Today on Blogcritics
Home » Culture and Society » Knick Knacks: Knicks Roll Over Wizards, But Talk Continues About Replacing Woodson

Knick Knacks: Knicks Roll Over Wizards, But Talk Continues About Replacing Woodson

Please Share...Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Share on LinkedIn0Pin on Pinterest0Share on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

While it is no surprise that the New York Knicks (31-28) rolled over the Washington Wizards (14-45) 103-65, it was a bit surprising to see the New Jersey Nets (22-38) beat the Philadelphia 76ers (31-28) on their home court 95-89. What is even more surprising is that the people calling into sports shows on talk radio here in New York are still going on about Knicks interim head coach (with emphasis on interim) Mike Woodson being out of the picture for next season. As the Knicks keep winning (even without Amar’e Stoudemire and Jeremy Lin) it seems incongruous that people are not willing to give Woodson a chance to be in the mix for next year.

The Knicks are 13-4 since Woodson took over, and Carmelo Anthony is playing like, well, Carmelo Anthony, instead of that impostor who played under Mike D’Antoni. Whatever the reason for this resurgence of prowess, Knicks fans need to know it is a good thing. Whether or not it is because Woodson is a great coach seems inconsequential to many, but the truth is that this team has been designed around Anthony, and it wasn’t working under D’Antoni. It is now definitely working and Woodson is a big part of that.

The fact that the Nets gave the Knicks a little gift is a nice touch, especially with the Nets having a chance to play spoiler. The Knicks are now tied for second place in the Atlantic division and for seventh in the playoff race. There was a time not too long ago when the Knicks didn’t look like they would make the playoffs; now, unless there is a major collapse, it seems a certainty.

The Nets get to play Boston today, and if by any chance they still want to play spoiler, that would be fine with Knicks fans. We are not getting any ideas here about taking the division, not being three games back with seven games left, but the closer we get to the Celtics, the better it is for us. It also speaks volumes about Woodson and what he has done with this team over the last seventeen games.

The bottom line for me is this: if the Knicks make the playoffs, Woodson should be seriously considered as head coach for next year. Why shop around? He has the right emphasis on defense, the players like him, and the fans appreciate his ability to motivate and guide this team. Mike Woodson as Knicks head coach for next year should be a no-brainer, but some people around town apparently don’t think so.

Photo Credit: bleacherreport.com

About Victor Lana

Victor Lana has published numerous stories, articles, and poems in literary magazines and online. His books In a Dark Time (1994), A Death in Prague (2002), Move (2003), The Savage Quiet September Sun: A Collection of 9/11 Stories (2005) and Like a Passing Shadow (2009) are available online and as e-books. He has won the National Arts Club Award for Poetry, but has concentrated mostly on fiction and non-fiction prose in recent years. He has worked as faculty advisor to school literary magazines and enjoys the creative process as a writer, editor, and collaborator. He has been with Blogcritics since July 2005, has edited many articles, was co-head sports editor with Charley Doherty, and now is a Culture and Society editor. He views Blogcritics as one of most exciting, fresh, and meaningful opportunities in his writing life.
  • Charlie Doherty

    When will NBA fans realize that offensive-minded coaches rarely lead teams to championships? I knew D’Antoni wasn’t going to last long ‘cuz he didn’t have the talent in NY that he had in Phoenix, but even there he never won anything.

    Defensive-minded coaches like Mike Woodson, on the other hand, win. He was the assistant coach to Larry Brown during the 2003-2004 Detroit Pistons championship run and led the resurgence of the Atlanta Hawks until a couple of years ago.

    I think it was a big mistake for the Hawks to let him go after 2010 and would be a bigger mistake for the Knicks to not sign him to at least a three-year contract if the Knicks hold on to a playoff spot, and even if they miss out by a game or two. (I say this as a Celtics fan who would like nothing more than for the Celtics-Knicks rivalry to continue being relevant, and that can only happen if the Knicks play winning basketball.)