Today on Blogcritics
Home » Has Privitization gone too far? — ‘Killing Fields’ Gravesite Privatized

Has Privitization gone too far? — ‘Killing Fields’ Gravesite Privatized

Please Share...Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Share on LinkedIn0Pin on Pinterest0Share on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

The Killing fields at Choeung Ek are worth a visit. Having been there, I can say that I was both disappointed and satisfied with the version of the ‘monument’ I saw. On the one hand, all that was there were some fields, holes, and a tower filled with the skulls and bones of the victims. Seemingly too simple and not fitting for the scale of the tragedy that happened there. I was expecting something a little more ‘official.’

On the other hand, while reflecting about my visit, I became more appreciative of the simplicity of it all. A couple of simple signs set under trees in the middle of surrounding rice paddies. At the centre of the site, a layered tower of bones. Very little attempt was made to explain why things happened (at least at the site proper), instead, just a few facts were displayed. It’s hard to understand why these things happened, but it’s easy to understand that they were horrible. That’s why the simplicity of it all was important to me.

Today, I learned that the site will be privatized. I’m both hopeful and saddened by the news. I’m hopeful that the site will become better, yet afraid it will become an attraction. There are a number of reasons why this could be bad:

  • Usually, a private company’s only goal is to maximize profit. As such, any profits generated will end up in private pockets.
  • The public loses control over how the site will be presented. If tourist dollars shrink, will the private company cut back on maintenance in order to meet the bottom line?
  • Because the site will now be for-profit, I can guarantee that a conflict of interest will occur between the goals of profiting and maintaining the site. Remember, in Cambodia bribery can get you anything.

Cambodians also recognize that this could be very bad:

Justice has not yet been found for the victims, but at the same time their spirits have been traded of for money.

Time will tell whether or not this is a good thing for the people of Cambodia. For now, I’m curious what the typical “smaller government” supporter thinks about this.

Source: CBC and Reuters. More information on Cambodia and the killing fields.

Powered by

About MaxPower

  • http://www.roblogpolitics.blogspot.com RJ

    If privatization improves the site, makes it more informative for its visitors, great. Apparently, it is pretty horrible right now, being gov’t-run, so why not give privatization a chance?

  • SFC SKI

    “yet afraid it will become an attraction” Well, I doubt it will become a Six Flags franchise, but it make take provatization to actually keep the site open, if the government funding is not there to maintain it. I’d donate to keep this memorial to the glory of Communism open.

  • http://www.maxpower.ca MaxPower

    I agree that it won’t become 6 flags, but you’d think that if instead of privitizing it, the Gov’t just raised the entrance fee like the private company will (already done?) that they could avoid privitizing the site and therby loosing all that control. On the other hand, Cambodia is full of bribery so maybe they want a private company that is above bribery on board.

    Cheers