When music journalist Robert Palmer died on November 20, 1997 at the age of 52, he’d long since cemented his reputation as one of the most astute experts in his field. A fixture at Rolling Stone for over two decades, the first person designated as chief pop-music critic for The New York Times, and an author of six books, Palmer examined and chronicled music with feral acuity while, at the same time, appreciating the best of it with unadulterated joy.
“In a style that blended elegance and hipster enthusiasm, he would travel deeper and deeper into his subject, bringing his readers along with him in the interest of turning them on to something he loved,” Anthony DeCurtis writes of Palmer in the preface to the recently published anthology, Blues & Chaos: The Music Writing of Robert Palmer, which he edited.
DeCurtis, a longtime contributing editor at Rolling Stone and himself the author of two retrospective anthologies—Rocking My Life Away: Writing About Music And Other Matters and In Other Words: Artists Talk About Life And Work—has been a preeminent voice in music criticism and cultural commentary for nearly thirty years. In addition to his written submissions to the magazine, in the '90s DeCurtis served as the editor of Rolling Stone's record-review section, which led him to work directly with Palmer, the experience undoubtedly informing some of his recollections on him now. Presently, DeCurtis teaches in the writing program at the University of Pennsylvania.
In this extensive interview with Donald Gibson of Blogcritics Magazine, Anthony DeCurtis discusses Blues & Chaos and the late Robert Palmer before generously yielding insight to his own career and craft. Along the way he reflects on music's immeasurable capacity to spark creative minds, the pros and cons of artist interviews, and how one such interview with a certain childhood idol resonates with him today.
How did editing someone else’s work compare to editing your own two anthologies?
You’re kind of willing to make mistakes on your own behalf. The two collections of my own that I did, I had fairly specific ideas for what I wanted them to be like. And once I got some momentum going on pulling it all together, I didn’t really question that too much. With the Palmer book, I found myself thinking a lot about how he would want to be represented…and about whether or not my own vision of what this book should be would match his. Finally, I just decided, this is what it means to be an editor. I was his editor. So it’s going to reflect his voice and who he was as I understood him.

.jpg?t=20120209092158)





Article comments
1 - Glen Boyd
Nice interview Gibson. Especially liked the insider stuff about Patti Smith and Bowie. Who knew that artists can be critics too?
-Glen
2 - Josh Hathaway
Gibson, this is first rate. I've been an admirer of DeCurtis for some time -- actually enjoyed the show he hosted with JC Considine on VH-1 for awhile -- and this is just golden here. I read Palmer's Deep Blues and I'm going to have to pick up this book DeCurtis edited. Wonderful.
3 - El Bicho
Glad to see he managed to squeeze some time out of his busy schedule and settle down for an interview. Great job but you forgot to ask him about the importance of where Rolling Stone ranks albums.
Nice bio, btw, even though the title has been tainted
4 - zingzing
pretty impressed you got this interview. quite a score for blog critics. although i'm not a fan of rolling stone over the last few years, decurtis was/is a very good editor and thinker for them. this interview did get a bit meta, didn't it?
5 - Cindal Lee Heart
Thank you so much for this Donald, this has really inspired me. I appreciate your position in my life all the more from reading this. -
:)