How The RIAA Keeps Us In The Dark

It occurred to me recently that the RIAA presents itself as a unified front. There are the consumers, the lowly peons who happen to finance the whole thing. That's you and me. There are the indies, independent labels who often struggle but continue to plug away. And then there is the RIAA. Or so they would have us believe.

Obviously the RIAA is made up of many member companies, and it would be nice to have a little more information on those member companies. But whenever we see figures on units sold or gross revenue, those numbers are presented as aggregates for the entire RIAA. This makes it difficult to compare the number to anything other than the same numbers from previous years.

But what if they were broken out separately? What if we could see how many units sold and dollars made were from Sony or Universal or Epic or whomever? Would we see new patterns?

Would we see that certain labels have raised prices more than others and that their unit sales have correspondingly gone down more than others? Would we see that some labels have continued to produce roughly the same number of titles as they have for the last few years and seen their revenues remain steady while others cut back on titles and saw their revenues go down?

I don't know. And I'm not likely to know, since those number don't seem to be published.

I hope I'm wrong. For example, it's possible that those numbers are published in each RIAA member company's annual report to its stockholders, and that an enterprising investigative reporter or blogger with a lot of free time could accumulate all of those figure and publish a spreadsheet suitable for graphing. But somehow I suspect that it isn't that easy, and frankly I suspect that the difficulty is deliberate.

People in power always gain from secrecy, and we the people always lose. That's true in politics, it's true in business, it's just true in life. There are always "good reasons" why the information needs to be kept private, but in the end those reasons don't benefit you and me, the people.

Should the RIAA publish statistics on a per-label basis? Do they and I've just missed it? Anybody?

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for phillip-winn

Article Author: Phillip Winn

Phillip Winn was the Chief Geek for Blogcritics, and a blogger since 1995. He may currently be found and followed as @pwinn on Twitter.

Visit Phillip Winn's author pagePhillip Winn's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - Jeff

    Jun 19, 2003 at 6:32 pm

    Personally, that is information I'd like to know. I'm going to see what I can find out.

  • 2 - Jeff

    Jun 19, 2003 at 6:34 pm

    You'd have to have a lot of time on your hands, the list of members is quite long. http://www.riaa.com/about/members/default.asp

  • 3 - Phillip Winn

    Jun 26, 2003 at 1:00 pm

    Yikes! I certainly wouldn't want to contact more than three or four off of the list, that's for sure!

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 19, 2013

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs