Home / Culture and Society / Science and Technology / Music Videos Causing Piracy Concern

Music Videos Causing Piracy Concern

Please Share...Print this pageTweet about this on TwitterShare on Facebook0Share on Google+0Pin on Pinterest0Share on Tumblr0Share on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

Sites that tout user-generated content, like YouTube, Google Video, and iFilm, are now under the gun from music industry labels for piracy concerns. This time it's not MP3 or wav files being shared illegally; it's music videos that are the problem.

It seems that users of these sites are capturing videos using things like TiVo, downloading them, and passing them along to other users. The problem here is the fact that it's illegal, and, well, just downright wrong.

From the Washington Post:

In recent weeks the Recording Industry Association of America has been stepping up its efforts to stop sharing of popular videos on such sites, particularly on the rapidly expanding YouTube. The site, which now claims more than 6 million visitors and 40 million streams daily, has become a haven for unlicensed music videos, which users are capturing with TiVo and other digital video recorders and then posting the files to the Web. Much of the material is coming from recorded MTV broadcasts.

The RIAA recently issued cease-and-desist letters to YouTube users sharing videos from the likes of Nelly Furtado, Beyonce and Rihanna.

While it does seem as if sites like YouTube are taking notice and trying to remove the illegal videos, the users themselves should know better. Everything from actual sound bytes of songs to the videos themselves are licensed materials that are protected. This amounts to piracy, which is illegal, and even worse, unethical.

The same bands whose music users of sites like Google Video want to share make their money from the sale of songs and the paid advertisements that go along with their videos. When sales don't happen, record labels don't make money, their employees don't make it, and the bands the fans profess to love don't make it either.

It's kind of like cutting off your nose to spite your face. If fans love the music and the videos, they should support the artists by buying their works. It's that simple.

Individuals who share these videos are getting into trouble, too, although it's pretty minor right now. The Post is reporting they're getting notices to stop sharing music videos illegally. But it's not out of the realm of possibility for the record labels to push more stringent measures.

Powered by

About TeevBlogger

  • This seems overly simplistic, because it fails to account for the fact that most labels see music videos as promotional efforts for the albums. It usually isn’t the labels that are worried about distribution of the videos, but the channels, like MTV.

    But then, that opens up the usual question about what the moneymaker actually is. Some bands see albums as promotional materials for the tours. And so on.

  • Credible Threat

    “The problem here is the fact that it’s illegal, and, well, just downright wrong.”

    Tell that to blogcritics.org regular “Bliffle.” He just uses Netflix to get a DVD in the mail, copy it, and send it back immediately. He thinks there is nothing wrong with this and justifies it by saying that if he could not do this with Netflix, they wouldn’t get his money.

    Where is the great Bliffle when you need him?

  • I agree with Phillip on this one. It’s not like the person couldn’t see the video on MTV for what they’re paying for it on the web, and putting it on YouTube definitely opens it up to a wider audience. I understand the copyright problems, but I really don’t see how the music companies can see this as a negative.

  • R0DJOh

    That’s ridiculous. I thought the whole point of music videos was to advertise albums, just like making any other kind of commercial. It’s an investment used for promotion. It should not be something we should pay for. As far as I’m concerned, YouTube users are doing them a favor.