Today on Blogcritics
Home » Janet Jackson’s Super Bowl Titty Massacre aka Janet Jackson’s career now officially dead

Janet Jackson’s Super Bowl Titty Massacre aka Janet Jackson’s career now officially dead

Please Share...Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Share on LinkedIn0Pin on Pinterest0Share on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

Janet Jackson’s one second flash of titty at the Super Bowl must constitute the lamest PR stunt of the year that does NOT involve her brother. Janet hereby makes it official with this little desperation ploy that even she recognizes that her career lay just as dead as Michael’s.

Some of us were rather contemptuous of the infamous Madonna/Britney kiss on MTV. The fading young star and the long faded older star conjured up a cheap bit of manufactured sexual outrage. Whatever. At least they set it up in some minimal way with the song and costumes, and did manage to get at least a bit of soft porn titillation out of it.

This business with Janet Jackson at the Super Bowl halftime was ten times lamer, though. The lameness starts with the partner in sleaze. We were tantalized for days with some big super special mystery guest, who turns out to be…Justin Timberlake?

On top of which, what kind of crappy excuse for a song was that even supposed to be? Her best bit of the night was “Rhythm Nation,” which was a mediocre song at best FIFTEEN YEARS AGO. The used copies of the CD going for 59 cents at Amazon are still overpriced.

Then they finished up with Timberlake ripping open one side of her outfit to briefly expose her right breast. Whoop-de-frickin’-do. Is this supposed to be shocking? TITillating? Oh, please. Is this supposed to make me tumescent?

Jebus Criminy, but she looks old and haggard here. Not to be crappy, but this little display forces me to note that she was looking considerably older than her actual 38 years.

Lame, lamer, LAMEST: Even at that, there’s a little tassel [“nipple shield- whatever]. Oh, for crying in a bucket- you can’t even pull off a naughty stunt right without stepping back.

Alright, one step further into stupidity- Lame, lamer, lamest, lamest-est ever: Timberlake’s pre-fabricated post-event claim that it was “accidental.” Right. That’s why she had the stupid tassel in place.

Janet Jackson has never been a significant artist- and that’s OK. She made a decent sized spate of hits, and made herself a name separate from the family. Good for her.

Instead of just accepting that her run was over, though, she has to come across with this quarter-assed stunt. It’s not significant enough to be even a HALF-assed stunt. It won’t sell her any records. It won’t do anything for her except get a couple of empty headlines, and a few lame jokes. In short, it makes her look like (an old, dried up) cheap, slutty Christina Aguillera. Yuck.

Why are the Jacksons SO utterly desperate for even BAD attention? Why can’t they just be content to go out and sign a few autographs on the street corner? You’d think with all their trillions of dollars they could afford therapy or something.

All right, then, Janet- to the Group W bench with you.

Powered by

About Gadfly

  • JustinT

    I just got back from the bowl – I was on the sideline. I guess the networks cut it out, but after Janet’s breast was exposed she tore the other breast covering off, got on all fours, and moo’d like a cow.

    What a great show…

  • http://macaronies.blogspot.com Mac Diva

    Missing the pulse as usual. Demand for her new album, with the song she sang as the lead single, is way up, it appears. Some failure. Even PR froth aside, risque sells. Just ask the talentless Paris Hilton.

    Tumescent? Not without Viagra.

  • Carol

    Justin ripping off Janet’s breast cup to her costume was no coincident. The close up on Drudge Report shows the piece Justin ripped off had snaps on it, which means it was meant to be removed.

    What is with the huge nipple ring? So Janet planned for this to happen. After all, she has a new album coming out in April.

    I wonder if Madonna told her to flash her tit! Justin is a bad liar.

  • http://www.morethings.com/log Al Barger

    In Justin’s defense, I’m sure he was just following the pre-ordained script that Grandma Janet wrote for him.

  • get a life

    you guys are crazy janet is still one of the finest women around, and anyone who complains about her breast would give up there house to have a chance to be with her. So get a life and stop hating on a ;ittle nipple, we see ass crakes on nypd blue and ugly ones at that.

  • Racerx

    The problem I have with the incident is my 6 year old that was watching the game with me. Damn now I got even more crap to explain thanks Janet! Cheap! Lame! And don’t forget its a family show, even Bionce cleaned up for it.

  • A Father

    You could just tell him/her/it that they were once plugged into one of them at least 6 to 8 times a day…

  • http://charles.gagalac.us/ charles

    janet’s not even original. lil’ kim had her boob out for a whole evening for the mtv music video awards a few years ago. diana ross gave a few taps to the exposed boob during an award presentation too.

  • HellScream

    Good god! A bare breast! The world as we know it will now be coming to an end.

    Its unbelievable what people get upset over. We have a moron for a president sending kids off to die in a war which was based on lies and all people are worried about is Miss Jackson’s bare titty on national television?

    Hello! Wake up people! Your kids will survive this. I don’t see what the big f*cking deal is about a woman’s bare breast. So f*cking what! Its just skin! What’s the diff between a man’s bare chest and a woman’s except for a little extra fat. I know men with bigger tits than some women. People don’t seem to mind them running around bare chested.

    Wake up people! A woman exposing her breast is the least of our worries.

  • http://www.morethings.com/log Al Barger

    HellScream, it’s not that Janet Jackson’s nipple is a Big Deal which will scar our children. It’s that it’s a really exceptionally LAME excuse for a publicity stunt.

  • Fatty McGee

    Had to bring up my “bitch tits” didn’t you… ;-)

  • Angelika and jon

    Ok I understand that she’s old n’all, but dont compare her to Christina the slut. Nothing is worse than her…. ohh wait brittany is… and besides your selling her cd on your web page… that was a pretty nice titty too…(Jon)

  • Mini

    I’ve commented already on a previous article and I comment again. How can you dare to pass judgement without knowing the truth? You’re daring to make a quick assumption as your own PR stunt. You hypocrite.
    Janet Jackson is an AMAZING woman and a MIND-BLOWING performer. How dare you – and all you nameless comment-ers – lay such a demeaning slap onto the reputation of such an outstanding person?
    The adornment? Why not? I have unmentionable piercings and I dorn them without ever showing them. For certain people it’s a fun little, in a sense, childish thing. The need for accessories.
    Look, it is just a breast. When you’re born you suckle at your mother’s breast. As a child you lay your head on your mother’s bussom to be comforted. It is, after all, just a lump of fat. Don’t exaggerate such a miniscule event.
    Can’t you see the scorn and shock on her face as well? She’s embarassed…don’t make it worse. You shouldn’t have that right, not just because she is Janet Jackson but merely because she is human.
    The Golden Rule: Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.

  • Angelika

    hey every one is entitled to their own opinion…….

  • http://www.morethings.com/log Al Barger

    And if I were engaging in such a cheap stunt as the Janet Jackson Superbowl Nipple Massacre, I’d expect others to make fun of me, too.

    And if Janet Jackson’s mediocre music blows your mind, then your mind must be easily blown. I mean, if Janet’s crap blows your mind, what would you do if you ever heard, say, some classic Miles Davis.

    Mini, I’d suggest you avoid Bitch’s Brew. I don’t think you could handle it.

  • Mini

    I never commented on her music as mind-blowing. I commented on her PERFORMANCE as mind-blowing. She’s a talented dancer and knows how to make HER fans happy.
    Miles Davis? I adore jazz. I know Miles Davis as well as I know my own name. Along with Billie Holiday, Ella Fitzgerald, Glen Miller…I could go on but that is a different topic.

    Again, I see you decide to pass judgement without any evidence for that judgement. I don’t think you can handle making a TRUE statement. You’ve seemed to have proved, fairly well, that you are just another disrespectful imbecile.

    Think before you speak, or in this case, write.

  • http://www.morethings.com/log Al Barger

    Mini, I am chastised and indeed intimidated by your scolding. I will never again dare mock any celebrity without your permission, no matter how bad they beg for it.

  • Mini

    Go ahead, make a mockery out of this, IF it’s the only way you are able to handle such criticism or correction.

    Just show some respect and don’t dash for the finish line in the race to demean another without the right nor the evidence to. Don’t stoop so low…it’s never admired in any one.

    Also, don’t mock others. Put yourself in their position and think of how it might affect you but be sure to consider how it will affect them as well.

  • Mini

    I did cross a line. I should not have labeled you as a “disrespectful imbecile” I take it back. It was unnecessary.

  • http://www.morethings.com/log Al Barger

    Mini, you’re certainly intending to be pretty harsh and disrespectful towards ME. That’s cool, but YOU are the one being highly judgmental.

    This Superbowl thing was obviously a pre-ordained stunt, and a damned silly one. She DESERVES a little bit of jest at her expense.

    I’m just saying, she wouldn’t need this dumb contrivance if she had any real SONGS.

  • http://www.morethings.com/log Al Barger

    Ah, very good Mini. I didn’t see #19 till after #20. It’s totally cool, anyway. I need a good dressing down from time to time.

    I’m glad to have you visiting. Take your shoes off. Sit a spell.

  • Mini

    I apologize for crossing lines in such a manner and I had no intention of you receiving my comments in such a fashion.

    Innocent until proven otherwise. You can’t prove that it was a pre-ordained stunt. I’ve seen Janet Jackson perform and no performer of her status would pull such a ploy, purposely. But, if she did then shame on her because IF it was a PR stunt then it is a low one.

    Yet, can you really say with such certainty that it was? I’m sure you have no true relationship with Janet Jackson nor any real knowledge of her person. Just by her name you state with such absoluteness that it was a PR stunt. You have no basis to your statement, nothing that’s as solid as stone. It’s like showing the world a clump of wet sand and telling them it will remain solid forever when it will just crumble away once dry.

    Look, I’m no fan of her music. Can’t say I really follow your mainstream music of today. But, I do have respect for all perfomers, whether I enjoy their music or not, because they obviously have something that others love. They are able to make certain people smile, maybe even more, with their “talent” (I use that term lightly). To be able to do that to such a mass? It’s a great thing.

    You may not enjoy her songs but there are others out there who evidently do. Humans are all different. Have different tastes, ideas, cultures, etc. That’s the beauty of this world. You will never meet someone exactly like another.

    BTW, I won’t just sit…I am going to bed. Almost 5 a.m. And I’ve had a thoroughly full day and now night.

  • Stuk_N_ROK

    This was obviously a PR stunt. She wouldn’t have had the cupcake holders in place otherwise.

    But think about it folks…this is what we can expect from all ‘has-been’ female singers.

    The order is: they get discovered, spit out a few radio-friendly tunes, (or in an actress case…a mediocre TV sitcom) then go through a number of years of not being on top. Missing the “good ol’ days” when labeled as a diva, they all eventually turn to the nude.

    Madonna and the fat chick from Wilson Phillips proves this theory.

    The bad news is…we still have to wait for Celine Dione to do this.

    The good news is…eventually Brittney will be there

  • spanky

    What? How could you even spend a minute lamenting over such a crappie stunt? And that Timberlake guy? Why is he still singing again? And why does he get to have all the fun? Poor Janet, just another cheap floozie in a long line of losers. And to think, she actually did have some talent once!

  • tl

    Nice timing on the boob job
    The last show the last best the last time we will get to see her in the superbowl? I thought her timing was great and her expressing herself like that was exciting. We need the willing-ness to share these time with us. Her actions were a mouthful. she is sexy
    and a product of the world today. The people never say anything when the cheerleaders tit falls out on purpose
    what’s the big deal if janet’s falls.

  • Bob

    Oh, I guess it is ok for my daughter to see Britney kiss Madonna. The reason she did Rhythm Nation was to wake people up! Get a life with the double standard crap! I bet some of you fools believe in same sex marriage!

  • http://www.morethings.com/log Al Barger

    Depends on how old your daughter is.

    The reason Janet did Rhythm Nation was to make a buck. There is no social statement involved, and little artistic statement of any kind.

  • Embarrassed

    Whoever thought that that halftime show was appropriate must not have small children! I was embarrassed! Not just the titty at the end but all the bumping and grinding during the Janet Jackson/ Justin Timberlake song was ridiculous!

  • LuvTits

    More importantly, does anyone have a link to the video footage?

  • Bunker

    Hi there,

    I just read about the Janet Show. Which I don’t understand is that all hell breaks lose over a tit. If I am right, a few months ago you could see people getting killed from within fighter airplanes and helicopters and that was SO COOL. That was also prime time tv. I am from Belgium and for my standards a titty is not so bad compared to seeing impacts of missiles into buildings and so. I would prefer for my kid to see some tits instead of a live war.

    Greetings from Belgium,

    Bunker

  • EllieMae

    Has anyone thought of this…if this was truly, as MTV put it, “unrehearsed, unplanned, completely unintentional.”…then why did Janet apologize? She would have no reason to apologize. She should’ve been one who was apologized to. Hmmmm.

  • http://www.thespark.com Anon

    As stated above, if you really care about the facts of this topic view the close up photos on the drudge report. Her nipple is not covered by a tassel, it is a large nipple piercing, and the material had snaps to be easily removed. The true outrage is not that one nipple or breast was shown, but the constant erroding of family values in this country. Don’t buy these albums and don’t let your kids buy them if you are offended. Evil is in our TV, just as much as it is in Iraq. Many kids in this country do not grow up with TV’s, shame on you for letting them watch it, don’t blame the TV station.

  • Jason

    i know someone named big red who has BIGGER BOOBS than janet does, he goes to my school!

  • George

    CBS knew about it, the controlroom knew about it, MTV knew about, even i knew about it. If you want your childeren to grow up savely like little saints, don’t watch TV, play monopoly, don’t let them goto springbreak …ever and please move to another country. thank you.

  • Celeste

    I think that the Superbowl experience includes alot of events.

    1. We have grown men trying to tear each other apart for the almight $$$ and a ugly torphy.

    2. We have many companies willing to pay 2.3 million dollars (I believe per second) to advertise beer, soda and other items for our well-being.

    3. We have NFL cheerleaders shaking things up and spreading team spirit by using every natual and un-natural assets.

    3. We have ticket prices so high that the average family will never be able to enjoy the Superbowl experience.

    Yet, people want to complain that Janet’s and Justin’s half-time show performance ruined their and their children’s experience are just looking for something to gripe about.

    There are many network shows that are pushing the envelope everyday…Shield, Nip N Tuck, NYPD (ugly asses, shower scenes), CSI (graphic crime scene).

    The human body yes, can be exploited. However, everytime a body part is exposed on TV the world should not have to stop and defend its morality.

    Guess what? Some people are not don’t find the breast to be sexy. What about the other parts…Britney’s stomach & pubic area, Christina’s ass checks, Pink’s stomach & hip bones, Beyonce’s hour glass figure. So what, folks! Move on.

    Sometime we act as though exposing a body part is going to unravel our moral fiber. Instead, we should realize how we respond and judge other will be undoing of our morality.

    The network knew who they selected for the half-time show. They even knew what songs were being played because they were in attendance of every practice. Have they every attended a Janet Jackson’s concert?. She’s known for selecting someone out of the audience to sexually tease. Sexuality is her appeal. Duh?

    I myself don’t believe that it was an accident. But, I do believe it was a great diverse half-time show.

    Next!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Kylliah

    Hey, just finished reading about this….. wow. Does anyone bother to say anything about Justin? I mean, he’s ripping the shirt off a woman almost old enough to be his mother, then proving once again that he’s a terrible liar when he denies the intention. Let’s face it. Janet’s always been a shocker when it comes to her shows. This should warrent nothing for her but a glance. And look on the bright side. She’s not like her brother! At least Justin’s legal…. ;)

    I know I’m going to probably get in trouble for that last one, but it’s the truth. Janet has never backed down from a publicity stunt in her shows, why should this be any different? If the commercials during half time can show as much as they do, why can’t Janet show a little skin?

  • http://oceangalleyseafood.com Grits5089

    It’s not the nudity I mind as much as the way it was done. A real woman would have smaked him up side the head. But Janet needs the publicity – and now we all know to stay at least an arm’s lenght away from Justin. It’s just bad manners people, and it’s MY decision if my kids see it – no one elses.

    Nor do I don’t let them watch “live war” on TV. I censor TV, music, everything, particularly violence.

    I want my kid’s to learn good sportsmanship from the SuperBowl. I want them to respect themselves and other people. Even though it was the SuperBowl, did anyone remember the tribute to the shuttle astronaughts? Or tributes to our solders fighting for our freedom. That’s what we should be celebrating – not giving in to Janet & Justin’s PR stunt – that was just plain low class.

  • James

    You people need to get a life,I’ve seen more skin in a music video,Janet is a very BEAUTIFUL women,and if you were offended….Oh Well :-)

  • purple

    I believe the reason why so many people may be upset is because it was unpredictable. Believe it or not, but many people monitor what their children watch. Of course there are a lot of sexual or nasty shows on tv – but thats what ratings are for. If this show wasn’t to be seen by children they should of said so. It does matter what was shown regardless of it being a breast or whatever. Parents should know whats going on. I feel that they need to get harsh on some shows, and people, on regular tv, before all minds of children and our society end up in the gutter – or much worse than it is now. These things only make society worse.

  • annimal

    I agree that part of the problem was that this was unexpected, and therefore parents had no idea to turn the channel to protect their kids innocent eyes from JJ’s boob. I expected the music to be terrible, knowing that it was Justin Timberlake and Janet Jackson (a has been for sure!). I can certainly say her taste in men isn’t very good. Jermaine Dupri? and then letting Justin Timberlake feel her boobs? Justin is like a whiney little boy whose voice sounds like it is still changing. His music is pretty retarded, no matter how much he tries to pretend he is a thug. But I guess being a mama’s boy-wanna be thug does get you hot (although airheaded) chicks. Just look at Nick Carter and Paris Hilton. She probably likes him b/c he can get good drugs now that he’s hanging out with Tommy Lee. Anyhow, the whole Janet Jackson/Justin Timberlake thing was pretty lame. If they actually had good music, they wouldn’t have to resort to such cheap PR stunts.

  • Paul

    I don’t see what the hubbub is all about. She definitely had her nipple covered, so there really is no true nudity. I’ve seen worse from mothers who whip out a boob to feed their child in the middle of a resteraunt or a mall. There is no true FCC violation here!

  • Aj

    I think that the whole thing was sad. A saggy boob from a has been, the age difference, tainting a family show, and the obviously pre-planned stunt. It would have been more acceptable had it been MTV awards or something…but come on..The SUperbowl?! Puleeze!

  • Bebster

    I dont get the whole “we weren’t told” BS. You are OK letting you kids watch guys physically beat and fight each other for a paycheck, a quarter million dollar paycheck at that, but a boob is unacceptable? What the F’ is wrong with you?!?!?!

  • http://www.vamptasia.com vamptasia

    Well I think it is sad that people are harking on a boob so much.

    Ok Lets look at football from the reality standards. NFL Football is a bunch of grown men in tight outfits with lots of padding knocking the crap out of each other trying to get a ball to a goal post.

    People get seriously injured some even result in permanent disability and death but are we going to stop the sport heck no.

    Have you noticed those cute little little barely there hardly any cloth to them left anymore costumes the cheerleaders wear now a days I mean half of them are just glorified bakinis with short short daisy duke like skirt/shorts with plenty of panty shots and butt cheeks hanging out. Do we make them put on more clothes heck no.

    You got woman exposing themselves daily, Feeding a child at the store, or mall, Or in a park. We all where exposed to breasts when we where children being fed by our mothers don’t make that same part of our body be dirty because it was slightly exposed during a half time game.

    Woman wearing bathing suites that conveniently fall off when entering a pool. Necked people shots on various popular TV shows.

    The problem is not that her boob was exposed. It is that people of America are ashamed of the natural body. They call it dirty and evil to expose it.

    Look at art. How many of the most famous art pictures are of nude men and woman Statues, paintings and the like that you see when you walk into a museum. Do you call it dirty and evil. No. It is admired and found to be beautiful.

    People need to quit harping on this whole expose your body and go to hell BS because it is not written in the bible as such.

    Her nipple was covered. Maybe the tip was exposed but unless you get a magnifying glass and blow up the picture it is not fully exposed and the women in shampoo commercials and movies with only their hair covering there breast reveal as much if not more than Janet did Yesterday. If you can’t explain to you children what just happened then don’t watch tv. Your watching a sport with scantly clad cheerleaders and players ready to take each others head off. Get a life people. Because breasts provide it.

  • Tim

    Most people could care less about this breast issue by Janet Jackson.

    Now the branch of the Federal-Nazis better known as the FCC is investigating. What really makes them mad is that Jackson stole momentary control from them. I like that best.

  • Daniel Jackson

    Ok – This was a PR stunt. She has a beautiful breast. Although in the above picture her face looks a bit haggered.
    If you saw her telavised concert from Hawaii then you would know she would stoop this low for PR. cause during this concert she strapped a fan into a contraption on stage and dry humped the hell out of him during on of her most vulgar songs. A song which even her mother was ashamed to listen too.

  • http://www.morethings.com/log Al Barger

    Yeah, the FCC investigation cracks me up.

    In defense of Michael Powell (sort of), I suspect that this is more of a CYA thing. What kind of crap would he get for NOT acting like he’s doing something? Think how much GRIEF he got for not raising hell about Bono saying the F word on an awards show last year.

  • Jeanine

    First, I want to know why alot of men that I am aquainted with are getting such a rise (no pun intended) out of Janet Jackson’s boob? Have they never seen a boob before? And it’s not like it’s oversized or overly perky, so what’s the attraction? For men to be spending their time at work today on the internet attempting to find the largest, closest photo of Janet’s boob, then am I to assume that flashing your boobs is now an accepted behavior? Then, perhaps all the men that couldn’t get enough of the boob in question would also be okay with their girlfriends, wives, or significant others to bear their breasts the next time they’re at the local bar or club. I think that if this kind of behavior is considered acceptable, then let all those men enjoy seeing their women bare their breasts to a barful of strange men, better yet, maybe they are also okay with seeing their daughters or daughter-in-laws flashing a little titty here and there! Don’t tell me that that’s not okay; you mean you guys have double standards?!? No way. Obviously, at least with the men I know, it’s okay for them to ogle and drool, but for some reason their girlfriends’ should cover up. That’s a crock, and I think if you want to look, then look at the one you consider your special someone flashing her tit to a bunch of horny guys! What, that’s not a turn on?

  • Ms.Maya

    I dont think its such a big deal that Janet showed her titty. If anything, people are just making a big deal about it because of the whole “michael Jackson” thing.Im sure there has been worse things shown on t.v, so grow up people,its not that big of a deal!!!

  • Brian

    Janet & Justin -low class vaudeville – pretty pathetic

  • Fire

    I dont see what the problem is..so what..its a boob. the nipple was covered. As for the parent with the six year old to explain things to now..I’m sorry..but I would rather explain a BOOB than have to explain why those two woman are up there kissing like Brittany and Madonna did. I mean let me get through the birds and bees befor I have to explain why some birds kiss birds and some bees kiss bees to my daughters. But then hey…thats my opinion on things….

  • Jay and Silent Bob

    MTV should sue the shit out of Timberlake and Jackson. They have singlehandedly taken away billions of dollars from MTV if CBS no longer allows them to produce the halftime show!!!

  • bbbrudy

    Ok. Forget if it was supposed to happen or not,. Forget that he is half her age. Her boob fell out of her “malfunctioning wardrobe.” HELLO??? Anybody see the key word here?..’FELL’? It didn’t pop out or come out, it FELL and FELL and FELL out. It dropped about 3-5 inches. She could have touched it without bending her elbow! Was her PR person drunk? Was she? She could have broke her hip when it fell out. Try it 30 years younger when they are a little, no, a lot more perkier.

  • hamburgerpimp

    Let’s see…she exposes her tit to the world in order to boost album sales/generate income…can you say whore?

  • HW Saxton Jr.

    Personally speaking,I prefer to watch
    “Girls Gone Wild”……..

  • SaveAmericasValues

    The showing of Janets breast in my opinion was totally planned and without taste. But, The network made a bigger mistake allowing Timberflake to sing his irresponsible lyrics about getting a girl naked by the end of the song. If a young female is unfortunately attacked by some impressionable young male because of what he heard his teen idol sing then Timberflake should be held totally accountable and lose his entire fortune. There should be alot more censoring of the lyrics and actions on television and cable. I was also totally offended by Miss Nelly trying to find his peanut during the performance. I see absolutely no talent in this creep at all. When is this Rap Crap going to end anyway. Time to protect our youth and send these jerks a message that these kind of irresponible actions will no longer be tolerated.

  • Paula Paula

    Why is everyone so upset about a nipple? so what?
    oh nooooooo kids saw a nipple!!!!
    what’s wrong with you people
    be proud of the human body, tell the kids that’s the place they first got milk from …lol
    I don’t see what the big deal is.
    it is worse to see all the violence on tv, other countries will show the beautiful human body and it is ok, it is normal, grow up!!!.

  • Reatorman

    It’s not just the silver nipple, or bad PR: It’s about the lie that says all of this is acceptable. The truth is that people are not going to find their financial success and failure on the american people. They have fallen into the lies of the devil that says get to the top and make your statement anyway you can. It doesn’t matter who is in the way, or who gets offended or what gets compromised. You all have commented on her talent and career, why does she feel, or the producers of the haftime show have to compromise?

  • Reatorman

    It’s not just the silver nipple, or bad PR: It’s about the lies that says all of this is acceptable. The truth is that people are not going to find their financial success and failure on the american people. They have fallen into the lies of the devil that says get to the top and make your statement anyway you can. It doesn’t matter who is in the way, or who gets offended or what gets compromised. You all have commented on her talent and career, why does she feel, or the producers of the haftime show have to compromise?

  • JC

    Does Janet really think that this will draw some of the heat off of her brother Michael’s child abuse trial?

  • http://www.geocities.com/joeysmom5 Marta

    I think today’s artists have so little talent (such as Timberlake) that this is what they need to do for attention….I am a bit surprised that Janet would do this, but I think she is getting back at CBS for getting rid of Michael who was supposed to perform earlier….I just have a problem with “artists” forcing their morality on us…My 12 year old was flabbergasted…..you may think thats funny but the truth is kids will now get the message that frankly anything goes….there is no respect anymore out there….there isnt any real talent either…..
    Justin has his little “oneupping Britney” thing too…so everyone wins…except our kids. Does this mean the man in the rain coat flashing isnt really breaking the law? Because surely CELEBRITIES are not above the law in this country are they????? (ooooh of course not)
    I could have cared less if they had done this AFTER 10PM….but it isnt fair to the parents in this country who try to protect their kids from all the crap out there in the world that is ready to change them into “the world revolves around me and the hell with you” type of attitude that this next generation seems to have.

  • http://www.weeklybitch.com Paul J. Stevens

    Seems to me the only boobs are the ones complaining about it…

  • Tonia

    WAKE UP PEOPLE….WOMEN EXPOSING THEIR TITS ON LIVE TV IS THE LEAST WE HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT….WE SEE TITS AND ASS EVERYDAY IN THIS WORLD….WE WHERE BORN NAKED AND EVERYone THINKS OMG I CAN’T BELIVE JUSTIN AND JANET DID THAT BUT YET PARENTS FIGHT AND BEAT EACH OTHER IN FRONT OF KIDS….GO FIGURE THAT ONE….I AM SURE KIDS WILL SEE ALOT WORSE AS THE YEARS GO ON

  • duane

    Gosh, Tonia, I’m sorry to hear that your parents beat each other in front of you, or I’m sorry to hear that you and your hubby beat each other in front of your kids. If the latter, then CUT IT OUT! As for your asserion that “KIDS WILL SEE ALOT WORSE AS THE YEARS GO ON,” I, as a father, would rather postpone my son’s exposure to the brainless crap that passes for American culture for as long as possible.

  • Human

    Sup?

  • Roy

    I demand that more tits should be broad cast on puplic T.V.!

  • Bart

    I’m disappointed that the wardrobe malfunctioned and exposed only her right breast. The fact that she and Justin are staring with dismay at the still covered left breast proves that it was planned. I wish she and Justin would have had the guts to stand up to the critics and just say “what’s the big deal…chill out already…we have no reason to apolozige.”

  • Silence

    You should keep your judgements about the Jacksons to yourself

  • http://www.foliage.com/~marks Mark Saleski

    c’mon, they’re whippin’ out some body parts, cuttin’ off othere…and we’re supposed ta do what? just sit there and snicker?

  • Silly

    Only in America you say! With all the murders,rapes and muggings going on every day in the States and they make this a big deal.When a breast starts shooting people then look out.Wow you Americans are brain washed.Bare breasts are something bad ,but having guns and killing is ok.Yup only in America.

  • JaeLin

    This nation is one that is built on nudity and obscene behavior. Everyday we are all exposed to sex, sexual innuendos, and sexually explicit content in the media. What is the big deal about Janet baring her breast to the world! It is something that many of America’s children are exposed on a daily basis. The 3 seconds of fame that Janet Jackson’s boobs had is nothing compared to the amount of time that our youth is exposed to drugs, sex, and violence. We allow our children to watch rated R movies and play video games where the goal is to KILL and SHOOT other people. Instead of focusing on a breast, the FCC should focus on more important things. Stop trying to make an example out of Janet and try fixing other obscenities on television!

  • Captain Exlax

    TIT TIT TIT. I didnt see it till I saw it on The Drudge and I have to say that it is a nice tit on a fine looking African American babe. I would love to meet the plastic surgeon who did her breast and shake that mans hand. Why?? Because if he did not do her breast then that Super Bowl would have soooooooooo boring. Justin Timberlake??? He is a fag who cross dresses on the weekends and looks for sheep in the country side. He will probably end up living with with Scott Baio with in the year. Who knows and who cares?? I heard Vivid Video was going to offer Janet a contract, after this stunt she will need the work. LOL

  • sadf

    shes a stupid ho

  • JOANNA

    IF BRITNEY SPEARS CAN SHOW HER BREAST IN HER VEDIO TOXIC THEN WHY CAN’T JANET? IF I CAN RECALL BRITNEY ONLY HAD TWO COVERS ON HER BREAST AND THE REST WERE GLUED ON DIAMONDS… I THINK PEOPLE ARE IMMATURE FOR MAKING SUCH A BIG DEAL JUST BECAUSE JANET JACKSON AND JUSTIN TIMBERLAKE DID IT… MORE POWER TO THEM!

  • T

    I second the commitee

  • http://msn.com Reality Check

    The problem is not about breasts being shown on tv. If this was the mtv award show, nobody would have cared. This is the superbowl. It is about respect for the average American family that tries to protect their children from lewd behavior present in society today. If Britney Madonna kissed in the super bowl, they would have got the same response.

  • Silly

    About respect for the average American family? Give me a bloody break!It was a breast for christ sakes,a womans breast,you know what your kid sucked on for 2 years.Have you ever taken your kid to the zoo,hope they didn’t see the elephants dick,especially if he comes from an average American family.Go back to church you wingnut!

  • http://www.morethings.com/log Al Barger

    Perhaps part of the problem here stems from so many people not breastfeeding their babies these days.

  • http://Porn Geoff

    I live in the UK and don’t know what you have to rant about….every time I use the internet I get bombarded by porn publicity – most of which comes from the USA (publicity I don’t want I must add!). Instead of passing a law regarding boobs on TV you should clean up your Internet Sites first!!!!

  • MJ

    Nice Tit.

  • HowBoutThemCowboys

    Did any of you idiots actually watch the Super Bowl or just the half time show? It was a damn good game.

  • http://www.morethings.com/log Al Barger

    Wait, there was a football game?

  • MJ

    The only idiot I see is a Cowboys supporter.

  • Susan

    For crying out loud. What is the big deal? So Jackson wanted to flash, so what? That not sleazy, that’s business. She wanted publicity and she got it. Nobody is talking about anything else. Since when did the Super Bowl become a big “cultural” event anyway? Related parties are notoriously low brow, that’s supposed to be part of the fun. At least the MTV crowd added a little spice and color to what is usually a bland, uninteresting and dull show. I’m not even a sports fan but did tune in because I like MTV and the scheduled stars. I sure won’t bother again if they go back to the usual snoringly bad fare next year. For the record, I am not the usual young MTV fan blindly defending Jackson and the show against stuffy critics, but am a 58-year old former hippie wondering what in the hell has happened to the outrage against censorship in this country and when will people wake up and realize that no one will die if a girl bares her breast on network television. Television is not just for families or children. Adults don’t want to see shows reduced to a level aimed only at the ten-year old viewer. Any kid who has breastfed has seen a bare breast, anyway, so it is unlikely a kid who sees one on television will be ruined for life. Explaining them should be simple. Breasts are a normal part of a woman’s body. End of explanation.

  • http://www.morethings.com/log Al Barger

    Wait, didn’t that use to be Michael’s nose?

  • Steve

    This entire page is completely amazing. Out of 84 posts, except for Susan directly above, and a couple others, no one knows anything about the English language. I cannot believe that such a large number of illiterate people either own, or have access to, computers.

  • magoo

    I live in Europe and I agree that it is just a boob. It is not the image of “a boob” that is the problem. It is the sexual context in which it was displayed. When she flashed it in the midst of hip shakin ,moaning, body sweatin jyrations , I don’t think it was for the use of milk for a baby. The U.S is so corrupted that everything always comes back to sex, violence , selfishness, materialism. Its all people care about . There are very few people who even try to be pure and save sexual images for the bedroom between two people who actually LOVE eachother. Why do you think we are so hated? (I am American) Because we are way too “open minded” when it comes to sex, violence etc. OOO hh I know I have really made some people mad , and you are the ones who I am talking to.

  • BigStank

    Since when is the Super Bowl a family event? Does it also mean that they’ll stop allowing people to bet on it. Lose or make fortunes on it? Most kids see this kind of shit at home. Who gives a good goddamn? It’s just a tit…everyone sees them at least once in their life.

  • http://675234 susy

    I think you people have to much time on your hands, it’s so dumb to hear what the world is so angry over a boob. Is Micheal Powell or just money and power hungry. While the pigs gather around trying take money away. Man walk around everyday exposing their breast and nobody does anything. That’s just plan sexist. We are not tolerant just ignorant.

  • upset

    Hey the only thing I have to say is who has not seen this type of cheap stunt before like sooooo many others before me has said this was a cheap PR stunt. Her last album sucked and this one will too. How do you go from being spiritual and soooo called enlightened as in the album the velvet rope to being a cheap sluty stunt puller trying to compete with little stunts like britany & co??

    Go out and bow down while the getting is good. HAve a little respect for yourself, Get a grip on the fact that your time is over. You played yourself just like Toni Braxton did and guess what she sold three extra albums for exposing herself in vibe mag. Was it worth it?

    that’s my little comment to “Miss Jackson if ya nastee”

  • wherestherocknroll?

    All I have to say is you can tell who the parents are on this list, the ones with the weight of responsibility….doesnt make us prudes or ashamed of the human body, just responsible for the adults of tomorrow.

  • D Suiter

    I’m very disapointed they chose to do this during a true family tradition.

    I really thought Janet Jackson and Justin Timberlake had more class.

  • http://mutt mike freppert

    why even say anything about it, big deal…..the previous 90 or so comments were written by people who need to get a life..oh oh….looks like I need a life too

  • http://www.bhwblog.com bhw

    Has anyone asked the question of why we have an extended half-time show on TV in the first place? Oh, ratings, that’s right. It’ stoopid. They should just have a marching band do a typical half-time show and let everyone hang around their tv for the commercials. It’s so overblown, whether the content is “clean” or not, that it’s ridiculous. What a waste of time and money.

  • What do you care?

    All the tit and ass on regular programming day to day and the FCC want’s to investigate Janet’s breast….another waste of taxpayer’s money…not to mention major hypocrisy!!!!!!!

  • capone blue

    What a bunch of jeolous lame asses!!!Have we not seen titties on national tv before? Granted..it is not ideal viewing for kids..but unless you had your eyes glued to the tv, a half inch away, you really didnt see anything at all!. In that fraction of a glimpse, it appeared as if her nipple was covered anyway. We better realize that there are far worse things to bitch about! Check yourself and ask..why am I really upset?Because this black woman has more money and nicer tits than you will EVER have!!!End of story!

  • barb

    You know people are so judemental about other people before they even know the truth. Ok maybe it wasn’t right but it could have been an accident and who cares if it wasn’t? Stop using kids saying this will affect them. Bull!!!!! Have you heard the way the kids talk nowadays>infront of thier parents.??? They act out more than this. Parents do you know really what your child is wearing to school? Even the elemlentary kids dress revealing and now you are afraid you child saw Janet Jackson”s Breast!!!!!! Heaven Forbid….. Don ‘t worry they can sue her 30yrs from now saying it caused them problems. People>>>>>WAKE UP!!!!!!!!!!! If you taught your child right they will realize it is not a big deal and this will not scare them unless you as a parents tells them it will….get a grip and start discipline at home and quit blaming everything that happens on someone else except YOU!!!!! Oh My I saw her breast and big DEAL>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>get over it and move on> More things to life than seeing boobs. Check your kids songs out You buy them the nasty songs but don’t want them to see anything… YEAH RIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • jim bob

    janet has a damn fine tit for being damn near 50 and i would like to see more tits on tha half time shows of tha super bowl…cuz like football….tits r good

  • Eric Olsen

    What’s next for Janet, Medicare? She is only 37, she was born May 16, 1966. Shanie Twain is a year older, Faith Hill a year younger – are they senior citizens too?

  • timberlakesuks

    boy when you read these comments everyone SOUNDS SO ANGRY….hmmmmm…maybe we should all turn off the tv’s and love our families but mostly ourselves….everyone here that keeps “shouting” about the violence and guns, I sure hope you dont own one, cuz you all sound pretty friggin scary….
    YOUR RIGHT lets turn America into Amsterdam, but frankly I dont think the selfish kiddies of today could handle that kind of freedom.

  • timberlakesuks

    oh and Jim Bob #98, I know you think Janet has a fine tit, but its actually a purchased one…so you should go for the real ones…..LOL…they are finer.

  • none

    Double standard. Hardly a scandal while the real scandal is US soldiers got slaughered in Iraq because of lies. How many of you saw Brazilian Carnival with women dancers exposing their breast?

  • smc

    “Breasts are perfectly natural.” Guess, what you idots. So are male and female genitalia. So is the act of intercourse. However, I don’t want to see it on TV. You damn liberals need to think anything anybody wants to do is OK. Just because other problems exist in the world like drugs and violence doesn’t lessen the severity of nudity. Quit living such a hedonistic-eat, drink and be merry lifestyle. You’re desensitizing the world. I feel sorry for you liberals. You have no morals. Must make you feel like crap. Instead of attacking people who don’t want their kids confronted with your particular brand of perversion, try sitting down and reading a bible. Try to learn that Europe is not the measuring stick for morality. God is.

  • Dan

    I agree with the guy who brought up miles davis. Now jazz is music-it’s so good it doesn’t need cheap crappy costumes that rip open at the obviously intentional pull of an ambiguously homosexual pop singer’s (and a poor one at that) hand. Give me some John Coltrane any day.

  • Dan

    Sorry but I have to post again because I just read alot more posts. You who blame the President for sending soldiers, oh wait-I forgot they’re “kids” not highly trained professional military personel-or at least that’s what alot of you under-educated people seem to think. Nobody who’s served in the military-particularily those who serve in battle would wish you to discredit the president, the war, or even the cause of war. Acknowledge there sacriifice. Many people have died so that you little sissy’s can sit back and whine about how terrible your circumstances are. What do YOU do that’s so great? Furthermore what’s so great about a set of jugs that makes you want to see them on TV? afterall if you see them all the time anyway then keep it to yourselves and don’t put the successive generation in position to be worse off than you are. It’s okay-people get killed all the time….yeh so does that make robbery okay? no. Is wrong wrong and right right? yes. It’s as simple as that. Twisted morons think you got something but all you do is lead yourselves and others to a worse place.

  • http://www.way.com Dane

    Well now … let me see …

    This “quarter-assed stunt” that wasn’t even significant enough to be a half-assed stunt, was apparently significant enough to have the “superior bloggers” of blogcritics.org rant about it.

    Who’s looking the bigger fool? *LOL*

    OK – so Janet has a tit – big deal. It was even covered up more than most bikinis at Venice Beach are ever able to, and I believe those are quite fine to show on TV.

    And whoever cares that Kid Rock’s bus was busted for drugs, that Sean “P.Diddy/Puff Daddy” Coombs had to make a slippery settlement out of court to avoid doing time for pulling a gun at the general public, or that almost every lyric Nelly ever does is about drugs or prostitution.
    Sure – that’s not a problem. But Janet displaying a semi-naked breast, not unlike the breasts every single female has twice as many of, not THAT is a disgrace.

    You people make me laugh … seriously.

    What do you think your 16-year old daughters are doing on their weekends?

    Land of the “free” … Home of the “brave” … but not much different from the segregating, disrespectful, chauvinistic world of fanatical muslim nations, is it?

    Oh well … hypocrisy is a fine trait.

  • http://www.morethings.com/log Al Barger

    Dane, I am impressed with your self-righteous posturing. I am now shamed, and will change my opinion. I now think this was a classy and artistically significant social statement from Ms Jackson.

    Yes, I’ve written two different columns related to this topic, and will probably have one or two more on the surrounding phenomenon. This is a topic of great interest to the public. They want to read about it, so I’ll rack my brain a bit looking for anything interesting I might have to say about it.

    I want people to come check out my stuff. I am a whore.

    Now, will Janet admit same?

  • Abbilica

    Who cares about the br_ _ _t?Even though it is a big chat to talk about,she’ll lose her wholoe reputation.Let’s just forget about it.All right?

  • http://www.morethings.com/log Al Barger

    Artistically speaking, she didn’t have much of a reputation to start with. The whole point of her stunt was to make a big impression and get people talking about her, so I’m not real interested in hearing people bitch that we’re making too much of it. It’s what she wanted. It’s what she’s got. I’m just happy to oblige her.

  • http://www.resonation.ca Jim Carruthers

    And as for Al Barger’s 16 year old daughter, I’m pimping her out, so hands off euro-skank. And Al, you’re late in your payments, don’t make me come over there.

    This whole Jackson thing is just a marketing malfunction, thought since she does have an album coming out (so to speak) soon, is purely a co-inky-dink.

    Now you want to see a pair of tits? Just turn on your teevee news show.

    Or really do something to support tits.

  • Susan

    Has anyone figured out why she did it!?
    TO GET THE BAD/NEGATIVE ATTENTION AWAY FROM HER BROTHER!!! lol

  • Rain

    A couple of comments: Janet Jackson is a beautiful and talented individual. The human body is beautiful, and breasts aren’t sexual organs. Men have them as well and show them with no repercussions, and theirs don’t even serve any purpose.

    Lastly, there was a derrogatory comment made way up on this litany that wasn’t touched on again about supporting same sex marriage… why, yes, I do. As does my same sex spouse. Oh my, there goes the moral fiber of the world, straying from the judeo christian roles that ‘the right wing’ have tried so bloodily for centuries to force on us all and obliterate the Goddess. I find it amusing to read the moral and intellectual ineptitude of those so afraid of anything that doesn’t kill someone or something different from what they believe is right. Freedom means more than having the biggest bomb and bullying everyone into believing your way and marching to your drum.

    Try a little peace, compassion, and equality. It’ll help your blood pressure level out.

  • Mindy

    Alright people. I’m only 18 years of age..but even I see a problem w/ being able to view Janet’s tit on national tv. Honestly, what is this world coming to? People just don’t give a flyin f*ck anymore. I don’t think any lil’ kid would have flipped out about seeing it, but its just the fact that it is wrong for people to do shit like that on a “family channel”..*as you might call it..* I’m no goody-goody. So don’t think that I’m just a proper lil’ girl or something. Whether you believe in God or not..you might wanna start believing in evil, cuz its all around us.

  • Carli Roman

    Aca en Puerto Rico estamos necesitados de ver unas buenas tetas como esas. Por lo que sugerimos que en el Super Bowl del proximo año no tan solo sea Janet si no todas las integrantes del medio tiempo. Ademas, no solo debe ser una teta si no las dos e incluso el chocho.

    Gracias por su atencion y los dejo por que me tengo que ir a masturbar…
    Carli

  • http://yellowcosby.tk Justin

    i think that janet and justin dont even look good together man!!!!!!!!

    That is my oppinion

  • Leonard

    When I was a kid, I figured that the boundaries would be pushed so far by now that performers would be completely nude – even on live television. Progress is painfully slow.

  • dee

    poor americans…. u always make big story of nothing…. poor bigots

  • Conner

    Have you guys ever seen what they show on television in Europe? Just speaking from my experience in Italy, a celebrity’s bare breast wouldn’t even elicit a raised eyebrow.

  • http://eveloz.com Timberlake fan

    Only because she is black you are making a lot of fuss about her tit. I don´t remember so much criticizing of the two bitches kiss (Madonna and Britney). I think that was more lascive and pornographic than the tit of that poor woman. I even think it was an accident because the red part was supposed to stay in place.

  • Graem Cross

    Big whoopdy doo. It was a little nipple. I really don’t get what the big deal is about this. The Super Bowl is one of the biggest events there is. So there is going to be something big. Janet is a beautiful women and should be able to flaunt what she has. And really it isn’t as big of deal as everyone is making it. You see pretty much the whole breast in dresses now a days anyway. So some people need to get over it.

  • http://sover.net Carl McNeely

    I think most of you miss the point – it’s not so much about an exposed breast, but how it all came off (pun intended). I don’t want my daughter or son thinking it’s ok to rip a woman’s clothes off like that. It is not to far off from forced sex, rape, etc. Where do you think many (not all of course) of our youth get the idea that that sort of behavior is ok in the real world. P.S.: I’m neither a Quaker or a prude.

  • Jonathan

    It’s just a tit.
    I don’t like that shield doohicky though.

  • brit

    i really think yanks are making wayyyyy too much fuss about this. This seriously is crap. She showed her breast so what? CBS shows pronographic movies everynight and once a weekend. And in Europe sex appeal and sexual content in TV is like an everyday thing. Trust me i would know. You yanks think us brits are all snobby and posh…but hey here is a perfect example of the simplicity of yanks and their stupidity. Seriously i mean you get these fit cheer leaders with mini skirts and huge breasts, yet when they show a celebrites breast is like the world is on fire, and it has actually over done your terrorist attacks on your country which just shows how simple and lame yanks really are….. geez dont surprise me a single bit, i also think this ******* has gone hard on her because she is black…i mean what happened to Martin Luther king day and all the equality bull**** which just shows the stupidy in yanks.

  • JTY

    Wonderful to see the “moral outrage”.

    Morals? What about alcoholism, booze, same-sex marriages, violence and other forms of nudity on TV? Freedom? Freedom does not mean being wanton. Before the puritans start flaming me, check whether if you are hypocrites. If you’re really concerned about morality, you’d have done a lot about the moral death in the country by now even without the breast exposure. So cut the act. Many have seen better.

    As for protecting the kids, please. Not that we should purposefully expose them to such trash, but hiding is not the solution. Better to educate them early, rather then to deprive them of a proper understanding by keeping things under wraps. The kids deserve it. Parents owe this to them. Let this be a good opportunity to teach them about what NOT to do and WHY rather than to condemn outright.

    By the way, I respect homosexuals as humans, though I have no taste for any form of gayness. Biologically, the human body was not designed for same sex unions, even if we don’t talk about morals. Gay activists, please don’t flame me on this. I don’t despise you, just don’t agree. If you want to claim that there is no absolutes barring a homosexual union you can consider being a paedophile as well.

  • Funny

    This is like watching that damn American CNN program.They drag it out,over and over and over.Bring in 5000 different lawyers to over analyze the situation,because they didn’t hear it enough.What a bunch of bible pushers you are in America,oh my goodness ,we will be struck down for seeing what is the most natural thing to a human,their body or any part of it.You bible pushers are so prudent and narrow minded, its ridiculous.Oh and brainwashed.It must have been real hard on you bible thumpers,having to hide your kids from that deadly boob,what would you say,..”The lord will strike you where you sit if you look at that dreadful thing” Then off to home and later that night you rip your old ladies top off and set your bible thumping lips right on her big erect nipple!

  • Reality Check

    JTY: rot in hell you disgusting bastard. I can’t stand people like you who claim to be “good little Christians” pretending to be perfect, when you’re just disgusting sinners like everyone else. Talk about the pot calling the kettle black. If you thing your bigoted bitch ass is getting anywhere NEAR heaven, then think again.

  • JTY

    Sigh. Another senseless flamer. First, I never said I was a Christian. Second, I never said anything about myself being perfect. As a personal plea, please stop your senseless flames. I may laugh to death. Then again, I may want to read more mail from you purely from amusement’s sake. Man, you’re way about Janet Jackson. She has much to learn from you

  • JTY

    I solemnly accept the judgment that you’ve passed on me that I’m nowhere near heaven. It seems like dogs and bitches are able to enter heaven as well! Thanks for the enlightenment. And yes, Reality Check, how did you know I am a bitch? Wuff! Wuff! My fellow bitches I can most certainly learn a lot from you. We lower life forms would love to enter heaven too, but then, since you’re the judge, we’ll never get there unless we learn from you. The Master knows the way, as always

  • JTY

    Last one from me for now, Reality Check. If you say everyone is a sinner, what bloody right do you have to condemn JJ for her breast exposure? Before someone picks your flames apart, please don’t make yourself a laughing stock

  • Dennis

    Does anybody know where I can find a picture of Janet’s left breast. It’s all I can think about…I need to see that tit.

  • Murphy

    Justin is such a dildo!! He’s now saying how disgusted and offended and shocked he was at Janet’s stunt. But immediately after the show he was interviewed and he was laughing and saying it was fun and how he enjoyed giving everybody something to talk about. Any JT fans out there, your boy is a big time loser!!

  • Murphy

    There were some earlier comments about the hostility toward Janet being racially motivated. Rather than accuse the accusers, I would ask why have CBS, MTV, and Justin hung Janet out to dry while they pretend that they were betrayed by her. I can see in Janet’s face how much pain those shit heads have caused her. Now CBS has barred her from the Grammies. That’s the real outrage in this circus.

  • Murphy

    To the Brit:

    We Yanks don’t need for you Limeys and other arrogant Europeans criticizing us for having different values and viewpoints than you. If something happens in our country which we find worthy of our attention, then just let us be. Personally, I find the royal family to be a huge yawn, but I don’t disdain your tabloids or the British subjects for being completely and inexplicably obsessed.

  • Robo

    Its about time Janet had a huge Public appearance..

  • Mr Man

    America relax. It was only a tit and the nipple was covered. We need to worry about that wreckless idiot in the White House.

  • Aggie

    I don’t know what seems to be the problem here. People who talk bad about janet’s boob showing on national T.V. seems like their just hatin’. You just wish it was your’s!

  • none

    This is why God is the judge. We all suck.

  • magoo

    This is why God is the judge. We all suck.

  • imrt

    I am right and you are wrong bla bla bla

  • MCV

    I’m Catholic, old man, but I like it.
    Better, then be killed somewhere.

    All the best AMERICA.

    Mark C.
    Melbourne, AU

  • http://www.morethings.com/log Al Barger

    Cat lickers RULE!

  • timberlakesuks

    HOW in the world did a boob become political fodder? For God’s sake…I just love when other countries bash the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA but the truth is you all need US….and as far as the comment about the ‘wreckless idiot in the White House’, I am proud to be aggressive towards the middle east…THEY are wreckless….seems Sept 11th is forgotten, and I thank GOD that fool Gore was not put in the white house to deal with it….If Clinton had properly dealt with the terrorism in ’93, (ie: cut communications, cut funding, and especially NOT selling weapons) perhaps the towers would have never come down….so who’s wreckless????
    And to get back on suject, I think it is completely wrong to ban Janet and not that whiny, little rich boy, who always gets his way….I hope he gets boo’d off the stage when he show’s his stupid face.

  • http://multimedea.blogspot.com Dew

    What’s amazing to me is this isn’t beyond Janet. Am I the only one who owns a DVD of her concert? The strip tease is well within the means of Janet’s boundary. TEASE – keyword here. She definitely didn’t mean to expose the entire breast. It was shock tactic that went horribly wrong.

    BTW If anyone really believes MTV didnt know or coerce her into doing it, well zip me up and call me lefty. =)

  • James

    If you want to see more pictures of Janet, go to http://www.absolutenow.com/music/artists/janet_jackson/links.html

  • Tony

    I missed the whole thing.
    But from what I hear. it was a
    cheap shot.

  • http://davelankford.com/confession Dave L

    Look, this was a publicity stunt. People thought that Madonna was ending her career when she released the book ‘Sex.’ Look at Madonna now. This is just a long line of publicity stunts in the history of the business. Don’t believe me? Think this is going to ruin Janet? Read more about Publicity Stunts in this article I posted at Confession: Struggling Screen Actor. There’s also a link from the article to a small animated video of the whole Super Bowl incident for those of you who waren’t sure if it was staged or not (however, Janet has already admitted that it was staged).

  • Purple

    Once again the problem with the stunt was that it was aired on a family event. The preformers shouldn’t have focused so much on “sex” but “good” entertainment. Ratings are given for other shows aired on networks so if it is a nasty or a dirty show parents will know. Of course the human body is a beautiful thing, when shown in an artistic way and not an exotict way. Im reading people say that it was art at what the two of them did. Nothing of their performance was art but pure lust. The reason why there is so much controversy on this issue is because they showed errotic behavior in front of children which is something that parents fight to keep there children from seeing. Of course art galleries have nude pictures, but it isn’t of pure lust and x rated scenes – like that of porn or something. Don’t compare this event to a mother breast feeding there is a big difference! Once again people thats what ratings are for.

  • stfu

    purple you soft hearted bitch stfu! all of you stfu! i think you are all making a big deal out of nothing! this is just totally great let her show her breast shit… you guys wished you had those sexy juicy warm breasts…and BTW it hink you are all old women who had 4 kids and are fat white women! stfu and dont hate!!

  • duane

    I am totally OUTRAGED by the way you people continue to use the words “tit” and “boob” to refer to part of the female anatomy. Please refrain from using these demeaning terms, and call them what God intended them to be called — “hooters.” Thank you. (“Jugs” is OK, too…uh…thanks again…)

  • Eric Olsen

    I would offer “rack,” but that would imply the full set – “half-rack” seems too unwieldy and is also too reminiscent of Tony Roma’s.

  • Bartikus

    Janet Jackson’s boob did not bring about the end of the world anymore than me showing some neighbor kids my testicles! Only difference is that I would be in jail bout now………..So much for free speech, art, humanity, or whatever else you want to call it!

    I guess “free speech” “art” and a bit of “humanity” can only be applied to some and not others!

  • Bartikus

    Would it be the end of the world if Janet went to jail…..just like you or I would?

  • Stunned

    You god damn Americans,its a fuckin tit,a piece of blubber with a nipple on it.Big god damn deal.You teach your kids that when they see two dogs screwing that its natural,but when you see a womans tit,its immoral and dirty,or filthy sex.You yanks are so god damn hipocritical and stupid its a joke.All over a fuckin tit,what a joke your country is.

  • Brava

    Its gettin’ hot in hurr..
    Titty! titty! titty!…way to go gurl. Why shud a sista go to jail for showin’ the world a bit ov flesh??..Its cool. Let the poor lady be, and screw the rest of y’all

  • bartikus

    Stunned….does that mean I can show my nuts to your kids coming out of school? We have laws here….don’t worry about it…..I’m sure your country has enough problems of their own!

    When American’s can decide what is right or wrong for you and your fellow countrymen….you can have a voice regarding our laws! K

  • barticus

    And Brava…..she should’nt go to jail ….anymore than i should by whipping out my bag in front of one of your little sista’s face! lol

  • missp

    It was an accident–why? Her nipple was showing on national network Television for goodness sake. Viacom owns MTV, BET, and several other media outlets that represent a significant portion of her audience. DO you REALLY believe she would willing piss them off when she has a new album on it’s way? Janet Jackson didn’t stay in the business this long for nothing. She’s no idiot, even if the rest of us are. She’s never flashed her tities before, but when Britany Speaks flashes her butcheeks on Stuff or Maxim mag, it’s no big deal right? Newsflash– your children are more likely to buy Spears’ next album rather than Janet’s.
    And the Superbowl–A Family show? For whom–The Mansons? Some of you parents need to come down of your moral high horse. Afterall, you are permitting your kids to watch a violent sport and delusionally refer to it as ‘wholesome family entertainment’ in the same breath. Nothing brings a family closer together than the sound of necks breaking, blood spurting, and shoulders popping out of sockets I guess.
    WAKE UP AND GET OVER THIS. An episode of CSI could be considered tamer by the Superbowl’s standards, and half of you let your children watch that too. You can’t turn on the TV today and not expect your child to be influenced in someway, no matter what programming is on. Seriously watch a half hour of the Justice League, or Sponge Bob, and you’ll know where your real problem lies. That’s the stuff you need to worry about. We live in the MTV generation– so Janet Jackson’s titty is not going to make your child a sociopath. Chances are, it’s that Blink 182 video that will earn him or her that distinction. Besides, Andy Sipowitz flashes his ass on NYPD Blue every week, and no one cries foul on that one. Though I really wish some of you would. Eww…

  • bartikus

    >>Nothing brings a family closer together than the sound of necks breaking, blood spurting, and shoulders popping out of sockets I guess<<

    I admit football can be quite a rough sport but……WoW missp! What game were you watching! How many died? ARe you sure this was a football game you are describing…..

    The moral high horse you speak of…..may not actually be high at all! Relatively speaking……anything above ground level could be seen as such!

  • bartikus

    People will get over it!

    Just seems that there is a double standard regarding the law….that’s all!

    It kinda seems unfair to send a common person to jail for the same stuff….ya know?

    Yet, I am also kinda glad that common people can get in some legal headaches for showing themselves to kids….at school, or in the park or whatever!

    I don’t want to hang them or cry out “HELP , THE SKY IS FALLING”! Like some assert…..I just want fairness and to live in a society where parents do not have to worry about other people deciding for their children when the appropriate time is for a child to be exposed to total strangers boobs, testicles, penises and such! I want that to remain in a parent’s control! Yet you have no problem deciding that kids other than your own….should not be watching football in the first place!
    It is your right to decide that for your OWN KIDS! What happened here was NO ONE HAD A CHOICE! People are saying “If you were watching football and did’nt expect some nudity….tough shit…Get over it! Nice….

    I assure you…..if football becomes anything remotely like you described….I will ask the broadcaster to at least give some previous warning about it! I can’t believe I even had to say this……lol! Respect anyone….

    Relax….take a deep breath….find a happy place!

  • bartikus

    Stunned….who said it was dirty or immoral?

    That is not the issue! Doh…

    Read previous obviousness…lol

  • Aditya Bothra

    Was it necessary to hide her nipples by coyly placing a star? I mean when u gotta show, just show…dont do half measures. In any case, the whole thing is laughable….hardly worth anyone’s time

  • bartikus

    Yes or No:

    Is it OK for people to now expose themselves publicly to whomever even if the other person objects and without consent?

    Should we all be able to do so?

    Should our Indecent Exposure Laws be removed?

    Amended….to say what?

    Anyone afraid to answer these?

    Anyone afraid of the answers? lol yikes

    Am I afraid to ask? That would be affirmative…

  • doh

    Moral “HIGH HORSE” measurement commences………..

  • simplesimon

    omg, what a bunch of jackasses. it’s embarassing to be an “american”.
    the TIT was artistic, within the context of the song/performance, and if there were any parents out there with half a brain, they would explain that to their kids. they are supposed to teach them about the world, not shelter them from it. the morons on this posting who think it sends some kind of message for everyone to expose themself whenever and wherever are insufferable.

  • stmfhu

    leave janet`s boob alone. All these ole grannies that are complainin here wish they had summin like dat instead of they wrinkly shit.so stfu and peace out to all the dawgs who feel me YO.

  • elric

    Hey simpleton……keep in mind…You are American by choice!

    “they are supposed to teach them about the world, not shelter them from it. the morons on this posting who think it sends some kind of message for everyone to expose themself whenever and wherever are insufferable.”

    Thanks for the parental advice and words of “wisdom”!

  • equal

    Apparently only “artists” can do it! Whatever that is? I think artistic expression should be available to all.

    I am not surprised that simple avoided that question entirely. He would have to say it is ok for Janet but not for others in order to look like he had any sense! By doing so, he only further promotes inequality in society.

  • daniella

    Seems the high horse is not at all high.

    Oh well, best wishes.

  • surgeon

    What is insufferable are people who point out the moral decay in society and by doing so expose those who suffer from it!

  • bart

    If i say that this was wrong or immoral in any way I am told to shut up and take that shit to church with you.

    But, if I say it was only a tit and apart of nature I am welcomed and embraced by the world!

    Just as Jesus has faced the rejection of “the world,” so will his followers (15:18-24). The world will treat the disciples of Jesus with such hostility because the world does not know the Father (15:21). Jesus has made the world aware of its sinful rebellion against God, and those who are part of that world refuse to accept the truth (15:22-24). In addition, Jesus has chosen his disciples out of that world system, so they no longer belong to it (15:19).

    The reality of the world’s hostility calls for disciples to live faithfully, despite the opposition. Jesus alerts his followers to this truth so they will not be led astray (16:1). He does not guarantee immunity from the world’s opposition. In fact, he promises such hostility will come. However, he assures his disciples the world’s opposition has not defeated him and will not defeat them, either. He affirms, “In this world you will have trouble. But take heart! I have overcome the world” (16:33).

    Surgeon, you are correct!

    Watch the responses carefully to this….they will only further prove this to be true!

  • Lisa

    Has anyone forgotten about Lil Kim’s outfit at (i think) the VMA’s or something like that a while back? Her little starfish on the breast thing? Yea, that was worse because that was all she had for the ENTIRE night, so….

  • Lisa

    I only had to bring up Lil Kim because everyone acts like Janet’s stunt is the end of the world and all of the children who saw it are traumatized. Little Timmy will just have to learn about sex ed (and body piercings, and anatomy) a bit early, big damned deal. Plus, any parent who knows the least about the Superbowl knows that the halftime show will ALWAYS be quite risque. Whether people enjoy it or not, these types of shows are going to get worse and worse in how revealing they are. Those who don’t like it should just not watch it and not let their kids watch it. Seriously, let other people have their sick fun instead of trying to turn our society back in time to the days when a bare arm was inappropriate.

  • Rese

    whatever! get over it already!!!!!!

  • lew the jew

    I missed the half-time show cause I was watching the Cheerleader Slumber Party Pillow Fight half-time show on FOX.

  • man

    >>Seriously, let other people have their sick fun instead of trying to turn our society back in time to the days when a bare arm was inappropriate.<<

    “if” we don’t allow this we will “then” be turning back time?

    Would that be like saying “if” we do allow it we will “then” someday we will have a society where nothing is inappropriate, Just in reverse?

    Slippery Slope Argument: A slippery slope argument is an argument that carries the conclusion to the point of ridiculousness by a series of absurd consequences. Slippery slope misuses the conditional operator “if . . . then”.

    Tip: When confronted with an “if . . . then” operator identify the outcome of the series of consequences and make sure it is a logical outcome of the proposition being argued against. If not, then show that the outcome need not be a consequence of the assertion being argued against.

  • corey

    America going to Iraq is not the end of the world! George Bush being President has not brought about the end the world either! Can you think of anything else that has not brought the end about? lol

    I love logic!

  • inquisitive

    Many things do not bring about the end of the world! That does not prevent people from speaking out against it. Does it?

  • samsonite

    get over telling others to get over it!?

    We have better things to worry about! Remember?

  • scott

    Janet Jacksons booby

  • D. Vincent

    The first thing that came to mind about Janet’s lame-o stunt was how cruel Father Time had been to her. I’ve seen many good looking 38+ year old women with bodies to rival those 10 to 15 years younger . . . Janet ain’t one of them.

  • http://blogcritics.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/12232 shawn Saif

    all people are acting like they have never seen tits in their life. Just relax and go on people. big deal!!!!

  • this world sucks

    Just one thing to add. Parents who use their children as excuses should be shot. Plus, the world is not going to get any better I 100 percent gaurantee that. If you want to protect your children from “immoral acts” then i hope you have a bomb shelter with a lock on the door. That will be the only way to “protect” them from this worlds “evilness” LOL. You people make me sick. You try to “over-protect” your children and in the long run they will suffer from it and be a lot worse off trust me I see it happen all the time. Also, the violence and guns and war issues? Wake up people I gaurantee 100 percent that that part of the world will never change for the better either trust me. This is all just the beginning of the world going to the crapper and there is NOT anything anyone will be able to do about it so get over your crying about it cause no one wants to hear it AND it won’t stop any of the “evil” from coming. P.S. All the bible thumpers out there should remember one thing “We were never given the right to judge ANYBODY and we will never have that right!” That is for GOD himself and he will never give that right to us so stop doing it.

  • guest

    OMG. I hate reading comments from people who are concerned about their kids.

    Daily news of murder, death, war, killings, theft, drugs. People are dying in big numbers, many starve to death because they have no food.

    And you are concerned about a tit? How do you teach that to your kids? Don’t they ever see momy naked? What kind of values do you teach?

    Nakedness is bad? Nipples are deadly? But USA on war is fine? Military is cool?

    USA, land of the free? I tell you what: Teach your children to have sex (at the right age, to prevent any misundrestandings here!!!), that sex is great, helps relieve stress, is a natural thing. Look at the porn web sites of pseudo reality, twisted minds of so called teens … don’t you see that all this has something to do with the values you teach your children?

    Your country should think about the society it is creating when showing precise missile attacks on buildings as if it was a video game but rant about a nipple slip …

    Think, think , think, think, think, think, think.

    THINK!

  • Archie Bunker

    First off, there was nothing “titilating” or “sexy” about Janet Jackson’s sagging tit . . . The only things offended are my eyes.

    Somebody said something about Janet’s “should-never-be-shown-to-the-public-without-being-forewarned” tit being purchased … If that’s the case, the woman needs to demand a refund or better yet take the people she purchased her tit from to court, cuz she got ripped off big time!

    It’s not nudity that I’m hung up on, its the TYPE of people who engage in public nudity . . . in situations where nudity is allowed, the first people to take their clothes off are the ones who NEED to KEEP THEM ON! If I have a big sagging gut and have the muscle tone of a beetle grub, you can best believe I won’t be strutting up and down the beach with a pair of speedos!

    Back to Janet . . . Janet looks like Michael after a sex change operation. I guess this little hullabaloo will breathe some life (although ephemeral) into her pretty much dead career.

  • Mistah Larry Wilson Monroe

    Janet Jackson has been around for thirty years and she still looks better than Brit(ho)ney, Mad(old)onna, J. Ho and Christina Ho-ga-dirty-lera. I will be buying four copies of the single and four copies of the cd, one for my scrap book, one to play, one I will never open and one for a friend. People like me will make sure she debuts at number one. Peace.

  • urban

    I love how some people think they can tell me what is appropriate for my kids!

    Do you think any of these people give a rat’s ass about my kids…or anyone else’s?

    Nope! Use your “insightful knowledge” on your own kids thanks! If you don’t like the idea of total strangers telling you or your kids between “right” or “wrong” …… keep it to yourself as well!

  • Roger

    Quit cryig over a tit. This is a body part that is commonly seen by children in other countries. This is far from corrupting the youth. 90% of the stuff kids learn is either at home with their hypocritical parents(that means you with your weed and secret porn stash that’s not so secret. I wish eveyone would make this much out-cry against every child molesting priest and pervert. That far out weighs this petty whining that you (Beaver Cleaver)mothers are doing Janet Jackson. Get off of your damn moral pedastal and do something to really help our children you cowards! If you focused this much on these sick child molesters and killers maybe that innocent girl in Sarasota FL would still be running around laughing. Do something real!!!

  • chais

    janet couldn’t stand her brother getting all the hype right now… i think justin was as much to blame. enough said.

  • johnnyb

    >>If you focused this much on these sick child molesters and killers maybe that innocent girl in Sarasota FL would still be running around laughing. Do something real!!!< <

    .......like you?

    >>90% of the stuff kids learn is either at home with their hypocritical parents(that means you with your weed and secret porn stash that’s not so secret.<<

    ……..were you referring to yourself or your own parents….or both?

    ….so sad

  • ulrick

    I know this may seem like an unbelievable, fantastic claim but, not ALL parents have secret stashes of porn and pot!

    I’m sorry….maybe they should..
    Shame on them for not! LOL

    I’m not sure if they are on “moral pedastals”! Maybe they are just trying to be decent role models.

    Role Model? What’s that? If you don’t know what that is….your probably not one!

    I wonder how many who have aired their views here are parents themselves? Nevermind…I don’t want to know!

  • psi-nation

    Your not going to believe this but I heard that not all teenagers smoke pot and watch porn! OMG….what is wrong with these people?

    Everyone should be doing it by now! Who are these rebeliious people who refuse to partake in such things? Something must be seriously wrong with them!

    For “goodness” sake…

  • Miles

    Why focus on child-molesters and killers when global warming is a far greater threat to humanity? Roger!
    Wait…maybe nuclear proliferation is a greater threat? No…terrorism…hmmmm

    lol

  • Monarch

    You would think according to some responses, the greatest threat to mankind are the people who have a problem with Janet Jackson exposing herself on National TV! (applying their own “logic” of course)

    It’s not surprising! They are not defending Janet as much as they are defending themselves!
    Figure it out…good luck with that

  • http://www.geocities.com/nool/ Nool

    For all the fools who don’t have kids who think that a woman’s bare breast seen by 7 and 8 year olds is nothing, I know you won’t find it offensive if I send your kids emails with topless women in them. Also remember that when your kid starts looking at porn on the net and becomes just another sex-addicted loser. (probably like you) I mean so what? They’re just body parts…whatever. There’s a lot of stupid people in this world.

  • Samuel T. Watkins

    Everyone knows that those who have an objection are living in the past! They have an old-fashioned, medieval, and regressive perspective!

    What many people don’t know is that the people who are pointing this out…..have a far more regressive perspective! They happen to be following Caligula of Ancient Rome…

    Progressive? Nothing new here folks…..all been done before!

  • stmfhu

    to the professional fool talking about sex-addicted losers, why can`t you get the hell over it?
    you just want something to talk about instead of doing something thats frigin constructive.
    look at all the shit thats going on around you…children being sexually abused, drug gangs bustin caps into each other and iraq which is in a complete state of corruption after the war.That is something you should worry about.
    “Overseas yeah we tryin to stop terrorism
    But we still got terrorists here livin”–Black eyed peas. Think about that.

  • samson

    >>iraq which is in a complete state of corruption after the war.<<

    In what state was Iraq in before the war wise one?

    You forgot the rest of the song from black eyed peas…”where is the love”? Maybe the love is in the words you speak?lol

    Then again maybe not….

  • samson

    >>to the professional fool talking about sex-addicted losers, why can`t you get the hell over it?

    Was this statement made out of love? Then please allow me to return the favor!

    Why can’t you get the hell over other people getting over it? Fool…….
    Does’nt sound very loving does it? Oh well, you had me going for awhile….lol…not really

  • Azreia

    stmfhu, my family is in Iraq and I am from Iraq. I am sure you have no idea what you are talking about when speaking of corruption or the state of Iraq today. You have that luxury, be thankful you do. Thank you Mr.Bush!

  • Eric Olsen

    thanks Azreia, that perspective, your perspective doesn’t get heard enough. I love the Black Eyed Peas but that song is hopelessly naive.

  • Azreia

    In regards to people who are offended by the display of Janet Jackson because of their moral high horses or whatever people say, I will only say this:

    If such people did’nt exist here in America, I am not sure if my people in Iraq would be free today.

  • http://www.tekwh0re.net Ms. Tek
  • Azreia

    Ms.Tek, you do not believe that men and women should be able to live according to their religious beliefs?

  • http://www.tekwh0re.net Ms. Tek

    Actually I do think that they should have the freedom to do so.

    What I am worried about is the people who do not follow those beliefs, or are not quite so orthodox. Last I checked, there were some Catholics in Iraq and some Muslim women who do wear veils but are still allowed to work and drive, etc.

    There in lies the crux- The Bush Administration does not want an Islamic government installed in Iraq but is perfectly happy to let women lose some rights there. You cannot have a democracy until everyone is truly free. If Bush were to allow totally free elections and Iraq chooses to have an Islamic government, then what happens to the women is the choice that all of Iraq has made. It is ingenious to say in one hand “No, you cannot decide what you want to do unless it is what we the US agrees with.” Then say, “But you are allowed to bring women backward if you want to”.

    If some women chose to follow that path then I am not one to stop them.

    HOWEVER for the ones that do not chose to do this, they should not be forced or terrorized to do so. How is anyone going to make sure that their interests are represented?

  • Azreia

    “But you are allowed to bring women backward if you want to”.

    You believe that women would be moving backward?

    “No, you cannot decide what you want to do unless it is what we the US agrees with.”

    I assume you mean the government?

  • http://www.tekwh0re.net Ms. Tek

    “But you are allowed to bring women backward if you want to”.

    You believe that women would be moving backward?

    For a non-Muslim to have to wear a veil or cannot hold certain jobs, or not be allowed to drive (thinking of Saudi Arabia) would be considered “backwards” for her. For the use of two women to confirm a story in court as oppsosed to one man would be condisered insulting to her.

    I know that in Islam, for a woman to hold certain positions or to not cover herself is considered “immodest” and possibly “backwards”.

    I am not a Christian, yet I do believe in God, and from my culture and standpoint, these things do seem “backward” to me. At the same time, I believe that people should be able to follow whatever religious beliefs that they want. The point is that passing laws like this affect ALL women in Iraq, regardless of what religion they are. It does not take into consderation people who are not “strict” muslims.

    “No, you cannot decide what you want to do unless it is what we the US agrees with.”

    I assume you mean the government?

    What I am saying is say tomorrow, everyone Iraq just happen to get together and say “You know what US? We want to run an Islamic state. There will be no seperation of church and state. We believe that Islam tells us all that we need to know, we want to elect this religious leader as our leader and that is that.” The current administration of the United States will not allow that to happen without a fight. Meaning more bloodshead and a longer occupation until there is a goverment in place in Iraq that the United States likes. It doesn’t matter if the majority of Iraqis want otherwise. If the US doesn’t like it, at this point in time, Iraq will not get it. At the same time, for the US to let a change in law that affect all women in Iraq go through once again blows hole in the American spin that “Well, we want to make sure that all groups are represented in Iraq’s new goverment”. Clearly, the United States has already shown that they really don’t care what happens to women in the long run as that they are not getting enough representation now.

    I do hope you understand that I am not trying to insult Islamic culture. I am just trying to voice that not everyone is being represented.

  • Azreia

    “I do hope you understand that I am not trying to insult Islamic culture. I am just trying to voice that not everyone is being represented.”

    How can everyone be represented without one side giving in to the teachings of another?

    Should the majority abandon their beliefs for the sake of the few? Should the few abandon their beliefs for the sake of the many?

    You obviously believe that the majority of faithful muslims should adopt your beliefs and in order to accomodate the few!

    I understand that is what is happening here in America. It is taught in the schools where the young ones can be reached and eventually causing the decay of their religious beliefs!

    For it is written “Raise the child in the way they should go and they will not depart from it”! This teaching is not seen as religious in the schools now, but I assure you that is what is referred to as secular humanism is as much a religion as the teachings of Ancient Egypt and the gods and goddesses of Amon-Ra and Osiris! They followed the same teachings! Their is no seperation of church and state in America! Secular Humanism is a disguise pulled over the eyes of Christians in America!

    A religion does not have to follow a God! A functional definition describes religion as “a set of beliefs, actions and emotions, both personal and corporate, organized around the concept of an Ultimate Reality. This Reality may be understood as a unity or a plurality, personal or nonpersonal, divine or not, and so forth, differing from religion to religion.”Such a definition clearly encompasses the worldview of Secular Humanism.

    I assure you that believer’s in Iraq do not slumber in their beliefs and will see such teachings for what they truly are! Yet, you speak on behalf of Catholics?

    Catholics are taught not to offend their host nation or offend their traditions by demanding to be able to do that which is offensive to them!

    In other words they are taught that it is not wrong to observe their traditions such as wearing a veil if it prevents a “stumbling block” for the majority!

    According to your words, you are the stumbling block in this equation by saying you care for the rights of the Catholic over the beliefs of Muslims!

    Your craftiness pits believer against other believer while at the same time erodes the beliefs of both!

    “No nation divided against itself shall stand” If the few cannot out of “tolerance” accomodate the many…how much more difficult would it be for the many? I do not believe you have concern for the Muslim nor the Christian!

    I don’t believe your deceptive teachings (which are not at all progressive or new) will remain in America for long….God willing!

    Such teachings create anger towards Muslim and Christian and Jew alike while the “Humanists” cry out “see how destructive religion is”! Not seeing what the true source of such destruction is!

    You care not for those who believe in that which you cannot see! I can see that from your other posts…so can anyone else!

    By the way…I follow the Christ Jesus! Many Christians in America may indeed be “asleep” but, I assure many in the world are “Awake” and will not abandon their fellow brothers and sisters in their hour of need!

    Here is one of your Catholic “loving” quotes:

    >>Maybe the hatred stems from the fact that too many now a days seem to use the bible as an excuse to dehumanise some people and to abuse them or limit their right according to a religion that some people chose and some people do not.

    The bible too often as of late is what is being used to perpetuate an agenda of intolerance and hatred!< <

    link:http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/02/06/214333.php

    Do you mean the Pope Ms. Tek? Being against things like abortion, gay marriage and such! Are you really concerned for the rights of the Catholic in Iraq…or anywhere else?

    You mean no disrespect to Muslims you say? How about Christians or Jews? How about Hindus? They all agree with these teachings! Do they perpetuate hate? Or….

    Are you perpetuating intolerance or hatred?

  • Azreia

    “The current administration of the United States will not allow that to happen without a fight. Meaning more bloodshead and a longer occupation until there is a goverment in place in Iraq that the United States likes. It doesn’t matter if the majority of Iraqis want otherwise.”

    Do you believe this to be true because it is the case here in America? Do you not speak against the majority and for the minority here and abroad? Does that mean further bloodshed is on your head?

  • Azreia

    “The bible too often as of late is what is being used to perpetuate an agenda of intolerance and hatred!”

    If those who believe the Bible, Koran, Torah, and the Hindu text (Inspired by the Bhagavad Gita) were so intolerant and full of hatred here in America….would you not be suffering as many have under the rule of Saddam?

    You don’t know what intolerance and hatred is…I assure you! I hope you never find out….

    There is more tolerance than you realize here in America? Keep up the accusations against believer’s and I fear that which you fear most may come upon you!

  • bart

    All are guilty of intolerance and hatred for others at times! Give and ye shall receive! I pray for blessings for all….friend and foe alike.

    Love your enemies….not just your friends!

  • stmfhu

    to whoever commented about my posts, look I don`t study politics, but I do watch the news. Don`t tell me that the state iraq is in now is much better than it was.Man your government is going to have to do alot of work to make iraq a much better place,good luck.
    bro, I just feel sorry for all those American soldiers right now that don`t know where the bullets are coming from and also to the iraqi people who are being killed. And to whoever says they were freed by the war there..they might be free for a while but you don`t know when you are going to get killed on the street by some maniac driving a truck full of TNT.
    So what was gained bro? more deaths?
    simple mathematics.
    We were talking Janet,now we talkin war.. ah well I just expressed my view..take it or not..it`s all good..I appreciate the fact this website was set up for this kinda stuff..cheers mate!

  • stmfhu

    Oh I just forgot..
    Sorry about the quote from the black eyed peas.. I don`t think ya`ll are fans of them.
    And to the ladies above…i mean…geez man you talk alot in your posts..i just cbf reading all that but I respect all ur views..
    cya for now peeps

  • http://www.tekwh0re.net Ms. Tek

    Catholics are taught not to offend their host nation or offend their traditions by demanding to be able to do that which is offensive to them!

    Excuse me? I was raised catholic for well over 20 years. At no time was I taught to do something that was against Catholicism. You are also twisting my words as well. I don’t follow the bible this does not mean that I don’t respect people who do. It is true that the bible has been used too often to spread hate. I never said all the time.

    Perhaps that is the difference between you and I. I don’t believe in absolutes. I don’t believe in forcing people to do things that are against their personal moral believes or traditions. If you want to go around and wear a veil because someone else told you to, that is YOUR CHOICE. You have NO RIGHT to make someone else follow YOUR BELIEFS.

    That is were YOU are wrong. So long as anyone tries to force their beliefs on someone else, then there will always be strife, bloodshed and war. To be honest, in that aspect, that is a great things. I know that I for one if I ever saw that kind of garbage really take hold in a America, I know what side I would be on. Hell, I am on that side NOW and do what I can.

    “You don’t know what intolerance and hatred is…I assure you! I hope you never find out….”

    Ah yes, you know so much about me that you can made a definitive statement about what I know and what I don’t know. Nope, I’ve never had any real violence against me. No one has ever shot at me, knifed me, etc. I have had an “attempted” beating beating before. Too bad they didn’t realize before they started that I had learned how to fight.

    “Do you believe this to be true because it is the case here in America? Do you not speak against the majority and for the minority here and abroad? Does that mean further bloodshed is on your head?”

    Any bloodshed in Iraq is not on my head. Bush the first failed in his mission the first time around. As far as I am concerned, after that royal screw up, esp since there were no weapons of mass destruction that Bush the Younger said there was (and really, he knew there never were any) then it was up to the Iraqi people THEMSELVES to get away for Saddam. If they had staged their own revolution toward a true democracy, then the United States would still have helped. The US does get involved in these things when it benefits us.

    The basic facts are that going to Iraq was a personal vendetta. Iraq is useful to us for strategic reasons. Bush et al, really doesn’t care about the Iraqi people, and anyone who says otherwise is a fool.

    We see on the news and radio all these “brave” Iraqi men shooting guns in the air at weddings, shooting guns in the air when a Cleric says something that they like. The opposition to America shooting guns and bombing helicopters and trucks. If they truly didn’t like what was happening during Saddam’s reign, why did they not go and be “brave” and take on Saddam and his troops. Revolutions and changes start at home. You cannot expect another country to go in and suddenly in 2 years, paradise is there. Democracy and freedom is not a franchise where someone goes in, sets up shop, and delivers product. Democracy and freedom must be fought for.

    The US often gets involved when they see that there are some “freedom fighters”. We’ll train troops. We’ll provide funds and expertise. We’ll lend special operatives.

    Outright going in and “giving freedom” to a country is something that is a bit new for us.

    And before someone wants to bring up WWII- that does not apply. We were ATTACKED. Also, there were some cells of resistance in Nazi Germany.

    The Iraqis in general did nothing to start a revolution on their own.

    You may thank the Americans now, but I am not so sure you will in two years.

    Time will tell. I say it’s going to get a lot harder before it gets better… for anyone involved.

  • Azreia

    >>As far as I am concerned, after that royal screw up, esp since there were no weapons of mass destruction that Bush the Younger said there was (and really, he knew there never were any)

    Do you have any evidence of this?

    Were the Bushes the only ones who said there were WMD’s?

    STMFHU…keep in mind that just because you watch the news does not mean that what is presented in the news is all-encompassing!

    >>So what was gained bro? more deaths?
    simple mathematics.

    What you apparently don’t realize is that there are worse things than death!

    I pray you never learn that firsthand.

  • Azreia

    >>The Iraqis in general did nothing to start a revolution on their own.

    Ms. Tek….you have no clue whatsoever!

    Is this willful ignorance?

  • http://www.tekwh0re.net Ms. Tek

    Ms. Tek….you have no clue whatsoever!

    That is a matter of opinion and perspective, isn’t it?

    Maybe you might want to talk to some Marsh Arabs and ask them how much support they received when they tried fighting Saddam? Or maybe the Kurds… I didn’t see a bunch of Iraqis joining up with the Kurds to oust Saddam. My enemies, enemy is my friend has some truth to it.

  • Azreia

    “I didn’t see a bunch of Iraqis joining up with the Kurds to oust Saddam.

    Were you there?

  • http://www.tekwh0re.net Ms. Tek

    No? Were you?

    And if I am incorrect then why didn’t Bush mention this to the American public? It would have furthered his agenda 110 % and would have appealed to most American’s heartstrings.

    Bush has a good way of pulling whatever he wants to further his cause. This he did not do in this case. What does that say?

  • Azreia

    “Ms. Tek….you have no clue whatsoever!

    That is a matter of opinion and perspective, isn’t it?

    No it is’nt a matter of perspective or opinion since you were’nt there! You IN FACT have no clue on the subject and YES…I WAS THERE!

    I’m pretty sure President Bush was not there either!
    But, by his actions many Iraqi’s have hope! My family has hope and so do I.

    Hope is something that most of my people have lived without for a very long time.

    Despite the words of people like yourself, I remain hopeful for America as well.

  • http://www.tekwh0re.net Ms. Tek

    You never answered my question.

    Were YOU there?

  • http://www.tekwh0re.net Ms. Tek

    Sorry, I misread what you said.

    Regardless, I think I better know what America does and how it works. Believe it or not, its people LIKE ME that make sure there is any hope left in the world. People LIKE ME don’t believe in dominating anyone or anything. People LIKE ME believe that so long as you are not hurting the environment or people around you, then people should be allowed to do what they want to do. If it weren’t for people LIKE ME, people wouldn’t be allowed to practice Islam here in the United States and in even other parts of the world.

    People LIKE ME don’t expect people LIKE YOU to do the things that I DO. However, people LIKE ME will defend your right to do them.

  • Azreia

    Ms. Tek are you ok?

  • http://www.tekwh0re.net Ms. Tek

    Yes, I’m fine, thanks. =)

  • Azreia

    I assume your last statement was in fact based on YOUR perspective and YOUR opinion.

    I will believe in something else entirely if you don’t mind!

  • http://www.tekwh0re.net Ms. Tek

    I assume your last statement was in fact based on YOUR perspective and YOUR opinion.

    I will believe in something else entirely if you don’t mind!

    Of course. I don’t believe in mind control. =) Dialog, learning, communication- never mind control.

  • stmfhu

    Round three Ms Tek vs Azreia
    commences after this point.

  • http://hi yowazzup567

    WHO CARES! YOU TALK AS IF YOU DON’T WANNA SEE THAT YOU F*CKERS!!!

  • Andy

    ok, first of which, she is not that hot…she looks too much like her brother…NOT GOOD…second, with tv now days, it’s normal to see that stuff, and no it’s not good…..i didnt learn about sex till 5th grade, and yet the new generation learns about it in 2nd, is this what we want???…i think that things should be censored, i mean, yeah i am a guy, seeing a boob isnt exactly a bad thing for me, but we need to think about the little ones….we dont need a poluted generation of youngsters, do we???…..

  • biat*h

    seriously how sad that 1 tiny thing like janet jacksons boob has made such a fuss over everyone…kids and everyone see things like this everyday on tv and anywhere… even if it was on purpose just get over it.

  • Azreia

    Quote from Ms.Tek:

    “Believe it or not, its people LIKE ME that make sure there is any hope left in the world. People LIKE ME don’t believe in dominating anyone or anything.

    I am glad you don’t believe in dominating anyone or anything! I assure you Saddam Hussein did.

    Thank you for standing behind President Bush despite the fact that most nations in the U.N were against removing Saddam!
    Because of people like you, the people of Iraq have hope!

    Thanks again.

  • http://www.tekwh0re.net Ms. Tek

    Thank you for standing behind President Bush despite the fact that most nations in the U.N were against removing Saddam!

    Actually, I didn’t. If I ever got the chance to stand behind him, I would give him a good hard kick to the arse on behalf of all of us who think he is a royal fuck up.

  • sickOfHumans

    every single one of you people are rediculously pathetic. i cant imagine spending as much time on anything as all you retards have spent bitching and complaining about a fuckin boob. fuck you and fuck anyone who is offended becase it’s pointless…go spend some quality time with your kids and maybe explain a little about life to them.

  • OUTLAW

    I LOVED IT, I WISH SHE DID HAVE THE NIPPLE RING ON

  • Azreia

    “”Believe it or not, its people LIKE ME that make sure there is any hope left in the world.

    Thank you Ms.Tek for pointing out the absurdity of this statement, especially regarding the part of the world known as ….Iraq.

    Sickofhumans: There are more offensive things in this world than Janet’s boob. Thanks for making that evident with your offensive comments.

  • http://www.tekwh0re.net Ms. Tek

    Azreia,

    Believe what you wish but it was people like me that helped stop some of the backlash on Arabs after 9/11.

    Call what you want to call absurd. I wouldn’t expect anything better from you.

  • Azreia

    “Believe what you wish but it was people like me that helped stop some of the backlash on Arabs after 9/11.

    How did you do that?

  • Azreia

    Ms. Tek

    I say President Bush has given hope to many Iraqi’s by his actions. You say he has not…you have secured the hope of the world! (I assume) you include Iraq as being part of the world.

    Keeping in mind of course that you are not Iraqi now are you? Whose opinion do you think carries more credence in regards to the hope or hopelessness of Iraqi’s?

    An Iraqi or you?

    I point out that which is obvious not only for your benefit but, the reader as well.

  • Azreia

    “Call what you want to call absurd. I wouldn’t expect anything better from you.

    I am not surprised. It does’nt get any better than the truth.

  • http://www.tekwh0re.net Ms. Tek

    Poor Azreia…

    You still think Bush did what he did for you because he cared about the Iraqis.

    History is already proving that theory wrong. Even as we debate.

  • Azreia
  • Azreia

    I did not say Bush did what he did out of concern for Iraqi’s!

    Who knows the intentions of another person’s heart? You apparently….lol of course.

    I said that by his actions people in Iraq have hope!

    Your absurdity becomes more evident with every word you write…..please stop

  • Azreia

    I did not say Bush did what he did out of concern for Iraqi’s!

    Who knows the intentions of another person’s heart? You apparently….lol of course.

    I said that by his actions people in Iraq have hope!

    Your absurdity becomes more evident with every word you write…..please stop

  • Travis

    First off, i loved the fact that we all got to see Janet’s tit! Second of all, what you wrote was the dumbest thing i’ve heard yet. Who are you to comment on somebody because their a jackson. Finally, janets carrer isnt over it only got better and from the shit you said your obviously have your own problems!!! Oh yeah, its 2004 and unless parents dont want there children to be exposed to this than dont own a tv and qiut makin a big deal over something most of us see everyday! Ya’ll need to grow up and get a freakin life!

  • Azreia

    Poor Azreia…

    You still think Bush did what he did for you because he cared about the Iraqis.

    How do you come to these conclusions?

    Can you also read minds? As well as (hearts) and be credited for all earthly hope?

    Your scaring me…..poor Ms.Tek

  • rbl4nik8er

    Hey travis:

    I loved the fact I got to see your Mom’s tit (among other things) last night!lol

  • godgrowup!

    why were ur kids watchin football in the first place?! doesnt that teach them violence and that runnin into ppl and hittin them as hard as u can is ok! and dont forget bout the commercials cause according to some of yous ur kids shouldnt b watchin alcohol advertisment! right?!!! geez ppl life is life and boobs r a big part of it!

  • http://www.tekwh0re.net Ms. Tek

    Azreia,

    Is English a second language for you?

    Why are you bringing up a quote I said in another thread about worshiping me?

    I don’t take myself too seriously- life is too short. That WAS a joke. I also talk about cheese anytime someone brings up racist remarks. There is something called “a sense of humor”. I find it gets one far in the world when things are unpleasant.

    Then again, that is the crux of this whole conversation, isn’t it? I just realized that you are unable to discern the facts and truth from what you read. You appear to be taking everything for wrote and what is told to you, you believe. That makes your conversation make perfect sense.

    If it makes you feel better to lower yourself in this conversation by calling me “absurd”, then so be it. Speaking with you, I can see is a waste of my time. Once I see a person just regurgitates what they see without taking it in context or even thinking about it, then to me that is like having a debate with a piece of cotton, or grass, or the wall.

    I honestly do wish you all the best of luck and bear you no ill will. I feel very sorry that you just don’t seem to be able to see the truth through the spin, but as I said, history as a way of bearing these things out, eventually.

    At least, I am happy to know that you will be happy wearing a veil over your head because someone else told you that is what you should do. Hopefully, it will come in a color to match the veil over your mind.

  • john

    ” 2004 and unless parents dont want there children to be exposed to this than dont own a tv and qiut makin a big deal over something most of us see everyday! Ya’ll need to grow up and get a freakin life!

    You need an education in Law!

    You see little one, the airwaves in which CBS broadcasts are owned by Americans! If Most Americans have a problem with nudity (without a prior disclaimer) shown over airwaves in which they own, by democratic principle the majority should be heard!

    We don’t need to get rid of our tv’s. We will get rid of the broadcaster first. This is not the same as pay television! Pay television is privately owned. National television broadcasts are publicly owned. Sell off your porn collection and get an education!

    This in no way inhibits your ability to look at all the flesh you like.

  • Travis

    hey rbl4nik8er,

    haha freakin ha! i’m glad u did to because i havent seen her for 2 year considering the fact that she’s dead! oh yeah, thanks its ppl like you whom i was directing my last sentence to!

  • godgrowup!

    hey john,
    i’ve got an education! i’m 29 i’m an orthipetic surgeon and i make $670,000 a year! so thanks for ur little bit of info. heres a tip for ya, SEX is what makes life, its what put me on this earth, but unfortunatly it put you here to! and heres one word for ya “JEALOUSY” take a sec to let that register if ur bright enough!

  • Azreia

    “I just realized that you are unable to discern the facts and truth from what you read. You appear to be taking everything for wrote and what is told to you,

    I can see the facts fine..it is you who are unable to write that which is true!

    No english is not a second language it is my fourth.

    I am sorry you are offended by me pointing out that “people like yourself” are not the source of all earthly hope! I did’nt realize you were joking about that.

    It was that statement that is indeed comical and if taken seriously, absurd!

    If I am required to wear a veil in order to be free from the things that Iraqi’s were required to do under Saddam, I consider myself blessed. I am actually glad you do not understand that.

    Finally, i never said that I believed Bush invaded Iraq out of his concern for Iraqi’s! You said that…

    I do not know the possibly endless reasons why Bush did! I don’t think you can know for sure either.

    I just know most Iraqi’s are glad. That’s all. I think you would rather me not say so since you abhor President Bush!

    Please do not try to diminish my words for your political gain. I speak the truth regarding the hopes of Iraqi’s in which you cannot!

  • john

    “hey john,
    i’ve got an education! i’m 29 i’m an orthipetic surgeon and i make $670,000 a year!

    Where did you study? I only ask because I am concerned that the University that was unable to teach you how to spell “orthopedic”…..may (and i know this is a stretch) might, possibly, perhaps want to rethink your Doctoral degree.

    godgrowabrain..

  • SamIAM

    I’m willing to bet that travis and godgrowup went to the same university!

  • CHEVELL JOHNSON

    I THINK MOST OF YOU ARE RACIST IF JANET JACKSON WAS WHITE YOU WOULD BE DEFENDED HER INSTEAD OF DOWNING WHITE PEOPLE ARE ALWAYS HARSHER ON BLACKS THAN THEMSELVES WHEN MADONNA KISSED BRITNET CHRISTINA WAS MAD THAT KNOW MENTIONED THAT SHE KISSED MADONNA TOO! BUT I GUESS WHITE PEOPLE THAT IT WAS CUTE AND EXCUSED IT. I THOUGHT IT WAS DISGUSTING AND THEY LOOKED WHITE AND TRASHY. BUT KNOW TALKED ABOUT SUING MTV! BUT AS SOON AS A BLACK PERSON DOES SOMETHING CALL THE DOGS AS IF WHITES HACE NOT DONE IT! IT IS NOT A CRIME OR INJUSTICE THAT HAS NOT BEEN COMMITTED BY WHITES FIRST AND FOREMOST GET OVER IT BECAUSE YOU STARTED IT!

  • http://www.tekwh0re.net Ms. Tek

    Actually, you are the one trying to diminished mine.

    And you don’t offend me because I find you very simple minded. You are attempting to play a game by circumvention and veiled insults.

    I don’t do that, sorry. I call a spade a spade when I see it.

    You my dear, are a spade and not as smart as you think you may be.

    “If I am required to wear a veil in order to be free from the things that Iraqi’s were required to do under Saddam, I consider myself blessed. “

    If you really believe that then you really are stupid. Trade one prison for another. Makes total sense. I suppose that it never occurred to you that perhaps you shouldn’t be oppressed by anyone or anything.

    But to you, a christian, you would uphold the beliefs of another over your own. True Christians have died for less!

    Sheep you are!

    English is not your first language. Very obvious. At least when I read German, I can tell when a joke is a joke. You might want to work on that.

  • Azreia

    “But to you, a christian, you would uphold the beliefs of another over your own. True Christians have died for less!

    Sheep you are!

    There is no law against wearing a veil for a Christian! I do not do so to uphold the beliefs of another.

    But, I agree christians should not uphold the beliefs of another in Iraq…nor here in America!

    Simple minded…stupid? Are these the words of those who defend hope for all?

  • Azreia

    “Trade one prison for another. Makes total sense. I suppose that it never occurred to you that perhaps you shouldn’t be oppressed by anyone or anything.

    especially by the likes of you Ms.Tek!

  • Azreia

    Are you a Christian Ms.tek?

    Just wondering since you seem to know how one should live!

  • Azreia

    “Let every soul be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and the authorities that exist are appointed by God.Therefore whoever resists the authority resists the ordinance of God, and those who resist will bring judgment on themselves.”

    Do you suggest that Christians rebel against their authorities so that their blood be spilled?

  • Azreia

    A wolf that has removed her sheep’s clothing you are……..

    We cannot stand against you. It is the shepherd you will contend with…..wolf!

  • http://www.tekwh0re.net Ms. Tek

    I’m not the one trying to do anything to you. I’ve never once told you to do one thing or the other. I keep telling you that you should do what you want to do. You just don’t get it.

    Btw… If you were to follow the bible completely and be a TRUE christian, you should wear a covering on your head anyway. It is something that is called for in both the Old Testament and the New Testament.

    However, if you indulge in any practices of another religion, it is considered a sin and breaks the first commandment.

    1. I am the Lord thy God. Thou shalt not have strange gods before me.

    This means there is a huge difference in veiling because of Islamic law, or veiling because of what the bible says.

    St. Paul says an unveiled woman is a dishonor:

    “But I would have you know that the head of every man is Christ and the head of the woman is the man, and the head of Christ is God. Every man praying or prophesying with his head covered, disgraces his head. But every woman praying or prophesying with her head uncovered disgraces her head, for it is the same as if she were shaven. For if a woman is not covered, let her be shaven. But if it is a disgrace for a woman to have her hair cut off or her head shaved, let her cover her head. A man indeed ought not to cover his head, because he is the image and glory of God. But woman is the glory of man. For man was not created for woman, but woman for man. This is why the woman ought to have a sign of authority over her head, because of the angels.” (1Cor.11,3-10)

    (for those watching, this is why you see Amish women covering their heads with bonnets and some other religious groups in Christianity do still have women cover their heads. The reason why women cover their head in Christianity is not to show modesty as in Islam but to show that she is beneath the man. The bible is very clear that the world order is God, Man, Woman. This is also why Catholic nuns had to wear veils up until vatican II began the changes in clothing for nuns and other members of the clergy.)

    So Azriea, you are basically saying that you would wear the veil if told by an Islamic government to do so because it is better than what you went through before. I have not heard you argue that you would wear one because the bible actually commands it.

    Interesting. You just broke the first commandment.

  • Azreia

    “But every woman praying or prophesying with her head uncovered disgraces her head, for it is the same as if she were shaven. For if a woman is not covered, let her be shaven. But if it is a disgrace for a woman to have her hair cut off or her head shaved, let her cover her head.”

    The bible commands it when prophesying or praying!

    Don’t forget that those who are subject to the law are accountable for every letter of the law!

    Rom 7:6 But now, by dying to what once bound us, we have been released from the law so that we serve in the new way of the Spirit, and not in the old way of the written code.
    Rom 8:1 Therefore, there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus,because through Christ Jesus the law of the Spirit of life set me free from the law of sin and death.

  • http://www.tekwh0re.net Ms. Tek

    Are you a Christian Ms.tek?

    Just wondering since you seem to know how one should live!

    I answered that before.

    No, I am not. I was raise Christian and given the best education money could buy from Benedictine Nuns, Jesuit and Franciscan priests and a few BVM (Blessed Virgin Mary) nuns, here and there. Throw in the fact that my mother is a fundamentalist, evangelical, christian, and I was require to have Christian religion classes for 12 years, general theology and world religions for another 2 in college, and my own self study because I find just about everything interesting, I think I have a fairly sound basis to know how a Christian should live from an Anglican, Catholic, Protestant, Evangelical, Mormon, etc point of view.

    It is because of my education and background that I find that Christianity for me is not a choice. Once again, I respect if someone else choses it and finds it helpful.

    Point to hone in on here: Just because something is not good for ME does not mean that I think everyone should do what I say. Everyone is an individual and needs to find their own path and what works for them. I believe in God and I think that God has a way of showing the Divine to each and every person in a way that they best can understand and feel comfortable with. This is why Islam works for some, Christianity for others, Zoroastrianism for a few… But these are just MY views. I don’t expect anyone else to have them.

  • Azreia

    Do not concern yourself with what laws I have broken dear Ms.tek! It is not I who is subject to them….

  • Azreia

    “Everyone is an individual and needs to find their own path and what works for them.”

    Then you will not find the need to call someone “stupid” for doing so?

    Anglican, Catholic, Protestant, Evangelical, Mormon, etc point of view.

    I am none of those…..

  • Azreia

    I am not perfect by a longshot! I am truly sorry if I have said something I should not have.

    I hope the best for you Ms.Tek! :)

    I should have been more loving and compassionate in my responses.

    God knows we could all use it! God, I believe wants you to have it. May it be unto you….

  • http://www.tekwh0re.net Ms. Tek

    Anglican, Catholic, Protestant, Evangelical, Mormon, etc point of view.

    I am none of those…..

    You are not an et cetera? But I thought you said you were Christian? Do you have your own special version of the bible? Does it say something different? Mind getting me a copy since I would love to see a new bible that says something different!

    Then you will not find the need to call someone “stupid” for doing so?

    Perhaps you would feel better if I called you “absurd”, instead? ;)

  • Azreia

    His words are written upon my heart!

    It is a law written on the heart, not on stones nor on tablet. Jer 31:33 It is the “law of the Spirit of life” that has “set me free from the law of sin and death”. Rom 8:1

    I will pray that your “copy” will come!

  • Azreia

    Call me what you will…..

  • Azreia

    “Does it say something different? Mind getting me a copy since I would love to see a new bible that says something different!”

    If you cannot first accept the written word…I’m not sure if you can receive the latter!

  • Azreia

    “Btw… If you were to follow the bible completely and be a TRUE christian, you should wear a covering on your head anyway. It is something that is called for in both the Old Testament and the New Testament

    Satan knows there is a God and knows the words and laws of the Bible as well! Probably better than you!

    However, I do not receive his instruction regarding what it is to be a true Christian!

  • http://www.tekwh0re.net Ms. Tek

    DAMN Azriea!!!

    You FINALLY got it. You FINALLY figured it out!

    I AM SATAN!

    You better run away quick before I lick you and turn you into a nipple baring lesbian with my words!

    MUHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!

    (devilish laugh can be heard everywhere)

  • Roger

    To Miles and JhonnyB.
    You both are very sick. I wasn’t refering to kids watching porn and smoking weed, I was pointing out the fact that kids first see that stuff inside their own home. It seems like I hit a nerve when all you can do is respond with cheap shots. Are you guys one of those people? Sounds like it. You seemed really offened when I mentioned sick ass child molesters and killers. Why? For the last four years I have worked as a private investigator mostly in marriage and child custody cases. I’ve witnessed everything from dads getting out with their 3 year old at 7am and pouring a cup full of malt liquor and driving with the child without a seat belt on to a church pastor driving 30 minutes from home to buy porn and drive around in a park trying to pick up other HOMO’S for sex. You’re really sick when you make wise cracks comparing global warming to child molesters. Do yourselves a favor and get some physcological help. What Janet did wasn’t the most tasteful thing I would just rather see this much energy focused on getting all of the weird’o predators off the street.

  • Roger

    I wanted to futher ad that I realize that not all parents somke pot and watch porn. I am a christian, but I don’t always live like one. If you are wondering why I am so harsh it’s because in addition to going to court as an investigator in child custody cases, two years ago a former neighbor of mine was stoned from smoking pot with his wife and friends. In a 20 minute time period they wern’t thinking and lost track of their four year old son. As the dad got into his truck to run to the store he backed out and ran over his son who was playing behined it. I did’nt go over but another neighbor did. The child was dead with about 60% of his brains lying outside of his head.

    As awkward as it may be, if all your child happens to see a womens breast you should try to explain that it’s a natural bodypart in a way that it is no big deal and lowers their level of curiosity down the road. (Depending on their age). Further if you are dending on pro athletes and celeberties to be role models then your kid is definately doomed.

  • http://none Memo

    thats a nice tit i think she planned it

  • Azreia

    No Ms. tek, you are not Satan.

    If you were, the point I was making would not have gone over your head.

    Seems that you are not as bright as you would like to think either.

    The point was simple but, maybe I did not put it in simple enough terms so here it is:

    No Muslim would allow a Jew to define for them what it meant to be a “true” Muslim!

    No Buddhist would allow a Hindu to define for them what it meant to be a “true” Buddhist!

    Is this clear enough? Let me be more specific….

    No Christian would allow you to define for them what it means to be a “true” Christian and…

    I’m pretty sure you would not allow a Christian to define your beliefs as well.

    I am glad to spare you such things…spare us as well!

  • Azreia

    “You better run away quick before I lick you and turn you into a nipple baring lesbian with my words!

    Best of luck with that….lol
    I am already fond of women, especially my wife!

  • http://www.tekwh0re.net Ms. Tek

    Azreia,

    Stop trying to tell me to shut up. I am entitled, just as you, to my opinion. Where I come from, we believe in free speech and everyone getting to voice their opinion in a respectful and logical manner. I know that you aren’t used to such ideas and to be quite frank, I can see how they may scare you.

    As far as what is a “true Christian” is- You don’t follow your own bible. you pick and chose the verses that suit you in order to feel more comfortable with your situation. And that is fine, you are entitled to do so.

    The thing is that some of us rely on faith and that God will get us through trials. Some of us think that God will help us so long as we stand up to things that are immoral and wrong. Some of us are sheep, keeping to what we know, knowing that somewhere someone watches over us. On the other hand, some of us go out and fight and bleed, put ourselves on the line, and sometime die for our beliefs. Some of us get slaughtered for the greater good.

    You keep saying “people like me” and that is fine. I’m proud of the type of person I am and for my character. This is why, saved for you thinly veiled insults, you don’t get to me. I am listening to what you are saying and I am telling you that it doesn’t matter if you want my help or not. I want to make sure that you, and others besides you, are always able to live their life how THEY chose- Not because some government tells them to. Not because some man tells them to. They lead their lives the way the want to because their heart and soul tells them too. Perhaps you would be so selfish as to deny your Iraqi sisters, some who do not live as you do, nor share your beliefs, the right to enjoy and live their lives according to their traditions and their gods and their hearts. You would rather dawn the veil if that is what the government tells you to do for redempton in heaven. The thing is that there is so much more at stake. If some people had their way, Iraq would turn into another Afghanistan. It is fine if you don’t care for yourself, but I CARE for those who still want to work as doctors, teachers, scientists, drive cars, be in movies, on tv, and not have to worry that because their head is uncovered, some religious militia is going to hunt her down and beat her. She doesn’t need to worry about losing any property that she owns. She doesn’t have to worry about the means that can make her self sufficent are unavalible to her. I care because I want everyone to have the same opportunities and choices that I have been blessed with having.

    I’m sorry that you don’t see that, and feel that you would rather insult me. I forgive you because you really don’t know any better. I forgive you because I also defend your right to be as an ostrich, with your head in the sand even though your soul might be in heaven. Just as you chose to do this, other women have the right to chose otherwise.

    May your God bless you, Azreia. May things get better for you. I fear things might get a little worse before they get better. I know that I will do what I can to try to make that not happen, just as I have done all along. My role in this world is not that of sheep, but that of fighter. You see, I believe that I too will be rewarded when my days come to an end for trying to keep the playing field even.

  • Man

    Hey Roger we just wanted a warning and to voice that! That’s all is that ok? Something wrong with that?

  • Azreia

    “On the other hand, some of us go out and fight and bleed, put ourselves on the line, and sometime die for our beliefs. Some of us get slaughtered for the greater good.

    Like most of my family…like me losing my eyesight and my left arm? Thanks for the information….I’ll try to reflect upon it.

  • Eric Olsen

    And to think all of this discussion is watched over by a woman with one globe hanging out, frozen in time.

  • Azreia

    “As far as what is a “true Christian” is- You don’t follow your own bible. you pick and chose the verses that suit you in order to feel more comfortable with your situation. And that is fine, you are entitled to do so.

    The letter of the (written) law is for those who are without the spirit! We tried to follow it and found that we were unable and needed a Savior! We submit to the authority of Jesus Christ and accept him as our redeemer. We have been redeemed from the letter of the law and the wages for breaking it (death)! We now live according to the spirit and will forevermore dwell with the Lord!

    If we could have lived according to the laws of the Bible…we would have no need for a savior! For it is written:

    “There is no one who does good, not even one.” (Romans 3.12) All of us are sinners.
    “All who rely on observing the law are under a curse, for it is written: ‘Cursed is everyone who does not continue to do everything written in the Book of Law.’ Clearly, no one is justified before God by the law, because ‘The righteous will live by faith.'” (Galatians 3.10-11)

    Faith in Jesus Christ. He came for the sick…not those who are “well”…for which there is none. Not one!

  • http://www.morethings.com/log Al Barger

    Perhaps I’ll start a new religion worshipping Janet’s All-Powerful Titty. She could be Our Lady of the High Web Traffic.

  • Azreia

    My life, then, has been stained by sin, because I have not followed God’s law absolutely. With that stain on my soul, how then could I be justified before God? How can anyone be justified before God, if no one is perfectly sinless, and “the wages of sin is death”? (Romans 6.23) You can’t save yourself by following the Law, because any effort to do so will inevitably fall short.

    That was how I realized why Jesus is “the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!” (John 1.29) Jesus sacrificed himself on our behalf, dying for our sins, even though he himself, God-as-man, had lived a perfectly sinless life. And so he was offered up as a sacrifice for sin that no other human could possibly make, because God demands an offering “without defect.” (Leviticus 1.13, 1.10, 3.1, etc.)

    Jesus is our righteousness!

    That is why I said that though we are only sheep amidst the wolves we have a great shepherd! For which no wolf can stand against!

  • Azreia

    To call a sin “sin” is good because it lets us know we are all sinners! If we know we are all sinners then we know we are in need of a Savior! If we know we need a savior from our sins….you can find him only in Christ Jesus for who paid the price!

    I figured since a non Christian can say what it means to be a Christian….so can a Christian! God bless

  • Azreia

    The lesson to man is the lesson that Satan himself needed!

    You can not be God’s equal by your own efforts! You cannot be “truly” good apart from the source! All goodness is in him. Do not try to do so by your own strength…you will fail! Go to the Savior for help….it is the only way.

  • Roger

    “Man” I don’t know if you’ve read all I’ve posted, but all I previously stated that a breast was natural and could at some point be explained to kids. What Janet did was a bit tasteless but what the little boy Justin did was worse by showing a “MALE”
    tearing off a womans clothes. I am a pro-child person and generally work as a private investigator mostly in child custody cases in situations that’s always in the childs best interest. When I stated that we needed to put this much energy into getting child molesters off the street a couple of idiots posted some stupid remarks comparing the seriousness of chid molesters to GLOBAL WARMING. Try working for an attorney and a good parent and sitting down with them and telling them (especially the parent)that you just discovered that their child has been living in the same house with an Uncle the last 8 months who had been arrested and indicted on 2 counts of child rape 11 months earlier. Fortunately the attorney was able to get an emergency hearing and get the child to the right parent. I’m sorry if I offended anyone but I have no sympathy for people like that. In fact I think that the sick bastard who abducted and killed that girl(Carlie Brucia) in Florida should be taken and executed in a painful manner on public TV. The ones that don’t kill should be castrated.

  • Roger

    People thinks that the boob was bad, as if teenagers don’t go through enough NBC has a show “QUEER EYE FOR THE STRAIGHT GUY”. That’s real cute. If teens or even adults use the word Queer then it’s considered hate. I have enough to worry about than someones sexual preferance, but if people are born gay then leave it at that. I don’t want my already stressed and confused teen having homosexualality thrown at them from every angle telling them that it is just another okay lifestyle for them. If you ever watch these gay shows like Will and Grace there are some very offensive sexual comments and acts that are fare worse that Super Bowl 38. I guess if we take the over sexed “Queer” shows off TV then we are hateing.

  • Man

    Point taken Roger, your comments are sound and your concerns are definately warranted! Peace Man! Don’t give up hope.

  • Roger

    “Man” if that is what you really are, what is your point. I posted one response on this page and next I have a couple of smart asses getting upset because I spoke out against child rapist and molesters. I do this stuff for a reason. Even if you can’t be seen you show your true colors. As far as the Peace Man, I sleep good every night.

    I know one thing I wouldn’t want you around my kids. Maybe you and the Global warming guy (miles or johnnyb}can
    babysit for each other.

    Oh yeah! I think at this point that Janet Jackson stands a better chance at not burning in hell than your child loving perverts. I don’t know who you guys are but it would be worth tracking you all down through your E-mail just to make sure that any kids around you are safe… And Gerbils too.

  • man

    I speak against you, i get shit!

    I speak nicely to you, i get shit!

    You must be full of it….

  • Dave

    I read all of the comments MAN dating back a while and from some of the stupid global warming comments made I think Roger can’t tell who is being sarcastic and who’s is not. It’s all good.

  • Man

    Dave…I guess he missed the point?!

  • MAn

    I said your concerns were warranted, meaning: You are right..people should speak out more against things like child molesters and other wrongs committed(especially) to children!

    Children…..that is the issue that is of utmost importance! Children is what the concern is (especially) for parents.

    If you roger think that people should not speak up about nuclear proliferation or ANYTHING else that may have a bearing on the lives of future generations….fine.

    But as for me and my family…..I will speak out about ANYTHING I CHOOSE TO! JUST LIKE YOU DO…IF YOU PEOPLE DON”T LIKE IT …..TOUGH SHIT FOR YOU AS WELL!

    “Freedom of speech” as one eloquent writer stated in this forum….YOU DON’T WANT ME TO USE IT? THEN YOU SHUT YOUR PIEHOLES AS WELL!

  • simon

    If you ask why people are making a big deal about a boob seen by kids, chances are you will never understand. Just a thought!

  • Roger

    Wow! If you go back to the 11th there were a couple of people just being smart alicks. Sorry if I offended you. Not being able to look someone in the eye makes it tough to tell who is serious and who is just making wise cracks. I agree with your environmental concerns. Below is a comment that I copied and pasted from the 11th. It was posted my someone calling themselves Miles. That is an insult to everyone with kids unless of course they are child molesters too. Find me a real loving parent who doesn’t find that messed up. Those are Two things that you can’t even come close to comparing.

    From Miles:
    Why focus on child-molesters and killers when global warming is a far greater threat to humanity? Roger!
    Wait…maybe nuclear proliferation is a greater threat? No…terrorism…hmmmm

    lol

    really serious.

  • Dave

    Hey MAN, above is the perfect example.
    Your buddy miles might have been taken a bit more seriously if it weren’t for the laugh out loud (lol)and hmmm. That was smart assed and juvinile. Sounds like miles was useing your Nuclear Proliferation to poke fun and act like a little punk. Go to anger managment and stay the hell away from kids.

  • Roger

    That’s alright. Beleive it or not I grew up only about 15 miles from where the first nuclear bomb was made. After all of this I’ve deciced that Methane Gas proliferation is much more important. I propose that if you eat a diet that produces a lot of gas that it be mandatory that you have your bunghole capped off… lol… lol…

  • Roger

    I wasn’t joking about where I lived. I actually worked in Oak Ridge for about two years. I’m even a member of the ORNL Federal Credit Union. I live about three hours away now. Type in the web address below.

    http://www.atomictourist.com/ornl.htm

  • Jock

    You Americans are amazing.Some black chick shows her booby and the world(sorry United States) is going to sink into the ocean.Then you call the FBI,the army etc.,etc, every night full time on CNN for dummies.Then you have a basketball allstar game and who do you have on the bench,you know ,where the kiddies can see her in person,yours truely Paris porno Hilton.Gee why doesn’t that surprise me.Just hours earlier she was giving head to all the players then gets put in front of the kiddies for all your kiddies to admire.Gee don’t show a booby what ever you do….hahahahahaha

  • anonymous

    Yo,back off Jock my boy.Yeah sure,Paris
    may be a sperm spitoon and all but she
    is our sperm spitoon… America # 1.
    Gooooooooooooooooooooooo Yanks!!!!!!!

  • drake

    “Just hours earlier she was giving head to all the players then gets put in front of the kiddies for all your kiddies to admire.Gee don’t show a booby what ever you do….hahahahahaha

    My kids did’nt see that? your point is moot.

  • DCarlH

    she has impeded my night of debauchery w/ her weak stunt. type “titty” into google search engine and find myself tapped into a janet jackson blog? who the hell would have thunk it last month? well, now i know what my fellow americans are thinking and discussing at the water cooler, and things are shit for sure. j jackson’s titty causing this much hubbub? oh janet, you really are desperate.

  • http://poetpiet.tripod.com piet

    googled: “statue of justice” breast. Results: 215.

    Janet’s ‘sublimurgent’ text: I am as you can see natural and juicy but besides I that I might just also be just enough to judge my own brother.

  • Roger

    Hey Jock! More like a Jock strap. You’re just Jealous that you weren’t giving those players head. That’s your fantasy is to give a bunch of American athletes head then go and talk about it on Larry King Live.

  • Dave

    Where are you from Jock{strap}???
    You Americans. I’m gonna cry. Jocks “cuntry” sucked so bad he’s home sick. Fuck Off!!! America is the greatest country in the world and I’m tired of “you americans this and you americans that”. Eat Shit you cunt. I wish you were somewhere I could look you straight in the eye you Coward!!! Now that your tails knocked in the dirt go home. BITCH!!!

  • Roger

    I kinda feel the same way “Jock”. I have a friend of fifteen years who is Lebonese and I’ve never heard him sound so unappreciative. He has been in America 18 years and often reflects on his past and loves all of the opportunities he’s been given here.

    We live in a country where people can be arrested for speaking “hate” toward people of different ethnic backgrounds.
    What’s strange is that it is people like you who spits out these words more than anyone.

    You’re filled full of resentment because you had to leave your crap country to be happy and you’re still unhappy.

  • kahn

    If America sucks so bad…why do we have the highest numbers of immigrants? Why is’nt everybody in the world flooding into Russia or China or even France?

    I guess we have the highest number because our nation is the “worst” place to be on the earth! lol. Good…go somewhere else then!

  • http://www.tekwh0re.net Ms. Tek

    Because everyone wants a shot at getting sucked off by Paris Hilton?

  • http://www.foliage.com/~marks Mark Saleski

    yep, Paris is still quite young. there’s still hope for everybody!

  • http://www.tekwh0re.net Ms. Tek

    Hurrah!

  • Roger

    I think this guy who calls himself “JOCK” is a pussy. Are you really form another country or are you just trying to stir shit. I’m not rascist or discrimanatory, just tell us where you’re from.

    Every now and then the “HOST” of these message boards pose as other people to keep their usless crap going.

    SOMEBODY TALK!!!

  • Paris H.

    I’m younger,richer,thinner and prettier
    than you’ll ever be boys and girls…..
    Slurp,suck,sluuuuuuuuuuurp……….

  • http://www.morethings.com/log Al Barger

    Roger, I don’t know about a “host” but I’m the author of the original article, and I assure you that none of these other names are MY doing.

    I wouldn’t be that conniving in how I go about raising hell. I stir up trouble more directly.

  • man

    “Why do we have the highest numbers of immigrants?

    I think this was the case even before Paris H. was born.

  • Roger

    AL:
    I believe you. I found the opposite on a much shitier counter-part.

    We have the most immigrants because people live so well in their native countries, they want to experience the horrific ways of America. You know, freedom, clean water, movies restaueants and all of the other extras.

    I hate it. I’ve been trying to get to Cuba for a year now. Nothing against Cubans, you are good people.

  • Jock

    You Americans are all brainwashed,dummest fucks on earth.Only country that kills people all over the world and doesn’t expect any retaliation.Why do you think most the world hates you fucks.You have more murders and rapes in one day in Detroit than any past war.The only reasons you have all these immagrants.One…your the only place that will take them,cause no one else wants them. Second… you murdered all their families ,so now you have to take care of them.Your the only country in the world that thinks killing is normal and seeing a women’s breast is criminal.What a pathetic society you have.

  • Shark

    Yeah, but we’ve got great half-time activities!

    And “Jock”, it’s probably not reinforcing your point when you criticize American intelligence by using the word “dummest”.

    My advice: I believe the Altavista/Babelfish site translates Moron to English.

  • Whale

    Hey Shark,we knew what he meant and we in internetland don’t really care about spelling,we care about the point made and he was right all the way.Now go back to grammar school you geek!

  • Dave

    YOU’RE A FUCKING CUNT JOCK! YOU’RE PROBABLY WEARING PANTIES WITH A PACIFIER STUCK IN YOUR ASS. I’D MUCH RATHER LOOK YOU IN THE EYE AND SEE HOW TOUGH YOU ARE YOU PATHETIC COWARD. IF WE ARE LUCKY MAYBE YOU’LL GET CAUGHT IN THE MIDDLE OF ONE OF THOSE DETROIT INCIDENTS YOU SPOKE OF. MAYBE YOU’LL GET RAPED AND BUTT-FUCKED. COWARD!!!

  • Jock

    Hey dave ,your probably skinny as shit with big lips from all the cock sucking you do. You live on cans of glue, think killing is as normal as you sucking cock,which is normal for you! Dave turn on CNN and listen to all the repetitive bullshit that all you dumb American fucks get caught up in.Now go sniff the can ,pick up your gun and blow your fucken head off,you moron!

  • Roger

    I don’t know who you are Jock, but I work independently as Private Investigator. Based on some of your remarks I’m considering tracking you down and reported to the authorities. If you think that you can’t be tracked because of your fake name, think again.
    I don’t know if you have any terror plans or not, but you sound like a very
    angry anti-american. Don’t be surprised if the Police and/or FBI comes knocking on your door. I’D ALSO LIKE TO KNOW WHERE YOU ARE FROM? CARE TO TELL ME???

  • Judy

    Gee he must have hit a nerve,it figures you americans think your your shit don’t stink.Figure you can blow the hell out of everyone and aren’t accountable.What goes around comes around!

  • Eric Olsen

    Roger, track the prick down.

    Judy, return to your cave with Osama, who will indeed be experiencing his own “coming around” shortly. I believe you are seriously mistaken about who blew up what first – of course literacy might help in your pursuit of knowledge or even just information.

  • Roger

    Judy,
    “What comes around goes around”? Sounds like a ligitimate threat to me. I couldn’t help but notice when I clicked on your name the email said “FAKE”. People a lot more clever have been tracked down. Send me an e-mail from your computer. My e-mail is real and comes straight to me. You never know I may be closer than you know. If your just playing I’d suggest doing it among your yourselvs. Send me an email and then we can make a bet on seeing how long it is before law enforcement is at your door.

  • Justice Mbuh

    Sorry! I beg to differ. Why all the Janet bashing? Who bashed Madonna and Britney Spears for kissing each other the way they did and in public? What is worse: Janet’s 5% nudity or the bunch of men kissing men and women kissing each other (aliens, from out of space, I suppose!) in the name of marriage as we have been given the treat by Californians and New Yorkers in the past few weeks? Gosh, we ought to question America’s overall morality, especially the keeping of religious studies–the every foundation of this nation, out of their schools! I beg, leave Janet (and even Michael) alone!
    Justice Mbuh
    Cherry Hill, NJ.

  • http://www.morethings.com/log Al Barger

    Actually Justice, many would in fact broadly connect Janet’s stunt with all these other things you are mentioning. The lowering of standards for public behavior, and the general lowering or apparent discarding of moral standards. These things get grouped together, not entirely unjustly.

  • brad cleveland

    i think that janeet has very nice tits stop being so imature fuck its just a boob like you never seen one before
    i see boobs all the time because i have a pair of them fuck!!!!!!!!!11

  • http://www.cdbaby.com/X-15 Douglas Mays

    Janet Jackson’s breast? What about violence against women? Justin should have been busted on that one!

  • Roger

    I wasn’t gonna comment on this Janet bullshit anymore but it seems that her stunt (which was hardly noticable in real time)has started a tremendous wave of CENSORSHIP via the FCC and all of the damn “do-gooders” whose own houses are still unclean. Everything on network TV as of recent has changed dramatically because because some government appointed officals and a bunch of morally sound parents in their squeaky-clean houses have nothing better to do than to crusade against a breast with a pasty that has “diseased the minds of millions”. This is a clear case where a bunch of losers in the FCC have found an easy target because they’re to incompetant to tackle something that would actually challenge their brains. And for all of you mothers who didn’t watch the SuperBowl please shut your pie hole. Aren’t there ligitimate groups for mothers and parents to do something really beneficial? That would actually require effort and some of your active time.

    I can promise you without a doubt that this has little or no bearing on kids. In fact all of the controversy has probably peaked their curiosity resulting in kids going out of their way to see a good picture like the one above. Good job. While you’re beating a dead horse they are learnig all kinds of detrimental stuff via their own curiosity,(as we all did) looking at real porn mags that are inside of the bookbags of other kids and watching their real role models. YOU! It’s sad that network TV has been set back about fifteen years and has had to spend millions just to go back and re-edit and cut seens and even complete shows.

  • jay

    You know I really have to say that this thing has been totally blown out of proportion.I also think its quiete racist at this point. Madonna has show here breast for years,she’s even slept with jesus figures, and masterbated in pepsi ads, and received millions for it. Christina and Britney are geared toward a twelve year old audience, and have thier asses sticking out every other song, not to mention all of the crotch grabbing, air humping male performers out there who get kudos for there antics. Janet is a beautiful remarkable talent, and the problem most have with here is that she is Michael’s sister, and he has a bad rep so they (people like you) want to give her a bad rep too. There has been no female artist to ever. Last this long without a little bit of media mishap. So get over it, Cher had her booty out in the 80’s, Madonna had her twat out in the 90’s, and now Janet has a peierced nipple waving to the fans so freaking what, its all in good fun. It’s all in bad taste, but the truth is it all sells. At that my friend is entertainment. So in the words of Janet herself, let her take you on an “Escapade”, and I am not mad at her for showing us its “Alright” to be who you are, “Anytime, Anyplace” and not care whose around. By the way those are some of her number one hits over the past 16 years. “If” you didn’t know. Bye now.

  • Janets Secret Admirer

    So Janet flashed her right tit…BIG DEAL! Maybe she will flash her left one next year….Personally I think she did nothing any worse than any of the rest of the performers acts on stage…I mean come on, after all, nipples are part of the human female breast! Breast are flashed every day every where you go…..Keep your chin up Janet …thumbs up to you in my books.

  • http://screenrant.com Vic

    It was not just the flash but the context in which it happened. The entire sexual nature of the halftime show was inappropriate and it culminated in a guy ripping part of her costume off. The whole thing had a violent S&M tone to it and this incident was the capper.

    Do this on MTV which I can block on my satellite box, but not during primetime at a family-oriented sports event.

    Vic

  • Diaperdoug

    “Jebus Criminy, but she looks old and haggard here. Not to be crappy, but this little display forces me to note that she was looking considerably older than her actual 38 years.”

    -butt I’ll still plug her here so I’ll get my .05 commission for promoting this krap-

    “Buy from
    Rhythm Nation 1814
    Janet Jackson
    Music, Usually ships in 24 hours”

    “Whoop-de-frickin’-do. Is this supposed to be shocking? TITillating? Oh, please. Is this supposed to make me tumescent?”

    seems az if u still want to have ure cake an’ eat it too!

    you’ll cut this i’m sure ’cause it’z an “personal attack”

    signed: showing my tit fer personal gain! (an’ yurs)

  • http://www.morethings.com/log Al Barger

    Howdy Diaperdoug, glad you could stop by. I just noticed this story has bubbled up into our top popular current list today, two years+ later. Ah, the golden oldies. Good times.

    I personally don’t get any commission off Amazon sales here, but I’d be proud to have you come by my MoreThings site and hit an Amazon link where I will get paid for it. Buy Janet Jackson’s crappy record and get me a commission- that’s great, you can buy whatever you want, but I’d recommend buying something good instead. Perhaps the new Prince album.

  • http://blogcritics.org/author.php?author=Casey%20Lunkley Casey Lunkley

    This whole thing is truly hilarious. Even two years after, people are still in an uproar.

    Family event? Yeah, I can see how that comes into play. You know, watching 300 pound men knocking into each other is a true family event.

    And I really don’t believe it was planned. She’s not much of an actress, and that face. It looked as though they didn’t plan it. She was shocked, and so was Justin.

  • ian cooper

    i still love here and one day i will meet her to love you aways ian j cooer

  • http://floacist.wordpress.com angela

    300+ comments and only about 4, if not less, mentions of Justin Timberlake.

    Taking jabs at Janet Jackson’s all of a sudden ‘lack of talent’ (I’ve never heard anyone damning her for that before the incident) assuming this was all a publicity stunt for a new album, despite the fact that A) She performed two old hits, which cannot promote new material B) The breast baring occured during Justin Timberlake’s song C) She actually didn’t have an album to release at that point, but most especially D) Her last album, only 1 and a half years before she performed, was extremely successful. Her most successful album to date, mind you. Why would she all of a sudden wake up and find the need to pull something like this — SOMETHING THAT SHE HAS NEVER DONE/KNOWN FOR DOING — to “sell records”?

    Madonna formatted her entire career on shock, controversry and marketting when she doesn’t really posess any sort of real talent, yet the American public puts her on a pedestal and praises her for “reinventating herself” and all that other lame hype. Janet, who is by far a better singer, dancer, actress and arguably all around entertainer, gets damned for doing something similar, for ONE time in her life?

    She apologized because she was ASKED to. Justin did the same, only thing is he copped out and pretended that it was all her fault, when actually there is footage to be found of him talking about it in amusement right afterwards (oops). To say that Justin was only doing what he was told, he is older than 21 years old. I think he can decide for himself what is appropriate or not inappropriate, and cannot be dictated to if that were to happen (yeah right). I very much doubt Jackson held a gun to Justin’s head.

    Its a shame that the FCC has fined Janet (not Justin, how strange) for that much money because of the MTV fall out. Now, concerning Music Television Videos, this is a channel, where, during their Spring Break programs they show horny half naked and censored fully nude college students/high schoolers licking whip cream off of each other’s exposed bodies, stripping and I even remember one clip where one woman opened her legs (they blurred out her crotch) while doing a highly provactive strip routine in some sort of contest, as judges jaw’s dropped and the audience cheers.

    Now MTV are all of a sudden prudes? They have no problem supporting Justin Timberlake; who should just be as accountable as Jackson, but they have banned and blacklisting Janet Jackson — who ironically, they just honored as the first mtvICON in 2001, not long before the incident happened!

    No wonder people outside the USA laugh at Americans. We’re so consummed with entertainers/celebrities — and even their personal lives, that we overlook what really matters. Look at our “newspapers” — how many of them now have turned to sensationalized format? Gossip columns? Terrorists must be having a ball as we bombared and dicuss the latest Britney Spears’ Lindsay Lohan’s drunken escapades while they kill more of our citizens in a pointless war we again, let President Bush go on with because nobody cared enough to protest. At least, not in numbers (and those who did got arrested).