Today on Blogcritics
Home » Movie Review: Spider-Man 3

Movie Review: Spider-Man 3

Please Share...Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Share on LinkedIn0Pin on Pinterest0Share on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

When Spider-Man emerged in 2002, it energized audiences. Far from a masterpiece, the film got fans’ feet wet. As Spider-Man 2 hit theatres in 2004, it immediately earned honors as one of the best comic book-to-motion picture adaptations of all time. By way of a bigger budget and tighter script, 2 dove into the pool headfirst and succeeded without a splash. Unfortunately, with Spider-Man 3, the result is a two hour and twenty minute shard of escapism that only offers glimmers of what made 2 great.

For Peter Parker (Tobey Maguire), life is grand: college is a cinch, the people of New York absolutely adore Spider-Man, and, Mary Jane (Kirsten Dunst) is about to become Spider-Man’s fiancée.

Peter’s sky begins to turn gray when a strange black substance arrives via meteor and bonds to his Spidey suit and body. What’s more, Peter’s best friend Harry Osborn/New Goblin (James Franco) still seeks to avenge his father’s death, while Peter’s uncle’s actual killer, Flint Marko (Thomas Haden Church), is still at large. When Marko accidentally enters a particle research center, he is transformed into the Sandman – a seemingly indestructible villain. 

Into the bargain, Eddie Brock (Topher Grace) looks to one-up Peter Parker as the Daily Bugle’s photographer, and in the process, Brock becomes Venom. Moreover, Mary Jane loses sight of Peter’s commitment. With so much trouble headed Peter’s way, he must conquer his greatest threat yet and win back the woman he loves.

Sam Raimi directs a few fine action sequences and works with a superb cast –- Grace, Haden Church, Bryce Dallas Howard, and Bruce Campbell (Raimi’s must-include) especially –- and CGI team. On the downside, Raimi chooses to have Spidey exude an odd aura as the character becomes both uncomfortably flirty with women who walk by on the street, and uncommonly active in a jazz club. Instead of adapting a dark, mysterious tone with the arrival of the symbiote suit, Raimi heads for cheese, Goth, and hedonism.

2 is a more entertaining movie than 3 because 2 possesses an inner character conflict in Parker struggling between being Peter and a superhero. With 3, it feels like Peter doesn’t have a worry in the world (other than losing MJ). He flies around the city unmasked, jumps from his own apartment window each time the police scanner becomes active (as if no one would see him), and allows the police chief’s daughter to partially pull off his mask in front of a large crowd of onlookers. With these moves, one loses a sense of seriousness, suspense, and in turn, interest.

To continue adding tick-marks to the unwise side of the chalkboard, only allowing Venom 30 minutes or less of screen time (considering he is Spider-Man’s arch nemesis throughout the comic book series) is an injustice. Venom deserves to be the main villain in his own film — not just an afterthought to throw into the mix. With that said, too many villains compromise the plot. In addition, a 140-minute running time is a little overboard (especially at this film’s uneven pace). Furthermore, hastily wrapping up all the loose ends was a mistake. Not to say that the door is closed on the series, but it’s certainly not looking as inviting.

With all three Spider-Man movies now on the table, it is evident that (much like the X-Men series) the second chapter is the meat in between two not-so-fresh slices of bread. Compared to the preceding achievement, 3 feels more like a disappointment than anything else. It is uncharacteristically dim-witted and hardly acceptable.

Powered by

About Brandon Valentine

  • http://www.minewastaller.com/ Ian Woolstencroft

    Venom is Spider-Man’s “arch nemesis throughout the comic book series”? Since when?

    The guy hasn’t featured in Amazing Spider-Man for years. He was a hot villain for a while but never in the same league as Green Goblin or Doc Ock. As for “throughout”, well Spidey made is début in 1962, Venom made his first appearance in 1988 so to quote Stan Lee ‘Nuff Said.

    Including Venom at all was a mistake and something Raimi originally said he wouldn’t do (and at heart I think didn’t want to do).

    Your assessment of the film is pretty accurate though.

  • http://www.valentineonfilm.com Brandon Valentine

    Thanks for the correction and compliment Ian.

  • katie luke

    i thouhgt the action and special effects in the movie were great but i didnt enjoy the cockyness and spiderman, he sorta turned into a jerk

  • Mike

    Everyone is being way too harsh on this wonderful film! Ok, there were 3 villains, to me that just added to the excitement. The film’s length was also fine, it went by quickly. It’s only 2 hours after all, Lord of the Rings 3 was much longer than that, but do we see anyone complaining? I am actually shocked this never got at least 90%, as the only things wrong were the short Venom scene and Spiderman acting like an emo (which wasn’t all that bad to be honest). This was better than Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer anyway, but Fantastic 4 was still awesome.