Labels Pushing Streaming

Streaming limits use of digital music files, giving labels control. Brad King writes in Wired:

    "Labels want to maintain as much control as humanly possible, and with streaming they can keep people coming back for more," said GartnerG2 analyst P.J. McNealy. "But the labels want to protect their content and generate revenues, so this means ultimately they want to keep selling CDs."

    Record executives have been loath to support downloads because they feared the practice would eat into the $14 billion CD retail sales market.

    Pressplay, FullAudio and MusicNet have been pushing for liberal download plans that allow consumers to grab any file they want, but with a catch: The downloaded files have an additional cost and come with restrictions that prevent unlimited mobility.

    Meanwhile, companies like Listen.com and MusicMatch are attracting users by offering interactive streaming services. Labels more readily license content to such services because it's housed on private servers, making it more difficult to copy and distribute over peer-to-peer networks.

    Even EMusic.com, which built its business selling downloads as a subscription service, is being forced to reconsider its business model after some users started downloading 2,000 tracks per month — roughly 165 albums — according to general manager Steve Grady.

This is music as a service rather than as a "thing."

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for eric-olsen

Article Author: Eric Olsen

Career media professional Eric Olsen is honored to be the founder and former publisher of Blogcritics.org, and former publisher of Technorati.com, which both rule. He is now editor, co-founder, and CEO of The Morton Report.

Visit Eric Olsen's author pageEric Olsen's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

  • 1 - Hazy Dave

    Nov 19, 2002 at 1:20 pm

    Streaming is a pain and barely worth listening to if you're on a dialup connection. On a higher bandwidth connection, fidelity can be acceptable, especially if there aren't any damn "rebuffering" glitches.

    Of course, once the data stream is out of the Record Company's clutches, how do they propose to ensure it doesn't get copied? I know there's a utility for the Macintosh that will save streaming audio to disk. If there isn't a Windows equivalent yet, I imagine people will get to work on it as soon as they can stream the music they want to hear at an attractive price.

    Until then, well, we're still paying royalties to the RIAA on blank cassettes, right? (I wonder if there's an auditor somewhere that can tell us how much of that money has been distributed to the Artists? Ha!)

  • 2 - Jim S

    Nov 19, 2002 at 5:52 pm

    the quality of streamed music is inferior, due to software interaction and yes, it sucks badly on a dialup.

    topping that off, there's the fact that you can only sit in front of your computer and listen. There is no portability.....

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 27, 2012

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs