever Changes are not meant to be taken in individual doses, but rather as a more complete sounding whole.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for glen-boyd

Article Author: Glen Boyd

You'll find Blogcritics music editor Glen Boyd sharing his Thoughtmares on his personal blogs The World Wide Glen, and The Rockologist. Glen is also the author of Neil Young FAQ, scheduled for a spring 2012 release by Backbeat Books/Hal Leonard …

Visit Glen Boyd's author pageGlen Boyd's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

  • 1 - James Baldwin

    Apr 20, 2008 at 1:53 pm

    You are a good writer. I enjoyed the read very much.
    Thank you,
    James Baldwin
    Spokane WA
    My site (drop in anytime).

  • 2 - Glen Boyd

    Apr 21, 2008 at 2:58 am

    Thank you for the kind words James. But, and I say this with all due respect, Melanie? In the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame?

    -Glen

  • 3 - Boba Ganoush

    Jul 26, 2008 at 2:26 am

    How this album could be number 40 is beyond me.
    It should be among the top five rock cd's of all time:
    1. Love - Forever Changes
    2. Pink Floyd - Dark Side of The Moon
    3. The Beatles - Rubber Soul
    4. Rolling Stones - Let it Bleed
    5. Television - Marquee Moon

    Arthur Lee was a out and out genius. The reason that Love never made it was simple - they refused to tour and did not really get along. This was a band which was clearly way ahead of its time.
    The greatest album in rock history in a great new
    release.
    Thank You Very Much!

  • 4 - Sam Williams

    Nov 11, 2009 at 9:32 am

    Quite a poor piece of reviewing, firstly the album was released is 1967, and it was not Love's final album, although it was the last with all the 'Forever Changes' lineup on a record together. The fact that it could have been the soundtrack to "dippy sixties movies with all of the hippies dancing around" is a very misleading comment, the album has much darker undertones than what was the norm from period, despite the pyschadelic influences.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Feb 14, 2012

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for January

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs