Console Review: Sony PlayStation 3 - Page 2

The only hiccup I had was when trying to get the Remote Play functionality to work with the PSP, and that was just because I was doing things out of order.

Hardware


Sony makes some impressive hardware, there is no doubt about that. The PlayStation 3 is no exception. The slot loading drive is quite nice, making me wish the Xbox 360 had one.

The Power and Eject buttons are touch sensitive, so they are flush with the trim. On the "expensive" model, there is a flap to the left of the disc slot for SD, CF, and Memory Stick Pro media. Underneath these ports are four USB ports.

Most all USB devices will work with the PS3, which is great. Most perplexing is the fact that you cannot plug in any USB web cam for video chat. Currently the only video camera that works is the PS2 EyeToy.

The last thing you notice is how quiet it is. This is in stark contrast to the blast furnace that is the Xbox 360. It is hard not to be impressed by the looks of the PS3. It is well engineered.

SIXAXIS Controller


As mentioned above, the controller is growing on me, though is a little too small to my liking. I also cannot help but think of the ways these games could have used rumble, but rumble is no more on the PS3.

Until you get used to it, the SIXAXIS feels too light. Playing the Xbox 360 after prolonged hours of the PS3, the difference is quite jarring.

I have a problem with the size though — this controller is smaller than the DualShock PS2 controller, and I find is too small for my hands. Also the molded "lip" under the L2 and R2 buttons is not as pronounced, making the controller harder to hold on to. More adjusting is going to be needed here.

Sony has also changed L2 and R2 into triggers, though they do not depress as far as the triggers on the Xbox 360 controller. This is another change that is growing on me.

Additionally, the controller has a "PS" button, similar to the Guide button on the Xbox 360 controller, four indicator lights to signify which channel the controller is using, and of course the motion controls built inside.

The launch games don't show a lot in the way of motion controls. There are some glimmers of light, but that is about it. I am sure that with more development time, better motion control mechanics will arise.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2 — Page 3Page 4Page 5Page 6Page 7Page 8Page 9

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for ken-edwards

Article Author: Ken Edwards

Ken Edwards is the Gaming Editor at Blogcritics, and calls Breaking Windows home. Ken works part time for Student Publications at BGSU as the Webmaster and System Administrator. He is also a freelance web developer.

Visit Ken Edwards's author pageKen Edwards's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

— go to most recent comments
  • 1 - Sil

    Dec 06, 2006 at 5:44 am

    Thanks for the best, and by that I mean the most clear and objective, plain english, review of the PS3 To date. It can't be faulted.
    However I do believe the PS3 has the edge when it comes to functionality. Movies, music, photos and web browsing to name but a few.
    I'll do away with my DVD player, Hi-Fi system (it helps to have a 5.1 sound system with 2 x HDMI inputs)and PS2 when the PS3 arrive in London. And no more lugging the Notebook PC into the living room to connect up to the Bravia.
    The PS3 is far more future proof than the XBox when seen as a multi-media device.
    But thanks again for a good read
    Sil

  • 2 - Aaman

    Dec 06, 2006 at 7:03 am

    Great, detailed review - now if only one could lay one's hands on the damn thing!

  • 3 - John Guilfoil

    Dec 06, 2006 at 2:53 pm

    Hell of a piece Ken. Very nice.

  • 4 - the Ninja

    Dec 06, 2006 at 2:56 pm

    Great review I just would like to add that upon comparison between the basic XBOX 360 and the "Basic" PS3 there are many differences, not to mention once you add the HD player for the 360 it is just .02 cents short of the 499.99 PS3.
    Plus if you wanted a hard Drive that wold drive the price $99.99 higher that the "basic Ps3..So,
    after the comparison if you look longterm and upgrade wise, you get more from PS3...

  • 5 - John

    Dec 06, 2006 at 3:04 pm

    Very thorough, although i think its a foregone conclusion that "The PS3 uses the same keypad layout found on the PS3"

    lol!

  • 6 - Ken Edwards

    Dec 06, 2006 at 4:04 pm

    HA HA, too much typing of PS3 and PSP, thanks for the catch, John - I fixed it.

    Thanks for all the kind words guys. I have a comparison section, but I cut it, because, well, this thing was getting a bit long.

    I might write a comparison piece, but like the PSP, the PS3 does offer quite a lot outside of gaming, and these are features I like, and take full advantage of on my PSP.

  • 7 - Bob

    Dec 06, 2006 at 4:10 pm

    Very Good review. Helped me out a lot. Thank You.

  • 8 - billytech

    Dec 06, 2006 at 10:09 pm

    Hell of a piece?
    Has the edge when it comes to functionality, movies and music?
    Ah, I don't think,, i KNOW not. I am looking at the recently "HD" upgraded original Star Trek series from film, (The best upgrade available to man) I have say this is awesome. Only on X box live Media. No $ony PS3 will have. After all the things my friends have lacking on their P$3's I KNOW the 360 is ABSOLUTELY the right choice in gaming and multimedia. The 360 allows me to record and pause live TV thru my Windows PC, Something EVERYBODY has. I can stream music, My 360 even knows what an Ipod is, something the almighty (Cough) P$3 can not comprehend.
    I have over 160 games to choose from, I have a DEDICATED live game system to play the BEST games online with friends around the world. If you have never experienced this you can NOT dis it. You must try Gears with up to 8 of your best friends or complete strangers online in a fight to the death to know what i mean. The shortcomings of the overhyped are OBVIOUS, the extended features and constant upgrades of the underog are seriously downgraded and overlooked by the "bought in" media. Choose for yourself, but if you actually DO look for yourself, the real answer if quite obvious.

  • 9 - Ken Edwards

    Dec 06, 2006 at 11:20 pm

    There is no question that Xbox Live is a better service. It is a service we pay for, and it is a service that Microsoft has taken years to build. Sony is just now, in 2006, starting their own free online service. It is going to take time, and I can only hope that Sony improves it, as it stands now it leaves a lot to be desired for online gaming.

    The Video Marketplace on the Xbox 360 is great. But you know what? I bet that Sony has something similar in the pipeline.

  • 10 - RCM

    Dec 07, 2006 at 5:28 pm

    There's no point to get this for Blu-Ray if you don't own an HDTV. I didn't see that mentioned in this piece. In order to fully exploit PS3 you need an HDTV. Same could be argued for 360 to an extent, although I can experience everything on that console without the monitor upgrade.

    PS3 is the second Sony console in a row full of deceptive cost. Thanks Sony!

  • 11 - Kmach

    Dec 08, 2006 at 2:11 am

    It bothers me a little when people hint at the "your paying for the systems potential" argument. Sony is charging an arm and a leg for their system and they should have the interface and online functionality to back it up. The Dreamcast was the first system to really dedicate itself to web browsing and online multiplayer. When Xbox entered the market they expanded upon the online idea. Meanwhile Sony and Nintendo sat by all these years doing nothing. I was not impressed with Sony's online service for the PS2 and sadly they have migrated it over to the PS3 along with the clunky PSP interface. MS is a software company and it took years for Live to get where it is, how long will it take Sony? Some great games are going to have to come out for the PS3 because I don't think they are going to be able to salvage much as far as the interface/online functionality.

  • 12 - Ken Edwards

    Dec 08, 2006 at 5:55 am

    To be honest, I don't think the PlayStation Network (PSN) will get to the level of XBL until Sony moves to a subscription model, which they should do.

    The PS3 has more potential than the Wii, and the 360 when it launched. At the launch of the 360 we pretty much knew what we were going to get. The only radical change from a year ago is that we have the Video Marketplace. At the time we knew MS was backing HD-DVD, or at least leaning in that direction, so it wasn't a stretch to see a HD-DVD add on there.

    With the Wii, we know what we are getting from the launch games alone, plus the games that we have seen that are in development.

    The PS3 potential is not really clear yet. But as I said, the reason to buy a PS3 should be clear to you right now, if you want one. You are going to want to purchase a PS3 for BD movies, and exclusive games, and if it has your interest, the PSP integration.

    I am also quite impressed with the openness to Linux flavors, as there are a couple PPC distros out there. I am going to be installing Yellow Dog Linux on mine shortly.

    As for the BD argument, I am sure there will be a lot of people who will play BD movies on SD sets. And they will be fine with that. And to be frank, I think you are cheating yourself out of the experience with both the PS3 and 360 without a HDTV.

  • 13 - Some Guy

    Dec 08, 2006 at 9:14 am

    The Playstation Network does not need to be on par with Xbox Live. PS3 serves a very good working existing network, i.e. the World Wide Web. Live is just Microsoft's latest attempt to control the Web and like all others it is bound to fail.

  • 14 - Matt Paprocki

    Dec 08, 2006 at 11:44 am

    "Live is just Microsoft's latest attempt to control the Web and like all others it is bound to fail."

    Thanks, I needed that today.

    Seriously, with 60% of users signed up for Live, you're going to have a difficult time sticking to that statement.

    "The Playstation Network does not need to be on par with Xbox Live."

    So being in the same area of the Live service isn't important when you're in direct competition with it? Brilliant statement.

  • 15 - Dena

    Dec 08, 2006 at 12:18 pm

    At least this was a very objective review. You looked at the good and the bad and I thank you for that. However, I am a 360 owner and a PS3 owner and I don't really find all that many faults as you suggested. Yes, I'd love background downloading but let's remember that was a feature the 360 received several months after launch. Hopefully, Sony will make a firmware update regarding this and yes, the community isn't that solid yet as XBox Live's but again that's also an issue that I'm sure Sony can fix up as the months go by. Let's not forget all the little quirks 360 had to fix up. So, now it looks like a solid gaming system but it too also had it's hefty flaws in the beginning.

  • 16 - Jesse Barnes

    Dec 09, 2006 at 8:01 pm

    Xbox Live bound to fail, huh?

    I dont think statements get more idiotic than that.

  • 17 - MACHETTEDOG

    Dec 14, 2006 at 5:24 pm

    So far I would have to say that online gaming on the PS3 is superior to to XBOX 360. I can play resistance fall of man on a 40 person server in multiple game modes on servers in Japan ( I live in California, playing on a Japanese PS3) with no perceptible LAG at all. On xbox 360 max players is 8 and very laggy.

  • 18 - Matt Paprocki

    Dec 15, 2006 at 12:04 am

    Wow. Someone has never played online with a 360 apparently. One game running smoothly doesn't mean anything. That has little to do with the hardware, and everything to do with that game. Also, while 40 hasn't happened, you can have a hell of a lot more than eight players in most online 360 titles.

    Besides, Live is about a hell of alot more than multi-player, as will the PS3 service.

  • 19 - annonomous

    Dec 18, 2006 at 3:01 pm

    ps3 sucks and the wii is awesome
    sony sucks!Nintendo rocks

  • 20 - Vinnie Hosquelo

    Jan 02, 2007 at 1:52 pm

    I loved the peice and, being british, it gave me an understanding of what to come. But I just want know what's better, the XBox 360 or the PLaystation 3??????

    Real nice peice!

    Vinnie

  • 21 - Vinnie Hosquelo

    Jan 02, 2007 at 1:54 pm

    And that "anomenous" guy, why's it so cheap if it's better???????????????????

  • 22 - Matt Paprocki

    Jan 02, 2007 at 6:17 pm

    So the high price immediately means something is a better than a lower priced one regardless of any other factors? Wow. Sometimes I cannot believe the things I read on the internet.


    This is one of those times.

  • 23 - Ken Edwards

    Jan 03, 2007 at 12:07 am

    Sony is losing exclusives left and right. For my money, I would buy a Wii. But then I have all three systems.

    I have more games for my 360. Take that for what it is worth.

  • 24 - James

    Jan 03, 2007 at 11:48 am

    I own both the 360 and the PS3/60g. Based on the Blu-ray, the Internet web browser which everyone forgets to mention and the smoother game play of the PS3, I have to be honest and say the PS3 is better. The XBOX 360 is excellent but the PS3 edges it out and since it's only just now releasing, it's only going to move ahead that much more. The ability to browse the web with the PS3 is a huge feature that is often not mentioned.

  • 25 - Matt Paprocki

    Jan 03, 2007 at 2:36 pm

    Of course you could browse the internet with your computer... I see it as a nice addition for the console like it is on the Wii but a huge factor? Not really, especially if you don't have a keyboard.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 08, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs