I Was A Punk Before You Were A Punk Pt. 1 - Comments Page 2

A long time ago, back before The Ramones could count to 4, before the Black Flag so proudly waved, before The Clash had enough rope, before X marked the spot and before the Sex Pistols backfired punk was knocking at the door. Now in 2005 "Punk" is just another genre in your local music emporium. A product to be bought and sold at the local mall.…
Read comments below, or read this article from the beginning.

Article comments

  • 26 - HW Saxton

    May 20, 2005 at 12:33 pm

    A quick word of explanation to all here
    this may concern. This post wasn't/isn't
    about me being into punk before you or
    anyone else.I likely was but that is a
    whole different story for a another day.
    I started going to punk shows in 1976 &
    saw The Ramones on the"Leave Home Tour".

    This was to be a lead in to who I feel
    are the first rockers from back in the
    1950's to hit upon the punk ethos.I do
    not think it's that new of a genre in as
    far as attitude or ideology.

    This was posted pre-maturely on accident
    by Eric. So what you are reading here
    is only half of a post.After I finish it
    & post the conclusion this weekend I'll
    gladly field any & all questions and all
    love/hate mail.

    PS: Dave, Who's Brunel? I was speaking
    of the surrealist/artist/film maker Luis
    Bunuel. But what does one's choice of
    reading material have to do with your
    credibility as a Punk Rocker? I read
    across the board from Dr Seuss to Howard
    Zinn,from the Bible to Bukowski.I don't
    see what this has to do with my musical
    taste though. I'd also be kind of hard
    pressed to call the DK's an "Art" band.
    They definitely tried incorporating some
    different sounds into their music and by
    all means Jello could be pretentious as
    all hell(but funny & insightful too)but
    I couldn't call them an art band in the
    same way I'd call Devo an "Art" band.

    Anyway thanks for reading and stay
    tuned for Pt 2 of this piece Okey Dokey?
    Same Bat Time, Same Bat Channel...

  • 27 - Douglas Mays

    May 20, 2005 at 2:07 pm

    Who was a punk first? I dunno, I hear stories of my dead grandpa who was an alcholic who would stand on the seat of his Indian motorcycle (say in the 40s)and be obnoxious.

    Punk goes on way before rock n roll. Attilla the Hun for that matter. Caliglia? OK, Jerry Lee Lewis, Elvis-the punk you could bring home to mother...

    This is really a subjective question....

  • 28 - Eric Berlin

    May 20, 2005 at 2:22 pm

    Right. Were Fitzgerald and Hemingway the punks of their day? It's all relative within the culture and morality and thinking of an era.

    Was Shakespeare punk? It's an interesting question.

  • 29 - Eric Olsen

    May 20, 2005 at 2:31 pm

    HW, pt 2 looks like it isn't finished yet - is this right?

  • 30 - HW Saxton

    May 20, 2005 at 11:23 pm

    Cerulean, you are lucky that you did not
    have the L.A. police to deal with.It was
    hard enough just looking the way we did
    and getting hassled by jocks, metalheads
    surfer types & basically anyone that was
    not a punk.For some reason the cops in
    LA declared war on Punk Rock for awhile.

    There were several major riots, serious
    beatings meted out to punkers male and
    female! Closing shows for no reason at
    all which of course provoked more melees
    that the cops were all too happy to
    oblige you in. Scary stuff for a while.

    There were not that many people into at
    the onset in the late 70's but by the
    time I got out of it in the early 80's
    there were thousands of kids into and it
    (punk clothes etc)could be bought at
    the mall.Usually we would go to a thrift
    store or army surplus place as they were
    very cheap and the whole D.I.Y ethic was
    half the fun.

    Eric, Pt 2 is done. I sent you a e-mail
    late this afternoon so you can post it
    whenever you feel like it.

  • 31 - Dave Nalle

    May 20, 2005 at 11:26 pm

    Snark: "It's BUNUEL, son. And no, anyone who opened a film with a closeup of a razor blade cutting an eyeball automatically gets inducted into the Punk Hall of Fame."

    Ooh, sorry. I made a typo. And what you're describing is avant garde, not punk.

    Dave

  • 32 - godoggo

    May 21, 2005 at 12:07 am

    What on god's green earth is wrong with you, Nalle?

  • 33 - godoggo

    May 21, 2005 at 12:42 am

    My "old punk" friends used to talk about "the Old Vex," as opposed to the the "New Vex," both of which were before my time, although I did go to the former once when it was briefly reoppened. I didn't actually go in, though, but rather tried to sneak in with my friends. We tried twice, failed twice. The bouncer who stopped us was Carlos Guitarlos. He was nice the first time, pissed the second time. I also went there a few years later for a super 8 movie class in college, to film my friend Glen posing naked in the parking lot. Ah, education.

  • 34 - gonzo marx

    May 21, 2005 at 12:49 am

    HW makes some great points here..

    "punk" and "hardcore" are really Attitudes and approaches to everything in life...not just music

    once music is "defined" into some stylized "scene" it has already become a Pose and a commodity

    just my one sixth billionths of the world's Opinion..

    your mileage may vary..

    Excelsior!

  • 35 - HW Saxton

    May 21, 2005 at 1:10 am

    godoggo, The original Vex at Brooklyn &
    Gage over on the East Side (anything
    east of 6th St was a strictly chicano
    neighborhood) was closed after a Black
    Flag show that a bunch of Huntington
    Beach assholes had a riot at and broke
    out windows, threw chairs out of windows
    etc. It was the home to many great gigs
    from a lot of chicano punk bands Plugz,
    Stains,Los Illegals,Undertakers etc.

    They kept The Vex going in a new place
    in the Paramount Ballroom on Brooklyn
    also. The Paramount was home to huge
    dance parties concerts from the East LA
    60's scenes. Cannibal & The Headhunters
    Premiers,Blendells etc. It didn't last
    long either though. The punks behaved
    like assholes for the most part & some
    one got shot there one night while
    spray painting punk grafitti over some
    gang grafitti.A big no no in East LA.
    Very rough neighbrhood but they did pull
    off some great shows at both venues.
    Man that was like a long long long time
    ago. PS: Carlos put out a phenomenally
    good solo record about 2 or 3 years ago
    that is worth picking up.

  • 36 - godoggo

    May 21, 2005 at 1:36 am

    I remember there was briefly a punk club in Watts, of all places, whose name escapes me - it was a man's name. I saw the Misfits there. The locals were nice enough to patrol the area in order to protect these crazy white kids.

    I must say, though, that I've never particularly felt unsafe anywhere in LA during the daytime.

    "Punk" was originally coined, god knows by whom, to describe a lot of disparate stuff, including much that would be considered "new wave" nowadays. Its meaning has changed over time. This is typical of genre names.

  • 37 - Thad Anderson

    May 21, 2005 at 2:32 am

    Great post. It is definitely funny the way "punk" means so many things now. When I was 15 or 16, I got really into bands like Dinosaur Jr. and Superchunk, who I thought were very "punk" or "indie rock" - much cooler than the "Home of Classic Rock" station I had grown up listening to every day.

    And then I realized that Dinosaur Jr. sounded almost exactly like mid-70's Neil Young, and Superchunk started trying to sound like Television, the late-70's punk band that had obviously listened to the Byrds as much as they listened to the Stooges.

    Now I just listen to "rock," having long ago given up on prefixes.

  • 38 - adam

    May 21, 2005 at 7:51 am

    Punk: the DKs, Sex Pistols, Stooges ... and, out of the pre-punk old rockers, Jerry Lee Lewis! Punk was working class and DIY, and in England, pretty much a rebellion against overblown, pretentious art rock. But also very heady surrealist, so DADA is part of it. Not giving a shit AT ALL. Pretty vacant. It's interesting the ways American Punk and British Punk are different. Maybe you can take that on after your much-anticipated Post 2, Saxton? Magfucknificent post.

  • 39 - mike hollihan

    May 21, 2005 at 11:08 am

    Punk started out spontaneously in a lot of places across America as a reaction to the prevailing musics of the day: 70's singer-songwriter, stoner California rock; English, blues-based cock rock; prog rock. These bands bubbled along mostly unknowing of each other, even in the same city sometimes. I remember Trouser Press magazine being one of the few places you could read about it early on.

    I think you can make a good argument that punk rock died in the wake of the Ramones tour of England in 1976. The British band explosion quickly got codified and commidified, picked up by their music press and then resold back to America.

    Most American punk rockers from 1974 to 1976 were kids from dying industrial cities and decaying big cities. Their music either reflected (Pere Ubu) or reacted against that. It was the Sex Pistols hype that brought punk to the attention of middle America and launched all the spiked hair, ripped jeans, leather, etc.

    Look at the incredible variety of music in 1974 -1976 American punk and then compare it to the post-Pistol's punk music. The "sound" was commidified.

  • 40 - mike hollihan

    May 21, 2005 at 11:23 am

    Oooh! That's not to leave out the seminal influence of Iggy Pop and the Stooges. In the same way that a lot of kids picked up guitars and started bands in the Sixties trying to be the Beatles and the Stones, a few kids in the Seventies wanted to be the Stooges. Remember: Cleveland's Rocket From the Tombs begat two bands: Pere Ubu and the Dead Boys.

  • 41 - Shark

    May 21, 2005 at 11:59 am

    Just to add to the historical (reaction) theory:

    punk was also a result of testosterone-crazed boys with no future who wanted to play in a rock band -- yet lacked the ability to play more than 3 chords.


    Wait! That should probably be the dictionary definition of Punk! Wow!

    "PUNK: 1) testosterone crazed boys with no future who want to play in a rock band yet lack the ability to play more than 3 chords."

  • 42 - Shark

    May 21, 2005 at 12:00 pm

    re: DaveNalle and Bunuel -


    Dave, yer such a dick.

    xxoo
    S

  • 43 - Dave Nalle

    May 21, 2005 at 12:52 pm

    Thanks Snark. I love you too. Pity you have the intellect of a gnat and the morals of a Nigerian spammer.

    Dave

  • 44 - marty thau

    May 21, 2005 at 5:36 pm

    HW, you sound like the guy who is locked in time to the music he made out to in the back seat of his father's car.
    Punk is very much alive today. Styles change, issues change --take a closer look HW and you might conclude that punk lives and is, in fact, quite healthy. In fact, one might say it's the only healthy corner of rock 'n' roll. In Europe it's hotter than anything else. Today's punk music is simply different than yesterday's version. You gotta roll with the times.

  • 45 - HW Saxton

    May 21, 2005 at 7:48 pm

    Mr.Marty Thau,How nice to hear from you.
    How about releasing a Suicide:Best Of...
    set with the harder to find tracks off
    of the later records like:"Be Bop Kid",
    "Harlem", "Rock N Roll Rebel",etc?

    I always wanted to ask you that question
    so with that out if the way... You just
    really couldn't have me more wrong about
    "Punk". I actually do like some of the
    new stuff and some of it is rather awful
    and embarassing.This is applicable to
    older punk stuff too.Some of it holds up
    & some is so dated and awful.Just plain
    embarssingly bad.

    I saw The Dictators two years ago and
    they were phenomenal,I mean just fucking
    incredibly good!On par energy wise with
    The Who,Ramones,early Van Halen,Stones,
    just plain intense what a great show !!!
    I saw Blondie a couple years back and
    was very embarassed for Debbie & band on
    the other hand.

    I know it's (PUNK) still very much alive
    and that is my main complaint about it.
    As a genre it seemed so limited in so
    many ways & there's only so many things
    you can play before you are repeating
    older bands and /or yourself. Electric
    Frankenstein may be a fine band but if
    you have The Dead Boys records what's
    the point in listening to E.F ? Rancid:
    Ditto,You can play Clash/Stiff Little
    Fingers etc.It all boils down to your
    own personal taste and how much you like
    the genre in the first place.I grew out
    of,got bored with and moved on past punk
    music in the early part of the 80's.

    I guess I just don't feel the need for
    it anymore, musically speaking. I like
    the energy of it and the D.I.Y ethic of
    it. But with it being such a commercial
    commodity it has lost that sense of the
    urgency and rawness that appealed to me
    as much as the music it self ever did.
    Anyway, I just don't hear much in "New"
    ('85 to the present) Punk Rock that does
    much of anything for me. I was lucky to
    grow up on The Dolls,Stooges,Lou Reed &
    Rock Scene,Crawdaddy,Creem ,etc before
    The Ramones,Sex Pistols,Heartbreakers,

    West Coast Hardcore,etc came around.

    Most of the new bands I hear are just
    rehashing to varying degrees, stuff that
    has already been done before. I see Pop
    music in general as temporary music and
    nothing to get nostalgic over.It was a
    soundtrack for a point in time that was
    relevant when it was happening but that
    does not have much staying power or any
    kind of timeless quality about it.

    The energy of the music was alawys a
    big draw for me but these days I draw
    upon my Fela, JB's, John Lee Hooker and
    other assorted Funk,Blues,Afrobeat,R & B
    etc records and CD's for my energy fix.
    It feels like getting swept up in a wave
    of enthusiasm as opposed to getting cold
    cocked with a sledgehammer which is how
    I feel after hearing The Ramones or The
    Damned or something similar.

    Also, in closing this post wasn't about
    what I don't like about Punk per se. It
    was about where I feel some the musical
    roots of punk lay.It was accidentally
    published before I had finished it,so it
    actually reads different than how it was
    meant to read. Well thanks for writing
    and I'm serious about the Suicide set.It
    would be nice to have all that stuff on
    one disc.Personally I have all the LP's,
    '12 of "Dream Baby Dream", Alan Vega's
    "Juebox Baby" EP etc. But most people
    don't and it would introduce them to one
    of the least known & highly influential
    bands to change the face of music in the
    late 70's/early 80's. I've got friends
    who are Hip Hop DJ's that I turned on to
    Suicide. They now use Suicide samples in
    their club sets.It works so good that ya
    wouldn't believe it!





  • 46 - SFC SKI

    May 21, 2005 at 7:56 pm

    Cranky Old Man's Lament "Most of the new bands I hear are just
    rehashing to varying degrees, stuff that
    has already been done before."
    My sentiments exactly, there is little new in music to me, because I have been listening to music for 30 years. That isn't to say that there aren't some great new bands out there in any genre, I just don't get as excited about them as someone half my age might. To them the music IS new, of course.

  • 47 - HW Saxton

    May 21, 2005 at 8:54 pm

    SFC Ski, That is an excellent point. If
    I didn't have the reference points of
    The Ramones,Buzzcocks,Clash,D.O.A,Stiff
    Little Fingers, then I might just enjoy
    a lot more "new" punk rock stuff because
    it would sound "New" to me. But I do and
    It don't.

    I wanted to ask you this:I have been to
    strange places in the world and I found
    people who were into Rock N Roll. Haiti,
    Indian reservations in the middle of the
    Sonoran desert in Mexico,small towns in
    the Phillipines,etc.Is there any kind of
    Underground market for American Rock and
    Roll in Iraq & the Middle East? Curious.



  • 48 - SFC SKI

    May 21, 2005 at 9:09 pm

    To my knowledge there is no Arab garage band figuring out "Louie Louie" but we can always hope.

    The western part of the Arab world, the Maghred, has a lot more western-style mixed with Arabic, but it is still a bit more dance or dub style music. The style of Arabic music and singing lends itself more to that style than staccato punk does.

    I have heard of an underground rock/punk scene in Morocco, but haven't found any recordings yet.

    Rock is definitely not mainstream, and in places like Qatar or Bahrain, the music I heard coming out of kids cars was more rap/drum n' bass.

    Wonder of wonders, I was able to buy Led Zep and Guns and Roses cassettes years ago in both Saudi Arabia and the UAE, in places that were not tourist shoips, so someone else must be buying the stuff.

  • 49 - SFC SKI

    May 21, 2005 at 9:11 pm

    I forgot to mention that Lebanon has a pretty big music scene, but it is more pop oriented in the worst sense of the word (though the women who sing it are damn pretty, and that can cover a multitude of sins).

  • 50 - gonzo marx

    May 21, 2005 at 9:13 pm

    as i stated earlier..

    it's the difference between pioneers , and those that claim a style/genre as an Influence..

    once it becomes a Pose, or a format...rather than Originalist energy..any "format" loses me in translation

    hence my "love" for Motorhead rather than later "speed" stuff..

    i had always liked Rush better than Led Zeppelin...in the latter i could hear T-Bone Walker, Muddy Waters etc...from Rush it was all new...

    i do like some of Green Day's stuff, but would rathe rlisten to the Stooges or Ramones...

    Pantera owns the "heavy category" for me...with Tool scratching my current "itch"

    but you get my point, eh?

    Excelsior!

  • 51 - HW Saxton

    May 21, 2005 at 9:34 pm

    SFC Ski, I have heard some heavy funky
    dub influenced dance music from the Mid
    East such as DJ Shoe. I figured it was
    the West African Afro-beat influence &
    influences brought back from W. Europe
    possibly by students studying abroad.

    Also Ethiopia has a big music scene that
    is heavily funk and HipHop influenced.
    I know it's an area heavily Christian
    influenced but I guessed with it's very
    close proximity that the influence might
    spread to nearby Arabic countries. Rock
    is so ubiquitous that I guessed it has
    to be around the Moslem world in some
    form. Thanks for responding.

  • 52 - HW Saxton

    May 31, 2005 at 1:10 am

    I'm totally flattered. Thanks much Eric
    and Temple! I really appreciate it. And
    I'd also like to thank all of the little
    people that I had to grind under my boot
    heel on the way to the top.Thanks again!
    TS and Eric, I'm stoked!


  • 53 - Temple Stark

    May 31, 2005 at 1:35 am

    What a card LOL. And we seem to be a pretty picky lot of editors, so it is meant to acknowledge something way above the rest, in impact or writing or most likely both.

  • 54 - HW Saxton

    May 31, 2005 at 2:12 am

    In all seriousness,I totally acknowledge
    that. Which makes it all the more of a
    compliment to me,TS. Again Thanx much.

  • 55 - alienboy

    May 31, 2005 at 7:40 am

    I haven't read ALL the comments here, there's far too many for that, but I would like to point out that, beyond HW's excellent post, it is also necessary to point out that Punk Rock USA stle was, and still is, a pale shadow of the British punk movement.

    Whether you want to talk about the seriously Anarchic groups like Crass and the Poison Girls or any number of bands who were a little less political and a little more arty like The Slits or Buzzcocks, the British punk scene was the real heart of the entire punk movement.

    Sadly, Punk got washed away in the early 80s and nothing significant remains today. But for a while there it was the greatest flowering of art, rebellion, politics, wild sex and drugs there has ever been. Rock music has never been the same again, and probably never will be as it's creativity seems to continue plumbing new depths...

  • 56 - uao

    May 31, 2005 at 8:48 am

    Great article, HW. I agree that punk as an attitude goes back to the 50's; it's almost tempting to call Link Wray and Jerry Lee Lewis "punk"

    I was entering adolescence during the punk era, so I wasn't looking for kindred angry spirits in bars. But the kindred spirits in my school, misfits and outsiders all, found each other. I remember the punk years spent in dusty basement record shops in Greenwich Village while cutting school, while the portly, bearded owner played the Stranglers loud.

    Or listening to Fresh Fruit for Rotting Vegetables really late at night, and feeling very diassociated from the mainstream culture and climate at large; punk for me represented not just angst and delinquency, but also community and political activism. In New York, it was a very tolerant community, by and large; all manner of misfits and outsiders were accepted.

    So it was a universe of kindred spirits. Good point.

  • 57 - Douglas Mays

    May 31, 2005 at 4:39 pm

    uao, you bring up a point I found about the punk movement. I went thru it here in Seattle and I really liked the sense of community and tolerance.

    Example. The punk movement was great for people who were, say, fat or had birthmarks on their face or something. By going punk they found acceptance of theirselves and acceptance by others.

    Well, tolerance for Reagan (Raygun) and other social injustices, there was none of that...

    peaceloveguidance

  • 58 - godoggo

    May 31, 2005 at 8:06 pm

    "punk was also a result of testosterone-crazed boys with no future who wanted to play in a rock band -- yet lacked the ability to play more than 3 chords"

    Billy Zoom

  • 59 - karen

    Sep 18, 2006 at 11:41 am

    You suck! You assume that anyone under the age of 30 has no clue what punk is. I cant help it if i was born in the 80's. There are a lot of kids still very much into the DIY hardcore punk scene today that never step a foot into a mall to buy their clothes.

    This is ageism at its best.

  • 60 - HW Saxton

    Dec 21, 2006 at 1:45 pm

    I SUCK!!!???? Aw c'mon,be nice toots. If you can
    find where I said anyone under age 30 has no clue
    about what punk is then please step forward 'kay?

    My point was that basically "PUNK" is really not
    all that new and has undeniably became another
    saleable commodity at the local mall. Undeniable
    and factual. It is just another genre of music
    as is Reggae,Jazz,Black Metal,Afrobeat,Swing etc,
    etc,etc and so on & so on.

    Glad ya like fast loud sounds and all and you buy
    your "Punk" clothes at somewhere besides a mall.
    But please learn to read and comprehend a little
    bit more carefully in the future. Kids,sheesh...

  • 61 - Frank

    Sep 09, 2007 at 8:51 pm

    Anybody have pictures for purchase of the New vex shows, venues, and any historical stuff for posting on a history of the paramount ballroom? [Personal contact info deleted]

  • 62 - Seth Borden

    Apr 23, 2009 at 11:53 pm

    We Have some pictures of the new Vex shows on our site. Joe and I have some more amazing events lined up. Check out the site.

    Seth

  • 63 - Brian aka Guppusmaximus

    Apr 24, 2009 at 8:48 am

    (A little late,but) Nice Article!

    I felt your passion and I have also felt this way about Metal. BUT, I can say,for me, I was bitten by the Punk bug in the 90's. Boston ,in the 90's, had an absolutely amazing supportive scene and we had some killer bands:

    Dropkick Murphys (Still rockin)
    The Showcase Showdown
    The Ducky Boys
    The Bruisers(N.H.)
    The Unseen
    Darkbuster

    Plus some really cool out of state bands:
    U.S. Bombs
    Choking Victim
    Voodoo Glow Skulls


    And, you're right, it was all about a movement which I thought was impossible because of all the people who had to look "PunK". Though, I had a friend that looked about as Punk as John Madden but he was a die hard fan of the music. He knew bands and their perspective histories, he also was a editor for a fanzine and he interviewed all these bands. This was the guy that got me hooked because he listened to so much Punk!!

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 11, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs