Today on Blogcritics
Home » Movie Review: Frost/Nixon

Movie Review: Frost/Nixon

Please Share...Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Share on LinkedIn0Pin on Pinterest0Share on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

When the actual interviews between David Frost and Richard Nixon aired way back in 1977 I was just a youngster with no interest in politics or much else of any great import. I probably could not even say the name "Nixon," much less "Watergate" or "resignation." Fast-forward to today and you will find the adult me still pretty much clueless when it comes to the Frost/Nixon interviews or any of the Watergate specifics.

I know, just your typical "dumb American," and I admit that my knowledge of history is lacking, not to mention a few other subjects as well. So, while I am not taking this film as absolute truth (an approach taken with any true story adaptation), I do see it as an interesting window into a fascinating moment in time. The movie isn't half bad either.

Frost/Nixon opens by introducing us to Richard Nixon (Frank Langella) as he resigns from the White House in the wake of the Watergate scandal and pretty much removing himself from the public eye. I suppose it was for the best – his disappearance, that is. He was a polarizing figure who wasn’t exactly in the good graces of the public; I'd disappear, too.

The opening also introduces us to David Frost (Michael Sheen), who lost his show in America and works on a fluffy interview show in Australia. The man is shown to thrive on his public appearance and desperately wants to get back in with the American crowd, where he believes the greatest success can be had.

The first act spends most of its time on getting David Frost into position. Following Nixon’s resignation announcement, Frost gets the idea that he would like to interview him for whatever reason. To that end he makes some calls, but it doesn't seem likely. However, with Nixon looking to rehab his image, and seeing Frost as the best candidate for a fluffy interview and the biggest paycheck, he accepts Frost's offer. Now Frost only has to get some questions together and find someone to air the interviews. This latter element proves to be the most difficult.

Once he gets the pieces together, the film moves into the second act, which focuses on the interviews. This is the real meat and potatoes of the film and the real reason to want to watch it. I didn't care about the setup or the eventual conclusion; I was there to see the verbal confrontations between the two men of the title. Not knowing anything about the interviews, this was my interest.

What a duel it is. The whole series of interviews as shown is fascinating, including the research build up and the work provided by producer Bob Zelnick (Oliver Platt) and James Reston Jr. (Sam Rockwell). Besides the work they did to prepare Frost for the interviews, they were also interesting characters – particularly Reston and his desire to take the fight to Nixon and give him the trial he never had.

It is interesting, but the film as a whole is not a great one. I have never been the biggest fan of director Ron Howard. It’s not bad by any stretch, but there is nothing terribly distinctive about his films. What makes Frost/Nixon work so well is the wonderful screenplay and the performances.

The screenplay was penned by Peter Morgan based on his own play. It is a sparkling example of words all in the right order without a word out of place. On top of that, with Frank Langella delivering a good portion of the words, they take on an almost Shakespearean quality. Not to mention there is an interesting relevancy to the current state of government surrounding our exiting President, stuck home by the line in the trailer: "I'm saying that when the President does it, that means it's not illegal!"

About Draven99

  • Austin Tacious

    The Liberals have allways used Richard Nixon as a kicking post trying to portray him as the Anti Christ, and with the passage of time make him out to be so evil. It’s true he was guilty of a coverup of something but its never mentioned that the Democrats were doing the same thing to the Republicans. Fast forward to modern times, Bill Clinton was Guilty of much worse including giving top secret missile guidance to the Chinese, the result, they make him into a saint. It’s OK to disgrace the office, lie under oath, give the nations secrets away, be impeached and a list that would go on all day but because he’s popular place him up with the allmighty himself. Way to go America.