Money and Happiness

Please Share...Print this pageTweet about this on TwitterShare on Facebook0Share on Google+0Pin on Pinterest0Share on Tumblr0Share on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

Money, or the love of same, is the root of all evil. So sayeth the Bible. But humans have no trouble turning that wisdom on its head and shaking loose the opposite axiom—Greed is Good. All of us have occasionally looked to money as a route toward happiness, notwithstanding the fact that one of the most banal lessons of Hollywood movies is: Money CANNOT buy you happiness. Think Scarface, whose leetle friend was no substitute for the real thing.

So which is it? Study after study has suggested that income level, beyond the level of basic needs, has very little effect on personal satisfaction, self-worth, or overall happiness. Yet research by Robert H. Frank and others had demonstrated that most people implicitly assume personal spending will lead to more happiness.

Two psychologists at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, Elizabeth W. Dunn and Lara B. Aknin, together with Michael I. Norton of the Harvard Business School, wondered whether the matter was governed not by how much money you had, but rather by how you spent it. "Specifically," the researchers reported in Science vol. 319 (sub. required), "we hypothesized that spending money on other people may have a more positive impact on happiness than spending money on oneself."

With that biblical hypothesis in mind (think rich men and camels and the eye of a needle), the researchers set out to identify situations where money DID buy some happiness. That’s not easy, because "the mere thought of having money makes people less likely to help acquaintances, to donate to charity, or to choose to spend time with others." (Science Vol. 314).

Not a promising situation. The researchers first took a nationally representative sample of Americans and had them rate their general happiness and break down their spending into two categories: personal (bills, expenses, gifts for themselves) and prosocial (gifts for others, donations to charity). Regression analysis revealed strong support for the group’s hypothesis: Personal spending was unrelated to perceived happiness, but higher prosocial spending was associated with greater happiness.

Next, the researchers tried the "windfall bonus" approach, tracking employees who received profit-sharing bonuses, and who reported levels of happiness before and after the cash award. As expected, “prosocial spending was the only significant predictor of happiness” two months after the bonus.

Finally, the psychologists gave participants an envelope containing either $5 or $20. They told one randomly selected group to spend the money on themselves, and another group to spend it on a gift or give it away as a charitable donation. Once again, "participants in the prosocial spending condition reported greater postwindfall happiness…"

To the researchers, it appeared that "intentional activities" like giving to charity have longer-term effects than relatively circumstantial factors like bill paying or eating dinners out. Earlier work had shown much the same. But the cruel rub is that most people behave as if the opposite were true. Participants in the national survey reported spending ten times as much money per month on personal use, compared to prosocial spending.

 A policy that promotes the overlooked emotional benefits of prosocial spending, the researchers conclude, might work "in the service of translating increased national wealth into increased national happiness."

Powered by

About Dirkh

  • Two thoughts: Studies keep rolling in, indicating that it takes a whole lot of extra money to make a real difference in how people feel. On the other hand, I can’t help remembering James Dean’s famous riposte to Liz Taylor in Giant, when she says, “you know, money isn’t everything,” and the dirt-poor James Dean character mumbles, “not when ya got it.”

  • Money can bring happiness, although I don’t believe them to always go hand in hand. The pursuit of money often brings pains and can split people apart. It is all about finding the happy medium.

  • sma

    i like ur opinion

  • Morris

    It is amazing. Is’nt it? What makes you unhappy is really ultimately makes you happy. When you start giving money for charities, it really makes you unhappy to begin with. Because you are parting with your money. But if you continue doing it, it hurts less and ultimately turns into happiness. In other words happiness can be learnt by going through painful process of parting with money on charity. Does it make sense?

  • Dan

    Voluntarily giving money to social concerns you find justifiable probably does increase happiness. But having your hard earned money confiscated by others to give away to social concerns they find justifiable probably just leads to resentment.

    Then there’s the happiness, and sense of accomplishment, of wealth that you’ve generated on your own vs. the relative lesser happiness of recieving unearned wealth.

    An interesting paradox I’ve noticed in myself and others who have accumulated some wealth, is that they’re not very materialistic people. That’s how they get that way.

    The happiness for them is the freedom that wealth gives them. If they spend it, they lose that freedom.

    When I was poor, I wanted things I couldn’t afford. I can afford some of them now, but not all of them. But now, I like knowing that I could have something if I wanted it badly enough.

    The spending that makes me happiest now, is when I can find a good bargain on something that I want or need. Or, if I can buy something useful that also appreciates in value.

  • Interesting that a team of Canadian researchers should choose Americans to be the subjects of their research.

    Could it be because in American culture, money above all else defines one’s every action and even one’s worth as a citizen?

    Just a suggestion…