Today on Blogcritics
Home » Girls Gone Wild Creator Joe Francis: Sexual Predator With a Waiver Form?

Girls Gone Wild Creator Joe Francis: Sexual Predator With a Waiver Form?

Please Share...Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Share on LinkedIn0Pin on Pinterest0Share on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

Girls Gone Wild creator and celebrity-glommer Joe Francis has apparently let his extended 15 minutes of fame go straight from his head to his groin.

Francis has amassed a multi-million dollar fortune making low-budget films featuring barely-legal age drunk women performing tawdry acts on camera for cheap trinkets. But now, via court records and a blockbuster new report, Francis, 33, is revealed as not just a smut-pushing profiteer, but also an opportunistic sexual abuser, allegedly taking a drunken woman's virginity against her wishes, manhandling a female reporter, harassing pregnant women into miscarriage, and routinely equating women with their genitalia.

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting Joe Francis may be the most vile celebrity sociopath who hasn't actually killed anyone. Yet.

The strange phenomena of intoxicated groups of girls getting naked on tape while cameramen casually suggest they make-out with their friends, masturbate in front of strangers, or otherwise degrade themselves, is some kind of toxic byproduct of the reality TV-celebrity mania that has taken our popular culture hostage. If pseudo-reality shows like The Real World, Flavor of Love, and Road Rules are the gutters of celeb-dom, then these low-rent party-porn productions are the sewers.

And Mantra, Francis' production company, knows where to strike: mass party settings like Spring Break, Mardi Gras, college revelries, and nightclub events, where mob mentality, peer pressure, narcissism, alcohol, and drugs can easily overcome inhibitions and scruples in the guise of "liberation."

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Joe Francis grew up in affluent Laguna Beach, California, and surely this gave him a taste for the finer things in life, like the Ferrari car and Gulfstream Jet he owns. What it didn't give him was talent, values, or respect for women. But having one's own jet certainly makes the ability to travel to warm locales and induce the natives to frolic in their natural environment just that much easier. Girls Gone Wild isn't just Francis' livelihood, but his lifestyle.

With his "film" chops honed and sharpened as a production assistant for the syndicated Reality TV show – where viewers sent in amateur videos – in the mid-'90s, it was hardly a leap of imagination to Francis' first solo business venture, Banned From Television. BFT featured gruesome images of animal attacks, vehicular accidents, and nightmare inducing gore.

After that tasteful jaunt, it was a small intellectual puddle jump to capture inebriated girls doing embarrassing things on video. While humans have been engaging in promiscuous sex under the influence of one substance or another since the beginning of time, it is a new thing to actually induce the behavior, capture it in video form, and sell it for personal profit.

This isn't porn, where the stars are paid for their performance and a professional structure is in place to give the appearance of legitimacy, this is like peeking in on a girls' slumber party after they've gotten into their parent's liquor. Sure it happens, but is it reasonable to have these moments haunt you on tape forever, and never see a dime of compensation?

Some would call it genius on Francis' part and many might admire his audacity. Further solidifying his pimp-celeb status, Francis has been seen in the company of celeb-sluts like Paris Hilton and Lindsay Lohan.

Photobucket - Video and Image HostingPhotobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Possibly the most succinct example of Francis' moral failure is the story of a young woman named Janeel Szyszka, detailed in a LATimes story by Claire Hoffman.

Szyszka is described as "a petite 18-year-old who prances around the stage like a star" who is "discovered" at a club outside Chicago where GGW is scouting for talent. As she describes it, Francis "grabbed" her by the arm, pulled her toward him, and said, "You are so going on the bus later." Rather than recoiling in horror, the flattered Szyszka response was, "Um, OK." "I was shocked," she said. "I was like, 'Whoa – Joe's, like, trying to talk to me … out of all the girls in here."

About Dawn Olsen

  • http://victorplenty.blogspot.com Victor Plenty

    You are dripping with fear, Karl Chase. You know it, and you will always know it.

    This is the curse you have laid upon yourself. Meaningless trash talk on the Internet will never free you from it.

  • Bliffle

    All America awaits the “Dawn Gone Wild” video.

  • http://victorplenty.blogspot.com Victor Plenty

    Is that the one where Joe Francis gets spayed with a rusty spork?

  • nugget

    Karl Chase is an idiot. Molded rebuttals with gross immorality as the adhesive ingredient are always too easy to see through. Keep lying to yourself Karl. Morality and justice are very real.

  • http://murasaki.blog-city.com Purple Tigress

    From the comments there seems to be a continuing prejudice against women who get drunk along the lines of if she was drunk she was asking for it.

    If the woman said no and was able to say no, then it should be considered rape. If she was so intoxicated that she could not say no, then she was also raped.

    Alcohol is a drug that has been used for date rape and has been condoned as such with a wink and a snicker.

    What other crime is considered the victim’s fault if the victim was drunk? If a person is drunk and that person is robbed by people who helped get him drunk, the crime would still be robbery. If a person was drunk and that led him into circumstances where he was murdered, then it would still be a crime and there would be less excusing of the behavior of the murderer.

    Conversely, if a person is drunk and kills another person while driving the driver is still responsible as the cause of a crime. A drunk person is responsible for actions that harm or are detrimental to the public welfare.

    The whole girls gone wild is basically the exploitation of women and an indication of the difference between the status of women and men.

    Some people do not believe in drinking and this, just as Mel Gibson’s current woes, would make a strong case to support their cause.

  • Martin Lav

    It is not an manly or honorably thing to have sex, consentual or not, with a woman that is obviously drunk. While technically or legally protected, it just isn’t right. Period.

  • Pam

    I think a bunch of college girls should get together and gang up on the ugly Joe Francis. His face is beyond homely. Anyway, they should shove a giant black dildo up his stinking asshole and make sure it gets onto the Internet.

  • joe

    Bride burning, women for sale from Asia, children sold from devastated lands, thank Allah-Buddha-Christ, all we have to worry is girls getting drunk and showing their boobs.

    Soon I will be a Pop of a little girl, hope I can teach her respect for herself and her society and not let her grow up to be a woman who thinks the world revolves around her, even though I am sure her mom and me will.

  • http://w6daily.winn.com/ Phillip Winn

    Whether Joe Francis is acting reprehensibly in creating the videos is debatable. The events described in the article, if true, are undebatably assault and rape. Nobody here knows whether they’re true or not based on anything more than the statements from witnesses in the article above.

    Those defending Joe Francis are making my skin crawl. Rape and assault, folks, rape and assault. Not getting someone drink to lower their judgement and videotaping the result: rape and assault.

  • Gabriel

    I think most of the point of views expressed here are correct.

    That guy IS an incredible asshole who probably couldn’t seduce a girl if he wasn’t rich and if the girl wasn’t drunk. Going down on a girl who is obviously NOT enjoying herself IS rape, though it’s not the sordid “dragging a girl in an alley to force sexual intercourse” idea of rape we have in the common unconscious.

    True also is the fact that this girl obviously was at least willing to go show her tits to a camera for a lame reason like getting in a movie, whichever type of movie it might be. When you start drinking and you don’t stop past a certain point, you can’t be held entirely responsible for what might happen with you, but yon can’t act like it happened out of the blue.

    As a québécois, where the legislation on alcohol is more loosely interpreted, my entourage and myself have started drinking around the age of 16 or so. Because of that, we get our drinking experiences a little earlier and by the time we are old enough to go out, we can manage to drink responsibly (or not) depending on our choice. When somebody becomes too drunk for its own good, the people around this person (male or female) should act responsibly and tell the aforementionned person to go home. This avoids ugly fist-fights as much as rape-like one-night-stands.

    I also want to say that if you describe a girl who gets drunk and is willing to be part of these kinds of movie a slut, that’s weak. Come on, such a behavior is only a symptom of lack of self-esteem and other deeply rooted problem. A poor girl who doesn’t know better might be more suited.

    Anyways, slut or poor little girl, all I know is I don’t try to hit on these girls. I would feel miserable if I could only have succes with boozed-up women. Plus they stink and the sex is lousy.

  • http://stacischoff.blogspot.com/ Staci Schoff

    This was really interesting, thanks.

    Some dumb videos of drunk girls flashing their boobs is only mildy annoying to me, but the predatory nature of Francis’ behavior is really disturbing.

  • Bry

    Go figure a bunch of college age girls get drunk and then do something they regret so they attack the guy. He was just filming what really happens and shouldnt be punished for it.

  • seagypsey

    Here’s a thought. I don’t live in the U.S. so I don’t know what the drinking age is in various places. It must be 18 because they are always asked if they are at least 18. If any girls drink and/or are drunk and underage they should be prosecuted. Raise the legal drinking age to 21. It could put him out of business. That’s assuming a 21 year old drunk female has any brains yet. Just think if these drunk girls are driving…..

    I have seen a couple of the videos in question and many of these ladies are “doing” each other. Why don’t they just say no to each other?? It aappeared that they were enjoying what they were doing. Hmmm.

  • Ping

    If the woman was raped, why have charges not been filed?

  • http://www.ladydragonfyre.com/index_files/LWS Lady Dragonfyre

    seagypsey,

    The drinking age in the United States is 21.

    However, the age of majority here is 18; that’s why Francis made the girl affirm on camera that she was 18.

    If Mr. Francis provided alcohol to this girl, he can be charged criminally for it, even though she drank of her own free will.

  • NIKKI

    JOE IS A RAPIST. I KNOW THIS FOR A FACT. I HIRED A PRIVATE DETECTIVE AND FOUND 5 OTHER GIRLS. I TRIED TO PRESS CHARGES, BUT DID NOT HAVE ENNOUGH EVIDENCE. WISH I KNEW THEN, WHAT I KNOW NOW. HE IS SICK AND DEMENTED IN THE HEAD. SHE IS NOT THE ONLY GIRL WHO’S VIRGINITY HE TOOK. HE GETS OFF ON IT. HE GETS OFF ON THE FACT THAT SHE SAYS NO, THE INOCENT, SWEET ONES. SOME ONE HAS TO STOP HIM.

  • Chas

    What is truly disgusting is that Joe Francis is featured on “Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous” type shows on VH1 like he is just another celebrity. I’m a 32 year old male and would be disgusted by the thought of taking advantage of a intoxicated 17 year old child. The worst thing that vilely smirking, greasy-haired piece of human garbage does is hurt the image of all American males around his age. That he can get rich from this rape-lite industry he created is disgusting. I hope that he goes to prison for the rest of his life and is passed around so often by 2000 inmates that he never has time to put his pants back on. He obviously is from the same genetic cess pool as Ted Bundy. I wonder if any of the parents of the girls has two things- a sence of pride and sniper rifle training?

  • http://www.savesurface.com/phpBB2/index.php Jstn

    Wow. Great site, with, with lots of well thought out comments. I haven’t much to add, except that I feel the need to apologize for my gender, after being exposed to the actions of a scumbag, like Francis. I have to wonder how he’d feel if he had someone like him hanging around his own 18 yr old daughter.

  • bobby

    you should show 1 day of uncencored action and if they miss it ch! to bad for them dummys really think about it the ratings are already high but 1 day of uncencored action they will go off the charts

  • http://nothing kelly

    nothin ineed to say

  • justpeachy

    As a woman I feel a great deal of responsibility to behave in a way that respectfully represents all women. Having said that, I feel that the ultimate blame lies with women and girls and their parents to instill in them the importance of self-respect (especially nowadays when every schmuck has a video camera). I think all people (men, women, black, white,christian etc) have the same responsibility. I’m equally disgusted by Joe Francis as I am by the women who let him humiliate them. Believe me, I’m no stranger to drunken debauchery myself, but if I saw some guy heading toward me with a nose job as bad as Mr. Francis’, I would run in the other direction before I even saw the camera. Or at least call some girlfriends over so we could share a laugh at his expense.

  • Zilla

    When Girls Gone Wild first hit the scene, I didn’t even know Joe Francis’ name. I just knew there were loads of girls screaming, flashing their breasts, and you could buy it all for $19.95. It was awhile later that I realized they were not paid anything but a T-Shirt, didn’t have a stake in the profit, and they signed waivers to such an effect. It blew my mind.

    Over the years, as any marketing phenom, it’s gotten bigger, raised the stakes to keep ‘em buying. The culture is changing, and I’ve heard girls that are very sober expressing desire to be picked for GGW, and hoping they’ll make final cut so they can buy the DVD to show off. Francis knows this, and he capitalizes. It has always bothered me, on different levels.

    Some people think he is a genius, and if you’re talking on strictly marketing terms, he sure is. Still, I’m not sure how many individuals out there WOULD capitalize on what he does, in the way he does. The ones who would are the ‘sell by whatever means necessary/greed is good’ types, who deplorable for obvious reasons. He made a personal choice to found his company on the basis he did, and personally, I can’t help but think someone who would do so has a sensitivity gene or two missing.

    If he were a straight porn director who paid his actors for the product, I’d have much less problem with him, and much less suspicion.

    Thing is, our media is skewed and hard to trust these days, so no media portrait of Mr. Francis can be touted as accurate. I think it will have to take someone with a conscience and great cunning within the GGW inner circle to capture film of Mr. Francis’ alleged mysogyny and hatred of women to lend any weight to any claims. I have faith in time, and I truly do believe that before long, the guy will indeed crash and burn.

    As for the girls, there are so many variables in each of their situations, that to herd them all under one statement or another is very unfair to me. I think some do sign the waiver, get their T-Shirt, buy the DVD featuring them, and never regret a thing. I think some do the same to fill some need they have right then in that time, then come to regret and learn from it later. Some I think are indeed very weak, very naive, and get themselves into a situation that screws them up for a long time. The bottom line is that rape in an atmosphere like that is not a crazy notion.

    Furthermore, a girl being drunk or making a misguided choice does not make her body become open territory for any predator. No amount of alcohol renders a woman’s body no longer hers, and no amount of alcohol changes the meaning of the word ‘No’.

    Mr. Francis could not have made the money he did without the women who delivered what was required. They do not profit the way he does, they do not gain the lifestyle he has, but still they keep doing it. For now they do anyway.

    It’s a hard topic, especially factoring the sexual climate of the culture which, as loathesome as he might be, Mr. Francis did not create all by himself. He profits from the influence it has on the girls, and there’s not much anyone can do about it while the majority of the girls more than willingly feed this monster.

    I don’t find brests offensive, I don’t think I’d find GGW so offensive if the dynamics were different. I find it so dumbfounding to think most of these girls would not go near a porn film, and yet they would be paid for doing the same acts they do for a T-shirt or a pair of panties on GGW. That many of these girls brag about their GGW escapades but will still turn their noses up at porn actresses for being ‘whores’. I often wonder why, when there is a larger group of women in pornography harnessing the power of their bodies, the market for them, and reaping a profit from it. Mr. Francis has hit on a goldmine in this respect, and the thing that bothers me most are the young girls who do not seem to understand this bottom line, and what they’re really giving away.

    I don’t think this country is going to hell in a handbasket of debauchery and hedonism. It’s a cultural climate, and the climate always changes. Right now, I think the climate is harder to bear BECAUSE of the sexual aspect, and our innate discomfort when confronting it as a country.

    It is discomforting to think that Mr. Francis is NOT on the level, that he exploiting GIRLS, I.E. children. He is about marketing and money, he is not about morality or sensitivity, which is something I think we can all agree on. He does not seem to have much any desire to express any concern for his subjects, his attitude indeed seems to be that if they agree, he will cash his check accordingly. I think his attitude will indeed lead to his downfall.

    I think the more this man is covered in the media, which I actually hope he will be, then perhaps a new consciousness toward him will change with the climate. That the girls who would formerly indulge him will turn on him, and not deliver. That the people who buy his product will get an increasing feeling of discomfort in what they’re contributing to, and go somewhere else for the fantasy they want to indulge.

  • Mike Thetiger

    Joe Francis is a genius.

  • IvanMonet

    If you lie down with dogs, you get up with fleas.
    Teach your daughters to be more chaste.
    Joe is an azz, that is not crimal, even if he is a scumball. These girls are responsible for the effects of their actions.

  • http://www.davidlion.piczo.com David

    Joe Francis is a Big Professional at what he does.
    Girls be aware and be inform.

  • http://aol Miguel Ramirez

    While many people may find this work of Joe Francis offensive as it may be, the bottom line is that personal responsibility for moral decisions lie with each person. No one is forced to remove their clothes in public and by doing so you give up your right to privacy.These women who allow themselves to be filmed are giving up their right to privacy. Except for minors, who should’t be drinking alcohol anyway, these are adults who may or may not be making poor decisions for themselves and should not claim legal rights for those poor decisions. I’ve never watched a single one of these videos and personally do not condone such acts, but each woman “bit the bait” and must pay the consequence for their own decisions.

  • grtgrfx

    This is kinda late (and the very botom of the column), but I thought I’d add my 2¢.

    First, it’s not like straight, sober girls are conned into drinking on the GGW bus. If they drink, it’s often several hours before entering the bus, in whatever club they were attending. Further, in many cases girls come back day after day to film more shoots. They know what they’re doing and desire to go even further.

    Second, partipants have lots of time to opt out of filming. It’s not much fun, or sexually exciting, to fill out several pages of release forms thick with legal language, while finding and showing your picture ID or birth certificate to a cameraman as a producer asks you questions about your age and whether you know what you’re about to do. This process can take up to half an hour, and is done even BEFORE the girls start to take off their clothes.

    Third, GGW hires private detectives who check out every single taped girl for their age and ID before they can be used in a video. If the girls call later and bow out, the video is scrapped. If they can’t be positively ID’ed, their footage isn’t used. If their parents complain, GGW settles (if they can) before the shows are aired.

    Fourth, GGW camera guys are, in fact, extremely good-looking young men, and it’s no surprise in this era of instant hookups that many college girls would want to have sex with them. While this may occur (what camera guy is going to refuse free sex?), it’s not common; the staff never touch any of the participants on camera, and anything the girls do is entirely voluntary. What happens after…well, let’s just say that lack of sleep and easy access to alcohol makes for tiring workdays for a bus crew person. Sex isn’t always on their minds.

    Finally, it’s a business, and many girls won’t do anything for the cameras…at least not for a t-shirt. The crews sometimes spend up to $500 apiece to shoot girls solo or together.

    The idea that teens are exploited for free is encouraged by GGW to tittilate buyers, but there are plenty of “ringers” in every video box. These girls are no more exploited than Jenna Jameson is when she shoots a movie. In fact, a fair number of GGW girls have moved on to prominent roles in Vivid and other adult fare. It’s what THEY want.

    So yes, Joe is often a slobbering caveman who mistreats women and takes advantage of young girls. He even dates some of them, which for a small-town teenager is a pretty amazing opportunity to get into the Paris Hilton lifestyle. But, he found a market niche and is getting rich off it in the same way that Kellogg makes Count Chocula cereal which is horribly bad and markets it to children on TV, or General Motors sells Hummers to uncaring adults, heedless of the fact that gas-guzzlers are a direct financial benefit to militant Arab governments which abet terrorists in the world. We give the Joes of the world ammunition by taking our clothes off on camera, and we buy the end product, pulling the trigger on ourselves. Whose fault is it if it kills us?

  • grtgrfx

    Oh, by the way…for those of you who have never seen a video of Joe’s…they are NOT about casual titty flashing anymore; that was so ’90s. Current issue GGW video features solo and girl-girl masturbation, insertion of objects including dildos and vibrators, oral sex and fantasy play.

    Nothing is left to the imagination, and trust me, the videos, if rated, would be NC-17 or XXX. When they say CENSORED in the TV ads, they are. Heavily. The real thing is a lot closer to amateur lesbo hardcore porn. And that’s why I know participants WANT to do it; no faint-hearted girl would do what these coeds are willing to.

  • http://saggyballs.orgy PeteMcGuiness

    Joe francis is a pimp with a vision, i salute you. Remember ladies being stupid is never an excuse, YOU JUST GOT PIMPED..rock on joe..rock on

  • G W B

    Well the publisher and blogger are totally going to Hell! Huge fucking hypocrit that thinks shes funny! Hahaha hes not going to hell but she is! RIP BITCH!

  • cristal65

    So the dude is a fricking pig thats nothing new in the world of today but…. keep the shit off the TV !!! My grandkids dont need to see this i cant even block the damn infomercials thru cable because they dont rate them !! I pay to watch tv and i dont have the right to block this as of now so my only option is to cancel cable or to start shit ! My option is to start shit by contacting all the stations that allow this trash on their stations. I have rights to not have to see this and I wish more people would stand up and contact these stations so we can get this off the our televisions. The only reason these are protected is because of a federal law from back in 1998. This has got to change.

  • Your Mama

    PhenomenON is singular; phenomenA is plural.

  • ssherman68

    It’s too bad that girl didn’t file charges against Francis for doing what he did. He’s definitely a first class ass.

    That notwithstanding, Dawn, you could have saved yourself a few hours by simply putting “Read This” and the link to the original LA times article. What was the purpose of rewriting it on this website? You don’t present any new information.

  • someone

    This Joe Francis is a sick pig,no doubts…I am not a woman,but I really despise a ‘man’ like this bastard and so many other like him. But I must say that the girls involved are naive to the point that they are stupid,I mean,a bastard like that one pushes you around,how can one think ‘wow,Joe’s talking to me instead of these other girls’. That’s just being a fool. I am sorry to see a pretty woman get humiliated,I really despise to see on the interned these photos of pretty woman with the mascara running down their eyes…what is this all about? What kind of ‘men’ are these? What the hell is this stuff? Can someone tell me? Do these women get paid to get humiliated like that? How does that work? This is crazy…
    This world is really sick,I don’t understand it,and I don’t understand how these things circulate on the Net. I would love to make love to a beautiful woman or a pretty one,but I think I am,infact,just dreaming…the reality of this world is so different from dreams.

  • The Truth

    Joe Francis is not the issue.
    Irrisponsible behavior is not the issue.

    Anyone in Joe’s position is going to be hated on by many.

    Anyone who acts irresponsibly wil be hated on by many.

    When someone gets Cancer, we don’t just treat the symptoms. We try and find a cure.

  • http://legaleagle To Punky

    As a 24 year old woman myself, I am disgusted by your opinion. You think that an intoxicated person has full control of what s/he is doing? How is a contract to be legally binding when one of the involved parties (due to intoxication) lacked the capacity to form a contract? That party should be considered incompetent.
    I would also like to point out that in much of the legislation regarding rape, consent must be explicitly expressed ie. silence is not consent. A person being attacked may be so overcome with fear and intimidation that s/he cannot voice consent. We had a disturbing case, R. v. Ewanchuk, in which the defense of “implied consent,” which was actually brought up by a judge, was ultimately shot down by the Supreme Court of Canada. Just imagine having an aggressive attacker who is physically stronger than you on top of you–would you not feel a little intimidated? Many people feel that if they are polite to the attacker, s/he will let him/her go. Many people lose control of their motor skills when they are subject to trauma. I realize that in the U.S. criminal law is divided by state (whereas in Canada we apply The Criminal Code to all provinces and territories), but I just thought I would respond to the poster who said that saying ‘it hurts’ is different from saying ‘no’. In Canada we would find a lack of consent in both cases and would therefore find this sexual act to constitute rape. Check your state’s legislation and case law (how that legislation has been interpreted) to find out what constitutes consent in your particular location.
    For all those who say, ‘if you can’t handle your liquor, don’t drink,’ have you even considered the fact that many of these teens are consuming alcohol for the first time? They do not have any idea of the nature of the impairment that alcohol imposes on their judgement. And for those who claim that in their drunken experiences they could still remember everything they did, and make clear decisions about their actions, let me remind you that your experience is not universal. Alcohol affects each individual differently, and many people black out when they consume too much. People who have family histories of substance abuse have very different reactions to alcohol than those who do not–it’s genetics.
    But this is not even the issue, as once intoxicated (whoever you are), you are incapable of making fully informed decisions. Your brain cannot process information and apply logic in the same way as it can when you are sober.
    I think it is pathetic that we live in times where it is still acceptable and even encouraged to blame victims. I rarely drink, and do not think it is a very wise decision to become intoxicated. However, when someone does make the decision to become intoxicated, that does not mean that this person is consenting to any activity that will result from his/her intoxication–and it certainly does not give me the right to take advantage of him/her. Blaming the victims and/or calling defenders of these victims including Dawn a ‘whore’ or ‘slut’ reveals a lot about your own character. You are just too afraid to confront your own lack of morals, and instead find it easier to blame victims for theirs. I also don’t see how you consider calling Dawn or anyone else a ‘slut’ or ‘whore’ an intelligent remark. Please do not post; your filth is not worth reading.
    I also hope that those who believe that “Joe Francis is a genius” seriously consider the implications of their statements. I cannot believe one of you has children and would love to see your right to parent forfeited.

  • http://seekanswers.blogspot.com Judy

    Excellent article. Well written and describes what a scumbag this guy is.. Isn’t it wonderful making your fortune from naive, drunk young girls?

  • John Smith

    Joe Francis’s butthole before jail = o
    Joe francis’s butthole after jail = O

  • jaden

    Several points are being ignored here:

    Every guy knows that a girls first time is to be treated with significance, not rather by handing her a paper towel to wipe off her crotch after you rape her with the herpes that Paris Hilton gave you. Then telling her to get off the bus. This girl was RAPED as her first sexual experience. She could be a mother one day…this could be your mother. She was in pain during the encounter, because of her anatomy. Do you still think she deserved that? As a rule, no woman/child wants her virginity to be taken when she is drunk.

    Secondly, men get totally sanctimonious that women who drink deserve rape. Men are constantly getting wasted and injuring themselves because they are egged on. Can you imagine if men were rape objects (outside of prison) how easy it would be to rape them when they drank? Or talk them into having a threesome with their friend that they couldn’t live down? The only reason this doesn’t occur is because women are sadistic and men aren’t the gender of desire in society and get to walk around at 4 a.m. without looking over their backs.

    Really, what is the answer for you guys to stop women from “raping themselves” as you call it. No more drinking for all women. You buy these GGW videos, and one day you’ll know a woman who was raped that you care about.

    None of these women on these videos have any chance of a career. Doesn’t that say a lot about how men never respect a women who takes off her clothes in public? Yet, they’ll fantasize about her rape scene (not acted) & cheer her on in the bars and wish they could be the guy who goes home with her (but secretly think that she’s trash). Are you OK that they threw their lives away for a T-shirt? Men are the ones sending the mixed messages not the RAPE VICTIMS.

  • lovergirl

    I never cared about GGW. I figured, if those girls want to go wild, let them. But when I actually saw Joe Francis, I was shocked to see that the mastermind behind the popular series was in fact a closeted homosexual with a terrible nose job who hangs out with Paris Hilton (the biggest fag hag and lowest common denominator). And as much as I enjoyed an earlier post regarding him contracting herpes from her, he wouldn’t sleep with her unless she had a penis, which, if not for her video and photos, I would think she did.
    I’m not sure if seeing the girls in these videos as victims is not the very thing that victimizes them. Why shouldn’t women be able to get drunk and horny? They should. But that creepy homo behind the camera makes it, well…creepy.

  • Hugh Jorgan

    So…EVERYTHING claimed by a drunken girl with a morning-after conscience is the gospel?

    And what’s claimed by members of a presumably sober film crew doing their job is bogus…

    Which are you:
    1. spiteful feminazi
    2. lesbian raving against all things hetero
    3. rejected by GGW
    4. All of the above

  • Lawrence

    Naked

  • http://twitter.com/tolstoyscat Cindy

    Dawn,

    What an incredibly well-written article. I’ll have to read you more.

    To the general population: People who take advantage of drunk people are predators. The girls are blameless.

    A moral person does not look for weakness and then prey upon it. That is what sociopaths do. A good question to ask oneself–if one blames drunk women for not being able to make good decisions and holds predators unaccountable–might be: “How sociopathic am I?”

    There is a phrase called ‘rolling a drunk’–look that up while you’re at it.

    I actually heard there are laws that prevent contracts from being valid if signed when under-the-influence of intoxicants. What happened to those? Then again, I don’t put a lot of faith in laws.

    (lol–talking to myself, but just had to let that out.)

  • Cliff Notes

    To summarize:

    Ugly chicks: whining.
    Hot chicks: flashing.
    Ugly guys: buying.

    Move on, nothing to see here.