Chuck D is a Signifying Monkey? I Think Not! - Comments Page 2

This has to be the most ignorant thing I've read in a very long time - Chuck D is a signifying monkey. The author of that article, Al Barger, made several statements that must be refuted.

(Originally posted on Move the Crowd)…
Read comments below, or read this article from the beginning.

Article comments

  • 26 - Will

    Jul 23, 2003 at 5:01 pm

    It's unfortunate that there are people who take pleasure in creating racial tension and "keeping the races divided". I think the "Elvis comment" is an example of this being played out in the 50s. Perhaps this discussion is a current example.

  • 27 - ClubhouseCancer

    Jul 23, 2003 at 5:05 pm

    Natalie:

    Someone who is "melanin-challenged" would be someone who has little or no melanin i.e. a white person. So Elvis WAS melanin-challenged.

    But few informed people really believe that Elvis said what he's accused of. I'm sure if you read the article cited or Guralnick's great bio, you'll agree.

    I'm sure you're not saying, as it would appear, that just because something has been repeated for a long time, it is true. Or that even if it's false, its "long shelf life" gives it some importance anyway.

  • 28 - Eric Olsen

    Jul 23, 2003 at 5:32 pm

    I was wondering about that "melanin" thing - I thought it was the sleep hormone and I thought Elvis often slept all the live long day.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 10, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs