And the Grammy winners are...

Grammy Winners

As usual, if you're dead - the sentimental Grammy tearducts just can't help but award you. The late, great Ray Charles was this year's big winner - capturing the top two awards: Record of the Year and Album of the Year.

Grammy sentiment couldn't help award the cheeze that is John Mayer's Daughters as Song of the Year, and as Best Male Pop Vocal. Personally, the song is terrible - but it pulls (or yanks violently) at the heartstrings, or something, so poof!, here comes the Grammy.

Grammy favorite Alicia Keys swept the female/R&B categories, proving still that Grammy voters are old fogies, and like their music to sound that way, regardless if the musician is twentysomething. Speaking of which, Grammy favorite Norah Jones took home her share of awards as well.

In the end - a predictable, adult contemporary night at the awards.

Record Of The Year: Here We Go Again, Ray Charles & Norah Jones

Album Of The Year: Genius Loves Company, Ray Charles & Various Artists

Song Of The Year: Daughters, John Mayer, songwriter (John Mayer)

Best New Artist: Maroon5

Best Female Pop Vocal Performance: Sunrise, Norah Jones

Best Male Pop Vocal Performance: Daughters, John Mayer

Best Pop Performance By A Duo Or Group With Vocal: Heaven, Los Lonely Boys

Best Pop Collaboration With Vocals: Here We Go Again, Ray Charles & Norah Jones

Best Pop Instrumental Performance: 11th Commandment, Ben Harper

Best Pop Instrumental Album: Henry Mancini: Pink Guitar, Various Artists

Best Pop Vocal Album: Genius Loves Company, Ray Charles & Various Artists

Best Dance Recording: Toxic, Britney Spears

Best Electronic/Dance Album: Kish Kash, Basement Jaxx

Best Traditional Pop Vocal Album: Stardust...The Great American Songbook Volume III, Rod Stewart

Best Solo Rock Vocal Performance: Code Of Silence, Bruce Springsteen

Best Rock Performance By A Duo Or Group With Vocal: Vertigo, U2

Best Hard Rock Performance: Slither, Velvet Revolver

Best Metal Performance: Whiplash, Motrhead

Best Rock Instrumental Performance: Mrs. O'Leary's Cow, Brian Wilson

Best Rock Song: Vertigo, Bono, Adam Clayton, The Edge & Larry Mullen, songwriters (U2)

Best Rock Album: American Idiot, Green Day

Best Alternative Music Album: A Ghost Is Born, Wilco

Best Female R&B Vocal Performance: If I Ain't Got You, Alicia Keys

Best Male R&B Vocal Performance: Call My Name, Prince

Best R&B Performance By A Duo Or Group With Vocals: My Boo, Usher & Alicia Keys

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2Page 3Page 4

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - The Theory

    Feb 14, 2005 at 12:28 am

    how is Maroon5 considered a "new artist?"

  • 2 - SFC SKI

    Feb 14, 2005 at 12:31 am

    Maroon5 best new artist over Los Lonely Boys? The Academy's taste is in its mouth.

  • 3 - Caryn Rose

    Feb 14, 2005 at 2:04 am

    It's not sentiment, it's called GUILT.

  • 4 - Temple Stark

    Feb 14, 2005 at 3:48 am

    Motorhead. alright. That's the shit. I'll have to update my interview post.

  • 5 - wally bangs

    Feb 14, 2005 at 9:49 am

    Best Historical Album: Night Train To Nashville: Music City Rhythm & Blues, 1945-1970, Daniel Cooper & Michael Gray, compilation producers; Joseph M. Palmaccio & Alan Stoker, mastering engineers (Various Artists)

    Way to go Michael Gray!!! I spent five years working beside the fellow at Phonoluxe Used Records.

  • 6 - Eric Olsen

    Feb 14, 2005 at 10:00 am

    John Lars, the dead guy factor is hard to beat, especially if the dead guy is a legend who put out his best album in about 30 years, which sold like free beer.

  • 7 - mrbenning

    Feb 14, 2005 at 10:35 am

    It's just difficult to get past the whole "yeah, you like me now, bitches!" factor in the Grammys. Especially in the last couple of years. It really seems like they care less about the good music being produced, and more about who they can side with in a successful marketing campaign.

    I guess I just wonder why the Oscars managed to (mostly) get over that hump and the Grammys are still stuck at the bottom of the hill.

  • 8 - Phillip Winn

    Feb 14, 2005 at 10:38 am

    Eric, free beer sells? I wouldn't pay a dime for free beer!

    Anyway, I couldn't care less about the Grammys, I thought, but then on the radio last night the announcer said that he had just received a phone call from L.A. from one of the guys in Brave Combo, who won another Grammy. And I realized that maybe I care, just a little. :-)

  • 9 - DJRadiohead

    Feb 14, 2005 at 10:44 am

    I do not know what the Grammys are supposed to represent but I do know last night was not the best in music.

    I know mainstream award ceremonies are easy targets and Ray Charles is a legend, but the Grammys could not be any more irrelevant. What horseshit! John Mayer and Alicia Keys have Grammys. 3 Doors Down and Creed have Grammys. Jimi Hendrix? No fucking Grammys (unless they gave him a late posthumous one). Enough said.

  • 10 - Eric Olsen

    Feb 14, 2005 at 10:57 am

    not to be an apologist, but the Grammys were an atavistic atrocity in the early days and ignored rock 'n' roll almost entirely. They have progressively become more current and relevant over the years, adding all kinds of new catagories, increasing the performance aspect of the broadcast. The main awards themselves are still often very safe and middle of the road, but great strides have been made, and they also seem to be trying hard to make up for the glaring omissions of the past with all these lifetime achievement awards - looks like Hendrix is still shut out, though.

  • 11 - mrbenning

    Feb 14, 2005 at 11:08 am

    "Jimi Hendrix? No fucking Grammys...Enough said."

    This just makes it sting even more when you think about the fact that The Starland Vocal Band have a Grammy.

  • 12 - Eric Olsen

    Feb 14, 2005 at 11:11 am

    LOTS of people have Grammys: the way it is now, the more niche-oriented you are, the more likely you are to score

  • 13 - Matt

    Feb 14, 2005 at 11:42 am

    I am pleased to see Green Day did not walk away with a truckload of awards. Not because of their politics, since I tend to align myself on the left side of things. But because they suck. I cannot take any band seriously that has an album named "Dookie", first off. I saw the performance last night, and the new song sounds just like all of their other crappy music, with that goofball singing in his annoying voice. I was wondering what that album sounded like, and now I know. MOre crap from Green Day.

  • 14 - Mark Saleski

    Feb 14, 2005 at 11:47 am

    i have to admit it: i really used to like "Afternoonn Delight".

    gawd.

  • 15 - jaosn

    Feb 14, 2005 at 12:54 pm

    the grammy people know nothing. nothing. it's all fodder for the perpetuation of the sick state of the music industry. i will never bother with the grammy's again.

  • 16 - E

    Feb 17, 2005 at 6:51 pm

    ? for anyone: why do they call it a Grammy?

  • 17 - Eric Olsen

    Feb 17, 2005 at 7:22 pm

    grammy is short for gramophone, the early record player

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 21, 2013

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs