Today on Blogcritics
Home » “Lost” Delivers Drama, Thrills

“Lost” Delivers Drama, Thrills

Please Share...Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Share on LinkedIn0Pin on Pinterest0Share on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

ABC’s other new dramas may be faltering somewhat in the wake of their stellar premieres, but J.J. Abram’s excellent “Lost” just keeps getting better. Tonight’s episode, the fourth, took the series to a whole other level. My initial read on the show was positive, but it certainly jumped beyond my expectations tonight.

What the writers have done particularly well is to maintain a large cast of characters, focusing on a few principals but giving equal time to many of the lesser players as needed. While we don’t know all 48 survivors, we certainly have a good sense of at least a dozen of them so far. I especially like the use of flashbacks, which has been sparing but extremely well thought out. The decision to reveal the back story of only one character each episode ensures that there are many more secrets to be uncovered throughout.

Last week, when viewers got a glimpse into heroine Kate’s background, it was clear that all bets were off. The carefully constructed façade she had presented was stripped away layer by layer, and we slowly discovered her past along with a few of the show’s characters. It was clear then that the slow unveiling of each survivor’s back story would become a running theme of the show. Such a device could grow old and contrived, but that certainly was not the case tonight.

When the mysterious Locke’s secret was revealed in the last ten minutes of the episode, it was absolutely jaw dropping. A moment that could have very easily been trite or melodramatic was played brilliantly, rewarding viewers with that reclusive epiphanic “Aha!” Scenes dating all the way back to the first episode that may have seemed odd or wrong on first viewing suddenly make sense. A few more puzzle pieces fall into place.

One of the concerns voiced about the premise of “Lost” was how long the show could keep up its premise, which admittedly seems more like that of a mini-series than an ongoing show. So far, however, every question that’s been answered has seemed to raise two more. Previews for next week clearly show that there’s plenty more to come that hasn’t even been hinted at yet, meaning we may be following these characters for some time to come.

After tonight, there’s no question that “Lost” should have cemented its impressive audience. Abrams and his staff of writers continue to deliver cliffhangers that make the week’s wait between episodes seem an eternity.

Powered by

About Nick Danger

  • http://www.breakingwindows.com Matt Paprocki

    I gotta agree on every point. I went in expecting nothing from the first episode and came out loving this show. I still can’t imagine how they’ll keep it going for multiple season, but I’m sure I’ll stay tuned for every episode regradless.

  • http://www.resonation.ca Jim Carruthers

    I thought when Locke was wiggling his toes in the beginning, he was just thinking, “hey I got some really expensive, as advertised in the back of New Yorker Magazine, nice gold toe socks”

  • Bill Sherman

    Loved the way the character went from mysteriously macho to pathetic to heroic to what-the-hell? as we learned more about him over the hour. Soem sharp writing. . .

  • http://calblog.com Justene

    This review was chosen for Advance.net. You will be able to find it on newspaper sites including Cleveland.com.