Today on Blogcritics
Home » Movie Review: Once Upon a Time in the West

Movie Review: Once Upon a Time in the West

Please Share...Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Share on LinkedIn0Pin on Pinterest0Share on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

As Jill McBain (Claudia Cardinale) rides the train west to join her new husband at the start of Once Upon a Time in the West, he is gunned down by the notorious Frank (Henry Fonda), a ruthless villain after McBain’s considerable fortune. Upon arrival, she learns the gruesome details of the murder and desires nothing more than to sell her inheritance at an auction controlled by Frank. But an unlikely team of Harmonica (Charles Bronson) and Cheyenne (Jason Robards) work together to block Frank’s power grab.

At first glance, this seems to be a somewhat standard plot for a western, but in reality it isn’t. What’s written above is the Cliff Notes version, condensed and simplified for your convenience. The actual plot, as it unfolds during the course of the film, is a great deal more complicated. The alliances of the three men in regards to each other or the woman are constantly in flux, never approaching a state where you can definitively say who is in cahoots with whom.

Naturally, this tends to be a point of confusion that isn’t helped by Sergio Leone’s unwillingness to provide any more backstory than is absolutely necessary. So the audience spends a lot of time trying to figure out who’s going to kill whom, which depending on your point of view is either a brilliant choice by Leone or a terrible one. If you view it as brilliant, then the argument is probably that in the wild west allegiances are always in flux, no one is to be trusted, and it adds to the general suspense of the film. All of these things are true. At the same time, this leaves Leone free to ignore basic things like character development and dialogue for his specialty – wide, beautiful landscape shots with a transition to a close-up of someone’s eyes.

And there are a lot of close-ups of people’s eyes, usually complimented by squinting. Call it the Clint Eastwood effect.

The credits contain three “story by” credits, which is a lot for a film that doesn’t contain much actual story, so allow me propose a theory on how this particular idea was born. Leone, in the process of trying to make Once Upon a Time in America (1984) was told by the studios that they wouldn’t fund it unless he made another western for them to capitalize on the box office success of his Fistfull of Dollars trilogy.

So, being frustrated with the constraints of the studio system, he did what any great filmmaker would do. He rounded up two of his fellow Italian filmmakers — Bernardo Bertolucci, best known for Ultimo tango a Parigi (1972), and Dario Argento, a rather well-known director of thrillers and father of the actress Asia Argento — and headed for the bar. There, they came up with the outline of a story that Leone could turn into a western on par with his earlier works. But, they didn’t bother to fully flesh out the story[3], figuring Leone could just fill in the gaps with landscapes and close-ups and music and the rest of his bag of tricks. And they were right, to an extent, but I think the film suffers a bit upon close inspection.

As a result, C’era una volta il West is, above all else, a classic example of style over substance. The prime instance is the opening sequence of three gunmen waiting for a train. Leone uses nothing but natural sounds (and a couple flies) to build the suspense of these men simply waiting. We assume they aren’t going to welcome whoever is on the train, but we have no idea who that person is, why they are waiting for him, or what exactly they plan to do with him.

So when the train arrives and no one emerges, we let our guard down for a moment, only to find Harmonica has gotten off on the other side. They stare each other down the way people do in westerns and Harmonica kills all of them. It’s an undeniably cool way to start a film. From there on out it’s one cool scene after another — some of them merely fun, some of them breathtaking — but few of them spend any time strengthening the film’s core, so if you fail to buy fully into the cool factor, Once Upon a Time in the West can tend to leave you cold. There are only so many times you can look at someone’s eyes without being able to look deeper before it gets repetitive, and Leone crosses that line a couple of times.

Technically speaking, this is a better film than Il Buono, il brutto, il cattivo (1966), but that’s primarily due to the budgets. What Once Upon a Time in the West (C’era una volta il West) lacks is what Il Buono, il brutto, il cattivo had in spades: a raw energy that made the film feel alive.

And while West has some amazing moments, it occasionally has the feel of a great director coasting along, killing time until he can make the film he really wants to. In short, he’s too proud to make a bad film, but his heart just isn’t in it. So, what could have been amazing is merely very, very good. Definitely worth watching multiple times, but not quite up to the standards of greatness.

Starring: Henry Fonda, Charles Bronson, Jason Robards, and Claudia Cardinale
Written by: Sergio Leone & Sergio Donati, from the story by Leone & Dario Argento & Bernardo Bertolucci
Directed by: Sergio Leone
M, 165 min, 1968, Italy/USA

Powered by

About Lucas McNelly

  • Scott Butki

    Another excellent review, Lucas.

    you know, if you list out which movies from the
    100 list you are doing next – maybe the next 3 to 5 – I’ll try to watch those too and we can compare notes.

  • http://lmcnelly15.blogspot.com Lucas McNelly

    scott,

    today, as part of my annual 4 July quest to do nothing American, i watched Andrei Rublev, so that might be next, or it might be Closely Watched Trains, but it really depends on my mood. i don’t really have a set order. those will probably be 2 of the next 3, i’d guess.

  • Scott Butki

    Ok, enjoy.