Today on Blogcritics
Home » Music » Music DVD Review: Pearl Jam: Under Review

Music DVD Review: Pearl Jam: Under Review

Please Share...Print this pageTweet about this on Twitter0Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Pin on Pinterest0Share on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

Pearl Jam’s place in the great Grunge Explosion of 1991 remains a subject of debate in some quarters. How they got together, previous bands, and the fact that the singer was from out of town were all considered major strikes against them. To a vociferous few they were seen as serious strikes that is. The rest of us were too busy enjoying the music. 20 years later PJ are still going strong, while nearly all the others from that memorable year have sadly come and gone.

The new DVD Pearl Jam: Under Review tells the group’s story from the beginning right up to today. Like all of the DVDs in the Under Review series, it is an unauthorized documentary. That means there was no cooperation or involvement from anyone in the PJ camp. Instead, we get a collection of music critics talking about them, live footage from various sources, and some older interview segments.

While I understand the complaints about this format, particularly the inclusion of the critics, I found this 90 minute DVD to be very engaging. There are no enormous new revelations, or any groundbreaking new footage, but somehow the Pearl Jam story is presented in a consistently interesting and entertaining way regardless.

To the surprise of nearly everyone, Pearl Jam’s debut Ten was a smash hit. It won rave reviews both from the public and the critics. They followed Ten up with VS a year later, which sold a staggering one million CDs the first week. A battle with Ticketmaster came next, which had the net effect of stopping PJ from touring the US for three solid years. Vitalogy became their third hit album in a row in 1994., And Pearl Jam served as Neil Young’s back up band for his Mirror Ball album in 1995. Then they decided to scale it all back..

No Code was a record very few bands ever get to make. Pearl Jam’s fourth album consciously avoided the big anthems and ballads they had become so famous for. Although they would never admit it to the record company, No Code was specifically designed to appeal to only the hardcore PJ audience. They basically set out to jettison the mainstream crowd that had been with them since Ten.

It took the album Yield, with its cover art fully telegraphing the group’s intentions, for Pearl Jam to move on. Yielding to the realities of their lost battle against Ticketmaster, and itching to get out on the road again, the band have never really looked back. Their main focus has become playing live, as the dozens of concert CDs and DVDs that have been released confirm.

The video clips in the first part of the DVD will likely be the most appealing aspect for many fans. There is some great footage of the bands that spawned members of PJ, such as Green River and Mother Love Bone. The interview with the late Andrew Wood of Mother Love Bone is particularly fascinating. As for extras on the DVD, the most notable is an interview with Eddie Vedder and Matt Cameron, recorded in Berlin, 2009.

In the overheated frenzy of 1991, Pearl Jam were unfairly dismissed as interlopers on the Seattle scene, as well as being nothing more than a “classic rock” group. How ironic is it that in 2010, the music of of Nirvana, Soundgarden, Alice In Chains and Pearl Jam is the de facto classic rock of Gen X? What goes around comes around, yet of all these great bands, only Pearl Jam remain intact.

While Pearl Jam: Under Review offers nothing really new, or earth-shattering, it is a solid overview of their history. As such, I think it is definitely worth watching.

Powered by

About Greg Barbrick

  • http://theglenblog.blogspot.com Glen Boyd

    I’ve always liked PJ and thought a lot of the flak they took from the Seattle scenesters back then was unwarranted.

    Did Ten sound suspiciously like a Bad Company record? Sure it did…just as Soundgarden sounded like Sabbath and Zeppelin and Alice In Chains sounded like the Cult. So what?

    Labels like “alternative” were always of a lot more use to the trendy music snobs than to those of us who just like a good rock and roll band anyway — however you want to label it. Good review, dude.

    -Glen

  • Greg Barbrick

    Thanks Glen – it really is hard to fathom that it has been 20 years now since our fair city was going to save rock n roll huh?

  • http://theglenblog.blogspot.com Glen Boyd

    Like Kurt Cobain was ever gonna’ save anything…hell, he couldn’t even save himself.

    -Glen

  • http://www.maskedmoviesnobs.com El Bicho

    I loved No Code. A lot of the songs hit home at the time it came out.

    So do you not think the Soundgarden reunion will last?

  • Greg Barbrick

    It was a fun time there for a minute though.

  • Greg Barbrick

    I don’t think it will last, those guys fight way too much, and now they’re what 15 years older than before. No way, a few gigs, but not long term.

  • zingzing

    and cornell has become the absolute antithesis of his former self.

  • http://theglenblog.blogspot.com Glen Boyd

    Thayil always hated touring, and I think Chris Cornell secretly wants to be Justin Timberlake. I don’t see a long future there.

    -Glen

  • Greg Barbrick

    Cornell wants to be Timberlake, thats pretty good Glen.

  • http://theglenblog.blogspot.com Glen Boyd

    Spoken for truth.

%d bloggers like this: