Home / High Noon in Cambridge

High Noon in Cambridge

Please Share...Print this pageTweet about this on TwitterShare on Facebook0Share on Google+0Pin on Pinterest0Share on Tumblr0Share on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

Yesterday was D-Day for Larry Summers; his meeting with the faculty in an extended session described by the Globe as an “emergency” meeting. Who knew?

From the Globe’s account the meeting seems to have been anticlimactic. It sounds as though Summers was trying his hardest to be gracious and that the klieg lights of the media may have tempered the faculty tantrums in a meeting that according the Globe normally “garners no interest at all aside from coverage in the student newspaper”(now THERE is an understatement!).

One faculty member critical of Summers, Caroline Hoxby, described the relationships in a healthy university as “a great shimmering web”. True enough. Then she went on to say:

“When you engage in speech that harms the university’s ability to foster scholarship and that is not thoughtful, not deliberate, and not grounded in deep knowledge, you break ties by the hundreds.”

Here she is exactly and entirely wrong. Summers’ remarks are published. Though speculative, they are thoughtful, deliberate, and grounded in deep knowledge (albeit in one field) and in experience (in many fields). I suspect that this professor does not agree with the content of his remarks, which is her privilege. That Summers has been put into such a show trial for merely entertaining such ideas as hypotheses illustrates that the campus diversity Nazis have spawned a second web within academia; one which Paul Campos of Colorado University described as “a web of lies kept intact by a conspiracy of silence.”

The willingness to listen, and an environment open to alternative views is the beginning and the foundation of academic pursuits. For all their incessant posturing about needing more diversity, ideological diversity is sadly unwelcome in much of academia at present.

From Squaring the Boston Globe

Powered by

About Harry

  • One of the claims I’ve heard against Summers is that under his leadership the rate at which women professors are getting tenure has declined from 36% to 13%. Yet, having been part of a university faculty, I know that the president of the university has no role whatsoever in determining tenureship. That’s all in the hands of departmental committees and lower level deans, so this accusation that it’s his fault is completely spurious. It makes me wonder about the validity of the other attacks on him. I think they just don’t like him because he’s not a leftist. If you look at his work in economics, his viewpoint is very free-enterprise, free-market oriented and totally incompatible with the dominant socialist ethos of most university faculties.