Movie Review - The Omen (2006)

Author: JessaPublished: Jun 07, 2006 at 5:19 am 3 comments

Remakes of classic films are very hard to pull off successfully. Most recent remakes hack the original to bits. In the case of The Omen, nothing has changed at all, but this does not make it any better than the original. Rather, it makes you question why this film was ever made in the first place. The original film took on a life of its own and become a part of our popular culture. After its release, parents refused to name their sons Damien and boys with the name probably got a lot of crap, especially if they had bowl-style haircuts.  


The remake is brought into the present day to incorporate the usage of technology and make it "hip" and relatable to young people. This means that those in danger have mobile phones to call for help and photographers wanting to prove a point can just "blow up" photos on their Apple Macs, instead of showing the negatives. Damien has also been given a scooter instead of a tricycle, because that is what all the cool kids at school have these days.

Speaking of fashionable, one aspect of recent supernatural films is the blubbering idiot of a priest. They are so incoherent, they don't start making sense until we stop paying attention and begin the ever-straining task of trying to read our watches in the dark. I understand that simply walking up to someone and saying, "By the way? Your son? Not yours. Son of the Devil. Oh, and a Jackal.", is far fetched and laughable, but the blubbering idiot has been done. It's time to go, blubbering priest.

The casting in this film falls flat on its face and that's one of the major problems with it. Whilst a good actress, Julia Stiles is far too young to be playing Katherine Thorn — the "mother" of Damien (Seamus Davey-Fitzpatrick). Stiles is too fresh-faced to make the audience believe that time has gone by in the film as we see Damien grow. The 14-year age gap between her and co-star Liev Schreiber is also much too apparent, making for an unconvincing married couple. Take the scene where Robert (Schreiber) is tending to Katherine's wounds — it almost looks like a father is tending to his child. Stiles does what she can with the role, but she doesn't quite pull it off.

Schreiber takes on the role of Robert Thorn, previously played by Gregory Peck. Schreiber does well in creating a much more tortured and flawed character who grapples with the secret of how Damien became his “son.” He also plays a fantastic anti-hero — someone who doesn't suddenly inherit the power of martial arts like everyone else seems to these days. On the other hand, Robert Thorn’s constant refusal to believe that Damien is the Anti-Christ, even after all the strange and unexplainable instances that occurred, made me want to whack him in the face.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for jessa

Article Author: Jessa


Jessa Kay attends a School of Communications and Contemporary Arts within a university in Australia. This means absolutely nothing
at all. Specialising in Interactive Multimedia and programming, Jessa spends most of her time on a computer where she grows

Visit Jessa's author pageJessa's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • The Omen The Omen

    After The Exorcist sparked a lengthy trend of supernatural thrillers, this 1976 horror film scored a hit with critics and audiences for mixing gothic horror and mystery into its plot about a young boy ...

Article comments

  • 1 - Triniman

    Jun 07, 2006 at 6:56 am

    I enjoyed the remake but because I had seen the original, I found it to be less scary. Still, I've seen far worse remakes. I wonder if they will re-make the sequels?

  • 2 - Aaron Fleming

    Jun 07, 2006 at 10:18 am

    I still hold that the iconic date is the only reason for this remake, as I said in some BC scribles back in the day. It's unfortunate that they've decided simply to refilm the original with, as you say, updated bits and pieces.

    When will they learn, if you're going to remake something, remake a crap film. Not a masterpiece like The Omen. Remakes of the sequels then? Pointless, but I'm sure there's an increased chance of something decent and worthwhile emerging.

  • 3 - Lisa Tolliver

    Jun 07, 2006 at 8:39 pm

    I saw The Omen in '76 and have no desire to see it again. That's in small part because scary movies creep me out, and in larger part because remakes that don't improve upon the originals are such a wicked waste of time.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 27, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs