New Video Game IPs Are Crucial

Note: This piece is a direct response to Rob Faraldi's Gaming: A Stagnant Puddle of Mediocrity.

Rob's desperate cry for innovation is heard in every corner of the gaming world. The sign of new intellectual properties is a positive one, not one of an industry refusing to change. There's a key point here that Rob brings out, but fails to make his point on accurately:

This industry has been around less then four decades and it's already drowning in a stagnant puddle of mediocrity

It's been drowning in that same puddle since they began. Pong was copied so many times by so many different knock-off companies, collectors are still trying to sort through the real and fake ones. Pac-Man rips were constant, Space Invaders would have been better off never being made, and Mario has been challenged by more human-like animals bouncing off each others heads since the NES days than we can ever count. When the general gaming populace is tired of something, the developers move on.

Lack of innovation is nothing new. The start of new IPs is a sign of a slowly turning shift towards new content. You can't expect to walk into an EB tomorrow and see 100 games that are completely different from each other. There's a bigger hurdle to face, and that's getting the mass public to buy into things they don't see as familiar.

With the world's biggest games publisher pushing new titles, it's forcing a general gaming populace into trying something new. That's what we need to get them familiar with (and get them as far away as possible from): game titles they already know. Once the transition is complete, we have an audience outside of the die-hard followers willing to accept something different, even better than slipping out obscure things like Okami.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for matt-paprocki

Article Author: Matt Paprocki

Matt Paprocki is a 12-year movie and game critic. He currently freelances for Blu-ray review site DoBlu.com and video game site MultiPlayerGames.com.

Visit Matt Paprocki's author pageMatt Paprocki's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • Halo: Combat Evolved Halo: Combat Evolved

    Humankind is fighting a losing battle against a powerful fellowship of alien races known as the Covenant. You and the other surviving defenders of a devastated colony world make a desperate attempt to ...

  • Burnout Revenge Burnout Revenge
  • Doom (Unrated Widescreen Edition) Doom (Unrated Widescreen Edition)
  • Turok: Evolution Turok: Evolution

Article comments

  • 1 - RF

    May 07, 2006 at 2:48 pm

    "There's a key point here that Rob brings out, but fails to make his point on accurately"

    I don't see how inaccurate I'm being when you agree with me.

    There's no denying there's been "me-too" titles since the industry began. One fact that seemed to slip past you is that Pong was actually ripped off from Ralph Baer's work. Including interesting points/facts like this would help add to the validity of your opinion. You did know that Pong was a clone didn't you?

    "When the general gaming populace is tired of something, the developers move on"

    That's not exactly true. Judging by sales of the Genesis and Super NES they weren't tired of 2D experiences until they were presented with something new by developers. Leading up to the Saturn and PS being released there was a huge shift in the development community towards 3D. New hardware and developers forced change.

    We've discussed this a bit through email leading up to your "direct response" to my little piece. I'm still not convinced you understand the point of my article.

    I'm not calling for radical change over night or to abolish conventional styles of play. I love old school and old style gaming.

    My cry for innovation is no more desperate than you trying to create debate on this website (which i'm cool with).

    "The start of new IPs is a sign of a slowly turning shift towards new content"

    Really?

    "Pong was copied so many times by so many different knock-off companies, collectors are still trying to sort through the real and fake ones. Pac-Man rips were constant, Space Invaders would have been better off never being made, and Mario has been challenged by more human-like animals bouncing off each others heads since the NES days than we can ever count"

    I've got news for you Matt, all those knock offs esp. the "Mario Clones" were new IP's. Bubsy was a new IP at one point. TY the Tasmanian Tiger was a new IP. Looking back they didn't really offer any new content that we hadn't seen before.

    I can't fault you for trying and I look forward to your lengthy response.

    -R

  • 2 - Ken Edwards

    May 07, 2006 at 9:59 pm

    Rob, correct me if I am wrong here, but wasn't the point of this point-counter point going to be a series of articles. In saying that, wouldn't the above comment you made be better suited in a follow up article?

  • 3 - Jiminy Shitwald

    May 08, 2006 at 9:19 am

    omg that is so cooling!! lol i love `vidoe gams hahahaha :):):)lol!!!1! I like mario 2! he he, jump on the mushroom!! ha, you go spidr man1!

  • 4 - Ken Edwards

    May 09, 2006 at 6:59 am

    ^^^ I'll have what he's having.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 28, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs