Hate and the Music Industry

It's no secret. The music industry has a bit of a problem with its public image. Yesterday I spotted two articles that exemplify the problem.

One was "Why Everybody Hates The Music Industry" by TechWeb's Fredric Paul. Written after Paul read Forrester Research's "Music Lessons: Is Your Industry At Risk?" report, the article traces the music industry's recent stumbles not to Forrester's conclusion — the "rigid monopoly-oriented thinking behavior" of media monocultures — but to the fact that everybody hates record labels.

"Musicians hate them for habitually sucking the creativity out of the music and the profits from the CD sales. Usually they do it legally, if not morally, but all too often naïve musicians with few options end up swindled out of their rightful earnings. And music lovers—don't call us consumers; music can't be consumed—see the record companies as greedy, clueless profiteers quick to jack up prices while placing limits on what music gets released and how you can listen to it."

Mixed in with common mythology (record labels "add little real value to the process of creating and distributing music," the irrelevance of which label an artist is on) are some very valid and substantive arguments — although they're mostly the bullet points taken from the Forrester's report. In the five stages of death and dying, the music industry is around stage four: depression. The strategies aren't going so well, he writes, and it's getting them down. Next will come acceptance "as the industry tries new download services."

I'm not sure depression is accurate because (a) the industry has been given new optimism from the Grokster decision and P2P companies' sudden willingness to play ball, and (b) I think it's too stubborn to admit yet that a rethinking of strategy may be a good idea. There's little that hints to remorse over a failed policy (at least publicly) and a lot of hints that there's a strong resolution to stay the course.

Paul's article was well though out and not nearly as judgmental as most. It certainly wasn't as judgmental and lopsided as "Music Industry Is Monopoly" op-ed in The Current, the newspaper of the University of Missouri at St. Louis. Though it shows a fundamental lack of perspective and insight, this should worry the industry much more than Paul's article. If labels want to know what a young college student thinks of their industry, go no further. Op-ed author Zach Meyer uses payola as a basis for his rant.

"Thanks to major music label industries and greedy communication companies, the radio waves are not what they could, or should, be. Independent record-based bands are scarcely heard and even big time acts receive a diminutive amount of the royalties. And yet, this blasphemy as has been occurring for years."
Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • Peer-to-Peer : Harnessing the Power of Disruptive Technologies Peer-to-Peer : Harnessing the Power of Disruptive Technologies

    The term "peer-to-peer" has come to be applied to networks that expect end users to contribute their own files, computing time, or other resources to some shared project. Even more interesting than ...

Article comments

  • 1 - uao

    Oct 12, 2005 at 8:12 pm

    Excellent piece, Glenn.

    The funny thing about the industry is that they seem so disingenuous; they can't seem to understand why, for example, people don't see p2p as wrong. Some p2p'ers actuallythink they're commiting a right in the face of inductry greed, corruption, payola, and creative bankruptcy.

    It is these things, far more than p2p that has caused their financial decline, yet the industry approaches its public with a "we'll crush you" attitude whileasking that same public to pony up more dough for rip-off crap.

    Your article raises a lot of interesting points; well done.

  • 2 - Matt

    Oct 12, 2005 at 11:08 pm

    The thing that amazes me is that the music industry thinks that we should hear one decent song off an album, nothing more, and then commit $14 of hard earned money on a crapshoot. Sorry--I've been burned too many times. My music colleciton is bulging with new releases, but I heard almost all of them in their entirety before buying. I was also able to avoid claptrap like The Bravery and Caesars before wasting my money.

  • 3 - Temple A. Stark

    Oct 17, 2005 at 1:14 pm

    This post was chosen by the section editor as a BC pick of the week. Go HERE (link) to find out why.

    And thank you
    - Temple

  • 4 - Yashin

    Oct 18, 2005 at 11:46 am

    Excellent article on a thorny issue. Definitely guilty of adopting popular myth myself.

    We form such an emotional bond with music that it's hard to empathise with an industry that seems concerned only with exploiting that bond.

    For an industry obsessed with image and PR, it's amazing that they can't present a more friendly face to joe public.

  • 5 - sfasfasfasfasf

    Nov 04, 2005 at 9:08 am

    you all suck

  • 6 - Eric Olsen

    Nov 04, 2005 at 9:13 am

    sfas, don't tell anyone

    Glenn, great story, thanks!! How are you doing?

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 29, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs