Today on Blogcritics
Home » Judge Blocks Screener Ban

Judge Blocks Screener Ban

Please Share...Print this pageTweet about this on Twitter0Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Pin on Pinterest0Share on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

I just got finished telling you what a disaster the screener ban has been for the MPAA – now, in yet another abject indignity, a judge has ruled against it, at least temporarily:

    U.S. District Judge Michael B. Mukasey sided with the independent producers, granting a temporary restraining order against the ban, which is enforced by the Motion Picture Association of America.

    Mukasey said he was swayed by testimony that showed awards are critical to the success of smaller films, which do not have the hefty advertising budget of larger studios.

    “Plaintiffs have shown they are at risk of loss of revenue as a result of the screener ban,” the judge said.

    Ted Hope, an independent producer, said the ruling was a victory for movie fans because it would allow smaller-budget pictures to get the acclaim they deserve, and therefore wider release.

    ….The ban was modified Oct. 23 to allow the 5,600 voters for the Academy Awards, the industry’s most important, to receive advance copies of movies up for awards in videotape form, which is more difficult to copy.

    But independent producers said they were still harmed because the smaller awards, handed out in the fall and winter, are widely considered to affect which movies Oscar voters consider.

    The 14 independent studios argued that the recent films, “Boys Don’t Cry,” “Gosford Park,” “In the Bedroom” and “The Pianist,” all lauded at the Oscars, were helped tremendously by receiving earlier, smaller awards. [AP]

Powered by

About Eric Olsen

  • http://www.ubersportingpundit.com/hotbuttereddeath/ James Russell

    This doesn’t surprise me, though it does surprise me that Mukasey didn’t just throw the case out on the day that the MPAA’s legal representative admitted the MPAA doesn’t actually have the power to stop the studios sending out screener tapes. And he gave them another week to shore up their case. What was the point?

    Oh well, time for the MPAA to buy themselves some new judges. Did I say judges? Of course I meant lawyers. I would never want to imply that a Hollywood organisation might do something underhand to make sure things go the way they want.

  • Eric Olsen

    Here we are talking about the structure of privilege, autocracy, and pervading sense of entitlement in the Middle East when there are strong vestiges of such here, especially in regionaly dominated arenas like entertainment (SoCal and NYC) where the power structure, as represented by the RIAA and MPAA, have grown accustomed to being laws unto themselves and are aghast when their hegemony is challenged and/or threatened. I say Ha-fucking-ha.