Today on Blogcritics
Home » Music 10 Years After Kurt

Music 10 Years After Kurt

Please Share...Print this pageTweet about this on Twitter0Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Pin on Pinterest0Share on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

Every April it hits me… the rapes/murders/suicides that tainted the grunge scene in 1994, the passing of Layne Staley, and all the angst and tragedy and darkness associated with a genre of music that once meant so much to me and my life. Maybe it still does. And what WAS grunge anyway? That’s like trying to figure out what PUNK was. Think about it, there’s a huge difference between The Sex Pistols, The Clash and Fugasi. A fucking HUGE difference. Yet they were all considered “punk,” just as Nirvana, Soundgarden, Pearl Jam, and glam rockers cum metal rockers Alice In Chains were all considered “grunge”

There is one thing I can say about that period in music and that period in my life though.The music stood for something. Displacement in society, alientation, rage, whatever. Nirvana and others brought a type of music that was never accepted by the mainstream into the status quo. No mainstreamer had ever paid attention to that kind of music before,not really. It didn’t matter if you were Mudhoney or The Smiths or even even U2 at one point. You were “alternative.” You were something outside of the norm. And a lot of that music outside of the norm meant SOMETHING.

When I was in high school, bands like Stone Temple Pilots and Nirvana were huge, and it was cool to not be too “cool.” It was cool to wear the tackiest ugliest clothes you possibly could. But not too cool…”alternative” cool. And that’s where it all seemed to go downhill.

R.E.M. was the first alternative/college rock band to sign with a major label, keeping one hundred percent creative control. And bands like Sonic Youth and Nirvana noticed that, and they followed. So, some of the “heroes” of my generation essentially “sold out” by their own standards, only not really. Because even a song as sappy and slow as R.E.M.’s “Everybody Hurts” meant something to an era… it spoke to alienated youth that just didn’t fit in with the mainstream ideal and saw through the bullshit and mass marketing they were subjected to. I’m not sure exactly what Kurt or anyone else was screaming about, but they were screaming about SOMETHING. And that meant something to a lot of people. That meant something to ME.

I grew up fascinated with Alternative music’s back catelogue, all the way back to it’s punk roots. The Cure and The Clash and The Smiths weren’t really from MY era, but I thought they were fucking cool. But I was glad my generation had it’s own heroes. I realted to them, I realted to something in the music. Which brings me to my two points.

Where are these “heroes” today. Who are they? Eminem? 50 Cent? Who is relating through music what it means to grow up, who is challenging the system and its corruption? I’m not sure. Maybe it’s a function of age or a function of the timesor a function of somehting else that I can’t quite figure it out.

Why do I care so much? I don’t know that I do in the way it might seem. I just think music is such a big part of people’s lives, especially when one is young, and that music stays with you to some extent for the rest of your life. And I can’t help feeling this bitter sweet sensation every time Nirvana comes on the radio… the sound is copied by thousands of bands, but the passion is not possesed by a single one.

I think it’s time to at least look at WHY that passion really isn’t around anymore, and if you’re a reasonably intellegent person, especially if you’re a creative one, I think it’s time to try to ask ourselves what more we can do to ARTISTICALLY say SOMETHING about this frightening transitory period that the world is currently in right now.

I don’t think it’s good enough to think outside the box, I think the entire box needs to be replaced with something else. Or, at least, I hope something or someone as impassioned as Kurt comes along to shock and awe the hell out of it.

[To Be Contunued]
Powered by

About jason

  • woodchuck

    The fact is Kurt Cobain & all the rest of the grunge “movement” (if true rebellion ever admits any kind of structure) were the final escapees from the tyranny of the music business & their byzantium industrial strength marketing machinery, which is often slow on the uptake, but always catches up. They blew it with Elvis in the ’60’s, the hippies in the ’60’s, and the punks in the 70’s. They got complacent in the ’80’s, thinking they had the music biz finally sewn up, but grunge sneaked in a few pretty good groups before they could manipulate it. Of course, they eventually did – re: Green Day, Blink 182 et.al. Here in the 21st century, they’ve got the stylized rebellion of Eminiem, the glossy sexuality of Christina A, and even the nostalgia of anything of value in the last 40 years -how many times can you buy Let It Be, Naked or Not? It’s nearly impossible for a band or musical movement to break through like it could in the good ol’ days – whichever era, take your pick.

  • sheri

    Jason TY for articulating this as eloquently and right on target as you did. :0)

  • Roger

    FYI, NBC’s Dateline is airing a special on Kurt Cobain and Courtney Love Friday 04/02/04.

  • Paul Proc

    It really angers me to think that people actually think Kurt Cobain killed himself.it’s 100%impossibe that he killed himself because he would have had to have left fingerprints on the shotgun used.why weren’t Kurts fingerprints on the shotgun.If Kurt wasn’t wearing gloves when he died he would have had to have left his fingerprints.NO FUCKin’ FIngerprints on The Gun. Hello, Concrete evidence. forget all the other stuff. this is it.how can a guy pick up a shotgun and use it to kill himself without leaving his own fingerprints???? Its IMpossible!!THINK ABOUt IT.just remember Kurt didn’t kill himself, and remember that when you hear the music.
    This is the Only Truth…here it is
    THanks
    Paul Proc

%d bloggers like this: