Home / Google’s Evil Intentions Become Visible as U.K. MPs Grill

Google’s Evil Intentions Become Visible as U.K. MPs Grill

Please Share...Print this pageTweet about this on TwitterShare on Facebook0Share on Google+0Pin on Pinterest0Share on Tumblr0Share on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

Google’s stand about its wi-fi data—it collected erroneously emails and passwords—has been rejected by UK MPs, during a two-hour parliamentary debate on privacy. Google has always maintained that the personal data was retrieved in error because of code being mistakenly included in street view software. This statement itself demonstrates that Google is not ready to accept what it has done.

Privacy Debate
That is why Conservative MP Robert Halfon has stated, “I find it hard to believe that a company with the creative genius and originality of Google could map the personal wi-fi details, computer passwords and e-mail addresses of millions of people across the world and not know what it was doing.” It is impossible to believe that Google did not know what it was doing, given Google’s leadership in cyber technology. It is pretending innocence to escape the consequences of its wrongdoing.

Street viewRobert added, “My own feeling is that this data was of use to Google for commercial purposes and that is why it was done.” Yes, Robert was correct about Google’s intentions. It is everything to do with commercial interests. There could be more than that also, given the accusations from some quarters that the CIA and Google are secretly communicating on intelligence issues, though the facts are yet to be established.

Google’s Denial

Google has a long history of denying the facts of its evil intentions. Google accepts its market leadership in communication technology but pretends innocence when it is confronted with the facts of its intentions on cyber-dominance through illegal methods.

For example, Google’s PR official told the BBC’s Today programme that code prepared for other experimental use was incorporated by mistake into the street view project, and was intended to map wi-fi hotspots in order to improve Google’s location-based services. The official went on to say the data collected was never used in any other Google project and the company had no intention of doing so.

Fooling People Always

Most importantly, and probably expecting people to be foolish always, Google maintained that it did not know the mistakenly incorporated code would collect personal and sensitive information pertaining to unsecured wireless networks. And we are expected to take Google at its word whatever it tells us about computer code. It seems Google underestimated people’s logical thinking ability when it decided to prepare code to be incorporated into the street view project to collect personal information for commercial use.

Google street viewGoogle says it did not know for five years that the personal data was being collected. It did not know the collected personal data was selectively being stored on hard disks. It was all done without knowledge of the top brass at the company. A Privacy International rep said the other day that the code was complex and needed the approval from the top for allocation of funds. But Google shifts the entire responsibility to a single engineer whose name is never revealed by the company. If Google had no evil intentions and it was a mistake, it should have held someone responsible for the damage caused to the privacy interests of the people.

‘Never Used’ Doesn’t Mean ‘Will Not Be Used’

A Google official said, “This data has never been used in any Google product, was never intended to be used by Google and will never be used.” It may be true that Google never used the data in any of its other products. But it cannot be believed that the data would not be used. If that were the case, why was the personal data systematically stored, as claimed by the Privacy International? Google won’t answer these questions directly. It has a policy of never addressing questions and queries publicly, in an attempt to safeguard its evil privacy.

Responding to Robert Halfon’s questions, Google simply said, “The allegations are completely untrue.” That’s it, very simple. You need not explain, argue, contend, or prove. Just deny it and keep calm, no matter how the questions and doubts are justified. As Halfon put it, “The question is whether the company underestimated the reaction of the public, and many governments and the world, once it had been revealed what it had done.”

Naked Truth

As Halfon said, it is not actually a question but a truth, a naked truth. Google was caught with its hand in the cookie jar. Graham Cluley, a senior consultant at the security firm Sophos, was surprised that the Google staff did not realize what the street view cars were storing. He was quoted by BBC as saying, “If you were competent then it would be surprising that you wouldn’t know that you were storing far more than you actually needed.”

BBC News presented a case of a woman refugee whose request was not properly looked into by Google. It is understandable why refugees would not want their locations pictured and placed on the internet. Another UK MP revealed that requests to Google to remove the refugee from the map had received no response. Again Google’s answer is simple. It said to the BBC that it was unaware of this particular case.  That is not surprising, indeed. Google could not detect that code written by one of its employees was collecting personal data. Then how could it come to know about a single request of a refugee wanting to be removed from the vast amount of data that it collected?

Lessons for Governments and People

Governments have to realize that their interest in making money is compromising the security and privacy laws they enacted. Firms like Google are exploiting the concerns of the governments about their debts and deficits, which are pushing them not to care about where the money is coming from and the social costs of such money from evil businesses.

The people must be aware of the cost of the free stuff available on the Internet. What is apparently free might actually come at the cost of our privacy and personal information. We can be manipulated through our social networks, internet ads, and other offerings to compromise our personal information. So citizens and netizens, beware of Google!

Powered by

About Sekhar

  • #4 Of course, governments are not doing their duty. They work mostly for the interests of big business houses. In that sense, we can not rely on governments totally. No doubt, personally we have to be careful. My point is general tendency of people to believe what they see, is pushing them into troubles. If it is their fault, then you are right.

    But, because people are innocent, that doesn’t mean they deserve to be exploited, Brian. This particular issue of “street view” has been on the news for at least one and half years. Still there are many people, who are even technically knowledged but do not know about Google’s adventure.

  • Brian aka Guppusmaximus

    @4 – Sekhar,

    I understand that not everyone is technically proficient when it comes to computers, the Internet & networks,BUT, if people are going to use the technology to handle important & private matters then they most certainly need to take the responsibility to educate themselves on such technology & the necessary measures to protect their private data.

    Relying on the Government & not taking personal responsibility is what got us into trouble with the Mortgage Industry.

  • #1 Brian, People tend to believe what they see, you know. We cannot even expect sometimes what is behind what we see physically. Internet is something we cannot see what is going on in the background. There is every chance for technically novice people, like me, getting exploited by the technical superiors. Primary responsibility rests upon them only, in my view. Governments have to take on such firms properly.

  • Hi ND, Let us hope Google stops abusing the internet by which it prospered and acquired present position.

  • Brian aka Guppusmaximus

    When will people ever have to take responsibility for their own ignorance or stupidity?? Really, it is almost 2011 and there are still unsecured wireless networks?!