Home / Movie Review: Brokeback Mountain

Movie Review: Brokeback Mountain

Please Share...Print this pageTweet about this on TwitterShare on Facebook0Share on Google+0Pin on Pinterest0Share on Tumblr0Share on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

Believe the hype — this movie is as good as you’ve heard. It may even be better. Brokeback Mountain is a sweeping tale of stymied love spanning twenty years, directed by the master of uncomfortable, unfulfilled love stories (The Ice Storm, Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon), Ang Lee. Lee knows how to wrangle pain from his actors, and here he is in his element with two characters who have spent their lives tamping down the feelings that could get them killed.

Yes, if you have to label everything and tie up the characters and story into neat little packages, then okay: Brokeback Mountain is about gay cowboys (but before you ask, alas, no pudding). But writing this film off with a few controversial labels doesn’t do it justice. If nothing else, one hopes that this movie can help to shed light on the notion that labels and stereotypes are often inadequate when it comes to sexuality. Ennis del Mar and Jack Twist are men (fully realized in tremendous, career-making performances by Heath Ledger and Jake Gyllenhaal) who fall in love, but does it make them gay? Are we defined by labels, or by the actions in our lives?

Part of the controversy surrounding this film lies in the perception that the movie is encouraging homosexual men to marry and live out “traditional” lives with a wife and children, the nuclear family American dream. There seems to be some feeling that this is a particularly unhealthy idea to propagate now when the delicate issue of gay rights is being debated across the country. What these people don’t seem to realize is that this film doesn’t advocate anything except the idea that being true to one’s self is difficult in any time and any place – and everyone struggles with that, homo- or heterosexual, male or female, rich or poor. For Ennis and Jack, their inability (due to upbringing, culture, and society) to live out the lives they might have otherwise chosen is their downfall. There’s nothing in the film that encourages gay men to act “straight.”

Nor is the film some sort of flamboyant cavalcade of homosexuality that some would like you to think. It’s difficult for me to refer to Ennis and Jack with the accepted labels of sexuality because sexuality is a rich facet of our selves, multi-layered and deep. It is not a simple question for many, and that struggle is one of the story’s strengths. Is Brokeback Mountain really about “gay cowboys?”

In the film, there are clues that for Jack, the potential at least is present from the beginning. When he first sees Ennis, they are just two cowboys waiting outside a trailer and hoping to leave with a job. Ennis is stoic, the perfect strong, silent type… but Jack sees something in the other man’s lanky form that calls to him, and he shifts restlessly against his truck, perfecting a masculine lean… and even then, his vulnerability, his need for acceptance and love is so clear that it’s heartbreaking. From that moment, silent and long, marked by Jack peeking at Ennis from under the brim of his hat, we can see their entire relationship laid out before them, down to its inevitable tragic end. Gyllenhaal really shines here in and in the scenes on the mountain, when the two are looking after a large flock of sheep. There is one scene in particular, when Ennis strips down to wash and Jack must… not… look… He goes on peeling potatoes for supper, but it is apparently from the tension in his jaw and his forcefully blank expression that the attraction that sparked at their first meeting has, for him, grown into a hungry flame.

bbm.jpgBut Heath Ledger’s mumbling Ennis is more difficult to define. At the beginning of that fateful summer in 1963, he is engaged and is hoping to save up a little extra cash for his fall wedding. He’s the real cowboy, all dusty workmanship next to the flashy, bull-riding Jack Twist. Whereas Jack bitches about the sheep, the rules, the job, and anything that crops up, Ennis accepts his place and does what is expected (a quality that will shape his life). When the fateful moment comes, on a cold night that brings the two men together in a tent against the chill outside, Ennis reacts to Jack’s first sexual overture with violence, slapping him away. When he gives in, a heartbeat later, there is an air of prison sex about the scene. These men are stuck on a mountaintop for months with no release. They might as well be in prison. And Ennis seems to give it no more thought than that. They discuss it later, once:

Ennis: This is a one-shot thing we got going on here.
Jack: Nobody’s business but ours.
Ennis: You know I ain’t queer.
Jack: Me neither.

And they move on, marrying… Jack because it’s convenient (or inconvenient; there is some question here that his marriage is of the shotgun variety) and Ennis because that’s what men do. And for Ennis, that marriage at first seems happy. After his initial violent and ill reaction to the end of that summer (he collapses in the shadow of a building, dry-heaving and holding back tears), life is okay. He works hard, but that’s what men do. His wife Alma (played by Ledger’s real life love Michelle Williams) has a couple of kids. And they share tender moments among the pain of being poor and saddled with children. The relationship is normal, if somewhat perfunctory, but so are many marriages. If not for the reappearance of Jack, Ennis might have lived out his life just like that.

There is one really excellent scene during Ennis and Alma’s short-lived marriage that seems slightly changed from the story but still amazingly effective. They are in bed, and Alma is trying to convince Ennis that they should move “into town.” The conversation doesn’t get very far; as with many young couples with children, they get distracted by the excitement of a few moments alone and the talk fades into sex. In the story, Ennis is careful to put his wife’s needs before his own and it is mentioned that she doesn’t enjoy the actual act of intercourse. In the film, it seems more that they are both enjoying the moment – loving one another and sinking into the physicality of simply being together – and then suddenly, Ennis turns Alma over and enters her from behind. It is the same in the story, but here, translated to a visual medium, it is a very telling moment. Ennis, no matter how far down he keeps his feelings, wants to love and feel love, and in this idyllic moment with his wife, he tries to recreate the only real happiness he has ever known – with Jack – by taking her the same way. It is a breathless moment, and like so many of the film’s best scenes, extraordinarily subtle.

Is Brokeback Mountain about gay cowboys? Yes and no. But by labeling the characters, and the film, the fact that it is a painful, momentous, beautiful love story is ignored. It’s an epic Western romance. Call it that and let it go.

But it’s also a story about freedom, the importance of the freedom to let go and be yourself. Jack and Ennis don’t have that freedom, no matter how much Jack wants it. Once they are reunited, after four years, a sinister memory casts a pall over any hope that this romance would end happily. As a child, his father took Ennis and his brother to see the tattered corpse of a rancher who lived alone with another man. Among other things, “they” had taken a tire iron to the man… and that image, and the thought of the tire iron, would take on almost mythic proportions for Ennis throughout his life. Except for one impassioned semi-public moment, Ennis keeps his feelings for Jack under tight control and never entertains the idea of giving it all up to run away with his lover, not even when it means he might lose him. He never considers letting go — because Ennis, the realist, knows what happens to the men who let go.

Annie Proulx’s terse short story was about an intense love between two men who were ill-equipped to deal with any feelings at all. And the film, adapted by Larry McMurtry and writing partner Diana Ossana, captures the story more accurately than most adaptations. The changes are minimal, limited to a little necessary expansion of minor characters and a lengthening of the buildup between Ennis and Jack. Most of the original dialogue is captured faithfully – often word for word. But the real achievement here, in my view, is that the very landscape itself seems almost a character in the film – which is apt, as their physical origin acts as strongly on Jack and Ennis as any other factor in their lives.

Ang Lee and cinematographer Rodrigo Prieto of Amores Perros capture the dust of the colorless town where Ennis is trapped with his wife Alma in such a way that we feel trapped right there with them. Much has been made of the shots of the mountains and the Wyoming sky, shots that evoke the postcards Jack and Ennis use to plan their trysts, but for me the most stunningly effective translation of the story is in that town. Maybe it’s because I spent scattered years of my childhood in such places, where being “working class” really meant poor, but I find it easy to sink into the sameness of the days and can understand how momentous it is when, four years after their summer together, Ennis gets the first postcard from Jack. By then, something different, anything different, is huge.

I can’t say enough about the performances in this film. Everyone is fantastic, from the two leads and their wives down to the supporting roles – most notable here is Randy Quaid as the rancher whose sheep bring Jack and Ennis together in the first place. Michelle Williams and Anne Hathaway are excellent as the wives, though Anne Hathaway (of The Princess Diaries) doesn’t age physically as well as the other characters in the film (hardly her fault). I have a feeling she won’t be doing any more Disney films after her scene here stripping and seducing Jack in the backseat of her car. Williams has one of the movie’s best – and most painful – moments when she steps to the door, eager to see the friend that had her reserved husband all but bouncing on his toes with excitement, and finds them kissing with a passion she has never shared with Ennis.

But the movie belongs to the men, and ultimately to Heath Ledger, though Jake Gyllenhaal is truly great as Jack Twist. It takes some time to accept Gyllenhaal’s voice in this role; I found it a little jarring at first, the earnest, youthful quality in his voice comes through a little too strongly in the opening scenes, but he relaxes into the role and that fades.

But Heath Ledger. Oh, Heath! What have you been doing all this time? Ang Lee, on Charlie Rose a few nights ago, mentioned Ledger’s role in Monster’s Ball as a factor in his casting here, and it’s unsurprising – he’s had some good performances in some mediocre movies, and that is the only opportunity he’s really had to shine in a strong and deeply emotional role. Ledger carries this film, easily and effortlessly. This is no insult to the other performances – there are no false chords in this romantic symphony – but in the end, it is Ennis you will remember, Ennis clutching the shirts he and Jack wore in 1963, shirts that Jack kept for twenty years, and Ledger pours forth decades of pain and struggle in a brief moment as he clutches those shirts.

Lee himself has had nothing but praise for Ledger in the role:

I feel very fortunate to have Heath in the movie. He’s a natural. He has great coordination, he’s very dedicated, and he does his preparation. He meticulously aims towards a certain target and firmly believes in what he’s doing… He and I talked about how Ennis doesn’t speak much. Deep inside, he has a big fear from a childhood traumatic experience, and from his awakening to his own sexuality, which is not allowed to be expressed in the West. Ennis has to cover that up with his attitude and, sometimes, violence. He can get very violent, because of how scared he is. So he’s a scared kid inside, playing a Western kind of cool. Heath not only had to carry his own character and the whole character of the West, but carry the movie – and he underplayed powerfully.

But don’t take it from the director – go see it for yourself. See Brokeback Mountain not for the controversy, or for any statements about society (there aren’t any), or even for the performances (though it’d be worth it). See it because so few modern films tackle the notion that love is work, and that it’s usually not a happy-fun-time where everything is rainbows and lollipops in a meadow. Love is violent and intense, it’s painful and more than anything, it’s hard, but even then it’s beautiful. It’s wonderful. It’s what so many of us live for. And Brokeback Mountain is about the kind of love that lasts forever – it’s a force of nature.

Brokeback Mountain opens today in selected cities, but will not hit wide release (to cities like my native Little Rock) until an as yet undetermined date in January.


You Don’t Go There To Fish
QuickTime High
QuickTime Low
Windows Media High
Windows Media Low

It Ain’t Gonna Be Like That
QuickTime High
QuickTime Low
Windows Media High
Windows Media Low

Powered by

About Alisha Karabinus

  • See? This is what I was saying about having to pick a “best of 2005” movie before the end of December (in my review I submitted to you last night). This movie won’t be out in Seattle until NEXT weekend. But I can bet that it would be among my picks for the best. Damn that deadline!

    Nice review, though. I definitely want to see it now!

  • I know — it definitely usurped the two I was considering for my own pick. But we have to be able to get it together before the end of the year. 🙁

    translation: all BC editors should be beaten with sticks.

    But oh my god, go see it. It’s incredible. I’m an Ang Lee fangirl, but still, go see it.

  • If anybody proclaims this is one of those queer propaganda movies, as certain Christian groups are trying to assert, they do not know what they are talking about. In fact, they are bearing false witness. This isn’t one of those movies. It’s a bona fide love story that plucks the strings of one’s heart like an angel’s harp.

  • Alisha, thank you. You found the words that I couldn’t find. This movie has left me drained and shaken to the core. As you well know, that is no exaggeration. I finally figured out the best way to describe it:

    Oscar and Felix from the Odd Couple meets Lonesome Dove. Ennis is Oscar; Jack is Felix. They do what the Odd Couple probably wanted to do, only in chaps and ten gallon hats. This movie is destined for the Golden Globes and Oscars. Unfortunately, it will be better received in Europe where the audience isn’t so insecure about sex. What a tragedy for Americans.

  • I’m not sure if I’ll get to see it or not – but it does sound good.

    The whole idea of this set up – homosexual situations that might or might not define a whole movie – reminds me strangely enough of Monster.

    I did not want to see that movie, not because of the possiblity of same sex scenes, but because it just sounded SO depressing! But a friend insisted I give it a try. Well it was good – still very depressing, but good.

    What struck me was the scene outside the skating rink – when (damn I forget the names!) Charlize Theron’s and Christina Ricci’s characters are making out like crazy.

    It was arty, it wasn’t pretty. It wasn’t porn, it wasn’t college boy fantasy (eg American Pie 2. And I almost forgot that they were of the same sex – or not forget, but that was minor to the scene.

    It was hot. Those women conveyed the need, the lust, the ‘I have to have you RIGHT now’ feeling that hopefully we all can identify with.

    Diversity is great – wonderful to acknowledge what makes one group unique from another, and respect those who are different and etc etc —

    BUT –

    Isn’t it also great to just ‘be in the moment’? No labels, no minorities – just a sharing of love or lust or desperation – no matter who is doing the sharing?

  • Mary, how wise and compassionate your words are in your closing above! Thank you. Paul Clinton writes a review of Brokeback on CNN today and his closing is similar:

    Human beings have a deep need to love and to be loved in return. “Brokeback Mountain” celebrates that need without making any moral judgments. One line in the film sums it all up: “If you can’t fix it, you gotta stand it.”

    Indeed, instead of curing ‘it’ maybe what’s in order is compassion and understanding. Even at a half century of age, I have been irrevocably affected by the power of this film. Ang Lee has done this to me for a second time. The first was with his wonderful The Wedding Banquet. This has been a tumultuous year. So much has happened – two Popes, the escalation of War, Katrina, Tsunami, etc. You would think that these major events around the world would have softened our hearts a bit to the idea that love does come in all shapes and sizes. Anyway, enough pontificating. Thank you, again.

  • very welcome Silas –

    I don’t wear the rose colored glasses all the time – I’m getting increasingly disturbed with life in general –

    but I still have hope for compassion and tolerance.

    If you can’t have hope – you don’t have much.

    OHH and maybe I’ll blame it on the rose colored glasses, but I screwed up in my earlier comment #5. I meant to say.. “it isn’t arty”

  • Mike

    What a wonderful review. You articulated everything I experienced in the movie.

    This movie has really stuck with me, far more than I expected. The morning after I saw it I cried for half an hour just thinking about it. I think it connects with any experience the viewer has had with loneliness, fear and the desperate desire to hang on to personal authenticity no matter how painful.

  • I saw this movie last Thursday at an Advanced Screening, and let me say…it is truly amazing. It’s really one of the best made films I’ve ever seen–AND WHAT AMAZING ACTORS! Anne Hathaway and Heath Ledger in particular…I felt were phenomenal.

  • Thanks so much for all the kind comments. This was a really tough film to review because it is so very emotional and it does stick with you… I found myself thinking about it over the next several days after seeing it, and it was still such a fresh wound, if you will, that it was difficult to pull my thoughts into line.

    And Mary, that’s lovely. That’s EXACTLY the feeling I get from this movie, too. It’s just a love story. There’s been so much BS written about this being a “gay romance” or the doomsayers bitching because it makes westerns look bad or oh no, positive gay stories and blah blah blah, but if it weren’t for any of that, if we could all just look past it, it would just be a movie. About a romance that went, to a large degree, unfulfilled. And it’s a great MOVIE. It’s a great STORY.

    Let’s hope it’s a hallmark of how things can be, maybe, in a few years.

  • GoHah

    I think I’ve said this elsewhere on another post, but I do recommend the novella/short story–I think its been published by itself now(?) but it was originally a short story in Annie Proulx’s “Close Range: Wyoming Stories.”

  • “That’s EXACTLY the feeling I get from this movie, too. It’s just a love story. There’s been so much BS written about this being a “gay romance”

    Alisha – Yup. I think if that’s the kind of thing you can take away from a film, then the director has done something right. (Oh and the actors too : )

  • GoHah — I LOVE the story. And I think the adaptation was excellent. I’m death on adaptations, typically… I can think of a spare handful I think did the original work full justice, and this one comes in very close to the top.

  • Does anyone know where to find out of what cities this movie will be released? I live in Spokane, WA. Thanks lots.

  • marc

    I saw the film on Thursady at the 12:00 AM showing. I don’t cry in movies, but I did in this one. It was so beautiful and thoughtful. I cried once I got home. This movie, as did the short story moved me.

  • Victoria

    Excellent review. I haven’t seen the film and I don’t know if I will, but this was a very thoughtful, well-written article. You should have Roger Ebert’s job.

  • Mung

    I still need to wait until Jan when it’s on in Leeds, can’t wait though after reading all the reviews and watching the preview. It’s not this gay cowboy love story fascinates me, it’s the hidden side of ourselves.

  • Moe

    Gay cowboys?

    I’ll pass.

  • ClubhouseCancer

    Too bad, Moe. It’s quite an affecting love story. Maybe you’ll catch it on cable sometime and see why so many folks loved it.

  • Moe

    NO I don’t think I’ll be watching this movie. EVER!

    Now if someone were to make a “love story” about two hot lesbian plumbers that couldn’t keep thier hands off each other I’d watch it though.

  • Alisha Karabinus’s review of Brokeback Mountain is one of the most thoughtful and well written I have yet read; in fact it may well be the most insightful one I’ve seen to date.

  • Rick

    I love America! Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and here is my on this dreadful movie: I think it is another example of left wing liberal Hollywood wackiest people trying to impose their immoral ideas on American society thru media. Brokeback Mountain is a movie that should have never been made. Two male sheep farmers getting it on in the mountains; how sick is that? The men depicted in the movie are both married have families to think about; it is just despicable. Infidelity and homosexuality, Is this what you really want to teach you children?

    Homosexuality – is it genetic? I do not believe that because some people might be genetically predisposed towards something (like being gay), that it is therefore ok. According to the Bible, God gave us free will. Free will which we can either use to give into our sinful urges, or we can use to resist unnatural urges. In my opinion, one of the main points of the story of Adam and Eve is to say that we are all predisposed to sin and that we all have significant temptation to overcome in our lives and we should do our best to not give into sin but make appropriate moral socially acceptable choices. Another thing I got out of the story of Adam and Eve was God created Eve (a woman) as a companion for Adam to help populate the Earth. Notice, he did not chose two men or two women for the task at hand, it was man and women he designed to accomplish this task.

    I don’t consider myself a bible thumper in fact I do not even attend a church but I do use and read the Christian bible in hope that the guidance provided within will help me make good moral decisions in this turbulent life. The following are a few scriptures that I find interesting in my non-gay lifestyle.

    Leviticus 18:22 – Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.

    Leviticus 20:13 – If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

    1 Corinthians 6:9 says, “Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor sodomites, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God.”

    The choice is yours; Chose wisely.

  • Mark 1:1 – What a big loada hooey.

  • Carol

    Ahhhh, Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve…..such a simple black and white concept, but then,life was never meant to be simply figured out. We are left with many shades of grey aren’t we?

  • Scott Butki

    Great review. Very well thought out.

  • Scott Butki

    I’ve read between 20 and 30 reviews of this movie and this is the best, the most thorough and thoughtful of them all.