Today on Blogcritics
Home » Medieval Attitudes: A Royal Decree Against the People of Haarlem

Medieval Attitudes: A Royal Decree Against the People of Haarlem

Please Share...Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Share on LinkedIn0Pin on Pinterest0Share on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

All the media in the Netherlands is up with extensive stories about minister Donner’s (Justice) decision to ask the Crown to sign a Royal Decree in support of his views over the notorious detention center on Schiphol International Airport. Only few days after the fire the minister was opposed by the borough council which decided to close the prison. Mr. Donner’s stance to rescind or at least postpone the order for immediate closure of the clink issued by the borough council of Haarlemmermeer, a territory north-west of Amsterdam where Schiphol is located , came as a shock. The elected representatives of the people were first threatened that the minister will ask the courts to annul their decision. It appeared as if Mr. Donner had forgotten that right there 11 people were burning for hours until they were piles of charred rubble. Bring new in the same conditions? Why the minister of Justice did not go to seek justice in the courts may remain a mystery but it is a safe guess to speculate that the courts could not meddle in this. Therefore the minister of justice would have been entrenched not only in a most unpopular but also in a very illegal, thus quite muddy, position if he was not saved by a Royal Decree.

While I was shocked 1.) by the request and 2.) by the consent, a gentleman called H. Borghouts, the Commissioner of the Queen for Noord-Holland (one of the 22 provinces of the kingdom) told the press he was not surprised that the Crown interfered to nullify the decision of the democratically elected governors of the public interest in Haarlem. But then somebody showed tough balls. Mr. Fons Hertog, the mayor of the borough (he is appointed by the Queen and NOT elected by the people because both the Dutch Constitution and Parliament still treat their citizens as half-witted serfs) sided with the public opinion and the facts that the cells were not safe. Furthermore, he said that the ministry was most uncooperative in extending data about the fire. The press presses the borough to shut up about the fire on Schiphol because it extended the permits for the operation of the detention center on September 22, probably without their inspectors being allowed to inspect anything and least the cells and corridors and fire-extinguishing equipment, its functionality and so forth. The deeper one goes the chaotic state of affairs and the arrogance as its only shield becomes more and more obvious.

Going this far, right to the most popular Queen Beatrix, to save what is absolutely untenable, the government must have felt pretty shaken. It is not easy to press the Sovereign with such a dramatic request. I do not think that anybody actually said “Your Majesty, please issue a Royal Decree in support of keeping the detention center operational despite its safety and other conditions are described and proven abominable”. This was more maneuvering than a move of desperate, highly incompetent and grotesquely arrogant bunch of worn-out old-guards. It appears so pathetic and out of sync. Of lately the Netherlands insists on development of local government throughout Europe while at home its ministers behave worse than the headiest spahi in a rebel-prone province of the Balkans. There, in the Balkans, (Srebrenica is the place where a heavily armed Dutch battalion under UN-flag abandoned instead of protecting some 5,000 Muslim man and kids who were slaughtered in consequence by the troops under command of indicted General Mladic) a spahi could quarter you for actions while here, in the netherlands, the officials (of any rank) can do the same in response to those who dare ask or press legitimate but awkward questions. When I complain to the officials that I cannot subside on $7,5 a day, the tax-office responds with a $1090-demand for health-protection insurance as a self-employed blog-author! Can you imagine that? Why Goulag? They create one around you and people run away from the walking archipelago of probation.

One walks along the manicured greens of the hushed picture-book townships of this land of alleged affluence and simply cannot accept that these people behind open-windowed, warm-lit sitting rooms do not contemplate about questions similar to these. For how long will this society endure to be told that parliament will never ever allow them to come out on a referendum and have their say about anything? Another half a century? Two? Who will they vote next year: same sort of men and women who will tell them, once the elections are over, that they are far from being capable to elect their own mayors? How are they capable then to judge whether the Constitution of the European Union is acceptable or not? Do they feel manipulated by a cabal of old hands? Are they so stiff scared from the revenge of the might? Why did not Her majesty simply reject the request and sent her ratings soaring and posed the ultimate question: monarchy, order and dignity of the people or out you go and I retire to enter History as it befits me.

Now, instead of resigning, the minister shows who is the real master here! Without the Royal Decree yesterday he would have been just another spent out politician. After the elections he will again be a spent out politician or a dry branch which will crack down with the first blow of the winds of change. The shenanigans after the tragic fire on Schiphol indicate that this is not a question of ministerial competence or responsibility. This is blatant disregard of decency and a most dangerous demonstration of arrogance. The parliament must act swiftly and either fire the minister or the cabinet or both.

Powered by

About Gogan

  • Ruvy in Jerusalem

    It appears that the present representative of the House of Orange has turned quite a few faces red. Queen Beatrix may have been within her rights as Sovereign under the constitution of the Netherlands, but she sure went against the spirit of times, if not that of the the document.

    Incompetent officials screwing things up are nothing new of course. Americans whine incessantly about the embarrassment that is George Bush, not to mention all of his flunkies – and then if you read what I write, you know that the fine upstanding gentlemen who run this country, people like Ariel Sharon, boy wonder Omri, Shimon Peres, Haim Ramon and now, Tzahi haNegbi, are all all honorable men (cough gag – hey get me the barf bag quiiiiiiiiiith! Now, it’s all over the floor – feh!)

    Anyway before nature interrupted this rant with one of her own, I was going to say that it’s always nice to have royal approbation when you screw up. Maybe we need a king to give that to Sharon – or does he already get that from the American Emperor, George II?

  • Aaman

    Therefore, the detention centre is now an instrument of state policy?

    Dutch colonialism has a pretty bad track record, really

  • [MR]Chip
  • http://www.volkskrant.com/weblog/pub/blogs/blog.php?uid=1507 Grozdan Popov

    Thank you (MR) Chip! (He warned me personally of a blunder). Please excuse me all of you! I have allowed a typo: there are NOT 22 but 12 provinces in the Netherlands. I am terribly sorry for that. Do not know whether I will ever forgive myself for such a negligence. My OWN site has it right and features all their seals, but that is not much of a consolation, is it?