Today on Blogcritics
Home » Moral Responsibility and Grass

Moral Responsibility and Grass

Please Share...Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Share on LinkedIn0Pin on Pinterest0Share on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

Sheri Tepper‘s Grass is a rabbit-hole entry into rich moral questions: Do good people have a moral responsibility to act to prevent evil actions by others? And even deeper: Can that action include killing the evil actor to prevent the evil action? Deeper still: Is there an objective measure for good and evil? By the time you know who (what) characters the protagonist finds good, you’re already well into Wonderland.

As with all of Tepper’s novels, there is also a frontal attack on a recurring question (in case you don’t have philosophical indigestion already): What is a worthwhile life? Can it be deferred for “heaven”? Can it be lived without the non-human other?

Marjorie Westriding is a “small being” faced with these questions on the planet Grass, where every plant is a variant of grass, and an evil intelligence lurks in the forest of blades. Her Catholic family and the prevalent humanist religion are both under attack by a widespread plague that has struck mankind everywhere&#8212except on Grass. The monoculture of grass echoes the monoculture of humankind, which has reduced most other species of animals to a sterile gene-sample library. Will Marjorie solve the problem and find the answer to the deeper questions? Will she choose to act?

I always feel as if this is the first Tepper novel I read (actually it was After Long Silence), because it was the first that resonated with my life. The day I opened the book, Iraq invaded Kuwait. Marjorie’s dilemma was being played out on the Gulf sands. When the US decided to go into Afghanistan, I reread Grass, and the resonance was still there.

Other reviews examine Grass’ feminist and environmental/religious themes.

Powered by

About DrPat